Bitcoin Forum
May 29, 2024, 02:58:45 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 [662] 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 »
13221  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [185 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: April 01, 2014, 04:33:40 AM
I've gone ahead and set up a public node for BTC to go along with my other couple coins.

http://us-east.royalminingco.com:9332/static/

The fee is .5% to pool and .5% donation to forrestv. This node has my patches related to helping small miners get less variance, and uses the interface which shows average "time to share" per-miner so you can see what's going on. Pseudo share vardiff is also set reasonably per miner so no ADDR+ tweaks are needed just for graph purposes. Next I want to fold in iongchun's miner-specific stats page, and add some extra charts/history/info to that.

It isn't like the world needs more public p2pool nodes, but I wanted to have at least one that I knew was using the changes I worked on for the alt coin pools. Smiley

More public node are a very good thing. People get less local latency and are able to compete better with dedicated nodes, lowering the barrier to entry, so more p2pool participants.

Nice to see p2pool steadily growing in hash rate and network share BTW. We are back down to about one day per block, after getting close to two days per block a few weeks ago.
13222  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Antminer S1] Sharing of ROI status? on: March 31, 2014, 09:23:00 PM
I think I misplaced a decimal point calculating things going into this mining project Smiley
I'm showing .012 to .015 BTC per day is that normal?

Thank you

Non overclocked S1 should be about 0.018 right now
13223  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: ZGL wallet: achieve zero gain/loss for tax purposes with coin control on: March 31, 2014, 09:18:09 PM
I was just referring to the fact that the cost basis of the "melted down" coin becomes the weighted-average of cost-bases of the inputs (which is true whether or not the "melting process" is a taxable event).
Maybe. In its guidance the IRS has stated a LIFO rule for virtual currencies.

Thanks for your continued help with ZGL, Smooth.  

May I ask where your read about the LIFO recommendation?  I didn't see LIFO mentioned at least in Notice 2014-21 (http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-14-21.pdf)

You are correct. I must have seen LIFO in one of the (apparently inaccurate) second hand reports, but it seems it didn't come from the IRS.

13224  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: ZGL wallet: achieve zero gain/loss for tax purposes with coin control on: March 31, 2014, 08:26:17 PM
I was just referring to the fact that the cost basis of the "melted down" coin becomes the weighted-average of cost-bases of the inputs (which is true whether or not the "melting process" is a taxable event).

Maybe. In its guidance the IRS has stated a LIFO rule for virtual currencies. With LIFO even if you melt-and-combine when you do a trade it could be that your cost basis is not derived from either of the coins you melted. If you are able to use the specific lot method, which seems likely but is not clear from the guidance, then the weighted average calculation is correct, but probably have to identify the original purchase date and price if the melting process is not a taxable event (reset of basis).

Also, let's not forget about holding period. LIFO might be more advantageous if it shifts more of your gains into the long-term category. If you buy two coins today, melt them together, and then spend that new coin, the tax treatment might ignore both the purchase and melting and consider your basis and holding period from some coin you bought long ago.

All this remains to be worked out. Some of this (for example preference of long term over short term holdings) could also be implemented in a wallet.
13225  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: ZGL wallet: achieve zero gain/loss for tax purposes with coin control on: March 31, 2014, 07:43:49 PM
Well, as a "normal" user of bitcoin, I like to combine all the coins I own into one output every now and then, mostly to avoid paying future transaction fees for very large (in bytes) transactions. The history of those coins do get "lost".

The history gets lost in the wallet, but according to the recent IRS guidance, that doesn't let you off the hook for keeping track of the history for tax purposes. You still appear to be required to keep track of the original history to report gains under a FIFO rule or possibly other rules such as using specific lots.


Yes, Smooth made this more clear than I did above.  If your "drops become and ocean," your cost basis for the ocean becomes the weighted-average of the cost basis of the individual drops.  

