child_harold
|
|
March 11, 2015, 08:06:06 PM |
|
is the current state of the chart undisputed? what else might be missing?
|
|
|
|
ffmad
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 868
Merit: 1006
|
|
March 11, 2015, 08:19:35 PM |
|
Ok, the "3rd party app" maybe not fully appropriate, but it makes no difference, The anonymization is handled by those "configured wallets", it's still not end to end.
|
| | fparticl●f | █▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█ █ ▀ ▀ ▀ █ █ █ █ ▀▀█▄ █ █ █▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█ █ █ █▄ ▄█▀ █ █ █▄▄▄▄▄▄█▀ █ █ █▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ █ █ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█ █ █ █▀█ █▀█ █ █ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ █ █ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ █ █▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█ | .Infinite . .Markets. | █▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█ █ ████ ████ ████ ████ █ █ ████ ████ ████ ████ █ █ █ █ ████ ████ ████ ████ █ █ ████ ████ ████ ████ █ █ █ █ ████ ████ ████ ████ █ █ ████ ████ ████ ████ █ █ █ █ ████ ████ ████ ████ █ █ ████ ████ ████ ████ █ █▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█ | .Public or.. .Private ... | █▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█ █ ▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▀ ▀▀▀ ▀▀▀ █ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ █ █ █ ▄▄▄▄▄ █ █ █▀ ▀█ █ █ █▀ ▀█ █ █ ▄▄█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█▄▄ █ █ █ █ ▄▀▀▄ ▄▀▀▄ █ █ ▀▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▀ █ █ █ █▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█ | .RingCT........ .Anonymity . | ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ | | | | ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ |
|
|
|
child_harold
|
|
March 11, 2015, 08:22:47 PM |
|
Ok, the "3rd party app" maybe not fully appropriate, but it makes no difference, The anonymization is handled by those "configured wallets", it's still not end to end. +1 by DRK's own admission DRK is a two-tier network. this is not P2P or end to end agreed?
|
|
|
|
WealthyBastard
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
|
March 11, 2015, 09:47:05 PM |
|
Ok, the "3rd party app" maybe not fully appropriate, but it makes no difference, The anonymization is handled by those "configured wallets", it's still not end to end. +1 by DRK's own admission DRK is a two-tier network. this is not P2P or end to end agreed? In my opinion you're right, not being fanboy to SDC or whatever... This is just the truth, not saying it's bad or good, people will decide, but this is a fact
|
|
|
|
child_harold
|
|
March 11, 2015, 10:43:00 PM |
|
Ok, the "3rd party app" maybe not fully appropriate, but it makes no difference, The anonymization is handled by those "configured wallets", it's still not end to end. +1 by DRK's own admission DRK is a two-tier network. this is not P2P or end to end agreed? In my opinion you're right, not being fanboy to SDC or whatever... This is just the truth, not saying it's bad or good, people will decide, but this is a fact thanks WealthyBastard
|
|
|
|
child_harold
|
|
March 11, 2015, 10:56:57 PM |
|
Evrybody happy with the chart as it currently stands?
|
|
|
|
KingCaper
|
|
March 12, 2015, 12:20:10 AM |
|
Lately it seems anon coins are in the mind of everyone so let's awnser questions. Updated with a fairer and more objective summary I don't have as much time to spend keeping abreast of things on this site as I'd like so something like this is really useful to me. My thanks to everyone who contributed.
|
|
|
|
toknormal
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1188
|
|
March 12, 2015, 08:37:12 AM Last edit: March 12, 2015, 09:23:27 AM by toknormal |
|
The anonymization is handled by those "configured wallets", it's still not end to end.
Optimising monetary fungibility is a very different technical objective from implementing "end to end" anonymity. If we look back at historical monetary media, like gold, there was no "end to end" anonymity in the sense that people wre trying to hide their transactions. But there was full fungibility (at least optionally) due to gold's low melting point. A minted coin could be recognised from one transaction to the next but then if a pile of them were melted down and turned into bars instead, the coins were no longer recognisable. So "hiding the transaction" is a distinct priority from "showing the transaction" but optimising monetary fungibility. In that sense, cryptonote tech is persuing the former and darkcoin tech is persuing the latter by supporting pre-emptive mixing - or 'melting' while the coins are in the wallet. In darkcoin, the coin supply is being continually anonymised because it gets done in your wallet, the previous wallet, the one before that and the one before that. There is less emphasis on any 1 transaction and more emphasis on keeping the coin supply as a whole anonymous and fungible. Whatever the specific comparisons on the effectiveness of cryptography vs mixing, they are largely irrelevant because darkcoin's massive redundancy and iterative approach blows away any deficiency. It's also a more holistic approach which addresses monetary priorities rather than security ones. For a prospective monetary medium, thats the right way around in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
Dofus (OP)
|
|
March 12, 2015, 11:58:26 AM |
|
Lately it seems anon coins are in the mind of everyone so let's awnser questions. Updated with a fairer and more objective summary I don't have as much time to spend keeping abreast of things on this site as I'd like so something like this is really useful to me. My thanks to everyone who contributed. Well you're welcome. Keep in mind that this might change in some times
|
|
|
|
solid12345
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 12, 2015, 03:35:29 PM |
|
So "hiding the transaction" is a distinct priority from "showing the transaction" but optimising monetary fungibility. In that sense, cryptonote tech is persuing the former and darkcoin tech is persuing the latter by supporting pre-emptive mixing - or 'melting' while the coins are in the wallet. In darkcoin, the coin supply is being continually anonymised because it gets done in your wallet, the previous wallet, the one before that and the one before that. There is less emphasis on any 1 transaction and more emphasis on keeping the coin supply as a whole anonymous and fungible.
