We are pleased to inform you that the investigation has been successfully completed, and we appreciate the user's cooperation throughout the process. We have sent an email to the user regarding the refund process. If this ends up being a simple process of returning funds to the OP then I am fairly sure it will be welcomed by him. If funds ever get stopped while customers are using an exchange, they would find themselves in a complication because they would not want to send KYC yet will start trying to get their funds returned. I hope the OP responds to your email soon. As for Trustpilot, we would like to emphasize that we do not engage in the practice of buying positive reviews. We believe in the importance of genuine feedback from our users, as it helps us improve our services and better meet your needs. Your satisfaction and trust are of utmost importance to us, and we strive to earn them through the quality of our service and the positive experiences of our users. Trustpilot has lost the positive reputation it once built because of all the allegations of the rigged reviews. I think it will be immensely naive to believe that every single one of the reviews on Trustpilot are genuine and accurate whether they are related to ChangeNOW or any other company. |
|
|
|
Where does that leave Fury and Usyk? If over time Fury had worked out how to defeat Wilder how does that affect the Fury vs Usyk possible fight? In my opinion if this Fury/Usyk drama was to continue the best thing that can happen in order to add pressure on both Fury and Usyk, is for Joshua to fight Wilder. That would really add a new dimension to the heavyweight division. Before Usyk entered the scene, Wilder was considered Fury's toughest opponent. In fact, many believed Wilder would win the fight, and he was the heavy favorite on sports betting sites. Wilder was -160 in the first fight and -125 in the second one. He was actually the underdog in their last bout, and he lost because Fury had figured out how to beat him. Although Fury had already defeated Wilder in their rematch, the last fight was a pretty dominant win for him. |
|
|
|
Fury should not have a rematch with Ngannou, that is now in the past. Fury should be focused on trying to fight Usyk and trying to unify the belts to become the undisputed heavyweight champion (either that or Usyk will). He seemed to be on a decline after the highs of beating Wilder because he has been fighting boxers he was head and shoulders better than therefore a fight against Usyk just might make Fury elevate his game and enjoy boxing again. Even though Fury won in a split decision, I dont think there should be a rematch. The problem was not because Ngannou is so good and can fight with champions on equal level, but simply because Fury underestimated him. If they would have a rematch I dont think that Fury is going to be so passive and slow. |
|
|
|
The other two judges awarded 95/94 and 94/95 therefore it was a closer fight in their opinions but the gulf between them and 96/93 is unacceptable if all three were watching the same fight. It is not just about who landed more jabs and punches, it is about the intent of the jabs and punches landed. Either way, this one is very difficult to understand how Fury won the fight on points because Ngannou was the one with far more aggression and intent that Fury. The scorecard that has to be the most dubious is the one that scored 96/93 in favour of Fury. I reviewed the scorecards again based only on the second and the third judge. Out of the 10 rounds, they only disagreed 3 times, in rounds 1, 4, and 7 which means these rounds were somewhat close and difficult to score. They both gave Fury rounds 2, 5, 6 and 9. Ngannou got 3, 8 and 10. So if in case these two judges gave all the disputed rounds to Fury, it'll be 96-93 in favor of the champion. |
|
|
|
|
These are the results from the games played this week:
Wednesday 8th November
Napoli 1-1 1. FC Union Berlin
Real Sociedad 3-1 Benfica
Arsenal 2-0 Sevilla
Bayern Munich 2-1 Galatasaray
FC Copenhagen 4-3 Manchester United
PSV Eindhoven 1-0 RC Lens
Real Madrid 3-0 Braga
Red Bull Salzburg 0-1 Inter Milan
Tuesday 7th November
Borussia Dortmund 2-0 Newcastle United
Shakhtar Donetsk 1-0 Barcelona
AC Milan 2-1 Paris Saint-Germain
Atletico Madrid 6-0 Celtic
Crvena Zvezda 1-2 RB Leipzig
FC Porto 2-0 Antwerp
Lazio 1-0 Feyenoord
Manchester City 3-0 BSC Young Boys Bern
|
|
|
|
Chelsea were really lucky as well that Tottenham had to play with even 9 players. But I confirm that they took advantage of this situation really efficiently. However they have another tough match waiting for them now. It is going to be against Manchester City in Stamford Bridge. This time luck may not be Chelsea's best friend. If Tottenham had kept 11 players on the pitch I not sure if they would have won the game because Chelsea were playing the game with extreme confidence. Having said that you could be right about Chelsea when they play Manchester City but if they play the same way they did against Tottenham I think Chelsea will win the game. Chelsea would hope to see a productive match from Jackson again. They will really need it. He made a hat-trick you know and I wonder how much this performance will effect his future performances. But in the end it looks really difficult for Chelsea to steal any point from Manchester City.
