|
MemoryShock
|
 |
March 18, 2015, 04:45:06 PM
Last edit: March 18, 2015, 05:03:10 PM by MemoryShock |
|
Are you helping them with their problem? They were the first exchange to add vanillacoin after all.
Regards,
He did. tf2honeybadger from Poloniex Staff also helped them with their wallet. john-conner shouldn't have to work on an exchange's issue after he applied a fix (in my opinion)...Poloniex is fine for now in my opinion. Quality exchange with quality staff. As for feeding the trolls - Sigh. It seems newbie accounts spewing one sentence accusations are never far behind HT's initial appearance. The coin will speak for itself one way or the other... Edit - Of course, C-cex on board is not a bad thing... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once a transaction has 6 confirmations, it is extremely unlikely that an attacker without at least 50% of the network's computation power would be able to reverse it.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hokus_pokus
Member
 Offline
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
|
|
March 18, 2015, 04:54:03 PM |
|
From IRC: C-cex is working diligently to get wallet working again
12:50:40 PM
they are recompiling now
they had corrupt wallet, john thinks he has identified the reason and he can prevent it from happening again
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GlitterRush
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 10
|
|
March 18, 2015, 06:24:24 PM |
|
|
Get your TAM today at https://c-cex.com/?p=tam-btc
|
|
|
|
anhpt192
|
|
March 18, 2015, 07:23:25 PM |
|
I made a quick drop-in kernel which does 260 Mh/s on r9 290x@1100/150, no cpu at all.
515MH/s here on 280x@1100/1500 with table-driven algo EDIT: uint2, copy of table in local memory, table holds 4*256*uint2, no sp_'s wide block trick, no 3bit table preshift EDIT: almost 540MH/s with overclocking 1:12 A:0 R:0 HW:0 Shares:5.49Sh/m Speed: 539.95MH/s 5s: 547.59MH/s
Found something... nCandidates==1
Verify()
Data :04000000C7F1737F4931F64A911CDD96B02268E1794168C9ABB16AE5217246F2844BF8FA2AB7ED299A064AF40FA3252B1D72C0AF0BB6635F6F60424D15DAA890D50156F2DD5209558DE4041B
Header:04000000C7F1737F4931F64A911CDD96B02268E1794168C9ABB16AE5217246F2844BF8FA2AB7ED299A064AF40FA3252B1D72C0AF0BB6635F6F60424D15DAA890D50156F2DD5209558DE4041B43B7195E
Nonce :5e19b743
Last :0x0
Hash :D403C4255B7A31499D9A164051C03C035CB20BF275D777CC83AFEF4200000000
Target:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000008DE4040000000000
Share hash above the target
1:13 A:0 R:0 HW:0 Shares:5.73Sh/m Speed: 539.95MH/s 5s: 539.76MH/s
$ amdconfig --odgc
Default Adapter - AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Core (MHz) Memory (MHz)
Current Clocks : 1150 1500
Current Peak : 1140 300
Configurable Peak Range : [300-1500] [150-2000]
GPU load : 99%
$ amdconfig --odgt
Default Adapter - AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Sensor 0: Temperature - 81.00 C
; ----------------- CS Data ------------------------
codeLenInByte = 16704 bytes;
NumVgprs = 50;
NumSgprs = 48;
Not bad. My best is 660MH/s on 290x so far. omg!!! can you share with us mining soft and config? |
|
|
|
|
shaan.is.one
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
March 18, 2015, 07:27:06 PM |
|
Hmmm wonderful flavour..! As name will be valuable too..  |
|
|
|
|
wow!NotAgain
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 10
|
|
March 18, 2015, 07:30:14 PM |
|
people not want coin that mined private miner large farm making dumps many problems wallet coin just made few using optimize mining sell exchange make hype coin die soon they launch more new algo coin people have optimize miner ready new algo get most coins dump exchange easy btc others end holding bag coin same others no future |
|
|
|
|
wow!NotAgain
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 10
|
|
March 18, 2015, 07:32:48 PM |
|
Hmmm wonderful flavour..! As name will be valuable too.. name stupid name mean nothing technology is matters most coin have problems technology many from launch just more pump dump few optimize miners large farm get most coin dumping exchange |
|
|
|
|
|
LovSan
|
|
March 18, 2015, 07:54:49 PM |
|
Hmmm wonderful flavour..! As name will be valuable too..  At least FUD properly, not like a past generation broken chat bot. |
❄❁❇❂❇❃❇❅❇❆❇❈❇❉❇❊❇❋❄♒❇♓❇♉❇♈❇♊❇♋❇♌❇♍❇♎❇♏❇♐❇♑❄❋❇❊❇❉❇❈❇❆❇❅❇❃❇❂❇❁❄ |
|
|
|
|
wow!NotAgain
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 10
|
|
March 18, 2015, 10:49:11 PM |
|
small volume nobody want buy
117 Vanillacoin Vanillacoin $ 52,463 $ 0.009135 5,743,112 VNL $ 464 -13.58 %
|
|
|
|
|
|
john-connor
|
|
