Sorry I am not going to teach you economics.
No prob. Didn't mean to interrupt your batshit delirium. Continue ranting pl0x. The delirium is yours. It is senseless for me to argue with an indoctrinated Communist. |
|
|
|
Did I say CfB is a thief? What did I write in the one sentence about CfB? You elided the quote to which that one sentence is referring to.
Do you wish to make any statement about the theory I posited that made no specific allegation against CfB?
I thought you implied that I was a thief. Looks like you know about http://www.gov.ph/2012/09/12/republic-act-no-10175/ and are smarter than I expected. Ok, for now the only crime I see is racism, but it's not that important to me, the Internet is full of racist posts. You have a lot to learn about the Philippines legal system that a quick Google search won't inform you.  Positing a theory about culture, has nothing do with race. If you are too dumb to understand the difference between culture and race, and theory and accusation, then I don't think there isn't an Iota of hope for ya. |
|
|
|
|
Sorry I am not going to teach you economics.
|
|
|
|
Did I say CfB is a thief? What did I write in the one sentence about CfB? You elided the quote to which that one sentence is referring to. Do you wish to make any statement about the theory I posited that made no specific allegation against CfB? You mean "that Communism is a philosophy of stealing from each other"? Yes, although it devolves to a Totalitarian state, but the underlying delusion is that less productive can steal from the more productive so that labor is not cheated of its fair share, or more saliently that production is a zero-sum game instead of an expanding pie. |
|
|
|
Goodbye asshats.
And as always you have a need to cowardly insult your opponents in discussions. Blahblahblah. Wasting more of my time. |
|
|
|
Did I say CfB is a thief? What did I write in the one sentence about CfB? You elided the quote to which that one sentence is referring to. Do you wish to make any statement about the theory I posited that made no specific allegation against CfB? |
|
|
|
Why do you think it won't work? What chops are needed? You said nothing but 'I know...'. I answered you already as quoted above, but you are obviously blind or simply a disingenuous asshat. |
|
|
|
Unfortunately the person who wrote that doesn't have the knowledge to understand. Let me explain. I'd prefer to have no securities regulation law. In order to not end up with such laws, then we must be able to police our own community. If we can't do that, the public will demand laws. Laws exist because of a power vacuum. That means that the collective is powerless to stop the hurtful activity, thus someone must step into the vacuum and take control. Thus voila! Government. Laws. We do it to ourselves because we have criminal mindsets amongst us who prefer to hurt others to get what they want, than to help others to get what they want. You mean to say people from US are enlightened with the wisdom, the rest of the world are dumb? Read his post again. That is not what I wrote. Try again to understand the point about power vacuums. As to the point about useless laws or conflating law with morality, I will share with you a debate I am having with another Communist criminal mind: Come on now boys. If you are so sure this is not a scam, then make your sworn disclosures about your involvement in it. Are you afraid of future SEC and FinCEN actions and thus afraid to disclosure. Hmmm.
Stop obfuscating with off topic diversionary tactics.
I am trying to rescue you idiots. But you are determined to dig own pathway to jail.
Wake up and see the light pronto for your own sake.
