Well, if source is the same, can we expect a "staking week", younglets/primelets and other awesomeness coded in here too?  Yeah that would be very easy to do, the Staking week was actually a very simple idea and doesn't require any extra coding. Fees are returned through Staking, and you can set your own TX Fee so the Weelets, Yanglets, Primelets etc. was just auto send scripts with a higher TX Fee. It would be like this. Decide on what amount to be given away through Staking and fill up a wallet on a node. Type ./PayCond settxfee 3 (to set the tx fee for sending a transaction to 3 Coins) Create a script to send Coins #!/bin/bash for n in {1..30} do ./PayCond sendtoaddress PJW2iA4ijs5aXt9iEpgdfgdf645gdFSD5e 10 sleep 120 done Then it would send 10 Coins every 120 seconds, 30 times with a tx fee of 3 Coins, the Coins are received back into Staking so it acts like a reverse Prime Node. I took it a step further and set a time varience and set the scripts to begin at the exact time when the countdowns were to end. I wouldn't expect that there would be anything near a 100% swap for ColossusCoin and lots of Coins were lost. I had originally got the idea from experimenting with different sources and that once there would be decided that there would be an end to the swap it would be likely that there would be a lot of Coins left over so it would be a good way of redistributing the Coins. |
|
|
|
again, what's up with this delusional 12 years old logic? "did not sell so I lost nothing" - it's beyond me.
Seriously. I would happily sell one of them a box of rocks for a million bucks and as long as they don't sell that box for less then a million well then hey, they haven't lost anything right? Actually you are losing by not selling since PayCoin is hyper-inflating so if you do not own a Prime Controller you are losing every day relative to the money supply. If you bought silver contracts at the top of the silver peak of $40 years ago and still own them even though it's worth $18 now, you haven't lost anything because you haven't sold. |
|
|
|
Crestington were you able to figure out the syncing issues? I resynced from scratch just fine with my wallet, but its a build from the last commit I made with nothing after it included.
I think that it was just that there was the conflicting checkpoint keys but as more people have moved onto the newest wallets that it's sorting itself out but will keep an eye on it, I haven't had any issues myself. |
|
|
|
Hmm, interesting issue how to swap coins when V1 blockchain is Stuck to a V2 Wallet. How about this: Users Step 1: Write down your Total Number of coins in your V1 wallet, Write down your password if encrypted Then Rename the V1 directory under c:\users\%username\appdata\roaming\colossuscoin with Old in front. Then Download and install the new V2 Client and sync with new blockchain. Then Write down your version 2 wallet address. Send Email to Dev, included # of coins, password, & New V2 Address. (FYI for Users: Never use that old V1 password again) Dev Step 2: Upon Receiving the email. Dev confirms the number emailed matches the number in the wallet.dat by using V1 software. The fact that you emailed the wallet.dat and included the password proves that you own it. Then the Dev sends you the V2 coins which are Reversed Split on the V2 Client, (Dev manually calculates what the reversed split amount would be from the V1 Total) so you receive the right number of coins in your new wallet at the V2 address in your email. Dev Step 3: Declares V1 is Dead, because if the blockchain is stuck , it basically is. V2 is now up and running. All Done.  FYI: Dev In the old V1 Block Explorer print out the rich list down to zero and check them off before you send the V2 coins out. You can set a deadline for everyone to have emailed you, after the deadline, then begin processing the v1 wallets. I would use a spreadsheet or database to match up the email , amount, V1 Address, & new V2 address, before sending out any V2 , in case someone tried double sending their wallet with a 2nd v2 address. That way if you receive a duplicate wallet , you will know there is a problem before sending out V2 coins. Plus you can do the exchanges 1st or last in the list your choice unless they complain. If wallets are over 9 meg, then link to a dropbox instead of emailing it. Whew that is a fair amount of work.  Sudo is managing the Coins for the swap so yes we can do it like that. I personally do not have enough of the Coin to do a direct swap (I have about 5% of CV2) but will direct him here so we can get this moving as I don't want to be spending extra time and money working on the V1 chain. I'd like to take the old COL chain out back and shoot it and be over and done with it and focus on improving the working chain. Yes, lets proceed with this. Sending the wallet.dat actually is not a big problem. You pointed out possible security issues sending wallet.dat, but that is easy to resolve. For example you can request the "wallet.dat" to be encrypted, and request the user send the password via PM here on the forum. So users send the encrypted "wallet.dat" in email, then send the password+email address via PM on the forum. This way there is a kind of two-factor authentication, so no security issues could arise. Crestington, I know you are very busy with your excellent work on PayCon. So could you please ask sudo23 to look into the thread here. We need this swap to get off the ground finally. It is a long time I don't see any progress on that, and as a result the COLv2 is suffering too. I personally don't have any COLv1 outside of Cryptsy, but I really want this swap task to move forward, as I hope some old community from COLv1 will be moved to COLv2 and give a new breath to the coin. Yes I already sent him a message asking Sudo if he could join in the conversation here so we can progress this a little faster. I have also updated the CV2 source with the latest commits from PayCon and doing some light testing to make sure the litestake functions correctly. The two sources are for the most part the same source, if you were to search and replace the names and lay them on top of each other the differences are more in the retargeting, inflation rates, and Fees. This is beneficial because updates from one source can easily be applied to the other so I wouldn't really want to see ColossusCoin2 be abandoned when it is already one of the most efficient Coins. |
|
|
|
Currently we are seeking a developer who is interested in assisting the Mintcoin team in developing a easy to use financial system with user friendly access to tools such as professional financial business reporting and easy to use advanced options that any business can currently find within their online banking website / quickbooks application.
