Bitcoin Forum
November 03, 2024, 01:55:32 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 [93] 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Critical Levels - EW analysis  (Read 355104 times)
chessnut (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1001



View Profile
August 08, 2015, 01:19:40 AM
 #1841

Thanks for the update chessnut.

If we passed the $300 ceiling, what are the chances that we will say to the $200's level bye bye ?

Thank you.

This would be wave five in any case so no the visit above 300 would probably only be brief. Wave ii or whatever follows would keep us below 300 for a while after.

chessnut (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1001



View Profile
August 09, 2015, 01:57:29 AM
 #1842

I hope everyone had tight stops. This sharp breakdown could indicate there being a bearish triangle, meaning this decline would be a terminal move. the initial decine from highs was undoubtedly an abc.

batou
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 52
Merit: 1


View Profile
August 09, 2015, 02:42:28 AM
 #1843

meaning this decline would be a terminal move.

What does that mean?
WhatTheGox
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 09, 2015, 07:43:34 AM
 #1844

Price is just probably flat sideways until 2016 before block halving, maybe we'll start going up spring time or something. 

Bitcoin traders will have to get jobs at mcdonalds mean time Grin
Tzupy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1094



View Profile
August 09, 2015, 01:53:30 PM
 #1845

Kind of disappointing how BFX and stamp munted the triangle form bottoming under wave c but with good form in china there is no reason why wave iv cant bottom here in the west with the existing form. Call it a double combo but it doesnt really matter.



This was invalidated, so how about a new and more realistic one?

Sometimes, if it looks too bullish, it's actually bearish
JustAnotherSheep
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 239
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 10, 2015, 01:35:01 AM
Last edit: August 10, 2015, 02:11:38 AM by JustAnotherSheep
 #1846

Perhaps this?



*edit: added (C) option

Is it a bull? Is it a bear? No, it's just another sheep.
Afrikoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1003


alan watts is all you need


View Profile
August 10, 2015, 02:19:52 PM
 #1847

Hi All,

Is anyone looking at the possibility of a failed 5th wave? What would one be looking for to observe if failure had occurred or not?



              ▄▄▄██████▄▄▄
          ▄██████████████████▄
       ▄████████████████████████▄
 ▄▄  ▄████████████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████████████▄
 ▀▀█████████████████████████████████▄
   ██████████████████████████████████
   ██████████████████████████████████
   ██████████████████████████████████
   ██████████████████████████████████
   ▀████████████████████████████████▀
    ▀██████████████████████████████▀
     ▀▀██████████████████████████▀
        ▀██████████████████████▀
           ▀▀▀████████████▀▀▀
.
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....





Patel
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1321
Merit: 1007



View Profile WWW
August 10, 2015, 02:51:42 PM
 #1848

We're headed to the 240's during August
RyNinDaCleM
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2408
Merit: 1009


Legen -wait for it- dary


View Profile
August 10, 2015, 04:58:38 PM
 #1849

Hi All,

Is anyone looking at the possibility of a failed 5th wave? What would one be looking for to observe if failure had occurred or not?

It is possible as sheep shows but my version is a little different, but it really doesn't matter since it has the same conclusion. The real question is if it's a truncated 5th, was it C of (B) or only a 1?

This is my version of a truncated 5th and a couple of possible outcomes


The larger view to show why it would have to be such a long correction for the green count



chessnut (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1001



View Profile
August 11, 2015, 10:33:17 AM
 #1850

It slipped my mind the chance of a truncated fifth. Its probably the best count here.

meh32123
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 111
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 11, 2015, 05:05:29 PM
 #1851

As i am new to Eliot wave theory, could someone please tell me whats wrong with this:

Calabi–Yau Manifold
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 19, 2015, 10:19:04 AM
 #1852

It slipped my mind the chance of a truncated fifth. Its probably the best count here.

Any EW count for Finex ? Tongue
Afrikoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1003


alan watts is all you need


View Profile
August 19, 2015, 11:21:55 AM
 #1853

It slipped my mind the chance of a truncated fifth. Its probably the best count here.

