Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 11:29:14 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 [69] 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 ... 236 »
1361  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Weekly pool and network statistics on: December 02, 2013, 05:06:30 PM
GHash.IO keep increasing their share of the network, most likely due to CEX.IO trading. I'm not sure how I feel about this - it's an increase in the proportion controlled by a single entity, but in effect any pool has the same control of hashes. It should make no difference that (as far as I'm aware) CEX.IO maintains the hash sources locally rather than the sources being distributed. Is there a downside I'm not understanding?

Only extra worry from cex.io/ghash.io that is different from past concerns is accountability.  If a public pool *attempted* to do something nefarious that pool just committed suicide whether they succeed or fail at the gamble.  When a pool that has ~1 PH/s (based on estimates looking at their speed fluctuations during known pool issues for public vs private) privately owned, there is no accountability left.  Pair that with using a 0% fee for what was already the 2nd largest mining entity before the public was allowed in.  If they attempt something, there is basically no downside.  If the public hashrate leaves due to an attempt, they aren't actually losing anything (no fee) other than the mining time on their private farm.
1362  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1400 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+Orphan, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: December 02, 2013, 02:35:25 AM
For those that don't read the top of Bitcointalk.org:

Your username+password on the forums may have been captured IN PLAINTEXT during a 38 hour long window.  I have already received multiple confirmed break-ins on accounts that used the same credentials on the forums as what they used on BTC Guild.  If your username/password was compromised, having an email on the account would still have sent confirmation emails for any account changes before they could take affect.  Similarly, if your wallet was locked, you were immune to losing any coins even if your email and account were both compromised.
1363  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1400 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+Orphan, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: November 30, 2013, 11:17:40 PM
Does having a faster internet connection result in higher shares submitted? I just upgraded my internet from 6MBps down/1MBps up to 15MBps down/10MBps up. My shares have gone up significantly.

Before I was submitting around 240,000 and now I'm submitting 300,000 and no less than 290,000 per shift!

So does it make a difference or was something wrong with my old internet?

Shift sizes were increased ~20% (1.2b vs 1b).  So that's why your shares per shift went up.  Contribution % shouldn't have changed much (although the pool has gained a bit of speed in the last two days).
1364  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1400 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+Orphan, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: November 30, 2013, 04:37:10 PM
API pollers would've died when the website was having issues earlier.  Shouldn't have been having any new problems since then though.

"API pollers" still alive? thank you!

API programs shouldn't be having any issues.  It was only a brief outage.
1365  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: MH/s, Mh/s, khs... Million hashes or Mega Hashes... on: November 30, 2013, 05:29:02 AM
I was looking into buying a Radeon 7950 card, and while searching Google for its hash rate, I found some threads here on bitcointalk saying like 700 Mhash, ~660MH/sec, and at least 550MH.

Then I went to a few different sellers and they say the same card works on 650khs and 600Kh/s, using K, not M.

The only difference I could find is that M comes with a capital H, while K came with a lower h.

After some search I only found this on the Wiki:
Quote
Mhash/s = millions hashes per second (raw speed performance; may not be very energy efficient with some models).

I thought M meant Mega, as K would mean Kilo, now I am utterly confused... Could someone help?

If the sellers are using kh/s, they're referring to litecoin mining.  Litecoin hash rates are much lower than Bitcoin hash rates.

Ignore capitalization in general, all sellers and most websites are quite careless with capitalization when it comes to KH/MH/GH/TH/PH.


K = 1,000 hashes/sec
M = 1,000,000 hashes/sec
G = 1,000,000,000 hashes/sec
T = 1,000,000,000,000 hashes/sec
P = 1,000,000,000,000,000 hashes/sec
1366  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: 25 BTC per block forever? on: November 30, 2013, 05:22:13 AM
Just FYI even if the block reward didn't halve, Bitcoin would still work as the inflation % would still go to 0.
I will take your word for that.  Personally, I am mostly interested in the technical and logistical issues caused by such a split but others may be interested in the economic aspects as well.

