Bitcoin Forum
November 08, 2024, 07:17:30 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 ... 139 »
  Print  
Author Topic: delete  (Read 165542 times)
cryptomite
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 304
Merit: 100



View Profile
September 21, 2014, 04:50:58 PM
 #401

What about the 1% one pool is donating to the development?
Pays hired coders and cryptographers (rfree, tewinget, mikezackles, surae, sarang, etc etc), not the core team

Quote
What about other donations?
See above

Quote
What about the herding of the Altcoin forum into your gains on the coins you bought cheap and or mined cheap?
I haven't sold any of my XMR

You may want to start selling before you have a cloakcoin v2.0 on your hands.

Its not like these guys arent telegraphing what is gonna happen lol, CN is old news, like the VCR of anon, lol

The tape is getting worn out, people are moving on. Those that dont will end up selling at 50k sat

Why, for what, more than one better anon out there

Cryptobro
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 04:51:13 PM
 #402

What about the 1% one pool is donating to the development?

What about other donations?

What about the herding of the Altcoin forum into your gains on the coins you bought cheap and or mined cheap?

You guys are not that motivated on BCX's allegation. Sorry for disturbing you.

(you guys create more unnecessary drama than a bitch on the rag, then you accuse me of creating the drama. Amazing)

Being a newbie I thought you had the respect of this forum...In reality you're coming across as rather unstable.

I suggest re-reading the various exchanges on this forum between yourself and the devs with a clear head. You might be surprised that you're the one who appears to be 'on the rag' right now.
TheFascistMind
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 04:51:36 PM
 #403

Which allegation? He never alleged any Sybil attack issues at all.

You know everything. He never mentioned anonymity being lost.

you found nothing

Well I am sure you are sure. And so we can stop now.
TheFascistMind
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 04:52:48 PM
 #404

you're the one who appears to be 'on the rag' right now.

You know everything.
TheFascistMind
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 04:54:45 PM
 #405

I'm 97% sure this is just FUD.

You know everything.
smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198



View Profile
September 21, 2014, 04:54:49 PM
 #406

Analysis of simultaneous equations attack on CryptoNote

"...that implies that no such attack, as outlined above, is possible against CryptoNote protocol."

TheFascistMind
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 04:56:42 PM
 #407

Rpietila wrote publicly only 4 - 8% chance of any lasting harm to Monero.

The same guy who said Bitcoin wouldn't fall below $400 twice and I am the same guy who PUBLICLY predicted both times it would.

And my group got out at $485 and bought back in below $400 because in the $500s I told them it would go below $400 again to retest the prior bottom.

Edit: If BCX doesn't attack successfully, Rpietila will be correct, for a short time.
bobbyb
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 109
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 05:01:08 PM
 #408

EDIT: Maybe you could discuss the fix with one of the other core members (or rpietila), I think most of them appreciate what you're doing here.

None of them take me seriously. I am tired of this shit.

You are missing the part where I spent hours (and little sleep) with you going over your work on Sybil attacks and the part (which I posted several hours ago) where I said that I thought you had improved on our work. Very odd.

If you want to offer assistance, it is welcome. If you don't want to help, don't. Either way we could do with a little less drama.

I rather fancy the idea of publishing the sender of (most) every ring signature on the block chain instead at a future date of my choosing.

I warned you don't fuck with me.

I will make sure BBR has the mitigation ready assuming they are still cooperative with me and they don't give my mitigation to XMR.

You are not dealing with BCX any more. You are dealing with me. Capice.

I didn't saw that coming.
This thread is gold.
RAJSALLIN
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 665
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 21, 2014, 05:01:42 PM
 #409

When bitcoin was in its infancy and experiencing some of its first bug exploits do you think Satoshi was whining about not getting payed, how the project wasn't his whole life and he rather spend time on the beach with his wife? As core developers you are suppose to believe in the project so much that you see the extreme potential and the coins you hold on to from the beginning will eventually be worth so much that it will compensate you for all your hard work.


  A revolutionary decentralized digital economy 
`Join us:██`Twitter  ◽  Facebook  ◽  Telegram  ◽  Youtube  ◽  Github`
.ATHERO
.Internet 3.0 solution
binaryFate
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012


Still wild and free


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 05:03:19 PM
 #410

Analysis of simultaneous equations attack on CryptoNote

"...that implies that no such attack, as outlined above, is possible against CryptoNote protocol."



Admirable simple proof.

Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. 
This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
NewLiberty
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002


Gresham's Lawyer


View Profile WWW
September 21, 2014, 05:05:06 PM
 #411

Trolling 101:
This is the message you can send if you get any response.
If you don't get a response, keep going, but add that they are unresponsive and uncaring.
Cycle as needed.

Yeah wtf? These devs are here arguing and crying like babies. This is totally unprofessional.

Why would anyone want to invest in a bunch of hotheads?


