There's probably a syndicate behind this and also an anomaly, if the court has seen all the pieces of evidence and the bettor proved that he is the real winner then all winnings should go to him, the proof of the burden should be on the gambling operator that the money was already withdrawn by someone else, the court is wrong here to find people who withdraw the money. The head office should hold the branch operator liable for not paying the winner because they will lose the reputation of the company and the trust of the bettors. This has never happened in my country because if it's a big amount the payor is the head office, the victim should pursue the case in the higher court and ask them to revoke the license of the branch and pay for the damages, there's injustice here, bettors should not bet on this shop and they should protest the shop, this could happen again to any of their bettors. I can see the corruption here as even the authorities or the court made a decision in favor of the betting agent. As stated in the OP, the winner got the ticket, and that should be a valid basis that he had won a bet and had to claim the entire winning. If someone had already claim then the lapses should be blame on the agent and it should not compromise the winning of the real winner. Not sure what is the court structure in Nigeria, but if it's in my country, when you are not satisfied with the decision of the certain court, you can file a case again and elevate it to the higher court, and the winner has to make sure that he'll add to his claim all the incident cost like filing a case, lawyer's fee and etc, so he'll come up with zero expenses when he'll be able to claim his entire winning. Curruption can be low tech or high tec really, you can steal by going after the local shops - something as old as humanity itself... pay for protection and all that. However, there is also similar ways of going after the technological on-line business in many states that hold that type of power. It requires a more systematic organisation, but it is certainly a possibility. |
|
|
|
Edit for an update: Several ATACAMS strikes have taken place in Crimea. It seems that they can perfectly skip the air defence.
I disagree and you do not have any believable source. The systems are not Ukrainian and every nation has the right to operate their own equipment in their territory and in international airspace. They are also free to use the intelligence gathered as they see fit.
But enough of silly stuff, my guess is that such integration is going towards creating a balanced if not Ukrainian superior sky in the frontlines. Air defences, F-16s that should be soon arriving will be able to see and target with a minutes time with integrated systems.
https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2024/04/25/european-trained-ukrainian-f-16-pilots-will-not-be-ready-until-late-2024_6669456_4.htmlWhole "F16 training" is a sham, ask any experienced pilot. Training program serves as a cover for a fact that planes will be operated by western pilots Regarding the date, yes it is well know, they are not going to put their beloved f16 out there with the hours of training of, for example, a Ruzzian pilot. I guess that after pilots with experience in F29 get one year of training in F-16 you are going to argue that now they are "western pilots"?? On your second statement... as usual, no credible source. I will give you one: https://www.twz.com/this-is-how-long-it-would-really-take-ukraines-pilots-to-convert-to-f-16sFor experienced Ukrainian fighter pilots, a type conversion to the F-16 could resemble a typical FTU transition conversion course, known as TX. “For a pilot with around 500 hours experience in a Western fighter, but that has never previously flown the F-16 — someone transitioning from the Hornet for example — without any breaks, working weekends, etc, they need 69 days to learn everything to safely employ the Viper in air-to-air and air-to-ground roles,” “The answer initially would have to be based on building a new syllabus based on Ukraine’s specific needs and the threat scenario, and to then take that into combat would need anywhere between six and 12 months of training. It would still be risky, but that might outweigh the rewards.”
