It's far more likely the bloated grifter is looking for low effort ways to line his pockets. He's probably going to charge people in order to utilise his "seal of approval" and remain part of his sad little cult. He knows his time is running out, so he has to milk you gullible schmucks for every penny while he still can. Enjoy your fanboyism while it lasts. Why are so many of you against the American dream? Isn't lining our pockets on the minds of many of us? So, you pick on Trump because he is wealthy, because he got down to business and did the American dream and made money. The American dream isn't about stealing money from others. Rather, it's about using ingenuity to make money and grow your personal empire... if you can... and helping others as Trump has been doing - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5269905.msg55119252#msg55119252. So, Trump uses the American dream in good and right ways, but you want to make money by stealing it from him... and from all of us who are in business. Is it that you are too dumb to figure how to make money in business?, that you have to pick on Trump because he made money, and hope to get a little money off of picking on him? That's called stealing.
|
|
|
Half the reason for all the 'trans' people is, they want to be able to do something that people of the other gender do. The danger of this is that you can't really do a good job of making people into the other gender. People really need to sit down and simply accept their gender position in life.
|
|
|
If you want Democracy to be worth anything, make it so that all laws enacted or repealed by government have to be approved by a 66% majority of the people to be affected. Of course most laws get approval of more than 80% but the challenge is the implementation of those laws when someone contravenes it and the worse is if it is violated by a politician, politician family or popular people. The laws are only implemented against the masses who don't have any influence or someone to call upon. In some countries or most of the countries, there are three arms of government especially in democratic government namely, the executive, legisture and judiciary. So in this case it is the executive that will implement and enforce the laws made by the legislature and the judiciary will interpret it. So the executive if corrupt will not enforce the law against themselves or other politicians that are their friends or popular person in the society despite that the law has the legitimacy of the people 100% but what you get is selected justice. Let me get this straight. Some African government makes a law. The law takes effect because 80% of the voting people voted an approval for it? If Africa does it like this, they have a way better form of government than the United States. In the US, all the President has to do is sign something into law, and it is law. The people never vote on it... and certainly not 80% of the people. Sure, they may vote him out of office at the end of his term, or if the law is really bad, they might impeach him. But the law still is a law, even after he is out of office or impeached. Even if Congress makes it a law that the President can make all the laws that he wants, when did the people get to vote 80% on THAT Congressional law? If Africa has this kind of law making, where the people have to vote a big majority before it becomes law, what's the problem? A potential law takes a few weeks to vote on. So, if it isn't voted on, it's not a law. If a government authority acts like it is a law when it hasn't been voted on, he is acting criminally, and should be executed, or at least jailed. African nations don't need a bunch of stinkin' laws. All that laws do is inhibit the rights of the people. Why? Because the law makers figure out how to use the laws that way. If Africa is having trouble with Democracy, it's because the Democracy doesn't have the people voting the laws in. Tyrants in government use the idea of a Democracy to make the people think that they have control of their government, when they really don't.
|
|
|
Actually, way back in 1980 or 1981, one of the science magazines had a cover with silent propellers for big passenger jets. The propellers were pushers, at the rear of the wing engines. They had kinda twisted blades (like drill bits, sorta) that fanned out behind the main part of the propeller itself. They produced as much thrust as jet engines, even though they only turned at 900 rpm. I haven't been able to find the magazine that had a jet on its cover, with the propellers on the trailing part of the wing. But look here for a bunch of kinda humorous pictures of science mag covers of the past - https://duckduckgo.com/?q=science+and+mechanics+magazine+1981&iax=images&ia=images. "Quiet" Thrusters For 'Flying Cars' Comes Out Of Stealth Development https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/quiet-thrusters-flying-cars-comes-out-stealth-developmentThe new eVTOL has thruster technology developed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration via a multi-million dollar grant from Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. Applied eVTOL Concepts revealed the "Epiphany Transporter" last week, described as a "new mode of personal mobility." The company released specs on the new aircraft, indicating it's capable of 160 mph with a 300-plus mile range but generates less than 55 decibels of noise at 50 feet. "The Epiphany Transporter can accommodate two people, their luggage, plus golf clubs! Intended to be simple and safe to operate, and about the size of a Tesla Model 'S' automobile, it fits into a standard one-car garage with its thrusters folded up, Applied eVTOL Concepts said. ...
|
|
|
1776: Make America Great Britain again Make America Great Again?