FREE MONEY1 Bitcoin for Silver and Gold NewLibertyDollar.com and now BITCOIN SPECIE (silver 1 ozt) shows value by QR
Bulk premiums as low as .0012 BTC "BETTER, MORE COLLECTIBLE, AND CHEAPER THAN SILVER EAGLES" 1Free of Government
Come-In-Behind
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 05:06:41 PM
 #412

Rpietila wrote publicly only 4 - 8% chance of any lasting harm to Monero.

The same guy who said Bitcoin wouldn't fall below $400 twice and I am the same guy who PUBLICLY predicted both times it would.

And my group got out at $485 and bought back in below $400 because in the $500s I told them it would go below $400 again to retest the prior bottom.

Edit: If BCX doesn't attack successfully, Rpietila will be correct, for a short time.

Impressive.

I also recall rptiella being the same guy that bought bitcoin at $10.
TheFascistMind
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 05:07:12 PM
 #413

Analysis of simultaneous equations attack on CryptoNote

"...that implies that no such attack, as outlined above, is possible against CryptoNote protocol."

Your mathematicians didn't address that rs = qs - csx mod l is also known, where qs is unknown.

Sorry I know you know everything.
Ultros
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 471
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 21, 2014, 05:09:53 PM
 #414

evolving language and behaviour pattern confirm and follows a simple social attack without substance.
monero devs should calm down and switch to a more attentive path. there is no need to play into others prepared hands.

Quoted for emphasis. Devs, take care of yourself and your sanity. Any forum can entrap you, but this one is full of malevolent people that constantly try to pick fights so they can reveal your weak-points.
Be careful not to get pulled. There's so much desire to harm on this thread it seems it has a physical form.
tacotime
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1005



View Profile
September 21, 2014, 05:10:35 PM
 #415

Your mathematicians didn't address that rs = qs - csx mod l is also known, where qs is unknown.
qs is unknown (and random) which makes the above equation more or less useless for solving for x, this will be addressed in a later memo.

Did you see TT just deleted his post  Wink
Anonymint edited his post, so I had to address the edit.

Code:
XMR: 44GBHzv6ZyQdJkjqZje6KLZ3xSyN1hBSFAnLP6EAqJtCRVzMzZmeXTC2AHKDS9aEDTRKmo6a6o9r9j86pYfhCWDkKjbtcns
Hunyadi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1281
Merit: 1000


☑ ♟ ☐ ♚


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 05:12:09 PM
 #416

Your mathematicians didn't address that rs = qs - csx mod l is also known, where qs is unknown.
qs is unknown (and random) which makes the above equation more or less useless for solving for x, this will be addressed in a later memo.

Did you see TT just deleted his post  Wink
Anonymint edited his post, so I had to address the edit.

Yes, and I deleted mine.

▂▃▅▇█▓▒░B**-Cultist░▒▓█▇▅▃▂
TheFascistMind
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 05:12:24 PM
 #417

Rpietila wrote publicly only 4 - 8% chance of any lasting harm to Monero.

The same guy who said Bitcoin wouldn't fall below $400 twice and I am the same guy who PUBLICLY predicted both times it would.

And my group got out at $485 and bought back in below $400 because in the $500s I told them it would go below $400 again to retest the prior bottom.

Edit: If BCX doesn't attack successfully, Rpietila will be correct, for a short time.

Impressive.

I also recall rptiella being the same guy that bought bitcoin at $10.

Indeed and he deserves credit for that along with 1000s of others. But that wasn't a short-term trading analysis, and it wasn't based on any need to know nuances about a complex technical issue.
smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198



View Profile
September 21, 2014, 05:13:13 PM
 #418

evolving language and behaviour pattern confirm and follows a simple social attack without substance.
monero devs should calm down and switch to a more attentive path. there is no need to play into others prepared hands.

Quoted for emphasis. Devs, take care of yourself and your sanity. Any forum can entrap you, but this one is full of malevolent people that constantly try to pick fights so they can reveal your weak-points.
Be careful not to get pulled. There's so much desire to harm on this thread it seems it has a physical form.

Well said brother
ajaxgeorge
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 05:13:45 PM
 #419

Rpietila wrote publicly only 4 - 8% chance of any lasting harm to Monero.

The same guy who said Bitcoin wouldn't fall below $400 twice and I am the same guy who PUBLICLY predicted both times it would.

And my group got out at $485 and bought back in below $400 because in the $500s I told them it would go below $400 again to retest the prior bottom.

Edit: If BCX doesn't attack successfully, Rpietila will be correct, for a short time.

Impressive.

I also recall rptiella being the same guy that bought bitcoin at $10.

Indeed and he deserves credit for that along with 1000s of others. But that wasn't a short-term trading analysis.

dear god.  can we just setup a webcam so you guys can whip them out and see who's is bigger & drop the facade?

geez
TheFascistMind
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 05:20:59 PM
 #420

Your mathematicians didn't address that rs = qs - csx mod l is also known, where qs is unknown.
qs is unknown (and random) which makes the above equation more or less useless for solving for x, this will be addressed in a later memo.

So sure are we. Subtraction may play differently in modular arithematic. I will wait to see what your memo says.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 ... 139 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!