Jackson was composed in front of goal, he deserved his hat-trick and he still has many goals to score. He will get better and better as the season goes on. |
|
|
|
Honestly, I'm surprised why this thread is still open.
~ Why not keep it open? People are still voting in the poll and actively engaging in the debate and sharing their arguments and opinions. At least this thread is not censored so anyone can leave any comment they want without fear of it being deleted. Why not ask BenCodie why his thread is still open? He has been posting in the Reputation board since he created his PytagoraZ account. He will eventually will make an error and that will cost him the account as it will receive more tags. It clearly is not his only account here but he would not want it tagged because enrolling on a signature campaign will make it difficult for him to let go. If he wants to post in a typical duplicitous manner, he is not doing himself any favours. It's 29:7.  It is 30:7 now  |
|
|
|
Times has really change isn't it, I remember way back when we can't watch the fight live and it's always delayed in our country. The only way to known the score is to tune in in the old and traditional way, radio. Yes, times really have changed because nowadays you're able to watch the fight live and watch highlights as often as you would like to thanks to the internet. The days of radio are not fully in the past because it still does have usage in certain situations. Here are the official scorecards. There are 5 rounds where the judges did not have the same assessment while in another 5 rounds, they unanimously agreed to each other.  Here is the punch stats of this fight. Maybe it helps in assessing the fight. Based on the stats I had it 95-94 for Fury.  The scorecard that has to be the most dubious is the one that scored 96/93 in favour of Fury. |
|
|
|
Are you guys shills for them? Of course I didn't take screenshots, I trusted them. What on earth would I possibly have to gain from this? They have made it clear they are not returning anything to me, and what little I had left I transferred to a random player. Don't wish to play on a scam site anymore. There are tons of sites out there, why play here. Why did you bother with this thread if you cannot engage in a cordial manner with those that are trying to merely be of assistance? And even if you believe I didn't lose or just lost by poor play, the site is full of bots and regs and it terrible to recs and people that don't live on a computer waiting for a fish to come by (of wish there are so few of most must be associated with the site). The only reason I played there is my country outlaws nearly all sites except them for whatever reason. Again, do you have any evidence to back your claim? It is you that is making the allegation against a third-party therefore the onus is on you to put your case forward with evidence otherwise it becomes a case of a member just posting what they want without consideration of any etiquettes. "It isn't a scam post". I'm not looking for anything from you guys. Kindly change that... What does this even mean? If you do not want anything then what's the point of posting it here without proof? That is a question he will not answer but maybe he is attention-seeking. |
|
|
|
The point is you claim to be making contact with alleged investors over email and Telegram and have never provided the basic of verifiable information via blockchain to show you actually made payments to anybody. Just by saying you don't owe non-investors an explanation you are missing the point. You claimed your hosted servers were hacked after the EOS tokens and you had 50 BTC stolen yet you never ever provided any blockchain evidence, nor did you explain why you moved the total bankroll from cold to hot wallet just in time for the alleged hack to take place. If I had 50 BTC of investor funds and it got stolen, I would post the address that the stolen funds were sent to in order for anyone in the crypto sphere to find a link as to who the culprit might be and any victim would do that but you did not do that. You have never disclosed any information regarding the alleged hack. You never even provided evidence you moved the 50 BTC bankroll from the cold to hot wallet either, there is no evidence it happened because you never posted any address that could be verified. All we have is your word and that is basically worthless as you have lied far too many times therefore you claim you do not owe non-investors an explanation. It is simply not good enough yet you keep showing up here from time to time each time saying you will not come back yet you again and again. Each time you claim to be refunding investors yet you provide zero proof. You will not post any information that can be verified. You have scammed on so many occasions even you have lost count but in the end if you have blown millions of USD$ from the ICO (that was supposed to be used on improving the website and not a single new games was added) on personal expenditure and lost reputation in the process over it, would it be impossible to believe you would not scam again? What was the bankroll cold wallet address where the 50 BTC were held? What is the address of the 50 BTC bankroll that was allegedly hacked? What was the address the alleged hacked 50 BTC bankroll was sent to? What was the specific date the bankroll funds were stolen? You did not inform any law enforcement agency when the alleged hack occurred but never explained why. Will you tell us why? I don't owe you any details, you are not an investor in the ICO or of the bankroll after the ICO (didn't you make money on BetKing pre ICO?) |
