I am looking for a reputable member that has an active LinkedIn account. I do not want to buy the account or use it for personal use but would like to make contact with someone who has a LinkedIn account for a noble cause, I will explain accordingly to the right person.

If you are at least a Full Member rank and are considered by many members in the forum as someone who has a good reputation and someone who is considered trustworthy, please get in touch.

(moderators can move this thread elsewhere if they feel it is more appropriate)

Considering the number of accounts registered in the forum, I would probably increase the number to +99.99% because the volume is too great. Trusting someone from the forum is not easy, trust has to be earned.

For example, this BabyBandit account was created last month, already posting in Reputation and Lending boards. Clearly it is not his first account here and we have no idea (apart from probably one day wanting to join a signature campaign) what his motive is therefore when adding these types of accounts to the list, the percentage of distrust increases.

Thank you. The spammers do not bother going to most self-moderated threads because they are worried about having their posts deleted as soon as they come across as low quality or spam. I think that is the best way forward but dangling the merits carrot could have a profound effect too. It is good to see you and many others support the OP in his application.

And there I was thinking digaran was a changed man with those references he made regarding forgiveness  

Personally (just to mention forgiveness in the context of the OP), I think it should be absolute and not be withheld however maybe his forgiveness is in limited supply. It could be he singled me out for special forgiveness.

It most certainly is not positive or negative feedback. It is safe to therefore conclude the only remaining option would be neutral feedback.






I am sorry to announce I will not open a discussion on the number of balls I have  

May I ask, according to your very deep statistical analysis regarding balls, are you stating as a matter of fact that every member of the forum (females included) must have two balls as a prerequisite to leaving a negative tag?

Furthermore, are you stating as a matter of fact based on your very deep statistical analysis regarding balls, that every member of the forum (females included) must have one ball as a prerequisite to leaving a neutral tag?

Also, are you stating as a matter of fact based on your very deep statistical analysis regarding balls, that every member of the forum (females included) must have zero balls as a prerequisite to leaving a positive tag?

Finally, would you be ever so kind as to define whether the balls you refer to are tennis balls, footballs, rubgy balls, soccer balls, US footballs, snooker balls, pool balls, swimming pool balls, beach balls, crystal balls, golf balls, baseballs or some other type of ball.

In the unlikely event you are referring to the human body, was it eyeballs, balls and joints or (ahem) testicles perhaps?

=================


=================


Thank you for forgiving me for the negative tag I placed on your account. Since you are in the forgiving mood, I hope you have forgiven ALL the other members that left you both negative and neutral trust and wonder if you will create threads in the Reputation board about them too: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=806776

It is clear you are upset at both Casino Guru and their (as you put it) ties with Cloudbet and Curacao licenced casinos but do ask yourself if you are taking your frustration a little too far. You are heading in to the conspiracy theory bracket as long as you do not provide tangible evidence to provide credibility to your claim.

Going back to your OP, you stated have concerns you did not receive professional customer services support considering you self-excluded, yet you were taken advantage of (because of misleading advertising). Can you tell us what you will (or intend to) do next regarding all the issues you have expressed in this thread?

Are you seriously stating that is your interpretation of publishing a review?

In a general way, this puts a whole new spin the tactics employed by account farmers and scammers. They cannot use fake crypto addresses as it would defeat the object (they want to receive funds but will use different address to avoid getting caught) but they can easily give out social media accounts belonging to other people and that creates the misdirection. That stealing identity part of process is something that creates another smokescreen for their benefit.

As I alluded to in the previous post, what would be the possible effect of having one merit source in the gambling board actively giving merits to quality posts versus say for example those that do not care for anything except spamming in order to meet their signature campaign quote?

What happens if you raise the number to say two or five merit sources. I created self-moderated threads in the gambling section to keep them legible and it has worked well because even though post numbers have dropped since I started deleting low quality posts and spam, it means those flooding with signature campaigns can go and do it somewhere else.