Thank you for your interest, if genuine. However, to quote Hillary Clinton (since you mentioned the Clintons a lot in some of your posts): "It’s a stark fact that the United States has less than five percent of the world’s population, yet we have almost 25 percent of the world’s total prison population."I'm in the 95%+ of the global population (=non US citizen). I'm also unaffected by the prison-mania of the USA, FinCEN, SEC etc. Not that if I were affected I would have something to worry about. Come-from-Beyond (who is in Belarus) make a similar line of argument to me. It seems to me that those who grew up in these (former?) Communist states developed a culture of theft, because that was the only way to game the totalitarian system. We all know that Communism is a philosophy of stealing from each other. And now they blame that on the Americans who worked more diligently and with attention to quality and pride in one's work, than any other nation except perhaps Japan. Globalist leaders insinuate it is okay for your to steal to take back from the evil Americans who took more than their fair share. They urge you to continue the Communist paradigm of ganging up on your neighbor. I call on American software developers to take the high ground and show the world our cultural heritage and values. Let's teach these Eastern Europeans why America kicks ass with productivity and trying to do the right thing. Now I will surely agree with you that so many Americans have become dysfunctional Socialists and are milking the reserve currency status. And I will agree with you that American leaders have abused other nations, and in fact Antony Sutton researched and concluded that the banksters from America and Europe installed the Bolshevik revolution. I haven't studied your history enough, so I don't want to make any claim. I will just try to urge you to please lose that Communist attitude and please work to make the world a better place. We need to not end up in an unethical clusterfuck Dark Age. And take back your right to own a gun because without that, you are nothing against totalitarianism. The USA is fucked up and it will need to break up into separate regions where those who have shared values can congregate. There are big changes coming to world accelerating as of 2018. I urge you to look past the tip of your nose and be part of the better future. Let's go make it. I am 51. My time to be highly productive at the top level has peaked; and I am on the tail end of my career. You are young. You make this world. Please think about what you are doing. Edit: and Evan is an American and thus all the more I demand he not insult the reputation of American developers by operating perhaps the most scammy altcoin by market cap (although some might argue that is Ripple).
As I warned you, the countries will be pushed towards cooperating against financial crime: http://www.theguardian.com/news/2016/apr/03/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-panama-papersThe globalists are destroying the nation-states on purpose and inciting the masses to clamor for a global discipline on malfeasance. I've known for a long time this would be coming. One thing you will learn about me by observing me over time is my ability to predict the future. For example was my 2011 prediction that the nations would not exit the EU and instead would double-down for more sloppy seconds. For a person with such a breadth of understanding regarding global expansion of totalitarianism, why would you insist on others publicly disclosing stuff like their cryptoholdings, when, tomorrow for example, crypto could be illegal and all such posts might be admissions of possession and thus grounds for confiscation? Cripes man, did this point completely fly over your head that you are the one who is demanding that everyone disclose everything so we can count and prove all the victims. I am arguing it should be sufficient to just declare Evan a sleazy scammer who rips off people by designing a scam to control the float and manipulate the price and volume, as well printing press coins out of thin air masternode scheme, handing them to insiders, and dumping them on the market. Could I ask that you please don't waste my entire day on this redundant shit. Do you even have any cryptocurrency?
Yes Bitcoin. Ethics are highly subjective.
That is what someone with no ethics says. Ethics are quite objective. But I don't have time to go off on that tangent with you which you can begin by unconflating morality and ethics. For example, pursuing zero-sum games (where you must take from others in order to gain) is objectively unethical when a non-zero-sum alternative(s) exist. This is why Communism is objectively unethical. |
|
|
|
Unfortunately the person who wrote that doesn't have the knowledge to understand. Let me explain. I'd prefer to have no securities regulation law. In order to not end up with such laws, then we must be able to police our own community. If we can't do that, the public will demand laws. Laws exist because of a power vacuum. That means that the collective is powerless to stop the hurtful activity, thus someone must step into the vacuum and take control. Thus voila! Government. Laws. We do it to ourselves because we have criminal mindsets amongst us who prefer to hurt others to get what they want, than to help others to get what they want. You mean to say people from US are enlightened with the wisdom, the rest of the world are dumb? Read his post again. That is not what I wrote. Try again to understand the point about power vacuums. As to the point about useless laws or conflating law with morality, I will share with you a debate I am having with another Communist criminal mind: Come on now boys. If you are so sure this is not a scam, then make your sworn disclosures about your involvement in it. Are you afraid of future SEC and FinCEN actions and thus afraid to disclosure. Hmmm.
Stop obfuscating with off topic diversionary tactics.
I am trying to rescue you idiots. But you are determined to dig own pathway to jail.
Wake up and see the light pronto for your own sake.