|
|
|
After all the desperation you have shown to raise funds, is that all you have to state now? After the confidence you showed by asking for a loan for your casino, you have given up that easily and have decided you will no longer be searching for investment? You really should be asking yourself first of all who from the forum will give $4500 to you when they have no idea who you are and second, who will invest their money as a loan to someone claiming to start a casino. Okay well noted, Thanks for the information. I am not willing to share my other projects publicly for a good reason.
I think I have less desperate means to raise the funds.
Remember AceBetGroup this name.
Thanks you guys tho
|
|
|
|
..Remember the ICO Christmas giveaway where he claims he gave a way 1 BTC a day from 1st December to 31 December to charities? Just to quickly correct, that was not ICO giveaway or anything to do with BetKing. That was my own money I gave away. I edited the post to remove the "ICO" in the Christmas giveaway where you alleged to have given 1 BTC away every day until 25th December in 2017. You could have made another correction but you have lied so much that you forgot it. Also, it was not your personal money it was money that was raised in the ICO for betking.io and to which you had no right to use as your personal cash cow. All the blockchain transactions were posted online and some of the charities even confirmed it publicly at the time. If the blockchain transactions were published can you provide a link? The only link you ever provided was to this thread: I'm donating 25 Bitcoin to good causes this Christmas. Join in and give BitcoinThis was the only address you posted on Reddit and the sums do not add up to you sending 1 BTC a day for 25 days in December 2017: I'm donating 25 Bitcoin to good causes this Christmas. Join in and give Bitcoin this Christmas (day 7) Where exactly is the proof any address you operated sent 1 BTC every day between 1st December to 25th December 2017 to any address let alone a verifiable one belong to a charity? |
|
|
|
You could post the tx id from when you were "hacked".
You could also post how much money you owe investors. Unfortunately he has never posted verifiable information. I would like to engage with him in a polite manner and to be fair he has been cordial since his most recent return to this forum but when it comes to posting information that can be verified, he does not do that therefore we have only his word and we all know that simply is not enough to convince anyone. You could also post how much money you owe investors.
I don't owe anything. This was not a loan. I am not in debt to anyone. I do not need to pay anything back. There are always risks when investing. BetKing is not the first business to lose money. In fact overall, BetKing has made investors far more money that it's lost over the years (even some of the ICO losses were from profit investors gained pre ICO) and you and everyone from back then know that. I am choosing to refund the remaining investors still in a loss out of my own pocket (which has totaled 6 figures so far) because that's the kind of person I am. I don't like to have people lose money when backing me. But, if interested, you could have read the 1st post in the thread or a few posts back where I gave the total: "investors still held over $2 million worth of tokens that we we're trying to refund" of $6 million raised in the ICO (do the math there and you will see over half of investors broke even or profited) Of the several problems with him, one is that he gets defensive. He engages and answers questions as long as there is no evidence to provide. When however there is a case where he is being asked to provide evidence he becomes petulant but would never actually provide evidence. Remember the Christmas wager where 20+ BTC was never paid to winners? Remember the Christmas giveaway where he claims he gave a way 1 BTC a day from 1st December to 31 December to charities? Remember the 10,000,000,000 BKT tokens on EOS with BKB swaps? What about the ICO where he miraculously he raised $6.5 million but not one penny was accounted for apart from some of the initial buybacks? The reason for petulance on his part is because he does not have evidence. Where he would have it he would post it. How much money did the investors lose when you were (allegedly) hacked. He will not openly state the amount but there is evidence to suggest the publicly funded bankroll at the time of the alleged hack was just over 50 BTC (52) which was around $400,000 at the time in October 2019. |