March 19, 2015, 12:48:46 AM |
|
From IRC: C-cex is working diligently to get wallet working again
12:50:40 PM
they are recompiling now
they had corrupt wallet, john thinks he has identified the reason and he can prevent it from happening again
Yes, I explained to them to maintain backups of their wallet files therefore my decision to have them de-list VNL until they fix their problems.  Thank you for your support. |
|
|
|
|
sly5am
|
|
March 19, 2015, 01:53:23 AM |
|
small volume nobody want buy
117 Vanillacoin Vanillacoin $ 52,463 $ 0.009135 5,743,112 VNL $ 464 -13.58 %
Fudsters always fud.. go away lewser |
|
|
|
|
poncho32
|
|
March 19, 2015, 02:03:44 AM |
|
small volume nobody want buy
117 Vanillacoin Vanillacoin $ 52,463 $ 0.009135 5,743,112 VNL $ 464 -13.58 %
Fudsters always fud.. go away lewser If it goes up another 17 places it will hit the first page of coinmarketcap.com. |
|
|
|
|
wow!NotAgain
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 10
|
|
March 19, 2015, 02:36:51 AM |
|
small volume nobody want buy
117 Vanillacoin Vanillacoin $ 52,463 $ 0.009135 5,743,112 VNL $ 464 -13.58 %
Fudsters always fud.. go away lewser how is fud? nobody want buy that why no volume how truth is fud? you must frustrate from holding bag I sell for profit coin I mine early now it late no profit not having optimize miner you not have? do not given you? you should mad them |
|
|
|
|
CryptoClub
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1000
cryptocollectorsclub.com
|
|
March 19, 2015, 03:03:04 AM |
|
small volume nobody want buy
117 Vanillacoin Vanillacoin $ 52,463 $ 0.009135 5,743,112 VNL $ 464 -13.58 %
Fudsters always fud.. go away lewser Bitcoin is down 10% today, so we are looking at 3.5%, pretty much nothing. I would like to get the new miner though. Until then I will mine something else. |
...
|
|
|
|
MemoryShock
|
|
March 19, 2015, 03:48:15 AM |
|
Can we please refrain from ad hominems. Granted, trolls going to troll and they have no issue with perpetuating a negative atmosphere but the rest of us don't need to embrace it.
Replies are obviously going to happen but let's keep it civil...it's better in the long run for sure.
Two cents...
|
|
|
|
CryptoClub
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1000
cryptocollectorsclub.com
|
|
March 19, 2015, 05:02:34 AM |
|
Can we please refrain from ad hominems. Granted, trolls going to troll and they have no issue with perpetuating a negative atmosphere but the rest of us don't need to embrace it.
Replies are obviously going to happen but let's keep it civil...it's better in the long run for sure.
Two cents...
I agree, as someone holding this coin, for the moment, I am concerned about the faster miners. No point in mining this if some can mine 6x faster, this needs to be fixed or it will screw up distribution. I am going to scale out a little tonight and hope somehow a miner gets released, as this coin is very interesting. If the distribution gets too messed up, that won't matter however. This is a serious concern. Short term price and volume isn't an issue, distribution is a major one. |
...
|
|
|
|
smolen
|
|
March 19, 2015, 08:26:56 AM |
|
I am concerned about the faster miners.
It so happened that whirlpool hash function, which is a base for Vanillacoin PoW, is a perfect test subject for bitslicing technique. So sorry, we do some research here, coin fate is mostly irrelevant  |
Of course I gave you bad advice. Good one is way out of your price range.
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
|
March 19, 2015, 09:23:58 AM |
|
Can we please refrain from ad hominems. Granted, trolls going to troll and they have no issue with perpetuating a negative atmosphere but the rest of us don't need to embrace it.
Replies are obviously going to happen but let's keep it civil...it's better in the long run for sure.
Two cents...
I agree, as someone holding this coin, for the moment, I am concerned about the faster miners. No point in mining this if some can mine 6x faster, this needs to be fixed or it will screw up distribution. I am going to scale out a little tonight and hope somehow a miner gets released, as this coin is very interesting. If the distribution gets too messed up, that won't matter however. This is a serious concern. Short term price and volume isn't an issue, distribution is a major one. FPGA may become a reality if this coin gets big enough - I wrote a nice implementation of Whirlpool that uses no lookup tables at all. I wrote one too, it worked on the pool but was incredibly slow. Just out of curiosity, how fast was your table-less implementation? |
|
|
|
|
