That is a very bold statement, I like it 

As members of the forum we should all be accepting intelligence but not in any form. Human intelligence ranging from the low quality posters, trolls, scammers and attention-seekers on one side and high quality posters and technical geniuses on the other side and every one else between the two are humans with intelligence. It is a broad pool.

On the flip side there is AI (to include chatbots) and that is basically taking things too far when it comes to this forum populated and dominated by humans. If those claiming to use AI to correct posts want others to believe them that is a different matter altogether but using AI to generate replies for the sake of trying to build accounts with minimal effort to make money from them is basically not intelligence. Would you agree?

Some of us have been asking for clarity for a very long time but had to interpret the rules as we thought appropriate. For that reason I think the whole debate will rage on for a long time until it eventually reaches a point at which AI would have inflicted a lot of changes. By that point, it would force admin to make an announcement to put an end to the confusion.

That is a very bold statement, I like it  

These are the final games from the round of 16 taking place today Tuesday 2nd July:

Romania vs Netherlands
Austria vs Turkey

I am confident that Romania and Turkey will win their games and with that will qualify for the quarter-finals

Not I am defending their actions but maybe those blog entries could simply be down to the fact that they were under heavy pressure from their own legal team which advised them to those steps. If not, maybe it was as a result of their own concerns that they could be facing future legal woes and decided to take drastic action as a precaution after Samourai Wallet was closed down and their founders arrested being accused of $1.7 billion money laundering.

If I remember correctly, not that long ago zkSNACKs was either seeking investment or were selling some or all of their company and as a result the owners were going to receive a financial windfall. All that seems to have ended now but it make people ask why GingerWallet would start up using the very same tools (via the fork) that WasabiWallet discontinued using in their attempt to protect themselves from any potential legal action.

If the options you mentioned are not going to be considered then what about directly asking admin to give accounts a retirement tag in their profile next to their member rank? The caveat being if someone asks for a retirement of their account then it is a one way request that cannot be undone. That way nobody including the owner/operator of the account (or any future AI hack attempt) will be able to access it.

What happened to your input in this thread that you created as an attempt to avoid receiving tags on your account. You no longer post there: Chatbots: The Future of Scam Hunting

You are clearly playing the role of an innocent individual pretending to be ignorant yet all you did was to demonstrate your mindset. Your ditec_wrogn account has been noticed by far too many members now and for that reason will probably not be monetised via signature campaigns in future therefore why keep up the charade?

Your posting similarities to a certain account comes to mind. How many accounts do you have in the forum?

I saw a similar video from a different source days ago and my opinion has not changed. Quite simply, Joshua looked like a bully trying to intimidate Dubois. He thought it was acceptable for him to disrespect Dubois but it was not acceptable for Dubois to return it back to him.

For me, when Joshua threatened to hit him with a chair he crossed the line and became a bully as well as a nobody. Clearly Dubois is not the most articulate when it comes to having a microphone in front of him and did not know how to respond but Joshua was aware of that since they know each from many years ago when they sparred.

I hope Dubois wins the fight and in the process helps Joshua expedite his retirement.

Like countless others, I have been reading about Bitcoin prices (call them forecasts or predictions) for a long time and I am not impressed with what I have read over the years. Whether Bitcoin reaches levels as low as $50,000 or not, it will not stop those that want to claim it and the same is for those that claim it will hit $100,000.

The problem will always be for people that see their investment as a liability when the price falls instead of remaining optimistic and refusing to sell.

This is definitely newsworthy as it makes another massive international brand become associated with crypto but I am not optimistic about the near future plans Sony could have with Whalefin. There is absolutely no announcement or indication that crypto will be implemented in to day-to-day activities when using Sony products therefore their business decision must be based on a different perspective.

I wonder how genuine your words are and if you even have another motive. You create an account on 28th June and are last active on 29th June and in that period you make one post. Also, it seems if the replies in this thread were of value to you (because of the pressing question you asked), you would have been far more active. How can you be taken seriously?

You created an account in the forum specifically to ask this question when your time would have been better spent asking a lawyer in your own country or finding one in Finland. In short, ask a lawyer in your own country or contact any lawyer from Finland: https://findanattorney.fi

If there has been any blatant deliberate act that traps players in to a cycle by locking withdrawals citing breaches of terms and conditions when there are huge amounts involved, then it is unacceptable.

If they do that while at the same time allowing for deposits to take place in order to entice/allow players to continue placing wagers in the hope they lose then unlock withdrawals when the amounts are smaller, it is basically a combination of many words including cheating, fraud and scam.

Metaspins.com do you have any comment to make about this?

