|
Without using userscripts, sending merits requires a lot of time and effort, so I agree with you that we need modifications, but they must all be in one update.
The most important thing is that if theymos is busy, why not ask for a developer, even part-time, there are a lot of modifications required, most of which have not been implemented.
|
|
|
|
|
Most traders have a background in Forex and regular trading markets, in which Leverage is used due to slow price movements. Therefore, traders often start with 1x leverage, and soon it turns into an addiction to reach a quick profit, so we see 10x leverage or more, which often leads in the end to losing your money.
|
|
|
|
Your exchange is exchanging Bitcoin to a bank account. Is this done automatically or manually? According to F.A.Q, after completing all the process, the user will need to wait, which means that this may be done manually. Do you have an account licensed to do this, or is it similar to localbitcoin P2P? It seems the development of this exchange is still unfinished.
Anyway, can I not exchange Bitcoin with other cryptocurrencies? Whenever I choose Bitcoin, it's automatically paired with RUB. My only choice is on the payment method.
Apparently, it now gives me an error that the available reserve is 0 BTC. |
|
|
|
you pasted a wrong username. You are referring to @NexusBet, which is not a scammer in my opinion, but above you there is a comment from @LuckyLabs [1], who appears to be the scammer. I gave him negative trust, and if there are any additional details, include them here. [1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2565299 |
|
|
|
|
You have displayed the results of posts per day on a scale for the last 3 months, while posts per month on a general scale, which gives bias , but in general there is a decrease in the number of posts, and if the data is compared to the last ten years, we may notice that part of the decrease is normal and the other part Due to the lack of signature campaigns and an attempt to reduce spam on Gambling boards.
|
|
|
|
|
If the price of Bitcoin is stable or fixed, many investors may not prefer to invest in Bitcoin. Therefore, as long as the general trend of the currency is upward, these fluctuations are not bad in the long term, and the economy cannot be decentralized and you want to control the price.
|
|
|
|
If the DRN price is less than $7 after the event, they will make up the difference in market value in the form of DRN.
This will be very bad for the project because it means a significant increase in supply at a time when many will think about selling, which means that the price will be far from the initial evaluation of $5. If during the investment period a certain value of USDT is locked, such as $2, there will be a guarantee of a minimum loss, and then the investment will be reasonable. |
|
|
|
You can't expect all Jambler partners to update their websites just because Bitcointalk is banning Jambler.
I can think of four reasons: - Mixtum & Mixermoney & WebMixer& jambler was paying about +15K per week, so the forum is important to them, especially after CM was banned. - ALTT is still small compared to BTT. - If any legal problems occur, then jambler will be safe as the actual mixing is done through partners. - From a technical standpoint, modifying the code is easy. Instead of calling ----> https://api.[banned mixer]/, they can copy the content of the code to partners back-end and call Liquidity lib code. Conversely, it will be an advantage as the mixing algorithm will be unique for each partners. They don't necessarily announce that the upgrade is due to BTT but to make their system more "decentralized." |
|
|
|
I thought maybe you did too. Which claims specifically? I didn't keep up with the entire discussion made in the Jambler thread, until recently.
No, I did not do that. On the contrary, I was against banning mixing services from day one. You can read my posts on that topic [1]The allegations are that you knew that Jamambler.io was doing the mixing and not the mixing platform? Did any of the campaign members have these doubts? You know what doesn't stick to this story? That theymos had no idea how Jambler works; not even seen a single diagram. The way I see it, is that some of you bombarded him with PMs, complaining that it's a mixer and it should be banned.
I don't think BitcoinGirl.Club contacted admin if he wanted to ban Jambler he would use PM without posting anything publicly [2]. I think we all trusted @icopress so I personally didn't visit the site F.A.Q until I saw @BitcoinGirl.Club's claims which are true. [1] Mixers to be banned
[2] In the bold part, I am with you. the ban for mixers [and funny enough that mixers are not completely banned, Jambler is all around the forum.] caused lack of information on Bitcontalk. If the mixer operations were normal like it used to be then we would know about it the moment it was happening. Many topics would be created even on their ann thread there would be a lot of discussion to aware everyone.
Altcoinstalks is still not mature as a forum and not many people even know about that forum. In search engine the forum posts are not ranked as they get rank on bitcointalk.