I guess I am not getting Evan's argument for Darkcoin being more fungible than Bitcoin. The US Marshalls Auction proves, at least in the United States, that government authorities don't seem to care whose hands Bitcoin was in previously. DPR's coins are not considered "tainted".
|
|
|
|
infofront
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2646
Merit: 2793
Shitcoin Minimalist
|
|
March 12, 2015, 03:57:20 PM |
|
Ok, the "3rd party app" maybe not fully appropriate, but it makes no difference, The anonymization is handled by those "configured wallets", it's still not end to end. +1 by DRK's own admission DRK is a two-tier network. this is not P2P or end to end agreed? Agreed.
|
|
|
|
adhitthana
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 13, 2015, 04:16:17 AM |
|
With a marketcap of 330K USD Shadowcash seems out of place. It doesn't from that perspective appear to put it in the same league as the other two.
|
|
|
|
rustynailer
|
|
March 13, 2015, 06:00:33 AM |
|
With a marketcap of 330K USD Shadowcash seems out of place. It doesn't from that perspective appear to put it in the same league as the other two.
This is more about the tech and going by that Shadow more than deserves to be included in this list.
|
|
|
|
ffmad
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 868
Merit: 1006
|
|
March 13, 2015, 08:38:34 AM |
|
With a marketcap of 330K USD Shadowcash seems out of place. It doesn't from that perspective appear to put it in the same league as the other two.
As if MarketCap really means something in tech... Look at how high are LiteCoin and DogeCoin ? It doesn't mean it won't go much higher in the future, you now cryptocurrencies ...
|
| | fparticl●f | █▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█ █ ▀ ▀ ▀ █ █ █ █ ▀▀█▄ █ █ █▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█ █ █ █▄ ▄█▀ █ █ █▄▄▄▄▄▄█▀ █ █ █▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ █ █ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█ █ █ █▀█ █▀█ █ █ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ █ █ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ █ █▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█ | .Infinite . .Markets. | █▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█ █ ████ ████ ████ ████ █ █ ████ ████ ████ ████ █ █ █ █ ████ ████ ████ ████ █ █ ████ ████ ████ ████ █ █ █ █ ████ ████ ████ ████ █ █ ████ ████ ████ ████ █ █ █ █ ████ ████ ████ ████ █ █ ████ ████ ████ ████ █ █▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█ | .Public or.. .Private ... | █▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█ █ ▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▀ ▀▀▀ ▀▀▀ █ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ █ █ █ ▄▄▄▄▄ █ █ █▀ ▀█ █ █ █▀ ▀█ █ █ ▄▄█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█▄▄ █ █ █ █ ▄▀▀▄ ▄▀▀▄ █ █ ▀▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▀ █ █ █ █▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█ | .RingCT........ .Anonymity . | ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ | | | | ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ |
|
|
|
bitcreditscc
|
|
March 13, 2015, 10:32:47 AM |
|
With a marketcap of 330K USD Shadowcash seems out of place. It doesn't from that perspective appear to put it in the same league as the other two.
As if MarketCap really means something in tech... Look at how high are LiteCoin and DogeCoin ? It doesn't mean it won't go much higher in the future, you now cryptocurrencies ... I strongly agree, nowadays i measure fair liquidity (how much you can liquidate within 20% of starting price) as an indicator. Market cap is just number of token x price, which is unrealistic.
|
|
|
|
Dofus (OP)
|
|
March 13, 2015, 04:53:46 PM |
|
With a marketcap of 330K USD Shadowcash seems out of place. It doesn't from that perspective appear to put it in the same league as the other two.
Hopefully, this thread is focused on the tech, that means something. Not like marketcap that can change in one night
|
|
|
|
nsimmons
|
|
March 13, 2015, 05:13:10 PM |
|
With a marketcap of 330K USD Shadowcash seems out of place. It doesn't from that perspective appear to put it in the same league as the other two.
As if MarketCap really means something in tech... So sure?
|
|
|
|
Dofus (OP)
|
|
March 13, 2015, 07:36:07 PM |
|
With a marketcap of 330K USD Shadowcash seems out of place. It doesn't from that perspective appear to put it in the same league as the other two.
As if MarketCap really means something in tech... So sure? I'm not sure to understand your reference
|
|
|
|
GingerAle
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1008
|
|
March 13, 2015, 07:40:59 PM |
|
With a marketcap of 330K USD Shadowcash seems out of place. It doesn't from that perspective appear to put it in the same league as the other two.
As if MarketCap really means something in tech... So sure? I'm not sure to understand your reference exactly.
|
|
|
|
Este Nuno
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1002
amarha
|
|
March 13, 2015, 08:04:00 PM |
|
So...with DRK and XMR which one is Betamax and which one is VHS? Beta was supposed to be the superior technology, right(XMR?)? But VHS had the network effect and user base(DRK?)?
|
|
|
|
|