Bitcoin Forum
May 10, 2024, 06:34:13 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 ... 838 »
421  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Selling a property to play gamble on: February 10, 2024, 06:58:43 PM
Selling a smart phone is far more convenient when using selling a house as a comparator therefore it makes sense for some people to follow that path if it is the norm depending on the area. Using items as collateral is something that most problem gamblers probably do, such as motorbikes, cycles, cars and a lot more.

Also, I think the damage suffered by communities that have family members that have addictions to slot machines, is under reported. Slot machines are magnets for people that are classed as problem gamblers and that is dangerous. You are right, the impact of gambling very big, it destroys families and lives when it changes from fun gambling to addiction.

What most people around me encounter is selling their smartphones to gamble, and some people also pawn them. Most of the gamblers in my area are slot gamblers, only a few play soccer betting, and there are also those who play both. Not a few of them also borrow money from friends, with other small property as collateral such as motorbikes, I haven't found anyone who sells cars, that's very risky in my opinion. As for this model of gambler, it is clear that they are addicted, it is difficult for them to give up this bad habit.

Of course the risk of regret always comes last, but most of them are very prepared for any risk, and will sell any property they can cash in on. The impact of gambling is very big, making you bankrupt and losing almost everything you have. Family, career, savings and future are at stake if you continue to gamble, most addicted gamblers will also avoid people who give them advice. I think if they are at the stage of selling the property to gamble, then they will no longer listen to any advice.
422  Other / Meta / Re: Icopress ' Merit Source Application 🚩 on: February 10, 2024, 06:30:48 PM
I am glad the thread was bumped. icopress created the thread in July 2023 therefore it is approximately seven months ago and there is no estimated time before he is advised if the application has been accepted or rejected.

As there are far too many merit sources at the moment it seems there is an understandable lack of urgency on part of theymos to process this and other applications. I hope he receives a positive outcome soon.

Friendly bump, as I think the forum still need more reliable sources
423  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Selling a property to play gamble on: February 10, 2024, 06:10:19 PM
I doubt anybody in the forum would open;y admit to selling a property to gamble and not only that, it is highly unlikely for people to do it. One way homes could be sold is if gamblers ended up taking loans against their homes for the purpose of gambling and they lost the whole amount. In that case it is probable debt collectors would be chasing the debt therefore a home could be forcefully sold via a Court order to recover costs to pay outstanding debts.

Other than that, it would be very unwise for someone to sell their home for the specific purpose of gambling.

Have you ever sold a property to play gamble and afterwards finds it difficult to replace that same property again?
424  Economy / Exchanges / Re: eXch - instant exchange BTC / LN / XMR / LTC / ETH / ERC20 on: February 10, 2024, 04:09:36 PM
By a lucky occasion Cloudflare isn't blocking me from accessing Bitcointalk today and I can finally reply.
Welcome back  Grin

Is there scope or plans for adding any other stable coins options to eXch in the future? DAI and USDT are available on the Ethereum blockchain but are there any plans to spread out further say to TRC-20?

What d5000 answered above is still relevant and can be taken as a full answer. We are still hesitant on adding Tron or Avalanche. We don't trust both project founders and specially the latter.
I need to look in to this to get a better understanding of why you might be avoiding adding them as potential options but TRC-20 seems to be getting popular as an alternative to ERC-20 because of lower fees. If you remain hesitant (after a significant amount of time) you must have valid reasons and concerns for not trusting them. I am not familiar with the background of either of the project founders (Tron or Avalanche) therefore I will try to find out about them.
425  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Rollbit didnt help me as Gambling Addicted - not closing main account on time on: February 10, 2024, 03:33:24 PM
This certainly does sound more like a complaint about the alleged lack of expected customer services and customer care rather than a scam accusation. I am not stating Rollbit could not have done more in this particular case but if the OP is upset about the $560 he lost then yes he has a right but this does not make it a scam.

I hope the OP will use this experience as the final push he needed to refrain all types of gambling in future.

In other words, this really isn't a scam accusation, just a complaint without much basis.  I understand how problem gambling can wreck lives, OP.  I sincerely hope you can get your life back on track if you've suffered any of the consequences of it--and if not, I hope you never learn how bad it can get.
426  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: [ SCAM ALERT ] Blackjack.Fun is a cheap Scammer on: February 10, 2024, 03:05:44 PM
Without commenting further on the scam allegation itself, I went to the blackjack.fun website to check if they removed the Curacao logo because it gives the impression that they are operating under their licence but the logo is still there. As there is no link added that takes customers to a verification page that shows a valid licence, what purpose does it serve by blackjack.fun showing the Curacao logo?

