I installed my own bitcoin mining pool using unomp (ubuntu VM) and I now try to run cgminer to test GPU mining on it.
I use CGMiner 3.7.2 and I have a NVIDIA 1050 TI
Unsupported. Only the current version and bitcoin mining with ASICs is supported here. |
|
|
|
..Again, I'm only working remotely on them but they're quite different to anything I've worked with before.
Any idea why they are only releasing such unclear videos, pictures and details about the hardware? Or do you mean something else by the they're quite different to anything you've worked with before? No idea on the hardware side what's going on as I've said previously. What I mean is they're uniquely different in terms of what software support they need to work which makes it clear they're different to any other hardware. So from my perspective, it's pretty clear this is different hardware and not just faked, even if I'm only getting to work on them remotely for now. |
|
|
|
|
I'm now currently working on cleaning up the drivers for these devices. The code is the usual disaster area I've come to expect from in-house drivers but hopefully by the time you see the code it won't be so bad. Again, I'm only working remotely on them but they're quite different to anything I've worked with before.
|
|
|
|
... stolen several accounts. See if any of you are there.
...
Wha dafuq are you on about? What am I talking about? That such people are stopped. And those who are affected by it, remember it early. I noticed that my miner software no longer displayed my BTC address. What you are saying is that you foolishly ran mining hardware from those bitmain fucking morons that turns on open write access to the API for the entire world and someone just logged into it and changed your mining address. This has nothing to do with this pool though. |
|
|
|
I'm getting the following error message for MRR. Is there anything I can do about it?
One or more workers on this rig has been assigned a share/worker difficulty by your pool that is too low. Hashrate performance issues may occur.
The OPTIMAL Difficulty range for this rig is 18,626 - 112k
Please either adjust your worker settings at your pool, or change pools if you are unable to do this at your current pool. Thanks!
It will adjust so shouldn't be a problem. If it's a problem, connect to port 4334 instead. Thanks for your help CK. I changed the port to 4334 and removed the worker extension. The owner of the rig is saying "diff shows 1MEG on the miner. It will never return any hash at that diff. Diff should be about 12k." Doesn't matter. Leave it there and it will adjust down as soon as 3 shares have been submitted. |
|
|
|
I'm getting the following error message for MRR. Is there anything I can do about it?
One or more workers on this rig has been assigned a share/worker difficulty by your pool that is too low. Hashrate performance issues may occur.
The OPTIMAL Difficulty range for this rig is 18,626 - 112k
Please either adjust your worker settings at your pool, or change pools if you are unable to do this at your current pool. Thanks!
It will adjust so shouldn't be a problem. If it's a problem, connect to port 4334 instead. |
|
|
|
Seems like that's already been said 5,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 times in this thread.  Here's hoping that number isn't also a prediction for future difficulty. |
|
|
|
My address is under the "payouts" section, no payout: "14KWusF6jjxCaEi1e2fF2pv4AUFybo6RMe": 0.00395418
Right, it means when we find a block, that's how much you will get as a payout. Oh. So after a cycle? Wait for the second one found for a payout to happen? Was chipping away before the last block came. You weren't in the payouts list at the time the block came. Here are the full block details for the last found block: http://ckpool.org/blocks/507708.confirmedYou'll see you're in the postponed list with this much herp: "14KWusF6jjxCaEi1e2fF2pv4AUFybo6RMe": 1084910365.24, You hadn't mined enough prior to that block find. |
|
|
|
My address is under the "payouts" section, no payout: "14KWusF6jjxCaEi1e2fF2pv4AUFybo6RMe": 0.00395418
Right, it means when we find a block, that's how much you will get as a payout. |
|
|
|
Over month since last block find. Hope someone find one soon.
Say I mine to btc address 1 then move to new btc address it not matter about shares on old address? has no bearing on chance?
Makes no difference here. Feel free to change to a different address, even a native segwit address  |
|
|
|
As I have done on the solo pool, I will be restarting this pool within the next hour to bring native segwit address AKA bech32 support.