Why would they wait for a year to field the f16 if they were going to use "western pilots"? They would say that it took 2 months of training and then send the f16 + "western pilots" with a few years of experience in the jet. It Regarding the integration, I have seen recently a tablet / ipad attached to an Ukrainian cockpit with battlefield information. My guess is that this information is going to be integrated properly. This means pilots will have view of all detected threats and radars and be able to be more effective in suppressing the Ruzzian air defences or avoiding them. If you look at my previous posts quoting strategies, it seems that Ukraine / US have finally come to the conclusion that there are no shortcuts, they have to wage war as it has be done: first weaken, then attack. The opposite does not work. The air strategy for Ukraine perfectly fits this narrative and the content of the aid package does also support it. Again, I expect to see from Ukraine more attacks on refineries - even crude exporting facilities after the US elections, more attacks on air defence systems to start clearing the air for the f16s and the Ukrainian aviation being more effective while the Ruzzian aviation starts either being grounded or start taking big loses. |
|
|
|
Zelensky gone from Ukraine will be a good thing. Of course, if he isn't assassinated, he will simply retire to one of his homes... maybe the one in Florida. Will whoever takes his place be worse? Or will Ukraine simply do the smart thing and capitulate to Russia? “It’s OVER For Ukraine & Zelensky Will Be GONE Within 60 Days.” Col. Douglas MacGregor - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kttfALsoQx0. I see his mouth, I do not see his money. I am going to quote this one so that the next time you quote him I can recall this. Anyway... Col. Douglas Macgregor is a retired U.S. Army Colonel Combat Veteran, author, and a defense and foreign policy consultant. He is the CEO of Our Country Our Choice, a new company designed to unite Americans "to create a stronger, more prosperous and secure" country. Yaicksss....smells of Putin's purse all over. I’m RJ, a devoted Christian and a father of four children. I own a small business and have a deep love for our country and its people. I invested my financial resources, time, and energy to support Trump in both 2015 and 2020. So... sure a veeery convincing source here. Among all the list of new supplies to Ukraine, there is a line that seems not that important: Equipment for the integration of Western launchers, rockets and radars with Ukrainian air defense systems; However this means much more that it looks at first. An integration of the air defence systems passed or existing in Ukraine with other NATO systems... what could this mean? Will the US AWACS and predators that are permanently observing the black sea and the frontlines be now integrated with Ukraine's air defence? My guess is that NATO can perfectly spot any of the planes that are launching the FABs (probably Ukraine's unresolved issue at the front). Passing that information in real time and with accurate coordinates to Ukraine's ground to air systems may be the beginning of the end of the Ruzzian advantage. They're already integrated, most of those systems are operated by foreign "advisers" I disagree and you do not have any believable source. The systems are not Ukrainian and every nation has the right to operate their own equipment in their territory and in international airspace. They are also free to use the intelligence gathered as they see fit. But enough of silly stuff, my guess is that such integration is going towards creating a balanced if not Ukrainian superior sky in the frontlines. Air defences, F-16s that should be soon arriving will be able to see and target with a minutes time with integrated systems. |
|
|
|
Recently in the case against Samourai Wallet the funders were arrested for money transmitting without a license and the wallet did not exchange bitcoin to fiat money, which means USA recognizes bitcoin as money. IMO something doesn't have to be literally called money by the government to be money. I'd say that bitcoin is money because it's being used as payment for goods and services and that's what money is. The problem is that in the last interpretation, the US gov. claimed that bitcoin is property. So which is it? I don`t think that serious countries will accept BTC. They have their fiat money and it is enough for all purposes.
Taxes we get on the profit. And i don`t think that someone get a bill with BTC in it. No, we got taxes in fiat money. I don`t like it but it is correct - when you get any profit - you pay taxes.
Colorado accepts bitcoin for payments, allowing you to pay state tax in bitcoin. I'd say they're being pretty serious about it  In the US there are always some states that tend to take the initiative, but that happens with everything, from social rights to pretty much the opposite. However the problem is that is has become quite unpredictable so it is ok to use the service, but base your company there or make significant decisions. It is the same in international politics, US swings too much. |
|
|
|
|
I wonder how many people here have ever used a "dictation" system on-line and just by subscription, it is a nit out of the ordinary to just on that type of wagon. However it is quite more common to have that "physical", like the typical guy who seem to be in the know of horse racing events and can potentially give you a tip, for your tip of course. Perhaps knowing in person beats the online on this.
|
|
|
|
Among all the list of new supplies to Ukraine, there is a line that seems not that important: Equipment for the integration of Western launchers, rockets and radars with Ukrainian air defense systems; However this means much more that it looks at first. An integration of the air defence systems passed or existing in Ukraine with other NATO systems... what could this mean? Will the US AWACS and predators that are permanently observing the black sea and the frontlines be now integrated with Ukraine's air defence? My guess is that NATO can perfectly spot any of the planes that are launching the FABs (probably Ukraine's unresolved issue at the front). Passing that information in real time and with accurate coordinates to Ukraine's ground to air systems may be the beginning of the end of the Ruzzian advantage. |
|
|
|
Yes Ukraine has recently hit another refinery, not far from the front. NATO has already deployed troops in Ukraine, but not for combat. As usual there are "advisors" meaning military intelligence officers, mainetenance & technical personnel, etc. It is not only Macron who is exremely angry at Putin for waging this stupid war. There is zero chance of Ruzzia targeting any nuclear weapon as of now. It is just ridiculous. I guess deploying nukes in Poland would be a good response to the Ruzzian weapons in BealoruZZia. Edited to add: Two main strikes actually, one a Refinery in Smolesnk (around 300 km from the border with Ukraine), but also in Krasnoyarskii (more than 500 km from dnipro), a depot of gliding bombs / gliding kits . It is evident that Ukraine knew what to hit. As more of a psy op, a helicopter was burned (and filmed while the sabotage was being carried out for proof) in an aerodrome in Moscow. Both of these strikes are level God in difficulty, as they have to fly over the in theory protected territory where the Ruzzian army is. |
|
|
|
There are two kinds of Trump trials. There are the government/court trials, and there are the trials of public opinion.
