[UNOFFICIAL] [VNL] Vanillacoin 0.4.1 | Instant ▱ Incentivized ▱ Innovative

[john-connor]

This thread is highly inaccurate, filled with dis/misinformation, pump and dump talks and should not be used for any reason related to the official Vanilla(coin) project.

The official BCT thread is here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1064326.msg13303164#msg13303164 where you will find links to accurate and up-to-date information.

Thank you for your support.

[pseudonymdude]

This thread is highly inaccurate, filled with dis/misinformation, pump and dump talks and should not be used for any reason related to the official Vanilla(coin) project.

The official BCT thread is here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1064326.msg13303164#msg13303164 where you will find links to accurate and up-to-date information.

Thank you for your support.

Yeah, this is the unofficial thread.

If john is reviving his thread, maybe it can be used for serious, development talks; although, talk.vanillacoin.net is the best place for serious communication and john responds to most posts there as you can see for yourself.

[john-connor]

This thread is highly inaccurate, filled with dis/misinformation, pump and dump talks and should not be used for any reason related to the official Vanilla(coin) project.

The official BCT thread is here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1064326.msg13303164#msg13303164 where you will find links to accurate and up-to-date information.

Thank you for your support.

Yeah, this is the unofficial thread.

If john is reviving his thread, maybe it can be used for serious, development talks; although, talk.vanillacoin.net is the best place for serious communication and john responds to most posts there as you can see for yourself.

This is an UNOFFICIAL thread not supported by the Vanilla(coin) project. It has become toxic and I have asked it be locked due to poor public image/first impressions.

Thank you for your support.

[pseudonymdude]

This thread is highly inaccurate, filled with dis/misinformation, pump and dump talks and should not be used for any reason related to the official Vanilla(coin) project.

The official BCT thread is here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1064326.msg13303164#msg13303164 where you will find links to accurate and up-to-date information.

Thank you for your support.

Yeah, this is the unofficial thread.

If john is reviving his thread, maybe it can be used for serious, development talks; although, talk.vanillacoin.net is the best place for serious communication and john responds to most posts there as you can see for yourself.

This is an UNOFFICIAL thread not supported by the Vanilla(coin) project. It has become toxic and I have asked it be locked due to poor public image/first impressions.

Thank you for your support.

I think that's a bad idea imo.  People don't like moderated threads as much.  If you think bitcointalk is too toxic, people will eventually come to talk.vanillacoin.net once new features are released and when/if marketing comes.

This thread being moved to the top with 284 pages is an ad for VNL.  If it's removed, we will lose all of the traffic it generates, which is 328926 views so far (not unique).  People will eventually find their way to other forums if their interest is piqued.  It doesn't have to be 100% accurate.  The OP has a bunch of links to your github, talk.vanillacoin.net, IRC, etc. and the one your official thread is right at the top.

I don't believe censoring the thread will do any good.  Once others can understand how the features of the coin are useful, that's when they will buy.  The FUD doesn't really do anything negative to the price imo.  People here are mostly looking for a quick buck and we haven't made inroads to anyone with a lot of influence in the BTC world yet, aside from the Roger Ver like of Bitcoin Dad's tweet.

[john-connor]

I think that's a bad idea imo.  People don't like moderated threads as much.  If you think bitcointalk is too toxic, people will eventually come to talk.vanillacoin.net once new features are released and when/if marketing comes.

This thread being moved to the top with 284 pages is an ad for VNL.  If it's removed, we will lose all of the traffic it generates, which is 328926 views so far (not unique).  People will eventually find their way to other forums if their interest is piqued.  It doesn't have to be 100% accurate.  The OP has a bunch of links to your github, talk.vanillacoin.net, IRC, etc. and the one your official thread is right at the top.

I don't believe censoring the thread will do any good.  Once others can understand how the features of the coin are useful, that's when they will buy.  The FUD doesn't really do anything negative to the price imo.  People here are mostly looking for a quick buck and we haven't made inroads to anyone with a lot of influence in the BTC world yet, aside from the Roger Ver like of Bitcoin Dad's tweet.