It is disappointing to see they have not removed a small logo from their website (and they should have done it by now) in order to demonstrate they are not trying to mislead their own customers.
427  Other / Meta / Re: The effect the mixer ban has had on the forum. on: February 10, 2024, 02:35:31 PM
I think we all understand that coming from a particular country does not indicate citizens will be wealthy by default. If memory serves correct, he does live in the US and he is a miner that has various mining machines (but I hope I will be corrected if I am wrong).  I believe he is indeed retired and that is part of the reason he is making a prolific number of posts per day/week.

I suppose if forum members have spare time at work and are allowed to use the internet, they will post here and it will increase their post count. Having retirement makes it altogether a different scenario whether it is for here or Reddit.

100 posts per week? Dude lives in the USA, how does he manage to do that? I am kinda curious sometimes when I see people from rich countries posting here a lot, are most of you retired? If not, how do you manage to post and work at the same time? I personally work in a good company where I am not occupied 100% of the time and I manage to visit this forum and post sometimes, it's kinda entertaining and I get some new information while interacting with people. I prefer it over Reddit.
428  Economy / Exchanges / Re: eXch - instant exchange BTC / LN / XMR / LTC / ETH / ERC20 on: February 10, 2024, 11:30:56 AM
Thank you for the answer  Grin

They probably have the capability (and infrastructure) to expand but they are taking their time by evaluating options and scenarios. There is another possibility "less is more" therefore if that is what the eXch team are trying to do by focusing on a core handful of coins it is working because they have an excellent reputation and provide a brilliant service. Maybe adding more options will damage their reputation especially if there are fluctuations in fees but that should not really be a factor in the decision.

About TRC-20 stablecoins, they have already written in this thread in November that they're perhaps interested, see here. They're however generally sceptical regarding Tron.
As for other Ethereum alternatives with stablecoins, in the same post they wrote about Polygon too (they were considering adding it, but sceptical due to the high fees close to Ethereum's, which may have changed), and this post probably means that they're not eager to add Avalanche, although the post is related to a bridge, not to stablecoins.

(I answer here just because I remembered these posts exch made in November. Of course their policies may have changed and I actually would also love some new alternatives.)
429  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: ⚽ English Premier League Season: 2023/2024 on: February 10, 2024, 10:47:11 AM
These are the games taking place today Saturday 10th February:

Manchester City vs Everton
Fulham vs Bournemouth
Liverpool vs Burnley
Luton Town vs Sheffield United
Tottenham Hotspur vs Brighton and Hove Albion
Wolverhampton Wanderers vs Brentford
Nottingham Forest vs Newcastle United


On paper Liverpool have an easy home game against Burnley and they need to win otherwise Manchester City could already have leapfrogged them to sit at the top of the table because they play in the early kick-off game against Everton.

Elsewhere, Nottingham Forest have started playing well even if the results did not fully reflect that therefore I think they will beat Newcastle United today. Brighton will give Tottenham a difficult game therefore that game looks to be heading for a draw.
430  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Fixedfloat is scamming me for 8000+ EUR IMPORTANT PSA! on: February 10, 2024, 10:31:11 AM
I have to agree, I think there is more to this story than meets the eye as far as the OP is co concerned. Even if he was not completely open (or honest) about what happened that resulted in him receiving €8000, the damage to the reputation of Fixedfloat has already occurred and is unlikely to be repaired.

Having said all that, it is not impossible for the OP to receive a large payment for making the website but it is as though some pieces of the jigsaw were deliberately withheld in the OP. Now both the OP and Fixedfloat are silent but whereas nobody knows the OP, it is Fixedfloat that lost much more as a result of them seizing the funds. The KYC they put the client of the OP through is one of the most bizarre things I have read regarding exchanges asking for KYC.

Even if they've refunded OP and get into a resolution off-screen, or [if we assume for a while here] OP did not tell the full story and there are more to tell, I think the taint on their reputation is already done and can't be erased. They've show that they overcomplicate things, requesting way too intrusive KYC despite their claim of supporting privacy, and --the most important-- no one can guess whether their fund will get through or get confiscated when dealing with their platform, given they have their own blocklist and taint measurement.
431  Other / Meta / Re: The effect the mixer ban has had on the forum. on: February 10, 2024, 10:20:38 AM
Those exchanges are run by people (and organisations) that effectively have their own interests at heart therefore they re driven by what they see as beneficial to them and not to their customers. The US market is massive and Binance want to be part of it therefore to achieve regulated/official standard to be allowed to trade there without fear of fines and arrest, they would be happy to adhere to any requests or instructions from regulators.

