Bitcoin Forum
May 04, 2024, 10:49:35 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 [736] 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 ... 1348 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It  (Read 3916343 times)
finlof
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 06, 2013, 03:12:18 PM
 #14701

incoming...
Transactions must be included in a block to be properly completed. When you send a transaction, it is broadcast to miners. Miners can then optionally include it in their next blocks. Miners will be more inclined to include your transaction if it has a higher transaction fee.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714862975
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714862975

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714862975
Reply with quote  #2

1714862975
Report to moderator
1714862975
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714862975

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714862975
Reply with quote  #2

1714862975
Report to moderator
1714862975
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714862975

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714862975
Reply with quote  #2

1714862975
Report to moderator
velacreations
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 06, 2013, 03:15:49 PM
 #14702

looks like div will be around .0028 or so

0.00290692

binaryFate
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1003


Still wild and free


View Profile
November 06, 2013, 03:18:17 PM
 #14703

0.00290692

Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. 
This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
aahzmundus
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500


Invest & Earn: https://cloudthink.io


View Profile
November 06, 2013, 03:20:40 PM
 #14704

0.00290692

Confirmed

robix
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 360
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 06, 2013, 03:28:38 PM
 #14705

Hmmm. An update would be appropriate.
bitcoin.newsfeed
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 06, 2013, 03:29:47 PM
 #14706

Mabsark I think that your prediction about ASICminer back then was pretty dumb, here's why :

So you said that the mining company which made a promise for shareholders to hold minimum 10% of the network and is mining 2520 BTC/week with another stream of 2000+ BTC from sales/growing franchises is paying steady div min 0.0113 (actually it was in range 0.015-0.03 for 3 months) and considering the share price of 2.50 BTC with APR in range 20%-60% is vastly overpriced? I don't get it !

* I think that the only reason, why AM lost 10%+ of the network(which caused lower divs and then share price) is massive failure in Gen2 chip design which hit the whole mining industry, not just ASICminer (look at Cointerra, HashFast, BTCGARDEN, BFL and LabCoin)

So I believe that the Friedcat & Co., is doing everything right to get the job done with gen3 ... otherwise we're all fucked.

... Question Everything, Believe Nothing ...
101111
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 525
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 06, 2013, 03:33:56 PM
 #14707

At least this week's div is higher than last weeks in $ terms  Wink

(by my rough calc 78c v 74c)
velacreations
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 06, 2013, 03:37:21 PM
 #14708

Mabsark I think that your prediction about ASICminer back then was pretty dumb, here's why :

So you said that the mining company which made a promise for shareholders to hold minimum 10% of the network and is mining 2520 BTC/week with another stream of 2000+ BTC from sales/growing franchises is paying steady div min 0.0113 (actually it was in range 0.015-0.03 for 3 months) and considering the share price of 2.50 BTC with APR in range 20%-60% is vastly overpriced? I don't get it !

what he's trying to say is that he was right, because the share price fell a month or so after his prediction.  The problem with this, is that he was very wrong, first, as the share price climbed considerably (and also divs) after his prediction.

If someone says "a share price will drop" they will always be right, if given a long enough timeline.  But, in the short term, it is very possible for them to be wrong (as is the case with Mabsark).

prancing_around
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 06, 2013, 03:38:25 PM
 #14709

Bitcoin price going through the roof has to be very good for AM, I'd wager that AM has more bitcoins than most of the other mining companies combined. In fact, AM is probably one of the largest holders of bitcoins worldwide.
Is there a rough figure for how many bitcoins AM has?
Elokane
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 817
Merit: 1000


Truth is a consensus among neurons www.synereo.com


View Profile WWW
November 06, 2013, 03:40:32 PM
 #14710

* I think that the only reason, why AM lost 10%+ of the network(which caused lower divs and then share price) is massive failure in Gen2 chip design which hit the whole mining industry, not just ASICminer (look at Cointerra, HashFast, BTCGARDEN, BFL and LabCoin)

Are you suggesting that there's a relation between these failures?

Synereo: liberating the Internet from abusive business models.

Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master.
<br>
binaryFate
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1003


Still wild and free


View Profile
November 06, 2013, 03:46:28 PM
 #14711

...
massive failure in Gen2 chip design which hit the whole mining industry, not just ASICminer (look at Cointerra, HashFast, BTCGARDEN, BFL and LabCoin)

* BFL didn't fail in the chip design, but in everything else
* LabCoin I believe never intended to design anything, so I'd call it a plain scam rather than a failure
* Cointerra, why do you think they failed?
* HashFast, BTCGARDEN: I didn't follow the stories that much. If anybody could summarize in two lines what's up with them... I thought HashFast at least seemed on track not long ago?

Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. 
This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
adara
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 102
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 06, 2013, 04:00:04 PM
 #14712

Wow, that was low div again, as expected.
Here you have a company with profits declining around 20% weekly.
Not a good management of its earlier success. Even with new announcements that rate of decline is a disaster.
finlof
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 06, 2013, 04:09:54 PM
 #14713

...
massive failure in Gen2 chip design which hit the whole mining industry, not just ASICminer (look at Cointerra, HashFast, BTCGARDEN, BFL and LabCoin)

* BFL didn't fail in the chip design, but in everything else
* LabCoin I believe never intended to design anything, so I'd call it a plain scam rather than a failure
* Cointerra, why do you think they failed?
* HashFast, BTCGARDEN: I didn't follow the stories that much. If anybody could summarize in two lines what's up with them... I thought HashFast at least seemed on track not long ago?