This is not clear. The question I have is whether "melting down" coins and using those to create new coins is itself a taxable event, or whether you actually have to engage in trade to constitute a taxable event. I think the latter.
13226  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: ZGL wallet: achieve zero gain/loss for tax purposes with coin control on: March 31, 2014, 06:14:55 AM
Well, as a "normal" user of bitcoin, I like to combine all the coins I own into one output every now and then, mostly to avoid paying future transaction fees for very large (in bytes) transactions. The history of those coins do get "lost".

The history gets lost in the wallet, but according to the recent IRS guidance, that doesn't let you off the hook for keeping track of the history for tax purposes. You still appear to be required to keep track of the original history to report gains under a FIFO rule or possibly other rules such as using specific lots.

I suppose a wallet could be constructed that would recognize that certain coins are made up of a combined lot of several other lots of coins, and then produce tax-compliant reports accordingly.

I'm not sure whether you can treat the mere act of combining the coins as realizing the gain or loss. I would guess not, but my confidence on that is low.
13227  Economy / Lending / Re: Islamic Bank of Bitcoin - LOANS on: March 31, 2014, 02:47:17 AM
I'm curious about sharia loans. My understanding is that it is allowable for the lender to accept a share of the profits (as opposed to interest)? So if you are borrowing to buy a miner for example, the lender could receive a portion of the mined coins. Is that correct?



   Yeah, this would be a joint venture and would be halal (lawful). This means that the lender shares the risk as well as the profit with the borrower... right now mining seems pretty risky, but what's your pitch? As far as I know, almost all mining operation are only profitable if bitcoin price goes up, which would edge into speculation territory, which is not lawful.

It wasn't a pitch, just asking a question about Islamic loans. I'm trying to understand is all. Thanks for response.
13228  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Need advice on: March 31, 2014, 01:44:07 AM
Sold out from bitmain but you can find them for sale for much less.
13229  Economy / Currency exchange / Re: $190 money pak (two codes, with receipts) WTB btc give me a price on: March 31, 2014, 01:27:41 AM
$100 left now
13230  Economy / Currency exchange / $100 money pak (code with receipt) WTB btc give me a price on: March 31, 2014, 01:13:36 AM
Best offer in the next 15 minutes. You send first.
13231  Economy / Lending / Re: Islamic Bank of Bitcoin - LOANS on: March 30, 2014, 11:02:29 PM
I'm curious about sharia loans. My understanding is that it is allowable for the lender to accept a share of the profits (as opposed to interest)? So if you are borrowing to buy a miner for example, the lender could receive a portion of the mined coins. Is that correct?

13232  Economy / Lending / Re: .06 Loan, w/ collateral on: March 30, 2014, 09:31:33 PM
Seems like too much trouble and shipping costs for a 0.06 loan.

Combine with some other collateral that can be shipped together for a larger loan and this is more feasible.

13233  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Antminer S1 Sales open] Price changes daily, now 0.893 BTC for 180GH/s on: March 30, 2014, 07:31:06 AM
Theoretically, if BTC went to 200$, would the price per ant miner sill be ~.89btc?

"Price changes daily" and, no, it's not going to be $180 for an item that includes shipping a heavy box halfway around the world.



13234  Economy / Currency exchange / Re: Looking for a TRUSTED buyer on: March 30, 2014, 05:38:48 AM
I'll buy 5.
13235  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: ZGL-wallet: achieve zero gain/loss for tax purposes with coin control on: March 29, 2014, 03:44:20 AM
... and people engaging in these transactions can routinely ignore the tax consequences, because there aren't any.

I acknowledged not being a lawyer before making my tax remarks. Peter R had the good sense to do the same, but I haven't seen that from you. For you to make the statement above I find it troubling, that is unless of course you are a lawyer or tax professional.

Sorry to hear you are troubled by a statement some random guy on the internet makes. Well, no I'm actually not. But if so, you should really pay less attention to what random people on the internet say.

Unless, of course, you want to engage in the conversation with respect to substance. I think that train left about three replies ago, however.

13236  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: ZGL-wallet: achieve zero gain/loss for tax purposes with coin control on: March 28, 2014, 11:29:14 PM
Well, it's whatever you meant then. I (as well as the tax attorney) say every transaction counts for documentation; you said that's wrong.