|
|
|
These are the results of the games played over the weekend and yesterday: Monday 6th November Tottenham Hotspur 1-4 Chelsea  Chelsea ended up surprising everybody by thrashing Tottenham, it means the only remaining unbeaten side in the Premier League finally lost after 11 games. Jackson was composed in front of goal and scored a brilliant hat-trick. Stirling was back to his best, Caicedo showed glimmer of past form and overall the team were excellent. They came from a goal down to score four but Tottenham were down to nine players at the beginning of the second half therefore it made it easier for Chelsea. Sunday 5th November Nottingham Forest 2-0 Aston Villa
Luton Town 1-1 Liverpool Aston Villa had a chance to jump up to 3rd place in the table if they had won but Nottingham Forest stunned with an excellent display. Luton were on the verge of a memorable victory against Liverpool upon their return to the Premier League but they conceded an equaliser in the 5th minute of time added-on. Saturday 4th November Fulham 0-1 Manchester United
Brentford 3-2 West Ham United
Burnley 0-2 Crystal Palace
Everton 1-1 Brighton and Hove Albion
Manchester City 6-1 Bournemouth
Sheffield United 2-1 Wolverhampton Wanderers
Newcastle United 1-0 Arsenal Manchester City are not slowing down they dismantled Bournemouth. Newcastle United won the game against Arsenal with the controversial goal and Arteta began his rant against the officials. Ten Hag is hanging on to his job with that Manchester United win at Fulham. Well done to Brentford, Crystal Palace and Sheffield United for hard fought wins. |
|
|
|
I just want to know how he gave me red tag?? 😫 Because you're a scammer. Just pay back the $300 before your entire alt farm gets negative tagged. Uvx jaynulkobir Shajin09 Shariyer Emon Abdulla015 Kurup1 Bukof1 Sowda9296 Safu123 Abdullah Al shamim Rohomat697 Fajil420 These are also all your alt accounts - in addition to the dozen or so already associated with you - and I can prove it. These are not my account. If they are not your accounts then you will not mind them all getting tagged, right? Whether all the names in the list are correctly linked to you or not (I have not checked yet), it cannot be easy building a farm and then watching the accounts get tags because all that effort to create them is wasted. It looks as though on this occasion a huge part of your account-farming will bring you no rewards. nutildah Sir forgive me for the last time, You are my boss and you can forgive me if you want, I hope you forgive me one last time. You are asking for a lot of forgiveness. Would you explain which accounts you are asking forgiveness for? You did have ample opportunity to conduct your work in the forum without bringing attention to yourself but it is too late to rectify the situation now. You are misunderstanding. Hard to believe but elaborate just for clarity sake. |
|
|
|
No, I have not taken a look but it seems they (Bitget the company) are in business for the foreseeable future because they have Messi as their brand partner. All the football world knows the name and this will give them the platform they require to increase their global presence. Regarding the shills, it is strange if they are not posting their evidence in their Discord to earn the rewards and it seems something a massive up and coming brand would not be doing at this stage of their growth. If not to post on Discord to get their rewards, why would they bother shilling here? They only receive rewards after they post their evidence on the Bitget Discord. Have you checked their Discord though? They have a dedicated channel where people report their work (mostly screenshots of them liking BitGet tweets) but no one is sharing bitcointalk screenhots and I went through last few days of their reports, meaning the shilling that is going on here is probably not the part of that bounty (unless I somehow missed those screenshots). |
|
|
|
Sir, I don't know how to make Merit, that's why I couldn't make it
Sir above all I confess my mistake to you, Sir please remove rad trust from my ID