It is true, at least in practice.  As more coins are out there, the inflation % decreases with each new block, even without the halving.  Additionally, coins can become permanently lost if they are sent/generated to an address where the private key has been lost (formatted or never existed).

Eventually, the rate of loss will equal the rate of inflation and establish equilibrium where the available money supply does not materially fluctuate in either direction.  You would not know with certainty the exact quantity of coins available, but you don't know that now either (nobody knows exactly how many BTC have been lost forever, but it's likely significant due to early day miners formatting machines).
1367  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: November 30, 2013, 03:54:19 AM
New difficulty is 707M. The change occured yesterday evening (UTC), only several hours ago. Maybe it can be mentioned here..
The change to the difficulty has been "only" 16 %.
The tempo of difficulty increase is decreasing for several epochs already.
I wonder whether it's a permanent change or a temporary one only. :-)

So does a 16% increase in difficulty equal 16% less revenue? (assume no changes to equipment and no changes to participants within the pool, just talking about difficulty as an isolated thing).

~13.8% decrease in expected earnings from a 16% diff increase.
1368  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Ghash.io owner might have more then 1 million bitcons on: November 30, 2013, 02:00:49 AM

Ghash.io isnt just one person. Anyone can mine there. it's a Pool. Alot of the hashing power are users pointing their physical miners to Ghash

At least 60-70% of their hashpower is owned by ghash/cex, not contributed from miners.
1369  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1400 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+Orphan, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: November 29, 2013, 08:54:04 PM
does anyone know what the specific usb connector that plugs into the ASICminer 49 port hub is called? none of the cables i have around the house seem to be the correct one. I need to know what to buy.

It's a USB A-to-B cable.
1370  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1400 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+Orphan, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: November 29, 2013, 08:53:14 PM

Quote
We do not support generated transactions from pools like Eligius, P2Pool etc.

What does this mean technical?


It means technically they don't support generated transactions from Eligius or P2Pool.   Huh

what is the difference between to receive NMC on a Namecoin client with a NMC address and to receive NMC in BTC-E with a NMC address?

that was my question. how can you prevent to receive NMC on a Namecoin address technical.

Eligius and P2Pool pay you with "generation" type transactions.  These can be orphaned, and also can't be spent for 120 confirmations.  BTC-e's system for processing deposits will not properly recognize a generation type transaction.

BTC Guild's payments are all sent using standard address-to-address type payments.
1371  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1400 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+Orphan, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: November 29, 2013, 10:02:17 AM
There have been a couple discussions about btcguild's payout-"restrictions" to avoid it being
misused as a bitcoin-wallet and I do understand that.

In the past, I have casually done manual payouts, and now my "Paid Out" is some quite
uneven number, and there doesn't seem to be a chance to ever get back to nice even
numbers (short of abandoning this account and opening a new one). Is there?

I'm aware that some will just not understand why anyone could even care about
"uneven" numbers, but, well, I guess it's just one example of a "1st world problem". Smiley


You're probably screwed on getting your "Paid Out" number to be a nice round number.  As you posted, the main reason to not have complete control over the withdrawal amount is that does directly encourage using your pool balance as a debit card and treating it like a bank that slowly fills back up as you mine.  Auto payouts are nice round numbers because the extra decimals don't mean much if you plan to continue mining.  Manual payouts are full-balance because if you want to quit it lets you fully liquidate every last satoshi so the idea that the pool is holding your spare change hostage isn't valid.
1372  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1400 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+Orphan, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: November 29, 2013, 05:40:13 AM
API pollers would've died when the website was having issues earlier.  Shouldn't have been having any new problems since then though.
1373  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1400 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+Orphan, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: November 29, 2013, 04:55:45 AM
I don't think my miner can even go up to 600Gh/s. How is this possible?



