China is definitely playing double game! Not just on crypto but on many other aspects as well. Allowing Hong Kong to host crypto related business is a part of their ambitious gameplan. They are cashing in while US is showing signs of strengthening it's grips over crypto market. It's clear as broad daylight.
But I really don't understand US. They are allowing crypto companies to operate and allowing listing on stock exchanges. At the same time, giving enforcement agencies a freehand to act against them.
Because that is how you get regulation in. Good or bad, you have to let people do something then you regulate it. If you regulate it 1st, people will do something else. That makes it harder to control so to speak. If you are doing 'A' and the government comes in and says you have to do 'A' this way, assuming you are a legitimate business, work the way the government wants. Anyone else will have to follow the same rules. -Dave
|
|
|
I get what he is saying. 1/2 of the government says one thing and the other 1/2 says another. BUT, and this is a big BUT, being aggressive towards them does nothing. Coming out and making threats of 'leaving' will get both 1/2s to agree 'fuck that guy'
No other way to put it.
Not saying he should not have said what he said. But IMO there are nicer ways of saying it.
I also know I have said it before, regulation is coming. You can fight it for a while, but once it hits a certain point. You have to adapt. Ever wonder why Gemini, which is just as US based [and also has plenty of faults / issues] and dealing with just as much government BS does not make the news as much. Perhaps they have more lawyers making sure more things are a bit more compliant. Not saying one is better then the other, but one might make for a smother & easier existence then the other.
-Dave
|
|
|
The computer is on a private IP network. So the only way in, so far as I know, is via the connection used by Bitcoin Core. Although it does get access to the outside world through other services such as NTP and whatever the heck Apple uses for software update.
My security plan, if it can be called that, is if any BTC of significant quantity is successfully mined, it gets moved into a cold storage wallet.
Anyone getting shell access to that machine would have a field day as they are now on my private LAN.
Once a machine has access to the pubic internet, even if it's on a private IP stack behind a router it's still vulnerable. Go to the wrong website, it's compromised. Copy the wrong file, it's compromised. Take a look here: https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT213670dozens of things patched last month for macOS, and a bunch of them have the ability to get to parts of your file system. Use a hardware wallet. -Dave
|
|
|
Did not get the notification. 3.13.0.16 is the latest version. What are you on? 3 dots in upper right -> settings -> about.
Check for update gives me I am on the latest version with the .16
Could be a scam, could be you are on an older version that is not updating for some reason.
-Dave
|
|
|
Leaving out the tinfoil hat wearing paranoia that some people have about the government censoring transactions, just due to the locations that pools operate in. There is no way to do this. Do you really think if North Korea, Russia or any of those governments want to move what the US would think should be a censored transaction that the mining pools in Kazakhstan care.
Or if the CIA got the private key for one of the addresses that North Korea has moved their ransomware funds to that Foundry Digital would not happily mine it for them?
With nodes, as o_e_l_e_o said, there are so many out there that it's not a real worry.
-Dave
|
|
|
PayPal is offering the same 4.15 rate and there are a bunch of banks offering better rates here in the US.
Much like not your keys, not your coins. Do you want 1 monolithic company like apple controlling a credit card, a savings account, your crypto info and all that other data that they collect when using their devices?
And lets not forget this thread started with a discussion about Coinbase, who closes accounts for 'their own internal reasons' So you linked your Apple pay to coinbase, who close you for their own reasons. Does Goldman Sachs who is running the savings account find out about it through some internal API communications that we don't know about?
-Dave
|
|
|
Although that article did mention a lot of cuts, if you look at a lot of them, there are a lot that were not going to generate a profit any time soon.
But...What I find interesting is that as part of intel's business plan (IDM 2.0) they are going to produce chips for others. Since as of now Intel has some of the most advanced fab plants in the world.
Even now Bitmain and Canaan and the other players do not produce their own chips. BUT, I can't see them gong to intel to make them if they have a competing product. Did someone do the numbers and figure out that making chips for miners is going to bring in more money then designing and making their own? Not something you say in public but could be one of the reasons why.
-Dave
|
|
|
Electrum was one of the earlier, perhaps earliest light wallets. So it also has that going for it's popularity. The old school bitcoin users have been using it for over a decade so it just has that kind of traction. Yes there are a lot of other ones out there, but inertia is a big thing. How many people start using something and even if something better comes along, they keep with what they know. Perhaps not even bothering to look at other wallets that are out there.
-Dave
|
|
|
so that I can use my bitcoin core wallet on my iPhone For consideration: if you use the same wallet on multiple devices, you increase the risk of getting it compromised. In general, I consider phones to be untrusted devices, and only add fund mobile wallets with small amounts. If you're expecting to get a substantial amount of Bitcoin, it's safer to store the majority in a safer way. Cannot stress this enough if there is a 'real' amount of funds involved. If you are talking about going out to dinner money that's one thing. But treat any funds on your phone as cash and be prepared to loose it at any time. Not to mention, if something does happen, now you have to figure out is it the desktop PC or the phone that caused the funds loss. Who had access to what and when, and so on. Better off keeping them separate. -Dave -
|
|
|
What wallet are you using? Are you running LND or C-Lightning yourself?
Ride The Lightning will do it one way, LNbits will do it another and so on.
-Dave
|
|
|
Last time someone was looking the answer was none without talking to them 1st and setting something up with them.
Is this something you can use testnet for? If you are just testing things that's what it's supposed to be done. If you want to do it all internally there is also regtest.
