libbitoin as i see is in cpp, not php or java, python as the OP mentioned.
I thin he is interested in using this on linux, and not using any executables.
swig! |
|
|
|
you speak only for yourself, so please stop trying to speak for others.
sometimes winning is indeed all that matters when it comes to your property, your family, your ability to survive and thrive, your wealth, your freedom and liberty, and your sovereignty ... all of which are being taken from us at exponentially increasing rates, methods, and means.
I dont want to be forced into being taken care of either. If you want that, fine, but dont do it on my time or my dime.
you have just not been here long enough to know that Atlas/Jon is a narcissistic ass. Instead of irrational ad-hominem attacks, debate the message... if you can. been there, done that, didn't work. btw. my ad-hominem attacks are not irrational, they are quite rational in fact, as it makes me happy to degrade Atlas/Jon. |
|
|
|
I made a site for collecting donations for all the awesome linux projects, and it is accepting Bitcoin.
sometimes people are just stupid, and don't know what they are talking about... GIMP, GCC, and mplayer, is NOT "linux" project, they are OPENSOURCE PROJECTS. GIMP and GCC, are gnu projects. and mplayer is independent(i think...). but they are not linux projects! i am a huge fan of linux, gnu and opensource in general. but you are a incompetent noob, who don't understand a single thing that happens around you. EDIT: ...and you is likely to be a scammer too, asking for donations on others behalf. |
|
|
|
it was America's own fault, they should not have fucked around in the middle east, and then their buildings would still stand. im not saying that im happy for 9/11, it was a grusome attack. but it's just stupid fucking around, and making people angry, and expecting that it doesn't come back to you at some point. |
|
|
|
I cant find the answer , maybe I'm blind . So do the world a favor and help a blind man.
NO, YOU CAN NOT WITHDRAW WITH SEPA ON MTGOX, ONLY DEPOSIT(afaik) use intersango for sepa transfers. i have been a huge mtgox fan in the past, but their service sucks now, abandon them and let their bad support hurt their wallets. |
|
|
|
big bullish move today... exciting times as promised :-)
::: jumps up and down with excitement ::: I guess this would be the euphoria phase of the investor emotion cycle? or perhaps right before simple question: up or down? |
|
|
|
|
then go read their website! NOOBS! or even this thread!
|
|
|
|
|
welcome to you dear new scamcoin/scamcash, may you have a short and painful life.
|
|
|
|
Anarchy is very socialist so we shouldn't have to put socialist with the anarchy word but with these abominations popping up calling them self anarcho-capitalists its needed.
it depends on the way you describe anarchy. anarcho-capitalists, might describe anarchy as: "i have the right to kick you in the balls, if i can do it" while anarcho-socialist, might describe it as: "sure i have the right to kick your balls, but why not be nice to eachother instead?" If you look at early anarchists and all anarchists until modern times they all had very socialist like views on the redistribution of wealth and stuff. like the ones in spain? now im on a topic that i have only a little knowledge about. btw. we are off topic, should we start a thread? |
|
|
|
Anarchy is very socialist so we shouldn't have to put socialist with the anarchy word but with these abominations popping up calling them self anarcho-capitalists its needed.
it depends on the way you describe anarchy. anarcho-capitalists, might describe anarchy as: "i have the right to kick you in the balls, if i can do it" while anarcho-socialist, might describe it as: "sure i have the right to kick your balls, but why not be nice to eachother instead?" |
|
|
|
Thats pretty much what I was thinking, but what kind of lag do you think we could expect by running the backend over Tor?
Also I don't see how the frontend would be unsafe, just vulnerable to being shut down taken over.
not much lag i think, you could always cache the big things, like bid/ask. i would rater interact directly with the backend, then using a frontend. the code for a frontend could be open and anyone could setup their own(or use a public one), in a similar way as diaspora does it(except they are totally decentralized). |
|
|
|
Just the couple of experts I spoke to said I2P was a more secure design but currently more vulnerable than Tor to attack due to Tor being a bigger network. Like I said before I was also in favour of a .onion site as well. Sorry for the confusion can we stay on topic.
Either they are government agents that lied to you on purpose, or just dumb. I2P is not more secure then Tor(they are about equal) my personal opinion is that tor is most secure, because of simpler and cleaner code(and of course its more used, but that not relevant when we are talking about the underlying systems). staying on topic from now on. Also the US gov (some parts of it anyway) also have good reason to be able to do things without being seen, it's why the CIA or some other agency is quite happy about Bitcoin. I'm anarcho-socialist so not a big fan of the US or any government really both the UK and US governments are bordering fascist regimes these days both the big parties who can only win the elections are basically the same fighting for the rights of banks ect above the average person needs. Sorry off-topic again  Please don't all attack me back now for mentioning I'm a anarchist which I have to put socialist after to explain my stand point. I'm a big-fan of bitcoin please all leave it at that  RAGE!!!!!!!! NATIONAL SOCIALISTIC, NAZI COMMUNIST! DUMB INTERNET TROLL RAGE!!!! (... what was the internet law about the nazies again?)  btw. i would also describe myself as a anarcho-socialist or nihilist. |
|
|
|
Just the couple of experts I spoke to said I2P was a more secure design but currently more vulnerable than Tor to attack due to Tor being a bigger network. Like I said before I was also in favour of a .onion site as well. Sorry for the confusion can we stay on topic.