Any EW count for Finex ? Tongue

Lol Grin



              ▄▄▄██████▄▄▄
          ▄██████████████████▄
       ▄████████████████████████▄
 ▄▄  ▄████████████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████████████▄
 ▀▀█████████████████████████████████▄
   ██████████████████████████████████
   ██████████████████████████████████
   ██████████████████████████████████
   ██████████████████████████████████
   ▀████████████████████████████████▀
    ▀██████████████████████████████▀
     ▀▀██████████████████████████▀
        ▀██████████████████████▀
           ▀▀▀████████████▀▀▀
.
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....





Afrikoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1003


alan watts is all you need


View Profile
August 23, 2015, 11:19:09 AM
 #1854

Since i began following BTC markets, i've observed some interesting patterns that take different forms but usually modified templates of the same pattern. Of course now, i consider them corrective patterns from EW.

I just wonder if any of you observed this too (on different timeframes) and whether you have any more to add to this 'collection'?



Also, here is the first one i noticed back in October '14




              ▄▄▄██████▄▄▄
          ▄██████████████████▄
       ▄████████████████████████▄
 ▄▄  ▄████████████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████████████▄
 ▀▀█████████████████████████████████▄
   ██████████████████████████████████
   ██████████████████████████████████
   ██████████████████████████████████
   ██████████████████████████████████
   ▀████████████████████████████████▀
    ▀██████████████████████████████▀
     ▀▀██████████████████████████▀
        ▀██████████████████████▀
           ▀▀▀████████████▀▀▀
.
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....





JustAnotherSheep
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 239
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 26, 2015, 02:57:05 PM
 #1855

Seems we (may) have completed 3 of 5 waves down, which for me begs the question of whether this impulse will be the entire final leg of the 2-year bear market, or just the start of it ((1) of V of (C))?
If the former, it may likely end as truncated/double bottom depending on how far the 5 extends. If the latter then capitulatory wave to lower 100's/double digits is still on the table, although (2) will probably need to retrace very heavily (ie to ~$260's) for the rest of the impulse to maintain reasonable fib proportions.



Curious to hear your guys thoughts on this, or any alternative counts.

Is it a bull? Is it a bear? No, it's just another sheep.
RyNinDaCleM
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2408
Merit: 1009


Legen -wait for it- dary


View Profile
August 26, 2015, 03:49:29 PM
Last edit: August 26, 2015, 04:43:26 PM by RyNinDaCleM
 #1856

Seems we (may) have completed 3 of 5 waves down, which for me begs the question of whether this impulse will be the entire final leg of the 2-year bear market, or just the start of it ((1) of V of (C))?
If the former, it may likely end as truncated/double bottom depending on how far the 5 extends. If the latter then capitulatory wave to lower 100's/double digits is still on the table, although (2) will probably need to retrace very heavily (ie to ~$260's) for the rest of the impulse to maintain reasonable fib proportions.

image snipped

Curious to hear your guys thoughts on this, or any alternative counts.

I was thinking in the case of a triple zigzag that your count is good for (a) of Z. Alternatively, this 5 down could be c of (b) of B where we will get a nice rally above 315 to complete a large B counter trend correction to the 152 lows' A.
When I get home in an hour or so, I'll post a chart of what I mean.

Edit: Got home faster than I thought. Red would be the former and yellow the latter


Edit #2:
I do think your 4 is too short (in time) as it is right now, so i could see a 50% pull back and a C up over the next day or two.

Queeq
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 427
Merit: 250



View Profile
August 30, 2015, 04:14:04 PM
 #1857

Even though this method of counting waves is somewhat uncommon, I guess many could find it useful to get an idea of what Bitcoin is really doing (courtesy of too-bad).

h3speros
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 189
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
August 30, 2015, 05:28:01 PM
 #1858

Solid analysis right there



Though there might be missing few LOL's from the middle

only crypto market predictions, no bullshit https://twitter.com/h3speros
maxll
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1011
Merit: 1006


View Profile
August 30, 2015, 05:31:33 PM
 #1859

just lol  Grin
Monopoly
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 30, 2015, 06:13:54 PM
 #1860




Very far away from reality everyone see the price is in a downtrend ........
Pages: « 1 ... 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 [93] 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!