What I said was wrong is that every transaction is "taxable" because there are reasonable methods of conducting transactions using specific lot identification such that there is no gain or loss on routine day-to-day transactions, and people engaging in these transactions can routinely ignore the tax consequences, because there aren't any. In some abstract theoretical sense these transactions may still be "taxable" but for all practical purposes they are not, because the tax on a gain or loss of $0 is $0.

No one is suggesting that you purge transaction histories from your wallet or otherwise fail to document or report anything you are required to report.

Quote
I didn't say it avoided capital gains. Once again, my disagreement with you is only over the accounting and reporting methodology, not whether or not specific lots can be used to offset capital gains.

Then you didn't read his original post. He explained how specific lots can be used to offset capital gains such that routine day-to-day transactions do not generate capital gains. Everything continues to be documented.


13237  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: ZGL-wallet: achieve zero gain/loss for tax purposes with coin control on: March 28, 2014, 10:10:50 PM
It's not simply enough to tell the IRS, oh, well due to the way we buy our gold we never have any capital gain events.

Stop this straw man. Nobody claimed this means never having capital gains events. It means choosing specific lots such that capital gains events, but not necessarily (or even at all) the amount of capital gains, are (greatly) reduced.

You realize that specific lot identification is used to calculate capital gains for billions if not trillions of dollars assets each year, right? This is nothing new to bitcoin.

13238  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: ZGL-wallet: achieve zero gain/loss for tax purposes with coin control on: March 28, 2014, 07:30:29 PM
How will a wallet take this into account for transactions happening in January if a purchase in July puts you into a different tax bracket?

Your tax bracket does not change the calculation of gain-or-loss on the sale of an asset. It only changes the amount of tax calculated on the gains.

13239  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: ZGL-wallet: achieve zero gain/loss for tax purposes with coin control on: March 28, 2014, 07:23:39 PM
Quote
#2 Every bitcoin transaction is taxable.
As I said in my first post, Bitcoin users will have to calculate their gain or loss every time they purchase goods or services with bitcoin. Yes, this is a very onerous burden and creates a significant threat to the widespread adoption of bitcoin. However, this outcome is not very surprising and is consistent with US tax laws. Hopefully the Treasury Department or Congress can be convinced to apply a "personal transaction" exception similar to the one that exists for foreign currency. But for now, this is how it will have to work. ...

He's wrong. Every transaction is not taxable. It may be taxable if it produces a gain.

It is trivial to show there is a method, at least in theory, to manage a wallet such that many transactions are not taxable.

Imagine that you purchase small number of coins on a continuous basis (using a robot most likely). You will in all likelihood have a small number of coins with a cost basis exactly matching the current market value at any time (unless the market value is at a new high). When you sell/spend coins with a basis of $498.37 and the current market value is $498.37, the transaction is not taxable. There may be reporting and recordkeeping requirements, but those can easily satisfied by the software. The user does not need to think, "Oh, this cup of coffee costs $3 but it also generates a capital gains tax of $0.37." If the purchase is larger, you will likely not have coins with the same cost basis as the current market value, and will generate a capital gain (or loss), but only on these larger, relatively infrequent, transactions.

If you have a large number of coins with a much lower cost basis, you will definitely have to incur a capital gains tax at some point (in the above example, by selling a block of those coins and giving the funds to the robot to start accumulating your collection of coins). This is not some "magic" method of avoiding capital gains taxes. If it were, you would be correct that it can't work, but it isn't.

The ZGL wallet is a slightly more complex way of doing the same thing.


13240  Economy / Lending / Re: Looking for investment of ~2500 BTC for music festival, return = ~150,000 BTC on: March 28, 2014, 07:04:58 PM
we wouldn't be looking to take a loan out for interest, rather to exchange equity for capital.

Perhaps the confusion is based on the the fact that you posted in the Lending forum. There is another forum for stock investments. Just saying.
Pages: « 1 ... 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 [662] 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!