Current To-Do List:
• Improve the load-time of wallets
• Option to filter out unconfirmed minted coins
• Enhanced financial reporting for business needs
• Easy to use multi-signature options for fundraising transparency
• UI Enhancements for easy archiving of addresses no-longer needed
• UI Enhancements to support usability software for people with visual difficulties
• Exchange API integration for Mintcoin market value
• Multi-Currency integration for ease of portfolio value tracking
• Integrate Shapeshift API for easy sending via recurring transactions as well as standard transactions
• UI Integration between desktop and mobile wallet
• Technical evaluation of current wallet with best practice recommendations
• Maintain the latest bitcoin core
• Continue to collaborate in bringing transparency options for businesses running on Mintcoin
• Build custom Mintcoin wallets for upcoming guardianship program
• Assist and Advise in integrating Mintcoin on new technologies
• Multi-Wallet control options
We want to be able to put a number on the true value of saving your mintcoins as well as offer a real alternative to organizational needs.
Current Exchange Rate 10 million MINT = $215.631 USD And that rate will drop if a new dev cashes out. Reason Devs are so important, is they can spend between $1000 or $3000 worth of programming labor in a month. And you are asking for everything but a kitchen sink. You need to put a x10 beside your offer, if you want to be viewed as serious or offer a $ amount in BTC so all of the new dev's work does not destroy your market cap. Or ask for Bids to get a better feel for what you need to pay. Just Sayin . No, you are right. What is wanted is all custom work and would likely take 3 months or more to complete and a minimum of 15k USD. The $215.631 USD for one month would buy you 1-2 features that were already implemented in another Coin, most decent developers would charge $50 an hour. |
|
|
|
loool, saulcryptoman ruined this coin
It was flawed to begin with if it could be ruined so easily. |
|
|
|
Yup I found aprilcoin.com
I'd seen it mentioned but hadn't looked until you just brought it up and, oh dear, is there nothing these idiots won't fall for? Seriously, Hashtalkers shouldn't be allowed on the internet unsupervised. All the smart ones got out ages ago, I don't think they realize that they are throwing money at the same Ponzi over and over again. Rule number one of investing is to cut your losses the moment you start seeing red flags. I wish the SEC would hurry up and get a move on, they are really taking their sweet ass time. The SEC is a slow moving animal I would have thought blockchain technology made it easier to gather the evidence of financial corruption but as Paul Revere would probable agree, it becomes a never ending labyrinth when deliberate coin mixing is involved. I don't think it would be too hard but probably more difficult for the average paper pusher than people around here. I doubt there are many people at the SEC that are even that bright, most people take government jobs because they are lazy and it pays well. |
|
|
|
You guys are forgetting something. He doesn't even have laptop/PC. I wonder how he will be working and spread his ideas. Possibly through his cell phone.