The official Vanilla(coin) project team members disagree, it's an advertisement of people talking moon and dump regarding false, inaccurate and outdated information, this thread no longer has any positives left and is a turn off for any new investor. If you are in for a "quick buck" go buy a shitclone because Vanilla is not going to give a short term gain (fact). There are plenty of other options for these types of people out there. Lastly, Roger Ver liking Bitcoin Dad's tweet is irrelevant. It was nothing more than a hype/pump situation that was short lived. Go ask Roger Ver at the bitcoin forums what he really thinks. He is open to questions (I should know), the only problem is people do not ask him but instead wait for a random tweet. This means there are no soldiers on the ground. If there is no branching out from BCT then Vanilla won't go very far adoption-wise.

Thank you for your support.

[dygus]

I think that's a bad idea imo.  People don't like moderated threads as much.  If you think bitcointalk is too toxic, people will eventually come to talk.vanillacoin.net once new features are released and when/if marketing comes.

This thread being moved to the top with 284 pages is an ad for VNL.  If it's removed, we will lose all of the traffic it generates, which is 328926 views so far (not unique).  People will eventually find their way to other forums if their interest is piqued.  It doesn't have to be 100% accurate.  The OP has a bunch of links to your github, talk.vanillacoin.net, IRC, etc. and the one your official thread is right at the top.

I don't believe censoring the thread will do any good.  Once others can understand how the features of the coin are useful, that's when they will buy.  The FUD doesn't really do anything negative to the price imo.  People here are mostly looking for a quick buck and we haven't made inroads to anyone with a lot of influence in the BTC world yet, aside from the Roger Ver like of Bitcoin Dad's tweet.

The official Vanilla(coin) project team members disagree, it's an advertisement of people talking moon and dump regarding false, inaccurate and outdated information, this thread no longer has any positives left and is a turn off for any new investor. If you are in for a "quick buck" go buy a shitclone because Vanilla is not going to give a short term gain (fact). There are plenty of other options for these types of people out there. Lastly, Roger Ver liking Bitcoin Dad's tweet is irrelevant. It was nothing more than a hype/pump situation that was short lived. Go ask Roger Ver at the bitcoin forums what he really thinks. He is open to questions (I should know), the only problem is people do not ask him but instead wait for a random tweet. This means there are no soldiers on the ground. If there is no branching out from BCT then Vanilla won't go very far adoption-wise.

Thank you for your support.

Do you rally bother you, what happends on this thread. Look on ETH, did Vitalik closed BCT thread?
You don't have to post or answer on this thread.

[dygus]

From talk.Vanillacoin.net

Due to the holiday season and taking five extra weeks to rewrite major portions of 0.4.x we must extend the timeline by 60 days, therefore we will rename it 6-month timeline and it will end around the last of March 2016.

Update regarding current outstanding items.

iOS and Android will be submitted this week. We have one darknet application already built, working and code is in Github. ChainBlender is making timely progress. The following items have been completed:

Core perfromance, scalability and security. √
Extended RPC support. √
Additional GUI features. √
Expand website content. √

Thank you for your support.

[CaptainCore]

From talk.Vanillacoin.net

Due to the holiday season and taking five extra weeks to rewrite major portions of 0.4.x we must extend the timeline by 60 days, therefore we will rename it 6-month timeline and it will end around the last of March 2016.

Update regarding current outstanding items.

iOS and Android will be submitted this week. We have one darknet application already built, working and code is in Github. ChainBlender is making timely progress. The following items have been completed:

Core perfromance, scalability and security. √
Extended RPC support. √
Additional GUI features. √
Expand website content. √

Thank you for your support.

ah excellent, so basically, nothing has been done to the average persons eye.

its still the same coin it was 6 months ago nothing has changed, congrats!

and submitting to the app store hey? that old chestnut, ive heard that same sentence 40 times over the last year. never happens.

im starting to think this developer is jl777, aka master of making new projects but never completing them.

its better to have 5 completed projects than 44 projects 90% completed.


its the sole reason the price is suffering, nothing useful is actually getting done.