The hush money case against Trump weaves a colorful narrative with a tabloid publisher suppressing torrid affairs for a businessman-turned-politician and a hush money scheme orchestrated by a now-disbarred lawyer to a porn star.
But Trump is charged with 34 counts of falsifying business records – so prosecutors have warned this will in many ways be a routine, document-heavy trial.
[...]
Banker Gary Farro testified to records that show Cohen changed course about two weeks later in October 2016 to instead open an account for another company – Essential Consultants – an entity ultimately used to pay Daniels in the hush money scheme to suppress her story about an alleged affair with Trump. (Trump has denied both alleged affairs.)
It is clear that this is not some short of casual spending or a simple scheme, it required the creation of opaque companies to get the money from A (the donations for a political campaign) to B, the account of a female porn professional that frequently calls Trump "tiny". As of now, the defence has failed to score any hit that might question the essence accusation. |
|
|
|
The strategic planning of this war is known and now it is just a question of the US & Europe being able to execute the actions required. The "infinite" recruitment capacity of Ruzzia, its unlimited manpower are all myths. The frog needs unfortunately more boiling - this is part of the price to pay for all the time Ruzzia has ignored treaties - you cannot negotiate with such a bad faith in front. https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/russian-military-objectives-and-capacity-ukraine-through-2024Russian forces are likely to peak in late 2024, with increasing material challenges over the course of 2025.
[...]
Russia faces significant limitations in the longevity and reliability of its industrial output. Of the tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, for example, approximately 80% are not new production but are instead refurbished and modernised from Russian war stocks. The number of systems held in storage means that while Russia can maintain a consistent output through 2024, it will begin to find that vehicles require deeper refurbishment through 2025, and by 2026 it will have exhausted most of the available stocks.
[...]
Russian Ministry of Defence (MoD) has assessed an industrial requirement to manufacture or source approximately 4 million 152mm and 1.6 million 122mm artillery shells in 2024. Russian industry has reported to the MoD that it expects to increase 152mm production from around 1 million rounds in 2023 to 1.3 million rounds over the course of 2024, and to only produce 800,000 122mm rounds over the same period. Moreover, the Russian MoD does not believe it can significantly raise production in subsequent years
[...]
Beyond 2026, attrition of systems will begin to materially degrade Russian combat power, while Russian industry could be disrupted sufficiently by that point, making Russia's prospects decline over time.
|
|
|
|
Hey, llamame loco  pero no me gusta pagar impuestos. Tampoco me gusta ir a la carcel o que me multen por eso no quiero pagar impuestos pero por lo legal. Total que lo que estoy preguntando es donde tengo q vivir y durante cuanto tiempo para poder pasar una buena cantidad de bitcoin (es para el futuro claro) a cash pagando lo minimo. Basta con ser residente fiscal un año en alguna jurisdiccion favorable o como? Hay formas legales mas fáciles si estoy dispuesto a desplazarme o montar empresas? |
|
|
|
Lo que enfatizaba un tanto es en el "plano digital" como citaba, donde estas rarezas no son físicas sino lógicas, otorgadas en base a una asociación adicional que se le otorga al satoshi, sea por orden numeral u otra idea que conceptualmente pueda parecer relevante.
En realidad podríamos cuestionar lo mismo en el caso de los "NFT tradicionales". No me refiero aquí a los NFT basados en Ordinals, que sí tienen algo como un "valor añadido" por la seguridad que les da estar almacenados en una blockchain. Sino a los NFT tal como se popularizaron con Ethereum, que lo que contienen es un enlace a un sitio web donde se aloja una imagen, audio, mini-video etc. Si somos sinceros de las imágenes que se venden como NFTs el 99% son de escaso valor artístico, es decir "solo por ser NFTs" tienen un valor muy superior al que tendría la misma obra (digital o analógica, si le restamos su "valor decorativo") si no existiera esa moda. Habrá un par de casos de arte digital de alta calidad, en los que sí el valor se corresponde con su "valor artístico", a esos casos no me refiero porque tienen en común bastante con el mercado de arte "real", y el NFT sería una forma de asegurar la "propiedad" sobre el mismo. Tampoco a los DLCs de los videojuegos, en este caso se trata simplemente de otra forma de vender algo que le puede ser útil a los gamers. Aparentemente eso significa que hay una especie de cambio de paradigma, que le confiere valor a algo por la rareza misma aún siendo digital. Sin embargo, por las razones mencionadas en el último post el tema de las "convenciones" puede perjudicar al particular mercado de los "satoshis raros" en el futuro. Cualquiera podría inventar un sistema que compita con el "sistema de rarezas" de Casey. Creo que los valores "black" ya son un ataque a los valores originales: le confieren un valor superior también al último satoshi en el bloque, y no solamente al primero como en el sistema original. Ahora yo podría intentar vender el satoshi que está en el centro del bloque, que es igual de raro que el primero y el último. O empezar a contar los satoshis de manera diferente. Al final podríamos imaginar un sinnúmero de "rarezas" que multiplican la oferta ... Esto me fastidia bastante. Parece gente intentando hacer no fungible algo que funciona porque es fungible. Por otra parte, a mi me da igual un sat que otro. Hay alguna manera en la que pueda vender algun sat raro q por casualidad haya llegado a mis manos en el pasado? Como funciona esto? Alguien tiene que certificar dicho satoshi para que se lo pueda vender al pirao de turno de este esquema piramidal? |
|
|
|
He is not looking to kill it, he is trying to impose the DAME tax, DAME means Digital Asset Mining Energy, and the idea is to start with this tax from 10%, then 20% in the next year and 30% on the 3rd year.