I read it but it's worth pointing out. GET A PC! You can buy one for cheap off Ebay but if also in LA you could head over to the poor area (anywhere but the downtown core) and buy a stolen one for $20. Just look for the black guy. |
|
|
|
Hmm, interesting issue how to swap coins when V1 blockchain is Stuck to a V2 Wallet. How about this: Users Step 1: Write down your Total Number of coins in your V1 wallet, Write down your password if encrypted Then Rename the V1 directory under c:\users\%username\appdata\roaming\colossuscoin with Old in front. Then Download and install the new V2 Client and sync with new blockchain. Then Write down your version 2 wallet address. Send Email to Dev, included # of coins, password, & New V2 Address. (FYI for Users: Never use that old V1 password again) Dev Step 2: Upon Receiving the email. Dev confirms the number emailed matches the number in the wallet.dat by using V1 software. The fact that you emailed the wallet.dat and included the password proves that you own it. Then the Dev sends you the V2 coins which are Reversed Split on the V2 Client, (Dev manually calculates what the reversed split amount would be from the V1 Total) so you receive the right number of coins in your new wallet at the V2 address in your email. Dev Step 3: Declares V1 is Dead, because if the blockchain is stuck , it basically is. V2 is now up and running. All Done. FYI: Dev In the old V1 Block Explorer print out the rich list down to zero and check them off before you send the V2 coins out. You can set a deadline for everyone to have emailed you, after the deadline, then begin processing the v1 wallets. I would use a spreadsheet or database to match up the email , amount, V1 Address, & new V2 address, before sending out any V2 , in case someone tried double sending their wallet with a 2nd v2 address. That way if you receive a duplicate wallet , you will know there is a problem before sending out V2 coins. Plus you can do the exchanges 1st or last in the list your choice unless they complain. If wallets are over 9 meg, then link to a dropbox instead of emailing it. Whew that is a fair amount of work. Sudo is managing the Coins for the swap so yes we can do it like that. I personally do not have enough of the Coin to do a direct swap (I have about 5% of CV2) but will direct him here so we can get this moving as I don't want to be spending extra time and money working on the V1 chain. I'd like to take the old COL chain out back and shoot it and be over and done with it and focus on improving the working chain. |
|
|
|
Swap chains; not worth the time trying to Frankenstein it
I would like to see how it would be done purely from a technical point of view but a direct swap is much easier. |
|
|
|
|
lol, I've seen this exact thread about a thousand times now.
"I have this great idea for a Coin but want to be a cheerleader and have someone else do all the work"
Atleast you didn't pull the "but would have to sign a non disclosure agreement" line
You either need to have your own strategy, are good at coding and do the majority of the work yourself or have a good strategy, ok at coding and have bags of cash to pay someone to develop it for you. If you launch an IPO Coin, it'll pretty much be DOA and no one will take it seriously.
Either way you will need to know how to code but good luck with your endeavors.
|
|
|
|
I for one am sort of glad that FinCEN is cracking down on these shitty IPO coins to be honest.
FOr the most part their should never be a need for an IPO to launch your coin.
I honestly think this is a good thing and people may think twice about posting garbage IPO coins from now on.
-415 trust? What did YOU do?! er, what do people claim you did ... Don't be lazy, just click on his trust rating. |
|
|
|
So what's the next big thing about PayCon? Constand? Or other excitements  Well, PayCon is part of GHminting as a larger asset base of GHX mining shares portfolio released last week. GHcloud was released yesterday https://forum.gethashing.com/t/ghcloud-beta-v0-9-is-live/3767 but I'm not sure if it includes CON for their online wallet. I am thinking it likely wouldn't be a part of GHcloud as an online Staking wallet for customers as they don't like holding customers funds (GHminting is different as GetHashing own the Coins). GetHashing also launched a new PayCon Block Explorer a couple days ago. https://con.gethashing.comI am also updating and cleaning up the OP, it has gotten a bit cluttered with all the new updates recently  ConStand is in the works, I am doing backend work on it but I am rather new to php so it's a little slow going. I would like it if I could get a bit of extra help with the coding, I'm not getting paid to work on it and don't have money to pay someone to help but to help get it up and running sooner would be a larger benefit to the Coin. |
|
|
|
Yup I found aprilcoin.com
I'd seen it mentioned but hadn't looked until you just brought it up and, oh dear, is there nothing these idiots won't fall for? Seriously, Hashtalkers shouldn't be allowed on the internet unsupervised. All the smart ones got out ages ago, I don't think they realize that they are throwing money at the same Ponzi over and over again. Rule number one of investing is to cut your losses the moment you start seeing red flags. I wish the SEC would hurry up and get a move on, they are really taking their sweet ass time. |
|
|
|
If it is possible to transfer COL from one Cryptsy account to another at this time:
/
Why not open a cryptsy account. Have COL users transfer their cryptsy COL to said account. Have the user send an email/PM in with their info, CV2 address, transaction, possibly a screenshot of transaction confirmation from their cryptsy account, etc. The user can then be sent their CV2 to the CV2 address provided.