[...] Discussing mixers from any angle is not prohibited. You can even recommend your preferred mixer to others if you want, but you cannot provide a direct link (that leads to the mixer). Btw, Jamber is not a mixer. |
|
|
|
I used FixedFloat.com (also known as ff.io) on March 26. They kept my funds, claiming it came from criminal activity, and refused to conduct the exchange or give a refund until I proved the funds were legit.
The service is currently not working and I think they may either rebuild the deposits and withdrawals system again or they will stop working, so you have to wait until the service works normally. I have read in some cases that the money is returned to you unless it is clearly linked to a court case or blacklist address. Yes. I wonder why people still use such instant exchanges, yet there are better alternatives that won't even bother one with KYC.
It's a little off topic but what are your recommendations for better alternatives? I have been searching for a reliable alternative for several months. |
|
|
|
This happened back when were just starting and laws were not as strict as they are now, and they were not accepting my country. One of their team members asked me to simply choose France as a country IIRC and to just proceed to use their services.
I think they can easily determine that you are using a VPN but after what happened yesterday they will be strict with members from Iran. Does anyone know why countries such as Burundi, Congo, and Canada are banned? I can understand the reasons for banning Afghanistan and Cuba, as there were wars in those countries, but Canada? |
|
|
|
So there is this app/website called defi which gives 6-8% return daily. My brother invested in it 10k INR, withdrew 12500, he received 10K out of it, as for withdrawal there was 20% fees.
So the profits are 2.5% not 6-8% return daily and the account fees are 20%. If they say that publicly and someone tries the service, then he is stupid. Any service that gives you a return higher than 5% to 20% annually in dollars is a questionable service, let alone 5% daily, which is truly considered scam. |
|
|
|
They told theymos (aka, the authority), as if it was secret all this time, lol. You can read here and here. I did not contact theymos. Did you know about these claims before? |
|
|
|
@theymos I think that if Jambler partners are the ones who receive deposits and withdrawals, bear full responsibility for clients’ funds, and Jambler is the one who provides liquidity and technical support, then it should be allowed. What do you think? Jambler provides a privacy feature and there are not many privacy services that are advertised here with high-quality posters, so giving them another chance will be beneficial for all. But today after reading the post, we decided to share it with theymos. There was an ongoing discussion about that topic so I don't know why you shared it with admin. The discussion started from here [1] and its goal was to improve the service, not attack it. [1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5491818.msg63925142#msg63925142 |
|
|
|
|
Do you expect these services to tell customers, “Your money is at risk or your deposits are being misused?” They will certainly not continue to lie, even if things are going well. Therefore, companies looking for transparency hire reliable third-party services that review all their reports, but they will not do that with these services. Misuses clients' money in an attempt to grow quickly.
|
|
|
|
Our objective is to make this coin a 100m$+ marketcap coin. We are on the lookout for a team of 15-25 Interested partners. We already have a few people who are strong hands and have collected the majority supply of this token slowly so that it's easier to push it. If you are genuinely interested then this could be a fun journey together, to make something beautiful and profit.
By using “Interested Partners,” are you looking for investors, marketers, or those who have access to pumping and dumping groups, or what? If we assume that the supply will be fixed, then you are talking about 20 times the demand in a short period, and this is possible for a limited supply, but since memecoins come in a very large supply, it is difficult for any team to achieve such results. Will you pay them in Bitcoin or in the same currency? |
|
|
|
It's possible since they are still new compared to them and as I can see, there's still a lot of Bitget army in the forum shilling the exchange. They always try their best to ensure that they will stand out and get noticed by the crowd. Binance and the likes exchange might be more popular than in Bitget but they still shared the same risk because all of them are centralized.
I don't know why they are doing it the wrong way. There is nothing wrong with promoting the service here. If they had created a signature campaign instead of armies of newbies' accounts, it would have been better for them. One of the reasons I did not register with that service is that their method of promoting their product does not look professional and it is difficult for me to trust them with my deposits. |
|
|
|
|
Flag supported. It is true that many of us try to buy some cheaper codes, but you will end up being scammed, so it is better to deal with reliable accounts only.
|
|
|
|
changenow.io has a long history of reports on the forum and some cases remain unresolved, so it is best to approach them with caution or avoid them. xchange.cx is a new platform and there are alternatives to it. Also, the topic was about a month ago and I think @OP has exchanged his coins. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
