I think you are already good to go. You got 3 Merits for your starting post, and the forum is all shouting about Merits these days. I'm sure you have already heard and read about the system (Merit System) so I won't go to that side. All I want to say here is what you have been doing is what all of us do when we start something new. No Legendary member of this forum have had the same experience or rank from the day they got into this crypto train, but they all earned them with the time. So just keep asking reasonable questions, and you will surely learn the things you need to in no time.

P.S: Welcome to the forum.

I'll be totally honest with you, what you posted is totally unnecessary, and if you are doubtful let me clear you, you won't get Merits just for starting new threads, but there should be something for the community in it. No posts repeating the same, usual and clear-to-all concepts are liked by anyone. Try to find a discussion where you know you can add something which has not been added yet, and give it your best shot. That is the only way you can earn Merits.
Take the advice, do what I said.

P.S: We already know everything about the system, all of us.

Exchanging Merits. Possible alt accounts. Their way of typing, and most of their posts in the Altcoin section, along with the fact of Meriting each others shit posts definitely indicate that either the accounts are being operated by the same person, or they have discussed to exchange Merits. In both ways, I believe they are abusing the system.

Accounts:
1. Miloudi0912 - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=542524
    Merit summary: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=542524

2. mekky1990 - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1301162
    Merit summary: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1301162

Nothing to say. Never thought it would drop to this point so quick, but as it has always been tagged to be "unpredictable" so yeah, that is what unpredictability is. I personally have exchanged some of my coins to USDT while the price was dropping, thinking that I will buy back when it starts growing again. Now that would save me from more loss if the price drops, and I can get profits too if I buy when it starts to grow. So you can try the same if you want. Don't just cash them out, but exchange them to a currency which is stable and buy back when you think the time is right.

"Check my account if you* desire to Merit my posts."
That is just a correction. Anyway, I think he can see your trust rating without having to open your account, and I doubt anyone would waste their Merits on someone who has negative feedback as it has no point to even rank up if you are not trustworthy. You have the same value, which is "no value", if you either have a negative trust being a Legendary member, or having a neutral trust being a Brand new.

Keep your Bitcoins to yourself, and you have your liberty. No government can charge/is charging a person for just keeping Bitcoins to a wallet, or trading them on an exchange online, but you get to their territory when you reach out to a bank account to get your cash earned through Bitcoins, and that is where you are charged. So basically the taxation might not be for Bitcoin in most countries, but it is for the money you are receiving in your bank accounts which you can't hide from authorities. You can also not say your account number was stolen by someone and they sent the money yeah I know that was a bad joke, sorry.

On what calculation bases have you come up with just two options? And why these two? I don't really know if the trend will continue for very long or it will end again soon, but I also don't think someone can predict a certain point of value where it will stop. It can go down to $2k, or rise up again to the same level where it stayed for a while, around $13-$14k. But I really want to know if there are any calculations or speculations you have considered before reaching to this conclusion.

Okay. So why don't you send me 0.1 BTC which I will place on the team you mentioned, and we will split the profit as it is a guaranteed win-win for us if the match is fixed. 

No matter how down the fees get, paying 5sat/B is still not recommended if you want your transaction to get confirmed earlier. Miners don't include transactions with micro fees to their blocks and it causes the transactions to get stuck for a very long time. I think it is better to pay the recommended fees than paying a accelerator service to push the transaction. Anyway, you should try https://pushtx.btc.com/ or http://confirmtx.com/. Maybe one of them can do the work for you.

Wait, isn't that a referral link you are sharing in your post?   It doesn't make any sense. The banner says "No Referral Required" and the thread shares a referral link (it should not look like that if it isn't a referral link).
By the way, why are you sharing it here if you could yourself earn $10 a day for just 20 to 30 minutes of work?   Since when did you become so kind to others?  

Hi.
I'm giving it a try.