So, the plan isn't to ban the mining, but with those huge taxes, no one will want to mine there. Is not a good business. But i don't think congress will let that tax come to live, and if it does, they will stop it before the 3rd year, because other way people will start creating illegal farms.
Yep, the "asset industry" is not at all the mining industry. It is being, as usual, made into a partisan thing and all that crap. My guess is that the news might lower the price of electricity by less than 1% if any?? I think it is contrary to a good practice to selectively tax a certain use of energy - like for example taxing selectively the land for cattle (cows) because these are harmful for the environment (should I say to a greater extent than bitcoin?) or you could tax the energy used in producing diesel or gasoline cars for the same reason...but my favourite would be to tax the energy consumption of VISA and Mastercard, including the one used to take the employees to the office, etc... https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=61364#:~:text=The%20CBECI%20estimates%20that%20global,to%20have%20been%2027%2C400%20TWh.The CBECI estimates that global electricity usage associated with Bitcoin mining ranged from 67 TWh to 240 TWh in 2023, with a point estimate of 120 TWh. The International Energy Agency estimated global consumption of electricity during 2023 to have been 27,400 TWh.10 So, the CBECI estimates put electricity supporting Bitcoin mining in 2023 at about 0.2% to 0.9% of global demand for electricity 0.2% is quite a bit of energy to be honest. |
|
|
|
The popularity of online gambling platform have been on the increase for a while now thereby creating several arguments between them and the physical outlets in terms of which is the best. There was an incidence I saw on twitter this money that made me decide to create this post so anyone who is bent on using physical shops should be cautious. According to the tweet and the victim narration, he bet the game in a physical shop and won N16,700,000 (~$13,500) but the agent of the shop refused to pay him even after the betting company from their head office instructed him to pay. Not that the company did not pay the agent, they paid but the agent refused to pay him saying that someone else have come to withdraw the money. He approached the court only to get N3,000,000( $2,400) out of the total winning and was asked to go and look for the people that withdrew that money. Normally, when there is winning, the only way to withdraw is to tender the ticket to the agents who will take the ticket before paying the winning. So I do not know how someone will withdraw the winning of another and what the person used to make the withdrawal. I think the agent wanted to steal the entire money but due to the pressure from the court, he has to return part of it. I see this as a warning on the dangers of greedy agents in physical gambling platforms. Source: https://twitter.com/General_Oluchi/status/1782027404027797716That is a quite surprising event, normally the legit agents would honour a ticket to the extent possible - they may not have the full amount or whatever - they can get in a lot of trouble and suffer demands and income loss if they fail to do so. But I would not take this isolated fact as a post on "limitations of physical" casinos, but rather as something you need to be aware of in case. |
|
|
|
Our unique blend allows us to deliver real-time insights through voice dictation, giving you the edge by revealing goals before they hit mainstream media, gambling plateforms, or TV screens!
Well I'm not surprised about some of the things you said because I already have a premonition about where this is going but talking about the lines on quote, what are you really talking about  Of what purpose is early revealing of goals scored to gamblers before it hits the media? I'm flummoxed really, gamblers who desire to have profit from his bet doesn't want the frivolous distractions, so how would that benefit subscribers of yours? So much questions to ask on your post. Seems nothing out of the ordinary to be honest. A Telegram channel that is supposedly going to give you more accurate predictions and insights that you'd normally get fro m free sources? It think that people will only pay if it is terribly good at it and even in that case many people bet trying themselves to get their own strategies, copying is not as fun as diy for gambling. |
|
|
|
|
One must think why the 60 billion aid to Ukraine has been passed with the support of absolutely all democrats, but also by nearly half of the Republicans. There is no doubt that the representatives had to come and face the truth: The US voters do want to help Ukraine and want Ukraine to succeed.