|
|
|
Hulda Clark showed us years and years ago that cancer is caused by tiny bugs. Bugs, not viruses. And that the bugs are much smaller than the standard microscopes can see. These bugs are essentially parasites. So, it's not surprising that ivermectin and fenbendazole (anti-parasitic drugs) can cure cancer. My man, that does not make any sense at all. Parasites are supposed to be living organisms made of one of multiple cells. Nowadays we have the technology of electronic beam microscopes which are able to make us see things as small as a single unit of a virus, which are smaller than a cell. There are even machines which have allowed scientists to observe collection of molecules and atoms. Also, I just made a quick research and I found out Hulda Clark actually died from cancer, Do you think would be appropriate to take such sensitive advise from someone who made such claims and yet was not even able to cure herself? Honestly, I wished such serious disease was so easy to prevent and cure, though some pills of ivermectin, but it is not the case. There are inventions galore that are not brought out into the open. And unless you have free reign to use an electron microscope as much as you want, why would you believe what the medical tells you?... considering the millions that have died worldwide from the covid vaxx - 2,508,656
REPORTS OF VACCINE ADVERSE EVENTS IN VAERS
35,821 COVID Vaccine Reported Deaths / 45,815 Total Reported Deaths
207,715 Total COVID Vaccine Reported Hospitalizations/294,389 Total Reported Hospitalizations
1,582,310 COVID Vaccine Adverse Event Reports Through August 4, 2023
Less than 1% of the covid adverse events have been reported What is underreporting and why it matters? Basically less than 1% of covid vaxx adverse events - https://openvaers.com/covid-data. The point being, why would anybody believe anything the medical says? If they happen to cure something, they could have done it far easier and cheaper some other way. And regarding microscopes, the Microsphere Nanoscope has been around for years, and it sees everything the electron microscope does, but living and in color. Why doesn't the medical talk about it? Sounds to me like the medical is the thing that is keeping us sick, and that cures are a whole lot easier than the medical makes them out to be.
|
|
|
There was something blue they didn't want to burn. Why, the deep blue sea, of course. There are some good talks and speculations about Maui going on at Freedom's Phoenix - http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/ - over the last couple of days. Some of them aren't on their front page any more.
|
|
|
If you want Democracy to be worth anything, make it so that all laws enacted or repealed by government have to be approved by a 66% majority of the people to be affected.
|
|
|
The point of this? Trump is arming his supporters with a method for them to keep from supporting his enemies by accident. This should help his people rally around him, so that he will be able to draw on their support for whatever he needs, even in the indictments. President Trump Monkey Flips Worthless and Vindictive GOPe with His New Policy - And It’s Glorious https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/president-trump-monkey-flips-worthless-vindictive-gope-his/Conservative Treehouse reported: The RNC has been covertly hostile, but you will now see them become openly hostile. President Trump knows this, and his next move is brilliant. President Trump has created an "official seal of approval" which must accompany any campaign endorsement, donor request or ancillary aspect implying Trump support. This is directly done to counteract the ability of the RNC to exploit Trump's affiliation and essentially hostage status. In essence, the RNC cannot exploit the MAGA brand for RNC/MAGA endorsement, and or use the donor data files, without the Trump "seal of approval." The data becomes worthless, because without the Trump seal any request is ignored. Additionally, without the seal any RNC candidate is ignored. This creates leverage. This is how the insurgency forces the compliance of the GOPe. At least that appears to be the goal from Donald Trump. If the RNC, or any vendor or candidate they have sold the files to, including any candidate who runs but does not align with Trump, attempts to exploit the files without the Trump seal of approval, the fracture between Trump and the RNC becomes openly visible. ...
|
|
|
While people are continually dying from the covid shots in the US and Europe, here's a country that used Ivermectin instead... and it's a third world country. Maybe the US and third world countries are starting to change places. Most Intensive Ivermectin Use Had 74% Reduction In Excess Deaths In Peru: New Study https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/most-intensive-ivermectin-use-had-74-percent-reduction-excess-deaths-peru-new-studyThe paper's results, published August 8 in Cureus, found a 74 percent reduction in excess deaths in 10 states with the most intensive ivermectin use over a 30-day period following peak deaths during the pandemic. When analyzing data across 25 states in Peru, researchers found these reductions in excess deaths correlated closely to ivermectin use during four months in 2020. When ivermectin was available without restriction, there was a fourteenfold reduction in nationwide excess deaths. Once access to ivermectin was restricted by the government, a thirteenfold increase in excess deaths was observed in the two months following the limitation of its use. The findings align with summary data from the World Health Organization for the same time period in Peru. Ivermectin is a widely-known and inexpensive treatment against parasitic diseases. Scientists believe the drug can also bind to the spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, limiting its morbidity and infectivity. ...
|
|
|
Trump is having his troubles, as we all know. But tables are starting to turn against Biden... and this time from his own son's lawyers. Hunter Biden's Lawyers Threatened To Put President Biden On Witness Stand https://www.dailywire.com/news/hunter-bidens-lawyers-threatened-to-put-president-biden-on-witness-stand-if-hunter-was-charged-by-doj-reportChris Clark, a lawyer for Hunter Biden, threatened the U.S. attorney investigating his client that if his client was charged in the case, the defense would call President Joe Biden to testify, thus creating a constitutional crisis by pitting the president against his own Department of Justice, POLITICO reported. The warning came after information had leaked to the news media that federal prosecutors believed they had enough information to charge Hunter Biden for illegally purchasing a firearm despite being a drug addict. "President Biden now unquestionably would be a fact witness for the defense in any criminal trial," Clark said in a lengthy letter to prosecutors, later adding: "This of all cases justifies neither the spectacle of a sitting President testifying at a criminal trial nor the potential for a resulting Constitutional crisis." ...
|
|
|
I think the cause is lack of savings. without savings man can do nothing. if you are that can of person that doesn't save, you will work in particular place for 100years without nothing to show fort .