I am unsure if merit source alone will get the gambling boards to a better level, I think it self-moderated threads are already helping immensely in that process therefore merits would be an added component (not vice-versa).

I have seen others applying for merit source but cannot recall announcement from any member stating they had become merit source. Your is an application in a current long list, let us see how this will play out. Maybe you will receive that message soon 

It is exactly that. If you agree with his point of view you are a saint but if you dare to go against this view he will troll you. If you really upset him too much he will create a thread, list all the names that have trusted you and ask them to distrust you. This is the level of low mentality people you are dealing with and I have to say you have shown patience in the manner you have expressed yourself.

The hypocrisy of this deranged individual BitcoinGirl.Club is still at all-time gutter low. He trolls and colludes in order to attack when he wants (making new friends along the way) yet he has the tenacity to say you were colluding with me and others. He makes it up as he goes along.

Let us get one thing straight, you did nothing wrong by standing up for yourself and that is what they cannot accept. You have every right to be here in the forum in the manner you want to express yourself, none of these trolls are either superior or senior to anybody in any capacity regardless of which member registered first.

These are diversion tactics used by trolls to justify their actions. They are effectively saying they attacked you because they did not like what you wrote when you did not attack anybody. You are dealing with narcissists with egos the size of the planet Jupiter who cannot accept they are trolls and that makes your patience even more remarkable.

I have BenCodie and BitcoinGirl.Club on my ignore list because that is where they deserve to be. I occasionally take a look at their posts when they are quoted by other members, other than that I have zero interest in them or the nonsense they spout. You do not have to justify yourself to these trolls. Forget about them when they make false accusations about you.

He is the same guy who was certain Whirlwind was a scam but decided not to not express his views because he wanted to get signed up on their signature campaign, clearly stating if he could earn from it he had no issues. Another example of lack of morals and ethics on his part.

Have you all read the same thing I did? What a stunning way for this deranged person to contradict himself.

There you have it ladies and gentlemen of this wonderful forum our ours. According to this member, we all have low IQ and as for him he does not mind outing himself as a hypocrite by applying to join signature campaigns (which he is convinced are promoting scams) just be because he does not want to miss the opportunity to earn some BTC.

I could not have expressed it better but 1miau did make a fantastic post that deserved a comment.

The thread deserved a bump  

The overwhelming consensus in the thread supports your application. Have you received any initial response from theymos yet?

I did not want signature spammers flooding my threads in the gambling board therefore I created self-moderated ones. Merits would be a good way to encourage quality posting but in my opinion when you have signature spammers flooding they have almost no interest in whether they receive merits for those posts or not, they simply want to get their weekly quota to be paid using all their farmed accounts.

Over the years I had contemplated on several occasions applying for merit source because I spent a lot of time in the sports threads I created in the gambling board. That was after I decided to give myself a needed break from searching for scams and posting about them. I had similar intentions/reasons mentioned earlier in this thread to apply for merit source but never got around to doing it. I suppose the only way to test if it were to be successful would be if a merit source starts concentrating specifically on that board.

If this application is accepted it will a good test to see what happens in the gambling board when those posting choose between trying to get merits for quality posts, or get no merits for low quality posts or get no merits for signature spamming.

These are the results of the games played today:

Arsenal 2-2 Tottenham Hotspur
Brighton and Hove Albion 3-1 Bournemouth
Chelsea 0-1 Aston Villa
Liverpool 3-1 West Ham United
Sheffield United 0-8 Newcastle United

Even though Newcastle United scored eight goals, the game of the day had to be the North London derby. It was a stunning game, Arsenal and Tottenham both look as though they will challenge Manchester City.

Brighton look like a team heading for a top 5 finish when the season ends. Liverpool also look like they will challenge Manchester City for the title.

What is going wrong at Chelsea? Aston Villa got off to an excellent campaign with four wins from six games but Chelsea have a dismal W1 D2 L3 record from their first six games.