I am unsure what the future holds for Monero and how it will navigate difficult times when more exchanges de-list it but as an example, the mixer ban in the forum probably had zero effect on mixers both in website visitor numbers and also the business turnover. The impact will be seen several months after Monero is de-listed.

As off-topic as it is, it is disappointing to read about the de-listing of any crypto that was being used by the community because of an actual function it provided (such as privacy) compared to many others that do not provide anything other than hype. Binance are doing what they are because of their owners wanting to remain on the right side of regulating bodies but the trade-off will affect many people. 
They're a CEX after all, of course Binance will want to stay in business, I don't think they're of interest if they keep on delaying or avoiding the regulations that's being imposed on them by the government, too bad that they do delisting of these privacy coins especially Monero but I do salute their stance about privacy and that they're never compromising, love that idea that there's still people in this world that will stand on principle and not worship money.
432  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Fixedfloat is scamming me for 8000+ EUR IMPORTANT PSA! on: February 10, 2024, 12:59:59 AM
The OP made his last post on 30th January therefore we do not know if any settlement was made between himself and Fixedfloat but it would seem highly unlikely. Yes they lied and for that they have to accept their reputation is basically zero when it comes to the opinion of members of the forum. In future, regardless of the steps they take in trying to protect their brand, they will be reminded of this incident because it clearly seems to be about them finding any excuse they can think of in order to steal funds.

The Fixedfloat forum representative have taken themselves out of the thread and that is disappointing. It seems they have not posted since 29th January.
Now you have stopped engaging in this thread, but it would be better if you explain the reason behind it. Because this raises doubts about the claim you are making.
They lied. That should tell you everything you need to know:
The funds remain frozen at our addresses, and when the frozen funds are seized by the authorities, they are also sent from our addresses.
That's not true. You say the funds "remain frozen", but that can't be since you've mixed them already.
The first transaction was mixed in this transaction and that same output was used to sent to another address. The second transaction was mixed in this transaction and also sent to another address. None of the funds were frozen in your wallet, you're normally using them to pay other people.
To summarize: if those funds came from criminal activity as you claim, you've now sent it to other innocent users who now own those "tainted" Bitcoins.
It sounds very much like you only care about "taint" when it's convenient for you.
433  Other / Meta / Re: The effect the mixer ban has had on the forum. on: February 10, 2024, 12:52:53 AM
As off-topic as it is, it is disappointing to read about the de-listing of any crypto that was being used by the community because of an actual function it provided (such as privacy) compared to many others that do not provide anything other than hype. Binance are doing what they are because of their owners wanting to remain on the right side of regulating bodies but the trade-off will affect many people. 

btw, binance is delisting monero and zcash

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5484277

This is off-topic but yeah that is definitely nuts. Its a major blow to the spirit of cryptocurrency in general. I understand they want to be in line with whoever's regulations, but still... Sad that this is what its come to. At least they are still available on Kraken and KuCoin. Bitfinex as well apparently. Down 24% now... seems like an overreaction.
434  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: ⚽ English Premier League Season: 2023/2024 on: February 10, 2024, 12:14:05 AM
These are the Premier League results since my last post. The notable results were Chelsea losing at home to Wolves and also Arsenal beating Liverpool as it makes the situation tight at the top of the table with Liverpool still leading but Manchester City have a game in hand and are just two points behind.

Monday 5th February
Brentford 1-3 Manchester City

Sunday 4th February
Bournemouth 1-1 Nottingham Forest
Chelsea 2-4 Wolverhampton Wanderers
Manchester United 3-0 West Ham United
Arsenal 3-1 Liverpool


Saturday 3rd February
Everton 2-2 Tottenham Hotspur
Brighton and Hove Albion 4-1 Crystal Palace
Burnley 2-2 Fulham
Newcastle United 4-4 Luton Town
Sheffield United 0-5 Aston Villa
435  Other / Meta / Re: Email used to create this forum? on: February 10, 2024, 12:01:48 AM
Maybe I am misreading the way you articulated your point but I believe it was common knowledge that Satoshi posted in the forum after transferring it here from SourceForge. There are many posts from Satoshi that were made directly here and the post history (with date/time stamps) show that to be the case.
Bitcointalk.org didn't exist when satoshi was active:
Code:
Domain Name: bitcointalk.org
Creation Date: 2011-06-24T05:19:00Z

This is often brought up by a certain troll. In my opinion, it doesn't matter: "the forum" is more than just the URL, it's the entire post database and it's users, and that database was transferred to a new domain name after satoshi's last post. The users moved too, and some of the old users are still active today.
Interesting, I stand corrected on that  Grin

Yes, If I'm not wrong then the forum was first moved to Forum.Bitcoin.org and then on Bitcointalk.org, a crawl of the old forum is available on WayBack machine on Archive.org and one can see that how the forum used to look back in 2010. Most of the members moved from both websites and finally settled down on this URL.

