Whelp. Looks like I'm on DT2 now. Does that mean all the merit beggars I negged for shadily propositioning me (and failing at it) are going to be out for my blood? (And also cryptohunter, who can't seem to stop chasing my tail for some reason, and who is no doubt going to somehow integrate this new development into the existing foxhole butt-sniffing pussy-petting conspiracy/orgy that I could never keep track of.)

Guess this is my life now: youtube.com/watch?v=316AzLYfAzw

You can add What Does Mt Gox Say? to your playlist.

I'm under the lectern, of course. Pay no attention.

You just can't leave me alone, can you? Anyway, time travel doesn't work like that, but I don't expect your limited mind to understand why, so I won't bother attempting to explain it.

No, I wasn't in that thread, but I was in some other threads concerning him, where I was inexplicably accused of misusing time travel and of sexual impropriety with suchmoon and The Pharmacist.

As for the video... I think I'll wait and see what future entrants come up with.

You can add 25 from me, plus another 25 if I'm portrayed with an exaggerated Australian accent like Wayne Gale (Robert Downey Jr) in Natural Born Killers.

No! Let go of my leash! Don't drag me into this anilingual orgy! Last time I was with Lauda I was coughing up furballs for weeks!

Yes, it's called "measuring". It's the standard method for determining exactly how different your results are and how to correct for it. Even alchemists had that much figured out.

Indeed, it does strike me as very odd that you drew a straight line on a linear chart instead of a logarithmic one, thus implying that the Dow was negative prior to 1984 (for reference, it was not).

There's no such thing as bottling "with caution". You're either measuring your sugar content, alcohol content, and bottling temperature to determine your carbonation level or you're not and you're just guessing whether your bottles will turn into bombs.

A ginger bug is an alcoholic beverage, technically a wine since it is fermented from simple sugars.

Same as any alcoholic beverage, though since it's brewed in uncontrolled conditions, the exact alcohol content will be difficult to determine.

This is just ordinary fermentation of sugar into alcohol, which does not produce "magic sprits", just the regular kind. Google "homebrewing" for more information.

Sorry, I assumed you were committed to upholding your end of the challenge over the time period in question without unilaterally changing the terms partway through. How silly of me to think that.

Curses! My cunning plan has been foiled! Actually, if I'm to accept your challenge, my plan will merely be postponed by three (or more?) years, but I suppose I have the time.

It shows you are unwilling or unable to honour your commitments. How can any of us trust you if that is the case, with or without time travel?

Why does this challenge get an extra year added every time I turn around? In any case, as I said before, I don't have a paid sig, so does that mean I'm not part of suchmoon's ass gang, dumb as it may be? I'm beginning to feel left out.

Monsanto products have never been conclusively linked to any specific disease, and have not resulted in any confirmed deaths. It's probably just a coincidence.

---

+1 for nudity, -1 for being too short to constitute an original work eligible for copyright protection.

In that case, enjoy your Schwarzwälder Kirschtorte.

I ought to wear a leash if you're going to keep dragging me into things. And what are you even talking about, anyway? I don't have a paid sig and never have, and I am not an alt of anyone.

The ninth member of the Vulpine Order of Merit is suchmoon!

While some will surely complain of favouritism and even more unsavoury forms of impropriety, the fact remains that suchmoon has repeatedly proven to be objectively better than everyone else in every way, though mostly in the way of eviscerating shitposters, which this forum could really do with more of (evisceration, not shitposting).

Foxy impropriety time!

No, a neural network merely gets a regression from a bunch of correlated data. If the data is uncorrelated, as hashes are, then the resulting regression will be random and have no predictive power whatsoever. This is a basic fact of machine learning. If you think this "in theory is possible", then your "theory" is one that is completely unknown in the machine learning field, and you should perhaps tell us more about how it works on a fundamental level before making grandiose claims about its capabilities.