BFL did fail in the chip design.  thats what ended up taking so long to deliver.  they either werent able to produce a working chip or kept trying to make their chip meet the power specs they originally released.
bitcoin.newsfeed
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 06, 2013, 04:25:11 PM
 #14714

* I think that the only reason, why AM lost 10%+ of the network(which caused lower divs and then share price) is massive failure in Gen2 chip design which hit the whole mining industry, not just ASICminer (look at Cointerra, HashFast, BTCGARDEN, BFL and LabCoin)

Are you suggesting that there's a relation between these failures?

Could be, why not. We don't have official news, so it's worth thinking about. I think some of them are cooperating behind the curtains. Especially those in China. It may not be wrong at all. Friedcat said "We met with two other groups making 65/55nm in China interested in collaboration", also from BTCGARDEN FAQ site "We also had some contacts with them(AM) through either IM tools or in person". ...

BTCGARDEN fail : " our ASIC miner hardware is suffering a very big BUG,here it is"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=321928.msg3448394#msg3448394

In the same time AM Gen2 fail

& In the same time Cointerra *fired their whole R&D team
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=267552.msg3495875#msg3495875

I don't follow HashFast but i read somewhere that they have some 2months delays or what ... and no comment about Labcoin, i think they are also from China.

... Question Everything, Believe Nothing ...
dvdrewritable
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 13



View Profile
November 06, 2013, 04:32:31 PM
Last edit: November 07, 2013, 02:06:45 AM by dvdrewritable
 #14715

attached few cube photos



price show around as 1.68/1.78

▀ ▀▀ ▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀     I  D  Ξ  A  O  L  O  G  Y     ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄ ▄
SUPPORT BRIGHT IDEAS THROUGH CROWDFUNDING
Follow us on:  Facebook  |  Twitter  |  Telegram  |  Medium  |  Youtube
adara
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 102
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 06, 2013, 04:36:33 PM
 #14716

* I think that the only reason, why AM lost 10%+ of the network(which caused lower divs and then share price) is massive failure in Gen2 chip design which hit the whole mining industry, not just ASICminer (look at Cointerra, HashFast, BTCGARDEN, BFL and LabCoin)

Are you suggesting that there's a relation between these failures?

Could be, why not. We don't have official news, so it's worth thinking about. I think some of them are cooperating behind the curtains. Especially those in China. It may not be wrong at all. Friedcat said "We met with two other groups making 65/55nm in China interested in collaboration", also from BTCGARDEN FAQ site "We also had some contacts with them(AM) through either IM tools or in person". ...

BTCGARDEN fail : " our ASIC miner hardware is suffering a very big BUG,here it is"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=321928.msg3448394#msg3448394

In the same time AM Gen2 fail

& In the same time Cointerra *fired their whole R&D team
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=267552.msg3495875#msg3495875

I don't follow HashFast but i read somewhere that they have some 2months delays or what ... and no comment about Labcoin, i think they are also from China.

Seems like Bitfury is eating everybody's lunch at this point in time. No doubt it will be an interesting race to follow.
Bargraphics
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


Every man is guilty of all the good he did not do.


View Profile
November 06, 2013, 04:57:08 PM
 #14717

* I think that the only reason, why AM lost 10%+ of the network(which caused lower divs and then share price) is massive failure in Gen2 chip design which hit the whole mining industry, not just ASICminer (look at Cointerra, HashFast, BTCGARDEN, BFL and LabCoin)

Are you suggesting that there's a relation between these failures?

Could be, why not. We don't have official news, so it's worth thinking about. I think some of them are cooperating behind the curtains. Especially those in China. It may not be wrong at all. Friedcat said "We met with two other groups making 65/55nm in China interested in collaboration", also from BTCGARDEN FAQ site "We also had some contacts with them(AM) through either IM tools or in person". ...

BTCGARDEN fail : " our ASIC miner hardware is suffering a very big BUG,here it is"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=321928.msg3448394#msg3448394

In the same time AM Gen2 fail

& In the same time Cointerra *fired their whole R&D team
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=267552.msg3495875#msg3495875

I don't follow HashFast but i read somewhere that they have some 2months delays or what ... and no comment about Labcoin, i think they are also from China.

Seems like Bitfury is eating everybody's lunch at this point in time. No doubt it will be an interesting race to follow.
https://www.kncminer.com/news/news-63
Quote
Currently almost 70% of all Bitcoins mined today are being created upon KnCMiner hardware, distributed to customers in over 120 countries globally.
bitcoin.newsfeed
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 06, 2013, 04:58:02 PM
 #14718

Seems like Bitfury is eating everybody's lunch at this point in time. No doubt it will be an interesting race to follow.

Yes. And meanwhile they are developing their gen2 chip ... with massive influx of funds from 20%(official) of network and without responsibilities to any shareholder.

... Question Everything, Believe Nothing ...
aahzmundus
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500


Invest & Earn: https://cloudthink.io


View Profile
November 06, 2013, 05:22:05 PM
Last edit: November 06, 2013, 07:03:33 PM by aahzmundus
 #14719

Quote
Currently almost 70% of all Bitcoins mined today are being created upon KnCMiner hardware, distributed to customers in over 120 countries globally.

... Does KnC still plan to stop shipping sometime to let their customers get ROI?  If they hold to that, could be a interesting self imposed fall from the top for them.

Puppet
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1040


View Profile
November 06, 2013, 07:34:44 PM
 #14720

BTCGARDEN fail : " our ASIC miner hardware is suffering a very big BUG,here it is"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=321928.msg3448394#msg3448394

Sounds like a firmware issue to me, not a big deal. Its not like KnC didnt have those.

Quote
& In the same time Cointerra *fired their whole R&D team

Dont be silly. They are hiring for the next generation chip, 20/16nm.
Hiring: Lead Physical Design Engineer for Next Gen ASIC
..
Knowledge on latest technology node (FinFETs, 20nm, 16nm) is a plus

Pages: « 1 ... 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 [736] 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 ... 1348 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!