Thank you for your interest, if genuine. However, to quote Hillary Clinton (since you mentioned the Clintons a lot in some of your posts): "It’s a stark fact that the United States has less than five percent of the world’s population, yet we have almost 25 percent of the world’s total prison population."I'm in the 95%+ of the global population (=non US citizen). I'm also unaffected by the prison-mania of the USA, FinCEN, SEC etc. Not that if I were affected I would have something to worry about. Come-from-Beyond (who is in Belarus) make a similar line of argument to me. It seems to me that those who grew up in these (former?) Communist states developed a culture of theft, because that was the only way to game the totalitarian system. We all know that Communism is a philosophy of stealing from each other. And now they blame that on the Americans who worked more diligently and with attention to quality and pride in one's work, than any other nation except perhaps Japan. Globalist leaders insinuate it is okay for your to steal to take back from the evil Americans who took more than their fair share. They urge you to continue the Communist paradigm of ganging up on your neighbor. I call on American software developers to take the high ground and show the world our cultural heritage and values. Let's teach these Eastern Europeans why America kicks ass with productivity and trying to do the right thing. Now I will surely agree with you that so many Americans have become dysfunctional Socialists and are milking the reserve currency status. And I will agree with you that American leaders have abused other nations, and in fact Antony Sutton researched and concluded that the banksters from America and Europe installed the Bolshevik revolution. I haven't studied your history enough, so I don't want to make any claim. I will just try to urge you to please lose that Communist attitude and please work to make the world a better place. We need to not end up in an unethical clusterfuck Dark Age. And take back your right to own a gun because without that, you are nothing against totalitarianism. The USA is fucked up and it will need to break up into separate regions where those who have shared values can congregate. There are big changes coming to world accelerating as of 2018. I urge you to look past the tip of your nose and be part of the better future. Let's go make it. I am 51. My time to be highly productive at the top level has peaked; and I am on the tail end of my career. You are young. You make this world. Please think about what you are doing. Edit: and Evan is an American and thus all the more I demand he not insult the reputation of American developers by operating perhaps the most scammy altcoin by market cap (although some might argue that is Ripple).
As I warned you, the countries will be pushed towards cooperating against financial crime: http://www.theguardian.com/news/2016/apr/03/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-panama-papersThe globalists are destroying the nation-states on purpose and inciting the masses to clamor for a global discipline on malfeasance. I've known for a long time this would be coming. One thing you will learn about me by observing me over time is my ability to predict the future. For example was my 2011 prediction that the nations would not exit the EU and instead would double-down for more sloppy seconds. For a person with such a breadth of understanding regarding global expansion of totalitarianism, why would you insist on others publicly disclosing stuff like their cryptoholdings, when, tomorrow for example, crypto could be illegal and all such posts might be admissions of possession and thus grounds for confiscation? Cripes man, did this point completely fly over your head that you are the one who is demanding that everyone disclose everything so we can count and prove all the victims. I am arguing it should be sufficient to just declare Evan a sleazy scammer who rips off people by designing a scam to control the float and manipulate the price and volume, as well printing press coins out of thin air masternode scheme, handing them to insiders, and dumping them on the market. Could I ask that you please don't waste my entire day on this redundant shit. Do you even have any cryptocurrency?
Yes Bitcoin. Ethics are highly subjective.
That is what someone with no ethics says. Ethics are quite objective. But I don't have time to go off on that tangent with you which you can begin by unconflating morality and ethics. For example, pursuing zero-sum games (where you must take from others in order to gain) is objectively unethical when a non-zero-sum alternative(s) exist. This is why Communism is objectively unethical. |
|
|
|
Well thanks for admitting you have no shred of an argument remaining, as you are now resorting to complete nonsense.
Now we've determined that another likely reason for your inability to comprehend the trouble you are in, is because you simply lack sufficient IQ (or are so disingenuous and deluded into thinking people are stupid enough to not understand you just stated nonsense).
33% ever of 84mn = 27.7mn 33% ever of 21mn = 6.93mn Neither of these are even possible 26 months later (because the coin supply is still less than 33% of 21mn - currently at 6.3mn). And you continue pretending I don't make sense? Seriously...? Can you continue pretending you didn't read (or comprehend) my rebuttal to that. Ask someone with sufficient IQ to translate this for you: But that is not even needed. You are totally disingenuous. The masternode scheme pays out the new coins proportional to the holdings percentage of the coin supply at inception. Duh!
Icebreaker's argument was: Dash's fiasco of a ninja-launch, featuring an "accidental" 33% of all coins ever going to the dev and a handful of insiders more or less right away, is the functional equivalent of a premine.
