Inter Milan got the win because one of Porto's players got a red card, so in the second half Porto started having trouble keeping up with the game, Inter Milan was only able to score a goal through Romelu Lukaku eight minutes after Otavio got a red card and I think if that match Porto didn't get a red card most likely the final result of the game will be different.

Inter Mila's performance in Serie A has not been too bad so far, they have managed to occupy the second place after four unbeaten matches. Inter Milan's defeat against Empoli also started from Milan Skriniar's red card in the 40th minute, so Empoli managed to control the match and in the 66th minute Tommaso Baldanzi scored the only goal for Empoli's victory.

Everyone has to organize his life properly because other people don't have the responsibility to do it. Likewise with financial planning that must be prepared carefully and correctly, so that financial problems do not put you in difficult conditions, spending money by buying expensive drinks and having dinner at restaurants will be a problem when income and expenses are not balanced.

Many people forget that life is not only for a few months and years, many things must be planned so that our financial capabilities will be better, but unfortunately people don't do things like this for their future. Every individual has responsibility for his finances and life, if he doesn't have a good concept of life then he has to blame himself.

The debate that took place was not at the logo change stage, but in the image that the OP shared there was a slight imperfection, because there was an unusual scratch on the logo, so it's only natural that something like this was debated, Because the degree of perfection was an art whose judgment differed from each other. However I don't think there is a big problem with the current state of the bitcoin logo, even if you pay attention to the many versions of the bitcoin logo that we find on the Internet even though they look similar.

The logo issue doesn't affect bitcoin at all, because actually bitcoin has nothing in common with other products that highlight the Logo side, which I know the level of perfection will be very different from an appraisal perspective, meaning that the debate about the logo is a fairness and does not have a very prominent value.

Without the presence of Gavi and Pedri Barcelona's game will not be as good as the first leg, Pedri is a midfielder who has creativity in maintaining the rhythm of the game and before giving feedback to the attacker, This player is an energetic young midfielder owned by Xavi and currently his contribution is very instrumental in Barcelona's success, so without the presence of Pedri and Gavi will greatly benefit Manchester United.

These two players are not as good as Pedri and Gavi, so Barcelona's style of play will automatically be slightly different, it will be interesting to see how the second leg goes at Old Trafford with a slightly different scheme and game.

If someone understands football tactics, then I think it won't be difficult to understand why Erik Ten Hag continues to entrust Weghorst as the spearhead up front, Of the several wins Manchester United won in their previous matches, Weghorst's presence was quite helpful in the process of scoring goals, because Weghorst always opened up space for other players to score goals. Even if you pay attention when he faces one on one with the opponent's goalkeeper he is not necessarily able to score a goal.

That's why Weghorst is considered important to be in the line-up every time Manchester United plays, because Erik Ten Hak understands very well what makes his team grow although the goal did not come from a centre-forward. In the philosophy of football, victory is very important because what is seen is not who plays well and scores goals.

Most people do not pay attention to the level of risk that will be incurred after the loan is made, so that what is imagined is only the profit when they want to start, investment is not like a mathematical calculation in the formula 1+1=2, that's why borrowing money to make an investment is not recommended at all to do, under any circumstances borrowing money to make investments in my opinion is not the right step, because price fluctuations will lead us to problems with the money we borrow.

It's different if someone has reserve money to cover monthly fees for a loan taken, this money serves to cover when bitcoin conditions don't match the investment scheme being carried out, so there's no need to sell bitcoins to pay monthly fees. Even so, it is not recommended to start investing using borrowed money.

Of the 21 matches that have taken place in the Domestic league, Porto has only suffered two defeats against Rio Ave and Benfica, this record is much better compared to Inter Milan, who have played 23 matches in Serie-A and have suffered five defeats, Although the Portuguese league is different from the Italian league which has its differences. Meanwhile in the qualifying round for the Champions League Inter Milan is much better than Porto, so betting on Inter Milan's victory is far more likely.

The only British representative that can be relied on is Manchester City, even though in this match Bruyne cannot play, but in my opinion Manchester City has a much more chance of getting full points at home to RB Leipzig and I will bet on Manchester City's win in this match.