And how would the Coins be destroyed in the transfer? |
|
|
|
 downvote, troll, fudster, shadowban. it's time! The right answer to this should have been that PayCON is already better than PayCoin, but still worse than Bitcoin. If you want to talk serious cryptos, that is...  PayCon is actually better because it has a fairer distribution and doesn't have selective hyper-inflating wallets, instead it has high inflation equally with static rewards which means the early adopters gain the most benefit. At the end of Pow there was 2 million coins, now there are 6.4 million coins so many have doubled or tripled their coins but because there is a static reward the amount of inflation compared to the money supply is reducing over time. Inflation is just high enough to keep price stable so although price is up 200-300% from the end of Pow, when compared to the money supply it is more like 1000% increase in price.Liquidity is still an issue to sell a large portion at once but if you can sell your principal and still have the same amount left, that's roi. That's not even including all the wallet features introduced. Bitcoin is still better though, at least in terms of market adoption. |
|
|
|
"irregularities in our contracts"  Right so their hands are tied while the ASICs are switched off, so no doubt they'll be allowing people to withdraw their funds in the meantime, right? Cos', you know, mining machines being switched off doesn't affect a bitcoin wallet, sooooooo, sure, yeah, they'll let people withdraw their funds while their 'lawyers' are dealing with the ASIC power-supply issue. That is so going to happen. We are going to be proven sooooo wrong about them being a Ponzi as they let people withdraw their funds while the miners are offline. That is so going to happen. I heard they called their lawyers so many times they installed a phone to speed up the process a bit.  The only ones making money hand over fist are the lawyers. |
|
|
|
Now we can easily measure up who has a bigger CON... amount... By the way is it better in terms of staking to have multiple wallets (not addresses, but software windows wallets) or you can have all your coins in the same address/addresses in a single wallet and it's only blocks that matter overall? Actually the best would be to host a wallet in the cloud with 2fa and SSH private/public keys and have backups of your wallets. A wallet in the cloud would give you 100% uptime and you can access it anywhere as long as you have your SSH keys in order to access it and for me I think it would be as secure, if not more secure as you are not holding your wallet.dat's on your PC you use for everyday stuff so if by chance you got hit with a wallet stealing virus, there would be nothing it could steal and if by chance someone got hold of your SSH keys, they would still need to know where it is and also your password to the SSH keys. To answer your question though, It's the size of your Blocks and doesn't matter whether it's one wallet or multiple wallets. I was running 3 wallets each with stakesplitthresholds of 400, 600 and 800 with atleast a few thousand in each address (so they aren't too small that they won't combine) but I have about 6-7 wallets in total I can make use of. If running wallets online then I must also assume there is a part risk and so to minimize that risk would be split up those amounts. I don't really see why people would want to be on the top of a richlist, I would rather not be on it at all. |
|
|
|
 Whole bunch of them  Their bigges weapons are their high heels, lol These ladies also accept CON? NO sorry not even Sexcoin :/ I guess any kind of fiat is OK though. Anyway not much ladies on that picture.one I personally prefer real woman's, but each on their own. BUT many like them. Can not understand it also.They can be fun talk to, though.But never ever mess with them"" Well atleast the thumbs up bar looks trustworthy. lol ,cres, made me laugh. But i think trustworthy, yes. We should open a "many thumbs up" bar, but i need some funds from the CAF to invest in Cambodia. SEC no problem, they won´t find us Before that we'll have ConStand up and running  Hello Folks, really nice con.i like it.i want to buy some of them. you try to add paycon to bittrex? This Constand is reall or a joke? thanks It's under development at the moment but I do like that people wonder whether it's real or not. If you want it to get added to Bittrex then send them messages asking for it to be listed and help keep the chat boxes busy, I am sure they will eventually list it. PayCon also has a new Block Explorer https://con.gethashing.com/ |
|
|
|
Whole bunch of them Their bigges weapons are their high heels, lol These ladies also accept CON? NO sorry not even Sexcoin :/ I guess any kind of fiat is OK though. Anyway not much ladies on that picture.one I personally prefer real woman's, but each on their own. BUT many like them. Can not understand it also.They can be fun talk to, though.But never ever mess with them"" Well atleast the thumbs up bar looks trustworthy. lol ,cres, made me laugh. But i think trustworthy, yes. We should open a "many thumbs up" bar, but i need some funds from the CAF to invest in Cambodia. SEC no problem, they won´t find us Before that we'll have ConStand up and running |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
