[UNOFFICIAL] [VNL] Vanillacoin 0.4.1 | Instant ▱ Incentivized ▱ Innovative

[MemoryShock]

Are you helping them with their problem? They were the first exchange to add vanillacoin after all.
Regards,

He did.  tf2honeybadger from Poloniex Staff also helped them with their wallet.
john-conner shouldn't have to work on an exchange's issue after he applied a fix (in my opinion)...Poloniex is fine for now in my opinion.

Quality exchange with quality staff.  

As for feeding the trolls - Sigh.  It seems newbie accounts spewing one sentence accusations are never far behind HT's initial appearance.  The coin will speak for itself one way or the other...

Edit - Of course, C-cex on board is not a bad thing...

[hokus_pokus]

From IRC: C-cex is working diligently to get wallet working again

12:50:40 PM
they are recompiling now

they had corrupt wallet, john thinks he has identified the reason and he can prevent it from happening again

[traumschiff]

We are being added to whattomine: http://www.whattomine.com/coins/130-vnl-whirlpoolx

Can some of the miners check if the numbers are okay? Thank you.

[GlitterRush]

i dont know why this coin  doesnt have a larger market cap i like large things 

[anhpt192]

I made a quick drop-in kernel which does 260 Mh/s on r9 290x@1100/150, no cpu at all.

515MH/s here on 280x@1100/1500 with table-driven algo
EDIT: uint2, copy of table in local memory, table holds 4*256*uint2, no sp_'s wide block trick, no 3bit table preshift
EDIT:
almost 540MH/s with overclocking

Code:

1:12 A:0 R:0 HW:0 Shares:5.49Sh/m Speed: 539.95MH/s 5s: 547.59MH/s
Found something... nCandidates==1
Verify()
Data  :04000000C7F1737F4931F64A911CDD96B02268E1794168C9ABB16AE5217246F2844BF8FA2AB7ED299A064AF40FA3252B1D72C0AF0BB6635F6F60424D15DAA890D50156F2DD5209558DE4041B
Header:04000000C7F1737F4931F64A911CDD96B02268E1794168C9ABB16AE5217246F2844BF8FA2AB7ED299A064AF40FA3252B1D72C0AF0BB6635F6F60424D15DAA890D50156F2DD5209558DE4041B43B7195E
Nonce :5e19b743
Last  :0x0
Hash  :D403C4255B7A31499D9A164051C03C035CB20BF275D777CC83AFEF4200000000
Target:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000008DE4040000000000
Share hash above the target
1:13 A:0 R:0 HW:0 Shares:5.73Sh/m Speed: 539.95MH/s 5s: 539.76MH/s

Code:

$ amdconfig --odgc
Default Adapter - AMD Radeon R9 200 Series    
                            Core (MHz)    Memory (MHz)
           Current Clocks :    1150           1500
             Current Peak :    1140           300
  Configurable Peak Range : [300-1500]     [150-2000]
                 GPU load :    99%

Code:

$ amdconfig --odgt

Default Adapter - AMD Radeon R9 200 Series    
                  Sensor 0: Temperature - 81.00 C

Code:

; ----------------- CS Data ------------------------
codeLenInByte        = 16704 bytes;
NumVgprs             = 50;
NumSgprs             = 48;

Not bad. My best is 660MH/s on 290x so far.

omg!!!
can you share with us mining soft and config?

[shaan.is.one]

Hmmm wonderful flavour..! As name will be valuable too..

[wow!NotAgain]

i dont know why this coin  doesnt have a larger market cap i like large things 

people not want coin that mined private miner  large farm  making dumps

many problems wallet  coin just made few using optimize mining sell exchange   make hype

coin die soon  they launch more new algo coin   people have optimize miner ready new algo  get most coins dump exchange  easy btc   others end holding bag

coin same others  no future

[wow!NotAgain]

Hmmm wonderful flavour..! As name will be valuable too..

name stupid 

name mean nothing 

technology is matters most  coin have problems technology many from launch

just more pump dump   few optimize miners  large farm  get most coin  dumping exchange 

[LovSan]

i dont know why this coin  doesnt have a larger market cap i like large things  

Hmmm wonderful flavour..! As name will be valuable too..