If I'm not wrong then Satoshi was part of this same forum but he wasn't present when the forum was shifted to Bitcointalk.org. The best thing is that all of the posts of Satoshi are present on this forum and that's more than enough for us.
The OP must have had a reason to ask the question beyond curiosity but it really is utterly pointless. In my opinion the OP certainly does not seem to be new to the forum even though his rank shows him as newbie and that might explain why I came to that conclusion.

Keeping that aside, it is interesting to note how things developed in the early days from the forum being available on SourceForge to it moving over to the bitcointalk,.org domain.
436  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: 1xbit refuse to send me back my deposits on: February 09, 2024, 11:46:32 PM
One of the problems that consumers face is being duped by advertising. It cannot be denied as a result of advertising, people tend to automatically believe that if an informative (or respected) website displays ads, they would be vetted and would passed various checks before their ads were placed. 1xbit/1xbit1 might have given up on using this forum to promote their business but they clearly are placing ads on other platform to attract customers. Unfortunately, there is nothing that can be done to help the OP,

Why oh why do people still choose 1xbet to play? I really don't get it.
They are stickied at the top of Blockchair's website, for instance.
437  Economy / Gambling / Re: bustabit – The original crash game on: February 09, 2024, 06:39:18 PM
It is interesting you do not invest in the bankroll, that was a surprise. If investors have not divested could it be down to them being comfortable because of having a trust element in you and the way you run your business?

What would you say are the current percentage of players that are bankroll investors versus non-bankroll players? I have asked something similar in the past but with the current rate of estimated annual returns for investment (of just 6%) along with any risks involved when investors no longer hold their own keys. Not holding keys is clearly a risk even though Bustabit has an excellent reputation.

Actually I don't invest in the bankroll at all. I also would have expected investors to divest a little by now. Using the same methodology I used earlier in the thread I reckon the expected annual returns are only around 6%, which doesn't seem that attractive given the risk.
438  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: [ POLL ] The Unification Fight: FURY vs USYK 18th MAY 2024 on: February 09, 2024, 06:22:59 PM


We have not see a unification fight since 1999 therefore this one is highly anticipate because of the historic element involved.

The new date has been set for 18th May 2024 but if for any reason the fight does not go ahead on that date because of either injury or anything else, it would seem then fight would not be going ahead at all. Usyk is trying to become the first heavyweight boxer trying to unify both at cruiserweight and heavyweight whereas Fury is trying to cement his own legacy.
439  Economy / Exchanges / Re: eXch - instant exchange BTC / LN / XMR / LTC / ETH / ERC20 on: February 09, 2024, 06:16:06 PM
I have had a look several times at the website recently, it seems the refilling of XMR is happening frequently enough to not appear zero as much as it used to therefore that helps those that prefer to not look elsewhere.

Is there scope or plans for adding any other stable coins options to eXch in the future? DAI and USDT are available on the Ethereum blockchain but are there any plans to spread out further say to TRC-20?
440  Other / Meta / Re: Mixers to be banned on: February 09, 2024, 06:08:43 PM
There is a huge lobbying movement in the US which is pushing the agenda forward on matters that are beneficial to those that donate to senators. If someone gave a bundle of cash as a bribe to a senator to ask questions in congress or put forward their agenda it might be considered illegal but if it is a legal declared donation and then the very same thing happen it is acceptable and legally allowed. Strange.

In the case of banks and other big businesses including fossil fuel benefactors, they have a massive lobbying machine behind them and many in congress benefit from their donations.

Mixers are banned because criminals are using them so far we have not heard the news that privacy coins are being used to launder money because privacy coins lacks liquidity, they are not as liquid as Bitcoin, and criminals mainly use Bitcoin as and platform where they can conceal their identity.
If anything, it makes more sense to say that privacy coins are used for money laundering rather than bitcoin mixers are used for it. There are many articles that talk about Monero and money laundering but you hear mostly Bitcoin because it's a mainstream currency and media will attract attention with talking more about Bitcoin.
By the way, criminals not only launder money via mixers but via banks too. JP Morgan is the best destination for money laundering but no one bans them or talks about them.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 ... 838 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!