I watched the highlights of this game and it was enough to see what was going on with how far Chelsea are falling behind and how Aston Villa are playing with increasing confidence. Eventually, Pochettino will make them gel as a team but it will take more game time. Imagine what would have happened if their goal had stood rather than be offside. I think Pochettino is the right man for the job.

You you made a decision to lock the thread you created. You then decided to post here therefore should have used your posts in this thread to try to put forward an alternative argument with a view to try to have some feedback removed/revised. You have not contributed anything productive in this thread.

I am sure you have other accounts which have not yet been discovered therefore you should consider giving up on the Zilon and associated farmed accounts and concentrate on the others.

From what I read, it seems players are not happy at the way Ten Hag treated Sancho. They stood by the manager when he forced Ronaldo out of the club but they will not stand by him silently when he mentioned Sancho was not training hard enough to be included in the squad. Also, other reports state some players are unhappy that certain teammates escape public and private criticism whereas some keep getting it on a regular basis.

What is clear is that the players are not backing the manager in his dispute with Sancho.

It is very early in the season however Manchester City, Tottenham, Arsenal, Burnley and Luton Town are where I expected them to be Chelsea have really surprised me. Pochettino needs to get Chelsea on to winning ways otherwise what a season it might be if Ten Hag and Pochettino get sacked in the same season.

I will post the league table after the games today have been played. Maybe Chelsea will move from 14th to 9th if they get a win.

These are the games taking place today Sunday 24th September 2023:

Arsenal vs Tottenham Hotspur
Brighton and Hove Albion vs Bournemouth
Chelsea vs Aston Villa
Liverpool vs West Ham United
Sheffield United vs Newcastle United

The North London derby is the game of the day followed by Liverpool vs West Ham United. These two games will be excellent to watch. Aston Villa are playing very well therefore they will take the game to Chelsea without fear. W1 D2 L2 from the first five games is not good enough for a team that has spent phenomenal amounts to buy players. Pochettino needs his Chelsea team to win otherwise there will be more pressure from the fans to do something before they move further away from a Champions League position.

These are the results from the games played yesterday:

Crystal Palace 0-0 Fulham
Luton Town 1-1 Wolverhampton Wanderers
Manchester City 2-0 Nottingham Forest
Brentford 1-3 Everton
Burnley 0-1 Manchester United

Luton finally got their first point at home, congratulations to the newly promoted team 

Manchester City continue with their 100% win record even though Rodri was shown a red card for violent conduct. I think Nottingham Forest played well but were unable to break down their opponents. Everton stunned Brentford with that hard-fought away win. What a pass by Evans to pick out Fernandes for the volley he scored. Manchester United needed that win but Burnley are in deep trouble rooted to the bottom of the Premier League table.

I cannot speak for others but I am open to removing/revising any feedback I have left for any member as long as I can be shown I made an error of judgement. The case did not look good at all in the first instance but now you state the first you knew anything about the associated accounts was when you read the names here in this thread (rather than by your own feedback).

Personally, I see this as you using this probably as the final opportunity to save as many accounts as you can, you are clutching at straws but having said that if you ever change your mind and explain why the negative feedbacks on all associated accounts should be removed/revised, I will look at it.

If possible could you comment directly on the allegations that the following are farmed accounts you have used to participate in nefarious activities: dbc23, Zilon, Alisha-k, Mistafreeze, DomainMagnate, Rococo23, coco2392, dricoco23

Let us not forget, these are the known connected accounts (possibly one of the above is innocent of being connected but the caveat of having me feedback revised is there) therefore what would you like to present as your argument to have the negative feedback removed/revised from that left it for you?
 

To me it is clear you will not be able to get a loan (for reasons explained by several members in various threads) but if you insist on trying, you should consider taking a different approach.

There are only a small number of lenders within the forum, did you try to make a request in every lender thread? Rather than post here and wait in the hope for a lender to approach you, why not consider approaching them all directly?