At least FUD properly, not like a past generation broken chat bot.

[Jookly]

wownotagain and hippietech you guys make it look like the dumbass bucket sprung a leak

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g7KVbTcvjJg

[wow!NotAgain]

small volume nobody want buy


117   Vanillacoin Vanillacoin   $ 52,463   $ 0.009135   5,743,112 VNL   $ 464     -13.58 %   

[john-connor]

From IRC: C-cex is working diligently to get wallet working again

12:50:40 PM
they are recompiling now

they had corrupt wallet, john thinks he has identified the reason and he can prevent it from happening again

Yes, I explained to them to maintain backups of their wallet files therefore my decision to have them de-list VNL until they fix their problems.

Thank you for your support.

[sly5am]

small volume nobody want buy


117   Vanillacoin Vanillacoin   $ 52,463   $ 0.009135   5,743,112 VNL   $ 464     -13.58 %   

Fudsters always fud.. go away lewser

[poncho32]

small volume nobody want buy


117   Vanillacoin Vanillacoin   $ 52,463   $ 0.009135   5,743,112 VNL   $ 464     -13.58 %   

Fudsters always fud.. go away lewser

If it goes up another 17 places it will hit the first page of coinmarketcap.com.

[wow!NotAgain]

small volume nobody want buy


117   Vanillacoin Vanillacoin   $ 52,463   $ 0.009135   5,743,112 VNL   $ 464     -13.58 %   

Fudsters always fud.. go away lewser

how is fud?  nobody want buy that why no volume

how truth is fud?  you must frustrate from holding bag

I sell for profit coin I mine early  now it late  no profit not having optimize miner  you not have?  do not given you? 

you should mad them

[CryptoClub]

small volume nobody want buy


117   Vanillacoin Vanillacoin   $ 52,463   $ 0.009135   5,743,112 VNL   $ 464     -13.58 %   

Fudsters always fud.. go away lewser

Bitcoin is down 10% today, so we are looking at 3.5%, pretty much nothing. I would like to get the new miner though. Until then I will mine something else.

[MemoryShock]

Can we please refrain from ad hominems.  Granted, trolls going to troll and they have no issue with perpetuating a negative atmosphere but the rest of us don't need to embrace it.

Replies are obviously going to happen but let's keep it civil...it's better in the long run for sure.

Two cents...

[CryptoClub]

Can we please refrain from ad hominems.  Granted, trolls going to troll and they have no issue with perpetuating a negative atmosphere but the rest of us don't need to embrace it.

Replies are obviously going to happen but let's keep it civil...it's better in the long run for sure.

Two cents...

I agree, as someone holding this coin, for the moment, I am concerned about the faster miners. No point in mining this if some can mine 6x faster, this needs to be fixed or it will screw up distribution. I am going to scale out a little tonight and hope somehow a miner gets released, as this coin is very interesting. If the distribution gets too messed up, that won't matter however. This is a serious concern. Short term price and volume isn't an issue, distribution is a major one.

[smolen]

I am concerned about the faster miners.

It so happened that whirlpool hash function, which is a base for Vanillacoin PoW, is a perfect test subject for bitslicing technique. So sorry, we do some research here, coin fate is mostly irrelevant

[pallas]

Can we please refrain from ad hominems.  Granted, trolls going to troll and they have no issue with perpetuating a negative atmosphere but the rest of us don't need to embrace it.

Replies are obviously going to happen but let's keep it civil...it's better in the long run for sure.

Two cents...

I agree, as someone holding this coin, for the moment, I am concerned about the faster miners. No point in mining this if some can mine 6x faster, this needs to be fixed or it will screw up distribution. I am going to scale out a little tonight and hope somehow a miner gets released, as this coin is very interesting. If the distribution gets too messed up, that won't matter however. This is a serious concern. Short term price and volume isn't an issue, distribution is a major one.

FPGA may become a reality if this coin gets big enough - I wrote a nice implementation of Whirlpool that uses no lookup tables at all.

I wrote one too, it worked on the pool but was incredibly slow. Just out of curiosity, how fast was your table-less implementation?