It's 3 things: 1. Lack of wisdom in using the funds one has; 2. Income tax; 3. Inflation. If we didn't have the Federal Reserve Bank, but instead let the US Treasury handle the money, inflation would be almost 0%... and we wouldn't need the IRS. The amount of money the IRS collects is the amount of repayment of the money and interest that the US borrows from the Fed. It determines how much the government can borrow. If we didn't have the Fed, the US creating money would be in the hands of the US Treasury, and the people would recall or sue government officials when they created too much money.
|
|
|
~
And your alternative is? Ukraine giving Putin whatever he wants? How suspiciously convenient.
~
Lol. You haven't really noticed, have you. It's more like stopping Putin from taking whatever he wants. If Putin wasn't such a nice guy, he'd have steamrollered right over Ukraine long ago. If Ukraine didn't have the help of the US and Nato - because THEY want Ukraine - the war would have been over in a month. Big Brave Western Proxy Warriors Keep Whining That Ukrainian Troops Are Cowards https://www.caitlinjohnst.one/p/big-brave-western-proxy-warriorsReporting that Ukrainian efforts to retake Russia-occupied territory have been "bogged down in dense Russian minefields under constant fire from artillery and helicopter gunships," The New York Times reports that Ukrainian forces have switched tactics to using "artillery and long-range missiles instead of plunging into minefields under fire." Then the article gets really freaky: "American officials are worried that Ukraine's adjustments will race through precious ammunition supplies, which could benefit President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia and disadvantage Ukraine in a war of attrition. But Ukrainian commanders decided the pivot reduced casualties and preserved their frontline fighting force. "American officials say they fear that Ukraine has become casualty averse, one reason it has been cautious about pressing ahead with the counteroffensive. Almost any big push against dug-in Russian defenders protected by minefields would result in huge numbers of losses." ...
|
|
|
Satoshi = AI.
|
|
|
People would be shocked and surprised.
If they knew what was written in the bible.
And if they understood that it is the truth, they'd feel guiltier than all get out. Then many of them might look to Jesus for salvation. As it is, even the best of Christians mostly don't really know what is written in all the Bible.
|
|
|
Russia is having successes some of the time, and Ukraine is having successes some of the time. Looking at an individual success by either of them doesn't tell you much of what is going on throughout the whole war. "I'll Be Blunt, It's Failed," Says Congressional Ukraine Caucus Co-Chair On Offensive https://www.zerohedge.com/political/top-ukraine-caucus-congressman-counteroffensive-ill-be-blunt-its-failedRep. Andy Harris (R-MD), a co-chair of the congressional Ukraine Caucus, said this week that he's not sure if the Ukraine war is "winnable" and called for the US to pressure Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to pursue peace talks. Harris is also a member of the Freedom Caucus, which has many members who have opposed US support for Ukraine. But Harris has been a staunch supporter of the proxy war against Russia throughout the conflict. "Is this more a stalemate? Should we be realistic about it? I think we probably should," Harris said at a town hall on Tuesday night, according to POLITICO. Discussing the Ukrainian counteroffensive, Harris said, "I'll be blunt, it's failed." ...
|
|
|
It looks like he’s now sending United States reserve troops to Europe to assist in this war. I wonder if they’re going to be able to keep the media from using term like World War 3 in the upcoming United States Presidential election… Like with the definition of women and recession, I think the definition of world war is about to become a moving target.
It would be fair that there is a difference between sending soldiers to counter-attack the Russian army and sending military advisors and aid personel to improve the efficiency or the Ukranian troops. I hope you are wrong though, because what I would have expected by now was a way to stop the conflict, instead of escalating it further into a global confrontation. On your point about censorship, it is very likely media will try not to talk about further developments on the war until there are some important advances by Ukraine to push Russia further closer to their border. In the mean time, the prime time is about presidential candidates and their public appareances. Note that, even though the world might not yet view the lands that Russia has taken from Ukraine to be Russian land, it essentially is Russian land... because they took it. Probably in the near future the world will have to accept the new borders that Russia is carving out for itself. The Russia/Ukraine border is in turmoil, ever changing, daily. Note, also, that the possibly hundreds of years of turmoil between Russia and Ukraine, is making every offensive on both sides into a counter-offensive. Kinda like the Hatfields and McCoys in the US, but longer.
|
|
|
|