The website issue screwed up worker speed estimates, so a few minutes worth of shares were condensed and being marked as if they were received all at once.  Nothing too big, it will fix itself as the averages get more data and the big bulk of shares rolls out of your estimate window.
1374  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1400 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+Orphan, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: November 29, 2013, 04:41:33 AM
Was the Guild just down? I couldn't connect for a little bit. Tried multiple browsers and even two different source networks.




Website was unavailable briefly, should be back up and running.
1375  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [115 Th] 50BTC.com - PPS|Stratum+Vardiff|Port 80|QIWI,Yandex,Mobile,WM... on: November 29, 2013, 12:45:45 AM
Oh, so no worries then.  I'm sure this'll turn out great.  Just like when pirateat40 claimed he'd be sending everybody's coins back in no time.
1376  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Why hasn't a pool owner done this? on: November 28, 2013, 11:40:30 PM
Why hasn't a pool owner modified SHA coin clients so that all SHA coins can be merged mined at the same time?

There are a lot of very intelligent people in this forum and it appears that this is a feasible task.

So why hasn't it been done?

Bitparking does it!!!

I assume their "simple" website without pretty dashboard like BTCguild, Bitminter etc. is keeping them small.

Bitparking only does it for a handful.  There's a lot of others.  My assumption is that's what this thread was about.  Specifically the few SHA256 coins which are "almost" worth as much as BTC.  Of course, the second they become merged minable they'll drop to virtually worthless very quickly, which is why they don't allow it.
1377  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [300 TH] BitMinter.com [1% PPLNS,Pays TxFees + MergedMining,Stratum,GBT,vardiff] on: November 28, 2013, 09:06:21 PM
10 stale namecoin blocks in a row.  Is that normal?

No. It appears to be caused by bugs in the Namecoin software. I'll see if there are any active Namecoin developers.


Are you using the namecoin main branch from github yet, or is it the old version?  I'm about to push the updated namecoind to all my other servers (only running on 2 of 6 pool servers at the moment).  I'll take a peek at my logs to see if there's been any noticeable jump in stales for Guild since updating 1/3 the pool to the latest namecoin hardfork version.
1378  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1400 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+Orphan, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: November 28, 2013, 09:03:04 PM
Just a question because I haven't been mining on BTC guild since 2011...

If I want to do merged mining with my Jalapeno, do I just connect to stratum.btcguild.com:3333? NMC will automatically be paid to my account? Or do I have to turn anything else on?

The only requirement for merged mining is that your worker must be set to the PPLNS payment method.



something changed on the api code? Android BTC Farm Watcher is not working anymore.

No changes have been made to the API yet.



can anyone help me to locate my NMC withdrawals to btc-e.com 1 or 2 weeks ago to address MzAx5buAA8FNV7tYhJTefXLfJXnHyaHgtd

it could also be a issue on BTC-E side maybe the NMC network itself? around 63 NMC withdraw 3 or 4 transactions.

thank you!

http://explorer.dot-bit.org/a/MzAx5buAA8FNV7tYhJTefXLfJXnHyaHgtd  shows 67 NMC has been received by that address.
1379  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1400 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+Orphan, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: November 28, 2013, 06:10:36 PM
wow, well, don't put yourself out man, I didn't mean like today lol

damn kid, have some turkey, relax, chat with the folks  Wink

I've never been a huge fan of Thanksgiving, neither were my parents.  We'll probably go out for some breakfast or something the day after instead.  I can't fathom how this holiday turned into Christmas Jr.  Hell, depending on what day of the week Christmas lands on, some people get more time off for Thanksgiving than Christmas!
1380  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1400 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+Orphan, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: November 28, 2013, 06:03:24 PM
any chance of parsing out total pplns earnings on the dashboard again?

I know its lazy, but that is where I mark my switch from GPUs to track equipment ROI

Total PPLNS earnings will be visible on the Payments page later today, so that the total earnings & payouts are both reconciled on that page.
Pages: « 1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 [69] 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 ... 236 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!