-Dave
|
|
|
Depending on the speed of the machine & drive & a lot of other things this could take a VERY long time.
Although @nc50lc said minutes/hours I have seen it take a lot longer on an older PC with a wallet with a large number of transactions it really can take a while and even if it does look like the GUI is frozen it is working in the background. Don't force close it or it will start from the beginning again.
OTOH, with a fast PC and a small wallet it is fairly quick.
-Dave
|
|
|
Even considering Bitcoin and cryptocurrency become more popular in last 3 years, i have doubt they'll make comeback even if unless they don't improve UI/UX of their software. I remember merchant have to keep their computer/server online all the time (to make their goods searchable by user) and user need to install software which is a bit resource demanding where search took some time.
Yeah, keeping the machine running was a big negative for the non tech people out there. Hopefully this time they either set something up that can allow others to host / mirror your store. Or a plugin for something like Umbrel / MynodeBTC where you just click a button and it does the rest. And having some other coins would be nice too. Along with a UI that was not from the early 2000s So, they do have a lot to do, but at least they are doing something. -Dave
|
|
|
As has been discussed, these numbers are mostly pointless. You should not care about their assets. Without knowing what they are supposed to have. Having $100 is great, unless you owe 4 people $100. Then it's....not great.
Having a lot of funds leave your exchange is bad. Unless is was a planned separation of a large client, then it's not important at all.
Spitting out numbers without context and *all* the other data is pointless.
-Dave
|
|
|
I thought that in order to use LN you have to open a channel between two wallets and that this channel is opened with a transaction on the blockchain. So, for example, if I know a shopkeeper who accepts Bitcoin with LN, a channel would have to be opened between him and me, with a transaction on the blockchain, and from then on we could carry out transactions with LN. This, according to the idea I had, would make it convenient to use LN for cases where I know I am going to make repeated payments, but if for example I am travelling and I see a place where they use LN, I would not see the sense of using it for a single payment if a channel has to be opened on the blockchain beforehand.
Though above answer has shared the info, I would like to add a little to make it more easier according to my understanding. There are nodes which settle payment between two parties. Imagine, there's a popular node which most of the shopkeepers is connected with. It makes sense why would most of the shopkeepers is connected with that node. If you and your shopkeeper is connected with that node, you can pay him. You don't need to create a lot of channels. For reference, my topic- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5202798.0As you can see, my topic is a mental shortcut LOL, as I wanted to make it easier for grannies. In technical term, I can be a little wrong but in theory that's what happened actually. Having used custodial LN wallets like WoS and running several of my own nodes too I can see a need for both. There are some nodes that no matter what I do, short of opening my own channel to them I can't send them funds. *Using WoS or Blue Wallet before they shut down worked every time. Looking at 1ml.com you could see they were only connected to a few smaller nodes and one of the larger ones. So if was tough to find a route, since for a while I only connected to smaller less connected nodes too. * Once I opened a channel to WoS and a few other larger ones everything worked great, but if I was locking up that much BTC in a channel I might as well just lock up less and use WoS. -Dave
|
|
|
And if you go to https://openbazaar.org/ you get a black screen with the text openbazaar 3.0 - coming soon So it looks like it's coming back. I sold a few things on it back in the day, bought 1 or 2 things too just to play. It just never got that much traction for some reason. With crypto becoming more mainstream it will probably do better this time, or at least we can hope. -Dave
|
|
|
There was a discussion a few years about how the government / bank / whoever would not even have to buy all the miners. All they would have to do is setup a phony PPS pool that paid some stupid amount of PPS say 120%. All the miners would flock to that pool, and all they would have to do then is slowly wait till a few of the larger pools went bankrupt since everyone else is mining there.
You would have the pools like foundry that are using their own miners, but how long till the investors start to bail since they are not showing the numbers that other places are.
Yes, there are several flaws with this. But you bet it would cause enough disruption of mining to allow them to do other things.
All it all, a 51% attack from the government / big business is not a big worry for most people.
-Dave
|
|
|
Personally for that much I would go with a colcard https://coldcard.com/ hardware wallet since it supports PSBT https://coldcard.com/docs/glossary#psbtIt never has to connect to a computer and can sign transactions and move them with a SD card from itself to a PC that can transmit. The PC never has the keys to sign and the hardware wallet never has to connect to an internet connected device. Not, the easiest way to do it, but it is secure. As with everything like this DYOR and make sure it will work for you and do what you want the way you want it. -Dave
|
|
|
Outside of a few programmatic things (can't send due to the way the transaction was made) and some addresses there is no such thing as a lost wallet. People can CLAIM that they don't have access, and that might even be true at the moment, but you never know what may turn up. i.e., 'I lost my seed phrase' turns into, 8 years later. 'Oh there is is, it was in the file folder for the water heater, oops'
Attempting to find / create a list of lost or undependable wallets may be an interesting thought experiment. But it would be mostly pointless.
I have coins that I have not touched in more then a decade and am not even 100% the private key I have is good anymore. But it's such a small amount it's not worth the time to figure it out or destroy the collectable it's on. Is that lost or unknown.
-Dave
|
|
|
There is no way for a LN transaction to be stuck. It either goes through almost instantly, a few seconds up to a minute or 2 at most. OR it's rejected and unable to complete. No other options, there is no way for it to be pending.
As others have said, this is a scam. Stop wasting time, your money is gone.
-Dave
|
|
|
|