I do not censor comments anywhere I do not have the power nor would I use it.
I will ignore abusive comments leveled at me though and I have.
Red flags and broken promises are going to be addressed. I have not ignored that. I have reported bad news such as the breach.
Again the Title is "GAW Claims" not me not the site the claim is on them and I wanted that clear. If you choose to read it as me absolving them of the issue that is fine but that is not the intention.
I do not work for GAW and have not. If I could work I would be back to running networks and mining bitcoin.
So news sites should not cover a companies release of a product because some people do not like them?
Reporting on a product people don't like = Perfectly fine
Reporting none of the red flags/broken promises/bad news = bad
Censoring any negative comments = bad
I will also say that the title is GAW Claims not me claiming it.
I have no once said it is not a big deal peoples email addresses and balances were seen. It was and is a bad thing.
Do you work for GAW or are you a journalist?
I think you've basically admitted private data was lost, so why not do the honest thing and fix the title?