I've helped my followers keep their profits and move onto better coins with proven tech. I'm curious how exactly you do that. Currently you're talking about LibrexCoin as if there's something miraculously happening with it and that it's making some comeback. But the reality is that it's just been pumped. There is no comeback. In a few weeks it will be back down where it was before just as has happened before with it... Soooooo. How exactly are you helping your followers when you're telling them some coin is fantastic when all that's happening is you're pumping it so you can dump on them.
|
|
|
Where exactly do you get that there was insider trading by the devs? Edit: Looked at your post history. Now I can see that nothing you would post can be taken as any sort of truth and is simply to manipulate the naive and thus the markets.
|
|
|
Look at Cloak price now and compare it to 10 days ago. How about DRK? 900k -> 470k in 3 days and still on it's way down. It's like someone (or a few) are getting out of anon coins all together.
|
|
|
Does anyone know what happened to the Syscoin launch? I'm hearing there is a lot of drama going on but I missed the developments apparently.
Looking thru the blog posts, this is what I have found out. If any of our blog readers are Syscoin investors, please correct me. It seems that Syscoin had an IPO and collected 250 BTC. The devs promised to set the BTC as a SELL WALL on an exchange, so it the price ever fell to the IPO price of around 500 satoshi, the original investors could sell and get their BTC back. Apparently, the devs have absconded with the BTC and are not answering email or blog posts. "I'm shocked, I tell you........ Shocked! !!" I just looked through the thread and the devs are there. So seems like the part about the devs leaving etc isn't true. They were apparently sleeping and everyone started to freak out and panic sellings. Too many people into these coins should go back to their video games or something because they really don't have the emotional stability for this stuff and just make it worse for everyone with their panic selling. Ok. Granted there was some technical issues and the devs shouldn't have just launched and went to sleep (not sure if that's exactly what happened or not though), but even so. Nothing but children in alt coins it seems. lol sorry but you dont ask moolah to release 250 btc to provide buying support and then not provide that support when price drops below the supposed buying floor. this on top of the botched launch they've lost a lot of credibility and now moolah considering the future of the funds it still holds in escrow. I thought that everyone in crypto didn't want others to hold their hand? Didn't want some centralization? They wanted a free market and to live or die by their own merits? I sure do see a lot of people crying all the time wanting their hand held. But yeah, devs messed up not being around to fix things when problems started to happen. As for the buy support stuff? That's just hand holding for those that shouldn't even be investing in the first place if they can't handle it.
|
|
|
Does anyone know what happened to the Syscoin launch? I'm hearing there is a lot of drama going on but I missed the developments apparently.
Looking thru the blog posts, this is what I have found out. If any of our blog readers are Syscoin investors, please correct me. It seems that Syscoin had an IPO and collected 250 BTC. The devs promised to set the BTC as a SELL WALL on an exchange, so it the price ever fell to the IPO price of around 500 satoshi, the original investors could sell and get their BTC back. Apparently, the devs have absconded with the BTC and are not answering email or blog posts. "I'm shocked, I tell you........ Shocked! !!" I just looked through the thread and the devs are there. So seems like the part about the devs leaving etc isn't true. They were apparently sleeping and everyone started to freak out and panic sellings. Too many people into these coins should go back to their video games or something because they really don't have the emotional stability for this stuff and just make it worse for everyone with their panic selling. Ok. Granted there was some technical issues and the devs shouldn't have just launched and went to sleep (not sure if that's exactly what happened or not though), but even so. Nothing but children in alt coins it seems. lol
|
|
|
IMO the amount that was stolen (approx $1.7million) from bter is too much to recover from. poloniex diddnt have anywhere near that amount to pay back so it was "easy" to return the funds. bter is going to have to pull some tricks out of the hat to fix this mess
in the light of what has happened it just shows that there is an even greater need for a decentralized exchange The hacker returned 42M of it now so it's not as much for them to recover from. Haven't looked at NXT, but I played around with the CounterParty exchange and frankly I don't see it going anywhere. To slow. Fees too much and of course there's not enough people using it. I was so frustrated I moved stuff out of it to a regular exchange and had my trade done in minutes. But I guess we'll see what happens.
|
|
|
as I do not know if it is even possible to avoid these initial fluctuations. I think the only way to avoid that sort of thing at the start is to have 1 or 0 reward for a few hundred blocks or more so the algorithm can kick in and stabilize.
|
|
|
agreed bter is just as good as dead. I'm curious. Poloniex was hacked in March. Why aren't they dead and why are people still using them? Mintpal was hacked as well wasn't it? So out of the remaining exchanges that NODE could get on, maybe Cryptsy or Bittrex (shit coin and pump and dump haven) could be used as most others seem to have no serious volume or simply wouldn't take a new coin.