I believe there will be some recovery stages going forward as well as minor corrections along the way, especially when considering bitcoin's performance in the previous month and today it has been in the $24k range, although the prediction accuracy is not very precise, bitcoin's performance has almost halved in half

To set a definite standard price seems very difficult and reaching a price of $30k should be very close. If you look at the price of bitcoin today, but there is also no guarantee to reach that price by the end of the month and there may be a slight correction back. Cyclical factors will come into play in the coming months before the halving, hopefully by the middle or end of this year we will have come to a conclusion about the next ATH.

Good job to those of you who at a relatively young age already know and have invested in bitcoin, because there are still many people out there who want to invest in bitcoin but don't have the money to start with. As far as the story you wrote in the thread and your father should have taught you how to store bitcoins in a safe place, as this is important as the next priority in keeping bitcoins in a safe place long term. Buy gradually and hold your bitcoins, because we will see a surprise for next year when it reaches the next ATH.

If you intend to store bitcoins in the long term, the electrum and bluewallet wallets are safe enough places for you to store bitcoins and if i'm not mistaken Stockpile requires KYC, is it correct?

To be honest I prefer to invest in bitcoin, not in crypto.

If you are not someone who likes to borrow money and will be very different from people who often do it and it is true that investing using borrowed money will bring you to the stage of risk. In addition, fluctuations in the price of bitcoin and the debt repayment period of monthly deposits will lead you to a new stage of trouble, especially when there is no reserve money to cover monthly deposits. It is better to avoid borrowing money to make investments, if you and anyone else don't want to get into trouble, especially for beginners who are new to bitcoin.

---

---

Note: Every investment must have a level of risk, this is not only because you take out a loan, but because of fluctuations in the price of bitcoin.

In other words, inflation and recession have not affected the journey of bitcoin and this has been proven time and time again. The total availability of bitcoins creates a demand on the economic relationship (Supply and Demand) in its course, while the supply decreases causing the bitcoin price to increase, and moreover many holders do not release bitcoins and continue to accumulate them for the long term, so that demand is only available on a few exchanges.

The fact is that bitcoin allows investors to limit their exposure, so that when confidence in fiat currencies wanes in the midst of a recession and ongoing inflation, many people will move their assets to bitcoin. I think these two variables are quite close to the actual analysis. Possible!!!!

Does your friend know bitcoin and know how to make transactions with it. If not, you have to return to giving the sermon for the use of the bitcoin you gave him.

The only reason that prompts you to give him a bitcoin, isn't because you can't make it to his birthday, right? Because if I'm right, you intend to provide an understanding of bitcoin in case of a good investment in the future. If your intention is to give bitcoins and at the same time your friend will ask for help to resell the bitcoins, here you fail to provide an understanding of bitcoins to your friends in my opinion.

Nobody controls bitcoin because it is decentralized, maybe the simple answer is like this to be able to guarantee that bitcoin will be a sustainable digital currency. However, whatever beliefs people convey, if someone does not understand the characteristics of bitcoin, then this belief will not be able to make people believe in bitcoin in the future.

Analysis skills and knowledge about bitcoin will bring you to a belief, it grows not because of coercion, but purely on what you learn and will lead you to a decision.

Gold is not a digital currency or trying to make an analogy with it is incorrect and gold still exists today and is still trusted by many people for investment, in this case you are misinterpreting gold and trying to make an analogy with digital currency.

To know whether bitcoin will survive in the future or not, no one can guarantee it. But everyone who has ever been involved in investing, definitely believes that bitcoin is the best investment for the future. Instead of talking about the future or not of bitcoin, then you should try to consider starting, at least it can be used for profit and don't forget to consider the risks in the investment you are running.

I'm not sure whether the bitcoin logo has a consensus or standard in its application, because after all bitcoin is widely recognized today is not the only reason the logo factor, although some people consider that the logo has an important role in the journey of bitcoin. If in the future there are additions or suppose there is a new logo design, then who will it be shown for? who will decide? and who has the right to choose the latest logo?

To be honest, I didn't really know that logos had a special meaning for bitcoin, if indeed my understanding isn't that much more correct than I already know.

More precisely not not getting support from the government, but many players (distributors) who accommodate rice to be exported outside, I am sure the government is starting to seriously pay attention to this sector, but not so the maximum supervision is carried out.

If I am not mistaken the intention you want to convey, there are several steps that can be taken to minimize the problem, because the agricultural sector is also very close to inflation and recession. What I understand is there are two points from you convey?