Your attempt to patch it up is pathetic at best. It is hilarious that still don't understand the elementary school math of my rebuttal. you simply lack sufficient IQ (or are so disingenuous and deluded into thinking people are stupid enough to not understand you just stated nonsense).
It's noteable that the quantity of insults and abusive rhetoric in your posts is in inverse proportion to the integrity of your arguments. You claim truth is not integrity. Goodbye asshats. |
|
|
|
Unfortunately the person who wrote that doesn't have the knowledge to understand. Let me explain. I'd prefer to have no securities regulation law. In order to not end up with such laws, then we must be able to police our own community. If we can't do that, the public will demand laws. Laws exist because of a power vacuum. That means that the collective is powerless to stop the hurtful activity, thus someone must step into the vacuum and take control. Thus voila! Government. Laws. We do it to ourselves because we have criminal mindsets amongst us who prefer to hurt others to get what they want, than to help others to get what they want. |
|
|
|
Well thanks for admitting you have no shred of an argument remaining, as you are now resorting to complete nonsense.
Now we've determined that another likely reason for your inability to comprehend the trouble you are in, is because you simply lack sufficient IQ (or are so disingenuous and deluded into thinking people are stupid enough to not understand you just stated nonsense).
33% ever of 84mn = 27.7mn 33% ever of 21mn = 6.93mn Neither of these are even possible 26 months later (because the coin supply is still less than 33% of 21mn - currently at 6.3mn). And you continue pretending I don't make sense? Seriously...? Can you continue pretending you didn't read (or comprehend) my rebuttal to that. Ask someone with sufficient IQ to translate this elementary school math for you: But that is not even needed. You are totally disingenuous. The masternode scheme pays out the new coins proportional to the holdings percentage of the coin supply at inception. Duh!
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately the person who wrote that doesn't have the knowledge to understand. Let me explain. I'd prefer to have no securities regulation law. In order to not end up with such laws, then we must be able to police our own community. If we can't do that, the public will demand laws. Laws exist because of a power vacuum. That means that the collective is powerless to stop the hurtful activity, thus someone must step into the vacuum and take control. Thus voila! Government. Laws. We do it to ourselves because we have criminal mindsets amongst us who prefer to hurt others to get what they want, than to help others to get what they want. |
|
|
|
Dash's fiasco of a ninja-launch, featuring an "accidental" 33% of all coins ever going to the dev and a handful of insiders more or less right away, is the functional equivalent of a premine.
Out of ~20mn coins, a "33% ever" is around 6.6mn coins. He shrank the planned coin supply once already. You are not helping the "Icebreaker #REKT" case. The argument is even worse with a larger coin supply. Basic maths man: 33% of 84mn (original spec) means Evan should have at least 27.72 million darkcoins to have instamined 33% ever. Well thanks for admitting you have no shred of an argument remaining, as you are now resorting to complete nonsense. Now we've determined that another likely reason for your inability to comprehend the trouble you are in, is because you simply lack sufficient IQ (or are so disingenuous and deluded into thinking people are stupid enough to not understand you just stated nonsense). |
|
|
|
Dash's fiasco of a ninja-launch, featuring an "accidental" 33% of all coins ever going to the dev and a handful of insiders more or less right away, is the functional equivalent of a premine.
