Evolyn
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 376
Merit: 312
Can you say... nighty-night?
|
 |
June 18, 2014, 09:34:04 AM |
|
I'm a bit confused. I was read the term 80/20 and franchising several times now. Will the container or 'tanks' just be sold or only sold for franchising?
|
this signature cant be bought
|
|
|
RoadStress
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007
|
 |
June 18, 2014, 02:49:22 PM |
|
They have a goal of 5 1.4mw containers and up to 10.
That would be 10-20ph worth of chips.
Also they somehow managed to get electricity costs all the way down to $0.02/kwh which is perfect for franchising. I'm hoping for at least 10-20ph.
20PH=0.35W/GH. How did you get this number? Has it been proven in a DataTank environment?
|
|
|
|
jimmothy
|
 |
June 18, 2014, 03:01:16 PM |
|
They have a goal of 5 1.4mw containers and up to 10.
That would be 10-20ph worth of chips.
Also they somehow managed to get electricity costs all the way down to $0.02/kwh which is perfect for franchising. I'm hoping for at least 10-20ph.
20PH=0.35W/GH. How did you get this number? Has it been proven in a DataTank environment? I misspoke it should be 1.2MW/container. 20PH at 12MW is 0.6w/gh and yes it has been tested.
|
|
|
|
CanaryInTheMine
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1060
between a rock and a block!
|
 |
June 18, 2014, 04:01:25 PM |
|
friedcat should seriously consider manufacturing the X24 boxes to counter bitmain. he can have an order of X24s going within days at a factory... waiting for other manufacturers only gives more time to AM competition to make and sell their wares
|
|
|
|
RoadStress
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007
|
 |
June 18, 2014, 05:24:36 PM |
|
They have a goal of 5 1.4mw containers and up to 10.
That would be 10-20ph worth of chips.
Also they somehow managed to get electricity costs all the way down to $0.02/kwh which is perfect for franchising. I'm hoping for at least 10-20ph.
20PH=0.35W/GH. How did you get this number? Has it been proven in a DataTank environment? I misspoke it should be 1.2MW/container. 20PH at 12MW is 0.6w/gh and yes it has been tested. Well that only means that you could fit 30PH which is 50% more hashrate using SP30 chips.
|
|
|
|
aahzmundus
|
 |
June 18, 2014, 11:50:38 PM |
|
Anyone have a good quick comparison chart of current mining ASIC's or fully assembled hardware on offer? I am curious to see how AM offers stand up. I know people like Jimmothy and Canary follow all that news far closer, where as I barely find time to keep up with this thread and reddit.
|
|
|
|
necro_nemesis
|
 |
June 19, 2014, 12:32:15 AM |
|
friedcat should seriously consider manufacturing the X24 boxes to counter bitmain. he can have an order of X24s going within days at a factory... waiting for other manufacturers only gives more time to AM competition to make and sell their wares Having full control over pricing product will allow them to compete with Bitmain's "spot price" approach. Bitmain has been successful through rapidly adjusting price to market conditions by providing a total solution. Although ASIC sales may mean greater initial margins it may not result in the volume at which profitability is optimized. The problem is you immediately compete with the companies you supply and those appear to be significant.
|
|
|
|
irritant
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 473
Merit: 250
Sodium hypochlorite, acetone, ethanol
|
 |
June 19, 2014, 01:02:40 AM |
|
Anyone have a good quick comparison chart of current mining ASIC's or fully assembled hardware on offer? I am curious to see how AM offers stand up. I know people like Jimmothy and Canary follow all that news far closer, where as I barely find time to keep up with this thread and reddit.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=456691.0 ?
|
|
|
|
aahzmundus
|
 |
June 19, 2014, 01:24:14 AM |
|
Definitely a step in the right direction to what I was looking for. I more care about j/GH and chip cost, but now I at least have a good page with links to relevant posts.
|
|
|
|
bitcoin.newsfeed
|
 |
June 19, 2014, 07:32:45 AM Last edit: June 19, 2014, 07:45:55 AM by bitcoin.newsfeed |
|
Where are dividends ? ? ?
price per Gh/s 0,49$ < minimum price tag production cost Gh/s 0,2$ < maximum possible price tag
April batch # of chips 850 000 ... sold for 4 165 000$ > REINVESTED (~2 082 500 chips) May batch # of chips 3 350 000(plan) ... sold for 16 415 000$ > REINVESTED (~8 207 500 chips) surplus of 1 507 500 chips or 3M$ June batch # of chips 6 700 000(plan) ... sold for 32 830 000$ > ? ? ?
Right now around minimum of 36 millions $ are somewhere
lets reserve capital for next July batch of lets say 7 000 000 chips , that's 14M maximum ... so there are 22M $ waiting to hit dividends this month, or ~0.1 BTC/share , there is absolutely no reason to withholding them for any longer.
How can someone think about august? There is no reason. Explain.
|
... Question Everything, Believe Nothing ...
|
|
|
RoadStress
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007
|
 |
June 19, 2014, 07:48:56 AM |
|
Where are dividends ? ? ? ..............