[MonsterZeroPrice]

Last warning: This is a clone coin.

[pseudonymdude]

Last warning: This is a clone coin.

Again, if it was a clone coin, it wouldn't be the only coin other than Bitcoin that Poloniex only requires 1 confirmation for: You can test this by going here: https://poloniex.com/public?command=returnCurrencies and searching for minconf":1," but you already knew that and the following:

If it was a clone coin, it wouldn't be the only coin with native gui interface as opposed to a qt wallet.

If it was a clone coin, it wouldn't be the only coin that gives you a random port if you don't have a config.dat

If it was a clone coin, it wouldn't be the only coin that automatically burns tx fees.


It has the staking mobile apps already, and the iOS app is already on Apple TestFlight Beta Testing.  Just pm xCore if you want an invite.

[bigfryguy]

just look at the code...

it is easy to decipher whether VNL is a clone...  stop being such a simpleton.

[STEALTHMODE]

retweet:

https://twitter.com/moneyisdigital/status/678600809899237378

@ErikVoorhees @ShapeShift_io Why haven't you added the only altcoin that only needs 1 conf on @Poloniex? Means Polo judges it the safest alt

done

[bigfryguy]

I dont see there being a problem running two threads, as long as people know that this is the thread for speculation, and a mix of informal information/disinformation.
people should go to vanillacoin.net and the official forum to find out about releases.

[pseudonymdude]

I dont see there being a problem running two threads, as long as people know that this is the thread for speculation, and a mix of informal information/disinformation.
people should go to vanillacoin.net and the official forum to find out about releases.

We should understand John's concerns. Much of the contents in this thread can only discourage serious investors. Just have a look at those trolls repeating over and over again the same nonsense. We shouldn't also expect John to waste his precious time here to fight that FUD. He has lots of real work to do, and fudders would use his absence to FUD even harder. Maybe some of us in crypto are unfortunately used to all this, but normal people wouldn't put their hard earned money on VNL after seeing this thread. We need a real constructive and informative forum, and that seems almost impossible at BCT.
My post is not against all people that have contributed to this thread. I want to thank all of them and specially to traumschiff for their time and work.

That is definitely a good point if he's pitching it to big investors, but as far as the average crypto user goes, I think this thread is a plus.

If we had a ton of advertising all over, killing this thread would definitely be a plus as very few on bitcointalk have any idea what they're talking about; but with no advertising, this thread gives us some exposure.

[EmilioMann]

retweet:

https://twitter.com/moneyisdigital/status/678600809899237378

@ErikVoorhees @ShapeShift_io Why haven't you added the only altcoin that only needs 1 conf on @Poloniex? Means Polo judges it the safest alt

you forgot to say that the coin is vanilla.
He may think that you're talking about viacoin, the logo is the same.

[HCLivess]

excuse me, but how often is the reward paid out for supernodes?

[pseudonymdude]

retweet:

https://twitter.com/moneyisdigital/status/678600809899237378

@ErikVoorhees @ShapeShift_io Why haven't you added the only altcoin that only needs 1 conf on @Poloniex? Means Polo judges it the safest alt

you forgot to say that the coin is vanilla.
He may think that you're talking about viacoin, the logo is the same.

They can see from my profile and they were looking at VNL in the past when we had more volume.

Feel free to tweet them or others anything you want, the way you want to say it.  If you tweet at them and mention another feature, that might even be better at getting their attention.

[Jookly]

excuse me, but how often is the reward paid out for supernodes?

It can fluctuate between as low as 0 and as high as ?  .  I have seen 4 on a "lucky" day.

[ancientcoins]

well bitcoin is starting to fall, wel see btc heading towards altcoins now lucky guys who got dumped on should see easy profit

[Levole11]

excuse me, but how often is the reward paid out for supernodes?

you can go days without and then have multiples in one, there's no specific structure..