Post 1:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2825620.msg28967524#msg28967524
Post 2:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2822349.msg29032142#msg29032142
Post 3:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2842261.msg29153561#msg29153561
Post 4:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2851361.msg29262421#msg29262421

That was sweet!  Thanks man. And of course, I'm always trying to be better when it comes on contributing to discussions. Hopefully I can keep it up and keep getting attention from my Seniors like you. 

The title Probably doesn't say it is a signature campaign, nor I can find any signatures in here, but it can't be some other campaign if it pays for posting. A lot of confusions here.
A campaign with nothing else then a joining form and a spreadsheet. No specific rates, no rules, not even a proper manager. And the most surprising think I guess is that it says you can join even if you are in a signature campaign already.
OP obviously needs to clear a lot of things here, or the only place this campaign belongs to is the trash folder of this forum.

Edit: Just found OP offering Member signatures for 0.005 BTC ($49+) Here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2851074.0 
Isn't that insane? 

Well, I believe the ones finding it difficult to be constructive enough to get Merits will find the system negative. Others are taking it as a positive feature for the betterment of this forum.

The idea is good. I would love to take the challenge, but can we reduce the posts required? I mean 40 posts a week is quite a challenge itself, and that might generate some spam from users trying to be up for the challenge and not being able to make them constructive. You will probably reject them but the forum cannot reject the posts made by them. So I think it would be a better idea to reduce the posts requirement for your challenge. If you do that, I'm taking the challenge, but If not, then I let others to take the chance.

I don't think this thread belongs to this section. I'm not sure to where it should be moved though.

And, if it was possible to pay very small fees for a transaction and then use a free accelerator to get your transaction through then I guess no one would have been concerned about the increment of transaction fees of Bitcoin.

Its not about English, nor about ranks, but about the contribution a post adds to a discussion/thread. It won't be unfair for the ones who can find at least one valid reason to post something which is what the forum lacks now a days and that is why the system has been implemented. Have as many accounts as you like, but none of them would be of work if you can't compel the users to reward you with Merits for your posts.
By the way, posting twice in a row is against forum rules. You did it just now.

P.S: You got a Merit by someone, which you asked for in your post, indirectly. No offense. 

You can't, if you don't even know what their function is, or even what their name is. 
Read the OP properly before posting anything.

Hi.
These 2 users are also exchanging Merits for their posts in the same topic. I'm not very sure if they have discussed it before, but I have a doubt, because they have agreed to the same point while giving Merits to each other for it. Well, though it can be mutual thinking, but, I have also checked the other Extra Merit Points they got, and I thought they are not genuinely earned Points, atleast not all of them. You should have a look.

Here are the links to their profile and screenshots to their Merit summary:
User 1: Adioliver
Merit summary: https://imgur.com/8VxXYQz

User 2: Sasuke102001
Merit summary: https://imgur.com/tuWvM7M

I'm definitely happy with the new system. By close observations, a person can clearly see that the majority of the people on this forum don't even know what a quality post is. Most of them think "more characters = higher post quality", and just because of this false assumption they start making much more longer and way more useless posts to make them look like quality posts, while the quality of a post has nothing to do with its quantity of length.
Merit system can be (if not used with partiality) a permanent full stop for all those accounts created for nothing else but joining Signature Campaigns. And that thus leads to less spam, IMO.


People creating duplicate or useless threads in order to get Merits would not get any, because that is why this system is implemented. If the duplicate or spam threads start to get Merits then there is no use of the system as there is no restriction for anyone from any rank on creating threads.


Hopefully in future the campaigns will require Extra Merit Points (Beside the ones already given for each rank on implementation of the system) to join along with the rank. And if that happens, there will be no use of Meriting well-known signature campaign managers to get into their campaigns if you yourself have none.
About newbies and jr. members with high quality posts; you can already find them having Merits. My profile is an example of that. So yes, we can rank up if we deserve to, and if we don't, we won't.