Right now around minimum of 36 millions $ are somewhere
You are assuming that all chips are sold which is simply wrong. It will take A LOT of time until all chips will sell.
|
|
|
|
bitsalame
Donator
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 714
Merit: 510
Preaching the gospel of Satoshi
|
 |
June 19, 2014, 09:36:45 AM |
|
Where are dividends ? ? ?
price per Gh/s 0,49$ < minimum price tag production cost Gh/s 0,2$ < maximum possible price tag
April batch # of chips 850 000 ... sold for 4 165 000$ > REINVESTED (~2 082 500 chips) May batch # of chips 3 350 000(plan) ... sold for 16 415 000$ > REINVESTED (~8 207 500 chips) surplus of 1 507 500 chips or 3M$ June batch # of chips 6 700 000(plan) ... sold for 32 830 000$ > ? ? ?
Right now around minimum of 36 millions $ are somewhere
lets reserve capital for next July batch of lets say 7 000 000 chips , that's 14M maximum ... so there are 22M $ waiting to hit dividends this month, or ~0.1 BTC/share , there is absolutely no reason to withholding them for any longer.
How can someone think about august? There is no reason. Explain.
Let them keep reinvesting until they can distribute 1 btc per share 
|
|
|
|
necro_nemesis
|
 |
June 19, 2014, 09:43:55 AM |
|
Where are dividends ? ? ? ..............
Right now around minimum of 36 millions $ are somewhere
You are assuming that all chips are sold which is simply wrong. It will take A LOT of time until all chips will sell. Your assuming they didn't sell or go into mining or franchising. Both are assumptions to be taken as merely that. Along that same vien Spoondoolies future chip specifications and availability are merely assumptions until they physically exist.
|
|
|
|
RoadStress
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007
|
 |
June 19, 2014, 09:51:57 AM |
|
Where are dividends ? ? ? ..............
Right now around minimum of 36 millions $ are somewhere
You are assuming that all chips are sold which is simply wrong. It will take A LOT of time until all chips will sell. Your assuming they didn't sell or go into mining or franchising. Both are assumptions to be taken as merely that. Along that same vien Spoondoolies future chip specifications and availability are merely assumptions until they physically exist. If they already sold 60PH worth of chips then you should get some dividends, but you aren't getting anything for the moment so that means that either FC re-invested all the money or that the chips didn't sell. It's easy.
|
|
|
|
Zubilica
|
 |
June 19, 2014, 10:03:07 AM |
|
ooo but they have the $ the only thing now is to buy BTC , it may take up to 6 months btw.
|
|
|
|
rudi
|
 |
June 19, 2014, 11:36:47 AM |
|
ooo but they have the $ the only thing now is to buy BTC , it may take up to 6 months btw.
Could you please elaborate?
|
|
|
|
ZephramC
|
 |
June 19, 2014, 01:13:25 PM |
|
Where are dividends ? ? ?
price per Gh/s 0,49$ < minimum price tag production cost Gh/s 0,2$ < maximum possible price tag
April batch # of chips 850 000 ... sold for 4 165 000$ > REINVESTED (~2 082 500 chips) May batch # of chips 3 350 000(plan) ... sold for 16 415 000$ > REINVESTED (~8 207 500 chips) surplus of 1 507 500 chips or 3M$ June batch # of chips 6 700 000(plan) ... sold for 32 830 000$ > ? ? ?
Right now around minimum of 36 millions $ are somewhere
lets reserve capital for next July batch of lets say 7 000 000 chips , that's 14M maximum ... so there are 22M $ waiting to hit dividends this month, or ~0.1 BTC/share , there is absolutely no reason to withholding them for any longer.
How can someone think about august? There is no reason. Explain.
Let them keep reinvesting until they can distribute 1 btc per share  Keep in mind that ability do not imply obligation.
|
|
|
|
arousedrhino
|
 |
June 19, 2014, 01:31:03 PM |
|
Where are dividends ? ? ?
price per Gh/s 0,49$ < minimum price tag production cost Gh/s 0,2$ < maximum possible price tag
April batch # of chips 850 000 ... sold for 4 165 000$ > REINVESTED (~2 082 500 chips) May batch # of chips 3 350 000(plan) ... sold for 16 415 000$ > REINVESTED (~8 207 500 chips) surplus of 1 507 500 chips or 3M$ June batch # of chips 6 700 000(plan) ... sold for 32 830 000$ > ? ? ?
Right now around minimum of 36 millions $ are somewhere
lets reserve capital for next July batch of lets say 7 000 000 chips , that's 14M maximum ... so there are 22M $ waiting to hit dividends this month, or ~0.1 BTC/share , there is absolutely no reason to withholding them for any longer.
How can someone think about august? There is no reason. Explain.
FC ran away with them! OMG hes right lets all panic! Why is August unreasonable? There are pains exchanging fiat to BTC in China so once there is positive cash flow there will be a delay to covert the fiat to BTC.
|
|
|
|
data
Member

Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
 |
June 19, 2014, 02:28:42 PM |
|
How about keeping a bit more cash reserve? Makes me nervous seeing that we were at close to zero with lots of stock. That's how you go broke although you don't need to? I am in for the long run here. Paying dividends necessarily weakens a company, because they could spent it on expansion, building their own datacenters or anything like that. I'd rather have a high rate of reinvestment, but then I don't have all the information.
|
|
|
|
spartan82
|
 |
June 19, 2014, 02:40:18 PM |
|
Why not just keep pumping the money back into the company and receive yearly dividends every Christmas? I'm all for it  keep the funds FC, make it a fatter payout at the end of the year for us lol
|
|
|
|
|