Either they are government agents that lied to you on purpose, or just dumb. I2P is not more secure then Tor(they are about equal) my personal opinion is that tor is most secure, because of simpler and cleaner code(and of course its more used, but that not relevant when we are talking about the underlying systems). staying on topic from now on. Recommendations on how to run GLBSE in such a way as to have a normal www face but having the data base in the darknet (this would allow darknet users to have access as well), ideally without much lag. backend stuff in the tor network. frontend server(s), that interact with the backend, through tor. the .onion address of the backend could be open to the public too, and the frontend(s) are just a simple(and unsafe!) way to interact the real GLBSE. |
|
|
|
Just the couple of experts I spoke to said I2P was a more secure design but currently more vulnerable than Tor to attack due to Tor being a bigger network. Like I said before I was also in favour of a .onion site as well. Sorry for the confusion can we stay on topic.
Either they are government agents that lied to you on purpose, or just dumb. I2P is not more secure then Tor(they are about equal) my personal opinion is that tor is most secure, because of simpler and cleaner code(and of course its more used, but that not relevant when we are talking about the underlying systems). staying on topic from now on. |
|
|
|
Who else thinks its a good idea to have a darknet (I2P or FREENET) mirror of the GLBSE?
why not .onion (Tor)? I think I2P and FREENET are more secure but wouldn't hurt to have a mirror on all three? and i think you don't know anything about it... I'm no whitehat hacker but I've studied Software and hardware engineering as a undergraduate. I do honestly believe every Tor exit node could be monitored by "Echelon" I2P doesn't use exit nodes in the same way and if you look at FREENET that is a much more secure darknet than Tor. My two satoshi worth anyway. exit-nodes have nothing to do with the internal .onion. exit-nodes are only used when you are accessing the normal internet, and are therefor not used in the tor darknet. your argument is irrelevant, to the darknet part of tor. Internal traffic from Tor is feed to end users via exit nodes. That's why there is a warning when you set up a exit node that the traffic your relying could be illegal and get you in trouble. There is no such problem with I2P and FREENET while being a lot slower looks the most secure option. you don't read what i write, and your posts shows lack of knowledge, please educate yourself on the inner workings of tor before you continue the discussion. EXIT-NODES ARE NOT USED FOR TOR'S INTERNAL .ONION ROUTING, EXIT-NODES ARE ONLY USED TO ACCESS THE NORMAL INTERNETyou can't access the normal internet from within I2P(without some none-standard vpn application). it was not what it was designed for. |
|
|
|
Who else thinks its a good idea to have a darknet (I2P or FREENET) mirror of the GLBSE?
why not .onion (Tor)? I think I2P and FREENET are more secure but wouldn't hurt to have a mirror on all three? and i think you don't know anything about it... I'm no whitehat hacker but I've studied Software and hardware engineering as a undergraduate. I do honestly believe every Tor exit node could be monitored by "Echelon" I2P doesn't use exit nodes in the same way and if you look at FREENET that is a much more secure darknet than Tor. My two satoshi worth anyway. exit-nodes have nothing to do with the internal .onion. exit-nodes are only used when you are accessing the normal internet, and are therefor not used in the tor darknet. your argument is irrelevant, to the darknet part of tor. |
|
|
|
Who else thinks its a good idea to have a darknet (I2P or FREENET) mirror of the GLBSE?
why not .onion (Tor)? I think I2P and FREENET are more secure but wouldn't hurt to have a mirror on all three? and i think you don't know anything about it... I'm no whitehat hacker but I've studied Software and hardware engineering as a undergraduate. but did you read the code? i have not studied shit, but IMHO tor are the most secure, because it have the most clean and stable code. and also as nafario said, freenet is just a anonymous and secure distributed data store, and would therefor not be the best choice for a request-response based system. |
|
|
|
Who else thinks its a good idea to have a darknet (I2P or FREENET) mirror of the GLBSE?
why not .onion (Tor)? I think I2P and FREENET are more secure but wouldn't hurt to have a mirror on all three? and i think you don't know anything about it... |
|
|
|
This user is currently ignored.
I just love the ignore feature. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