|
|
|
So what gives? Nobody likes a good shitcoin anymore? I love me some good fresh shit coins.
|
|
|
This is awesome. I was just thinking I needed some fresh shit in the old shit collection. PMing my Dogeparty addy for some steaming fresh shit.
|
|
|
yeah we've heard this retard talk over and over again - gimmicks don't seem to be helping the scams but? Ok, but without ongoing development, features, things that actually keep it in the public eye and talked about, things that keep it competitive, how will any coin actually go anywhere. And just to be clear, bitcoin cannot be used as an example. It has a life of it's own and everything else at this point is just looked at as a means for people to get more bitcoins.
|
|
|
hello everyone, i searched for faucets of dogecoins and all the lists are not updated, with old not-working faucets and without new faucets, so i create a site and i put on it the link of all the working faucets for dogecoins (if you found another working faucet send me a message), i think it's not spam because it's correlated to bitcoin (if yes delete the topic), anyway here is the link of the list updated today: http://faucetslist.altervista.org/if i helped you just say thanks or donate There's more listed here http://cryptofaucet.us/faucetlist.php?coin=DOGEAnd another one http://www.cryptoblox.com/faucets/DogeCoin/
|
|
|
Spoetnik has come out and said that the only coin not a scam is Bitcoin. Everything else apparently is a scam and/or shitcoin according to him. Seems like he even took Jackpot coin out of his sig.
|
|
|
I'm actually coming around to his way of thinking! Soooo. Basically that the only "real" coin would be Bitcoin? All the guys calling every other coin a scam, I always have to wonder what coins they would say aren't scams. They have a list of things used to label a coin a scam, but what's the list for a coin not to be labeled a scam? Some guy released a coin with no premine, no IPO and stuff like that, only mineable via the wallet, doesn't even talk about exchanges. Updates things once or twice a week. And yet some people came in there and call it a scam. It's like there are no coins that aren't a scam. lol
|
|
|
And you know that how? Because the hacker said so? I don't think so. Each side came out with their own story about what happened and the truth is probably some where in the middle. The hacker would be of the mindset to exaggerate and brag while Bter would be trying to save face.
Bter never denied the hacker claim and admitted it they were using same password everywhere. Where do you see Bter denial? All I saw was Bter posting that one of their hosting accounts didn't have 2FA and the hacker got in there. Should Bter have posted a denial? What purpose would that have served since they came right out at the start and said they were hacked and where he got in. Where does Bter say they used the same password everywhere? I didn't see that but there were so many posts maybe I missed it. My point though is that we can't believe either side entirely and so shouldn't be talking about things as if they are fact when we don't know (and probably never will) what the real facts are.
|
|
|
is there ANY real crypto........ Can you define what you mean by "real crypto"? Do you mean a coin that will make you rich? lol IMO, there are none and probably never will be until one comes from outside the crypto community so that it thinks about real world use first and foremost. As for the rich part, I keep looking for a coin that comes out and goes up over time. But all I can find is pump, dump, maybe a couple times but over all, just a slow (or for some very fast), decline into obscurity. Have there been any that haven't followed that trend? People seem to think DRK is like the king of anon for some reason. I don't get it. As for it's "value", it's been in a steady decline since it's peak in May. I personally think it will hit 300k or so before finally flattening out. Assuming of course some of the whales don't do some pumps. Quark (or any older coin) really should do "something". There's so many new features out these days that they really should implement some of them so they remain relevant.
|
|
|
The owner was using the same password for 90% of his logins And you know that how? Because the hacker said so? I don't think so. Each side came out with their own story about what happened and the truth is probably some where in the middle. The hacker would be of the mindset to exaggerate and brag while Bter would be trying to save face. Here's an interesting question for people. Which do you think is "safer". Working with an exchange that's been hacked and has improved their security, or one that has "never" been hacked? Cause you have to know that there are hackers out there trying to get into all of them.
|
|
|
the launch is Sunday or Monday? If all goes well
They said that if Bter works on it Sunday (as they said they would), then it would be Monday. Course that assumes everything goes smoothly. Bter has bigger issues to deal with right now.
|
|
|
FYI. The Bter hacker has sent more of the stolen NXT back to Bter. Seems there's some backroom dealings going on.
Oh. And XCR has creeped up. Might be some sad people for having dumped in panic.
|
|
|
Oh my DRK is taking a crapper. Hopefully they will be smart and move to Cloak. DRK has been on a slow but steady decline since it's peak in May. I keep looking at it but I feel as if it will continue to slide until it starts reaching probably 300k. Cloak on the other hand basically corrected itself from the pump and is back to prepump levels. Would be surprised if it keeps falling. But then again there's been too much general bad news lately and everything is down, down down.
|
|
|
|