Out of ~20mn coins, a "33% ever" is around 6.6mn coins. He shrank the planned coin supply once already. But that is not even needed. You are totally disingenuous. The masternode scheme pays out the new coins proportional to the holdings percentage of the coin supply at inception. Duh! Come on dufus. Get the fuck off my lawn. I am tired of playing with your dumb, redundant asshat. |
|
|
|
As I warned you, the countries will be pushed towards cooperating against financial crime: http://www.theguardian.com/news/2016/apr/03/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-panama-papersThe globalists are destroying the nation-states on purpose and inciting the masses to clamor for a global discipline on malfeasance. I've known for a long time this would be coming. One thing you will learn about me by observing me over time is my ability to predict the future. For example was my 2011 prediction that the nations would not exit the EU and instead would double-down for more sloppy seconds. For a person with such a breadth of understanding regarding global expansion of totalitarianism, why would you insist on others publicly disclosing stuff like their cryptoholdings, when, tomorrow for example, crypto could be illegal and all such posts might be admissions of possession and thus grounds for confiscation? Cripes man, did this point completely fly over your head that you are the one who is demanding that everyone disclose everything so we can count and prove all the victims. If I say "I had 100 bitcoins and you stole them from me" then I'm not admitting possession in real time. I *had* them. I don't *currently* have them thus such information would not be incriminating in a future where cryptocurrency becomes illegal. You cannot break the law with retro-active effect in any serious constitutional state. The law must first exist so that you can the break it. So if I say, right now, you stole my BTCs, and a law comes in effect next year saying I'm not allowed to have BTCs, I've not broken any laws. Now you are arguing the Statute-of-Limitations can turn an unquantified but generally exposed "rip off" into a legal activity and thus there was never anybody ripped off. Holy shit. You just verified for everyone the way your twisted criminal mind rationalizes Evan's what I allege is to be illegal activity. Note it is 10 years in the USA from the last act for financial crimes, so Evan won't be safe from criminal proceedings until 2026 at the earliest. I am arguing it should be sufficient to just declare Evan a sleazy scammer who rips off people by designing a scam to control the float and manipulate the price and volume, as well printing press coins out of thin air masternode scheme, handing them to insiders, and dumping them on the market.
Ok, so you are not OK with proving the scam so you just want to declare people "sleazy scammers". We feel we sufficiently proved the scam to argue for him being on a list of who this community thinks scammed and ripped off some of us in the community. Everyone's innocent until proven guilty, you know...
Not in terms of public opinion. You seem to realize that, which is why you are desperately trying to obscure the truth here. And, if you call people scammers when they haven't actually scammed people, that's a criminal offense in itself.
Let's take it to court and subpoena all the records so you can have your proof of the scam and a conviction in a court-of-law (civil or criminal or both) of the scammer. I will counter-sue for damages and seek an injunction to escrow/lockup DRK masternode developer funds to cover costs of losing the case. If those collapse in value due to the court case, will seek an injunction to seize for escrow against Evan and accomplice's real assets. Based on the manipulative nature of what has transpired, I would expect Evan and accomplices to try to hide and dispose of real assets and would argue that to the court. |
|
|
|
I want to say something regarding GadgetCoin and IOTA, I follow them from the very beginning, guys behind these two projects are very talented and skilled, these two projects are very potential, it's not necessary to argue on which one is better, time will prove it, client release will prove it and market will prove it, if the guys can cooperate with each, it's the best thing,win-win is real win.
Facts to back your opinion? I analyzed the technology of Iota in reasonable detail and came to a different conclusion. |
|
|
|
As I warned you, the countries will be pushed towards cooperating against financial crime: http://www.theguardian.com/news/2016/apr/03/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-panama-papersThe globalists are destroying the nation-states on purpose and inciting the masses to clamor for a global discipline on malfeasance. I've known for a long time this would be coming. One thing you will learn about me by observing me over time is my ability to predict the future. For example was my 2011 prediction that the nations would not exit the EU and instead would double-down for more sloppy seconds. For a person with such a breadth of understanding regarding global expansion of totalitarianism, why would you insist on others publicly disclosing stuff like their cryptoholdings, when, tomorrow for example, crypto could be illegal and all such posts might be admissions of possession and thus grounds for confiscation? Cripes man, did this point completely fly over your head that you are the one who is demanding that everyone disclose everything so we can count and prove all the victims. I am arguing it should be sufficient to just declare Evan a sleazy scammer who rips off people by designing a scam to control the float and manipulate the price and volume, as well printing press coins out of thin air masternode scheme, handing them to insiders, and dumping them on the market. Could I ask that you please don't waste my entire day on this redundant shit. Do you even have any cryptocurrency?
Yes Bitcoin. Ethics are highly subjective.
That is what someone with no ethics says. Ethics are quite objective. But I don't have time to go off on that tangent with you which you can begin by unconflating morality and ethics. For example, pursuing zero-sum games (where you must take from others in order to gain) is objectively unethical when a non-zero-sum alternative(s) exist. This is why Communism is objectively unethical. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