1. National scale food

The government can limit exports abroad to local products and buy every harvest that is owned by its people, so that the supply of raw materials and rice is stable again in the market. While market prices must be guarded and guarded by related agencies, so there are no games from distributors for food security problems. Regulations are needed to give sanctions if there are some elements violating the rules for food security, even though it looks complicated and difficult, if the government is serious then I'm sure it will look easy.

2. Household scale food

This can be utilized by small land available around the yard or vacant land that is less productive, at least for weekly and monthly when harvest conditions are not good, the community can use these plants. The problem of people today is too lazy to plant their own needs, because according to them can be purchased even though the price is expensive.

Another reason that causes scarcity because of the games of distributors in regulating market prices and existing raw materials, So they deliberately create scarcity conditions in the market and can increase prices when everything happens. This area needs to be strengthened by the government with strict regulations and sanctions for anyone who violates, because in reality food is an important source in most countries in the world.

If the problem of rice is a problem of food shortages, then you can see in some countries that try to plant rice using small land. The source of problems like this is because humans are too lazy and rely too much on things that are easier to use. Although the land owned is usually more productive and can be used to plant some basic needs to support food problems.

Best solution:
1. Start loving the agricultural sector
2. Planting food for your own needs
3. Take advantage of small land to be more productive, by planting some food needs on a family scale.

I do not understand the relationship of cryptocurrency with the climate change you mean, can you explain in detail and what type of links you mean. Climate change and the relationship of food sources may have an interconnected level of influence, but if the relationship with cryptocurrency is completely irrelevant, although maybe what you mean is Bitcoin mining.

The draw that Manchester United got in this match was enough to open up opportunities for them when playing at Old Trafford, Marcus Rashford got several good chances at the end of the second half, but these opportunities could not be used to score goals. While Barcelona continued to press in the last 15 minutes of the second half, but Manchester United's defense is still quite solid and able to break the attacks built by Barcelona players.

The draw in this match also broke the predictions of several bookies who considered Barcelona to come out victorious and in the second leg I think Manchester United are far superior, although playing as the host is not a guarantee to win.

That's how competitive the English league is where no club can guarantee every win in the matches they play, Arsenal really have to learn from some of the unsatisfactory results they got in previous games, so the opportunity to continue in the title race is still open for them. Manchester City has shown rivalry, where in the previous two matches in the Premier League and FA they managed to beat Arsenal.

Arteta must take advantage of the momentum to rise when facing aston villa, so that his team can get out of pressure, follow the poor results they got in the previous match. I think Arsenal are still on the track to fight over the title, if they manage to get up when they face Aston Villa and show consistency in the next match.

In football, the term strategy is known and that is the factor that makes them win matches. Experience and strategy are usually needed by every team when facing important matches such as the Champions League, so that they can lead them to the desired victory. In my opinion there is no bad football club if you have gone this far, but because you have to deal with a stronger team, therein lies the weakness that made Brugge have to admit Benfica was superior and the Benfica coach managed to see an opportunity to beat Brugge.

To advance to the quarter-finals, Benfica has a far greater chance than Brugge, apart from playing at home in the second leg and a 2-0 advantage is a big enough capital to secure a ticket to the next round.

The match was still quite even for the two teams, because overall both Barcelona and Manchester United played openly and both did not defend, Wout Weghorst and Marcus Rasford had good chances in the first half, but their shot was still pushed over by Marc-Andre ter Stegen, while Barcelona made several attempts in the first half but no goals were scored. Even though Barcelona controlled the ball more dominantly, Manchester United were still able to keep up.

Both of them played well and didn't dominate, because if you pay attention there were several attacks built by both teams and the match was quite interesting. Marcos Alonso scored one goal with a header and three minutes later Marcus Rasford leveled, Jules Kounde scored an own goal in the 59th minute to put Manchester United ahead temporarily.

This is what was feared since the start of the season, Arsenal will experience inconsistency after swallowing several defeats in the previous matches and I think Arteta will be under pressure following the unsatisfactory results and he will have to work harder to motivate his team going forward. But I think Arteta is still a successful coach at Arsenal so far, compared to the results Arsenal had in the previous few years. Although currently the number of points is the same as Manchester City, Arsenal still have one game left, so Arteta must really evaluate some of the shortcomings of his team.

In fact, in the Premier League it is very difficult for any club to keep winning every game. So there is nothing to blame because they have been doing well this season, the game against Aston Villa will be an evaluation point for Arsenal, if they still want to be involved in the title race, because I think there is still hope for Arsenal.