Restart completed uneventfully. This pool now supports bech32 addresses. These are currently available on only electrum wallet by default, but the next version of bitcoin core due out, 0.16.0, will be able to natively support them. These are native segwit addresses that start with bc1 instead of 1x or 3x (eg bc1qw508d6qejxtdg4y5r3zarvary0c5xw7kv8f3t4), and the advantage of native segwit addresses is they take up less blockchain space making transactions that use them slightly smaller and thereby having a very slight decrease in transaction fee. For more information, see: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0173.mediawiki |
|
|
|
I'm planning to restart the pool within the next hour for pool and bitcoind updates to make it compatible with native segwit (bech32 addresses starting with bc1). As always, assuming all goes well there should be only minimal downtime.
Restart completed uneventfully. This pool now supports bech32 addresses. These are currently available on only electrum wallet by default, but the next version of bitcoin core due out, 0.16.0, will be able to natively support them. These are native segwit addresses that start with bc1 instead of 1x or 3x (eg bc1qw508d6qejxtdg4y5r3zarvary0c5xw7kv8f3t4), and the advantage of native segwit addresses is they take up less blockchain space making transactions that use them slightly smaller and thereby having a very slight decrease in transaction fee. For more information, see: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0173.mediawiki |
|
|
|
Does it help if I say these are real? I can't speak for their production targets times costs etc. but they do hash uniquely different and I've helped work with them remotely.
U mean remote connection through a computer or have u physically operated one? I said remote. |
|
|
|
|
Does it help if I say these are real? I can't speak for their production targets times costs etc. but they do hash uniquely different and I've helped work with them remotely.
|
|
|
|
Just added 9T. Going to stick around for a month or two and see how it goes.
Welcome aboard, one needs to be very patient to mine here for the time being. |
|
|
|
@ck
I have some dust (low value derp) mined under an old address that I don't plan on reusing.
Is there any way for miners to donate that to the pool?
Signed message maybe?
Thanks for the offer. Don't worry about it, if it's below dust threshold it will just go away with time and isn't worth worrying about. Now if only our hashrate was higher so that the "with time" happened faster. |
|
|
|
ok, im going to ask a stupid question... i was looking at how payouts work and i dont understand something, im probably seeing it wrong or im just not as knowledgeable as the rest of you guys are but it says that the top 100 miners plus an additional 50 get paid out when a block is found
"Each time a block is solved, the top 100 miners will receive a payout while 50 of the remaining smaller miners will receive a payout. Rewards will alternate between the smaller miners according to who has waited the longest for a payout. Rewards accumulate from blocks worked on even if miners are not scheduled for a payout with that block."
looking at the active miners list on the new website i am sitting at around the high 30's out of top 100 and i have 2 postponed so far and im not currently on the current payout list. did i miss something or am i overlooking something?
You are in the top 100 currently active miners. The top 100 share contributors in the last 10 trillion shares are the the ones that get paid. Over time you will eventually contribute a proportionate number of shares. am I wrong in saying that, 1MEo4aCnSbKA5FaBSVCEPQQYpxRr9MZ4be, going to get around 0.00214289 BTC if a block is found in the near future? Not on the next block unless you accumulate a lot more shares before the block is found (and then you'll earn more than the .002). You'll see you're not on the pool work payouts list, only in the active miners. However that amount will be credited towards whichever block you do end up getting into the work. |
|
|
|
ok, im going to ask a stupid question... i was looking at how payouts work and i dont understand something, im probably seeing it wrong or im just not as knowledgeable as the rest of you guys are but it says that the top 100 miners plus an additional 50 get paid out when a block is found
"Each time a block is solved, the top 100 miners will receive a payout while 50 of the remaining smaller miners will receive a payout. Rewards will alternate between the smaller miners according to who has waited the longest for a payout. Rewards accumulate from blocks worked on even if miners are not scheduled for a payout with that block."
looking at the active miners list on the new website i am sitting at around the high 30's out of top 100 and i have 2 postponed so far and im not currently on the current payout list. did i miss something or am i overlooking something?
You are in the top 100 currently active miners. The top 100 share contributors in the last 10 trillion shares are the the ones that get paid. Over time you will eventually contribute a proportionate number of shares. |
|
|
|
The next block is around the corner !!! The last block found is more than a month already. Does this means that based on stats, ck solo should find a block soon? or it all depends on each personal hashrate.
No, only each personal hashrate matters. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