I had not visited the eXch website for some days but again upon checking today I am having problems because the website is loading intermittently: https://hszyoqwrcp7cxlxnqmovp6vjvmnwj33g4wviuxqzq47emieaxjaperyd.onion/

It is good to see the eXch website when it is functioning but I am having hit and miss problems. Sometimes the website opens after an excessive delay and on other occasions it times out completely. There do not seem to be any issues with the clearnet but is anybody else currently experiencing the same issues with the onion link?

This is a plus point for those that were using WasabiWallet but stopped because their default co-ordinator was removed. They could use GingerWallet and retain previous WasabiWallet folders or keep using WasabiWallet but modify the GingerWallet api link. Either way there is a benefit for those that want to keep using these wallets.

I cannot recall if WasabiWallet was restricting downloads to a specific country (USA) or whether their previous versions that did allow a default co-ordinator could even be modified to use n alternative one therefore cannot compare the two points you raised about GingerWallet. What I will say is that when a company claims they are privacy focused but people can see many issues with those claims, it becomes harder for the company to win back confidence.

If GingerWallet decided for example to go on a promotion or advertising spree to market their service, it could work out for them but not if they have question marks over their privacy structure and people are discussing the flaws in forums. If they want to avoid going down the WasabiWallet route with regards to reputational damage, they will need to ensure they never have any links with anybody that has the mindset of Kruw (and to immediately distance themselves if any claim of collaboration is made with someone like that) and they have to engage with customer/clients on some platforms. Even then, it might be difficult for them to succeed when people question how much privacy is actually afforded to people using their service.

Keep us posted regarding the lawyer you contacted.

There is no difficulty in perception. This post from Metaspins.com seems fairly conclusive. The stance they have chosen to take means they are citing your breach of rules for all of your accounts being banned. They have no intention of letting you withdraw any funds that were won as a result of breaching the terms and conditions therefore your options are limited and none would probably help you receive any funds.

These are the results of the games played today:

France 1-0 Belgium 
Portugal 0-0 Slovenia (Portugal win 3-0 on penalties)

France could not find a way to win the game until the 85th minute when it took a deflection off Belgium defender Vertonghen to give France a 1-0 win. Belgium could have changed the outcome had Lukaku and De Bruyne scored when they had excellent chances but this was another tournament that Belgium failed to impress. France also have not been playing well but have a found a way to get to the quarter-finals.

In the other game all eyes were on Ronaldo looking to score in his 6th Euro tournament but the game ended with penalties. Ironically, Ronaldo saw his penalty saved at the end of the first 15 minutes of extra-time and became very emotional. In the end Slovenia saw all three of their penalties saved but Portugal scored all they took, first penalty was taken by Ronaldo.

What a game thanks to the team performance by Slovenia. They could have won the game late when Pepe slipped and allowed the Slovenian striker one-on-one with the Portugal goalkeeper Costa but he saved the effort.




---------------




The first six teams that have qualified for the quarter-finals are: Switzerland, Germany, England, Spain, France and Portugal

I am not a scam casino agent, what gave you that nonsensical idea?

When you say "one more scam casino agent" can you actually name names or will you simply imply without any substance?

Keeping your little rant aside, explain in your own words what reason they gave you for closing your account. What was it they claim you did that put you in breach of the terms and conditions that you willingly signed up to?

Do enlighten us.

Bitcoin getting past $75,000 is never going to be a problem, whether it happens in July or later it is going to happen but there is no reason why it cannot fall down again. The real victory for Bitcoin will be if it manages to get to a high price and then stabilises. If $75,000 (or $X) is the new stable price then anything less than that price really means it is not stable, right?

Usually in cases such as these, we never get the full picture about what really happened to result the complainant in getting his account closed at a casino or gaming website. What does happen very frequently though, is when scam accusations are made in the forum the complainant leaves out key information which would indicate to a breach of the rules that they signed up to when they registered.

This reply by Metaspins.com probably covers all they are allowed to post considering they have data protection rules. The OP has not provided any evidence that demonstrates to being unfairly treated or scammed but he is more than welcome to post the reasons why his account was closed and then we can discuss the virtues of that.

I suppose it comes down people being creatures of comfort. Generally once people are used to something or to doing something in a particular way, it is difficult to show them a new way.

When Bitcoin was introduced in 2009 it did not bring people in masses from all age and educational demographics then and it is not doing it now either though year-on-year number are increasing. Today people using Bitcoin (or their preferred crypto) are increasing in numbers across all age and educational demographics but in comparison to those that use fiat, it is in such a minority that working out percentages will be difficult.

UEFA have announced they will open an investigation into what Jude Bellingham did after he scored his overhead kick equaliser for England against Slovakia. Apparently, he seems to make a gesture with his hand towards his groin area. Some reports suggest a ban will be excessive and they are anticipating he will receive a fine instead.

Personally, I think Switzerland will beat England when they meet in their quarter-final match regardless of whether Bellingham is playing or is banned.





--------------

France and Belgium are 20 minutes in their game and the score is 0-0