Plz, Plz, Plz, 🙏🙏🙏🙏 What on earth is wrong with you? I can understand you must be disappointed that an account you were trying to farm has been caught out but how long will you keep up this charade because we all know you are not as innocent as you seem. Hello dear sir OP please forgive me sir I accept my mistake 😭 I just deposited Token my friend's exchange to sell and someone complained against me sir you only gave me red trust for the transaction I made a mistake 😥 sir I hope you Please give me a chance please remove my Red Trust from my id Over the years we have read many stories about connected accounts including brothers, sisters, mothers, fathers, uncles, aunties, neighbours and of course friends. I think you know your plea will be ignored but it was never going to stop you trying at least one last time. What action are asking members of the forum to take and against which members? How are you disputing the tags left for you by albon and nutildah? -- yes i see in your address there is no transaction in 15 days how can he give u red? Yes you are right. there is no transactions in your address : 0xa58ba40D6CBAeF4DBde481f58e6cB0e740F385DC
I attention everyone you can check and take action against albon So you decided to expose your other red-tagged alts account here by vouching with those accounts? Even if there were some confusion and this is why nutildah leave you a neutral. Now you are proving that those are your alt accounts. LOL. I cannot imagine how dumb a person could be. Do you think people will believe these vouches? Even though those accounts were connected to some different alt farms, now it's there should not be any confusion and you guys connected your first firm to another firm. LOL. bad luck. You are right, it seems as though he has just used some of his alt-accounts to try to vouch for him. After all the effort nutildah put in, the very least I could do is to get busy and start tagging these accounts. I will try to get it done this weekend. |
|
|
|
|
These are the games taking place tomorrow (Saturday 4th November):
Fulham vs Manchester United
Brentford vs West Ham United
Burnley vs Crystal Palace
Everton vs Brighton and Hove Albion
Manchester City vs Bournemouth
Sheffield United vs Wolverhampton Wanderers
Newcastle United vs Arsenal
The game of the day has to be Newcastle United vs Arsenal and I think Newcastle will take all three points.
If Manchester United lose at Fulham it could be the end of Ten Hag. Everton will be looking to make it difficult for Brighton, I will not be surprised in Everton win that game. Manchester City will be looking to beat Bournemouth and move to the top of the Premier League table.
|
|
|
|
Another way to ask this question is, what are the odds of any two people generating the same private key at any time? The answer for this question is pretty interesting, but to make long story short, you have a better chance of winning the lotto 9 times in a row. Bitcoin private keys uses SHA-256, which is the number 2 to the 256 power. Which is an unfathomably large number. If you counted all the grains of sand on planet earth and all the drops of water in all the oceans on earth, you would not even come close to that number! More detailed explanation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2eZ5DP2P5AsI have not viewed the video link but what I will state is that if the chances of winning the lottery 9 times consecutive and the grains of sand and drops of water on earth are true, then that would explain why (as far as I know) nobody has ever claimed they lost their funds as a result of duplicated private keys. The odds would be zero I must say, because the private keys are auto generated, unless you change them to popular phrases you can remember or know with a group of people just like a mime, it would be very difficult, if not impossible for anyone to guess someone's private key or seed phrase. Until I read this thread, I cannot recall ever thinking about this before. There are numerical chances of it happening do exist but it is almost impossible for such an event to take place. |
|
|
|
Ngannou earned the respect of all those that doubted him before the fight took place. In my opinion, he was by far the better boxer and should have been awarded the win or at least had a very dubious draw. As for a rematch, I doubt there would a clause for Ngannou to invoke it therefore he should move on to other fighters to make a name and money for himself while Fury vs Usyk try to get their own unification fight on. If there are politics in play in order to ensure Fury vs Usyk takes place in Saudi Arabia then that could be the reason otherwise I have no idea how a judge scored the fight 96/93 in favour of Fury. Shocking  And with that, it seems that Francis is smelling big money already and Ngannou: I Have A lot of Options - But I Want Fury Rematch The Most!But I doubt about this scenario that he has laid out, I mean don't see Usyk stepping aside, they already sign a deal with Fury and everyone is now tune in this fight. So the best option for Ngannou is to wait. Although he seems not to be damage physically as compare to Fury, he needs to take that rest as well. And this time, he will be on the venue and the one to watch the fight and maybe after the winner of the Fury vs Usyk fight, he will go up in the ring to challenge the winner verbally. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