Putin has been defeated in the political US fight. Have no doubt he has done the best he could on regards to stopping the aid, buying wills and throwing money and extortion to the problem. But he failed. And is not like a one vote fail, is like 100 of 200 fail.
Trump has been absent from the conversation, but this is a political loss on his stance about Ukraine, within his own party - at most, coming off his usual naps during his trial for paying a sex professional - he tweeted that this is very costly and thee like. I guess that he is trying very hard to ignore that two thirds of that money goes directly to several US states currently held by Republicans - e.g. Mississippi or Texas in the form of military contracts of huge sizes.
This is a full-blown diplomatic and political catastrophe for Putin, who can brag about some advances in the front, but at this point clearly understands that the current strategy of using FAB and then sending the "turtle tanks" may be short lived.
|
|
|
|
https://www.csis.org/analysis/back-stock-state-russias-defense-industry-after-two-years-warHow a frog boils, but does not get out of the pan: Ruzzia is planning to increase their weapons production, which can obviously be expected as the "Three days to Kiev" was cancelled and this is of course possible in a country were you can just ignore if the people would rather have better schools or better medical care. What is significant is that the investment is not going to the latest in missiles, fifth gen fighters or sophisticated weapons that can penetrate any defence. They are going to produce... more shells. This gives an idea of how devastating this war has been for the best and most irreplaceable production of Ruzzia, now centering the efforts in first world war dumb explosives. Given the size of the frog, this is not something to be taken lightly, but is a clear indication of how the future looks like for Ruzzia and for their reputation as weapons exporter too. My guess? Putin is praying for a Trump victory, but should be careful of what he wishes on that regard. One of the main developments has been the rapid emergence and massive scaling up of Russian civilian and military drones providing significant ISR and assault capabilities to the Russian armed forces, often launched with missiles for a maximum impact.
While Russia has also invested in the production of modern tanks, ammunition, and EW systems, CSIS research has revealed Moscow is not self-sufficient and relies on partners such as Iran and North Korea to field enough of these weapons on the battlefield. The analysis has also shown that while Russia indeed improved its domestic arms production capacity in 2023 compared to 2022, it has nonetheless continued to tap into its Soviet-era stockpiles by, for instance, refurbishing and sending its 60- and 70-year-old tanks to Ukraine. Overall, last year saw Russia transition into a long war of attrition while increasingly shifting to low-cost and lower-quality weapons systems. Smells of frog. Wow.... I think that some people are going to think that I read this before my posting about future strategy... ...
More precisely, Western policymakers trying to support the Ukrainian war effort should do
the following:
▪ Continue supplying higher-end military equipment to Ukraine at a pace that exceeds
Russia’s production rate.
[...]
▪ Target Russia’s oil revenues.[...]The main way to seriously undermine Russia’s capacity
to increase spending on its defense industrial sector is by targeting its oil revenues
[...]
▪ Close sanctions loopholes and enforce existing export controls.
[...]
▪ Collaborate with the countries of the Global South. T
[...]
▪ Begin planning for a strengthened and empowered European defense industry.
[...] dude... I should get paid for this. To the stupid stuff... As Russian Troops Broke Through Ukrainian Lines, Panicky Ukrainian Commanders Had No Choice But To Deploy One Of Their Least-Prepared Brigades
The situation in and around Ocheretyne is desperate for Ukraine
[...]
Is it time to mobilize women and teenagers yet? Because UA is winning so hard?
Yes, a light brigade inadequately armed left positions. Another one was sent to stabilise. A not really unusual fuck-up, not a "collapse" but certain you are giving here a real frog leap into calling for recruiting teens. BTW women are already fighting for Ukraine, given a gun, they kill Ruzzis perfectly well. But hey... perhaps they should learn from Ruzzia and send teenagers into military targets and then claim they were hit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yelabuga_drone_factoryn July 2023, an investigation revealed the factory recruits students of Alabuga Polytech, a branch of the Yelabuga Polytechnic College, as workers, some as young as 15. As of August 2023, the factory had several hundred students employed.[11] The students were promised a job and locally competitive salary of up to 70,000 rubles (US$700) per month as part of a work experience program. Instead, students enrolled were encouraged, and in some cases pressured, into working at the drone facility where their salaries are contingent on meeting production quotas In a 2 April 2024 offensive, the drone factory was struck by an improvised drone apparently adapted from a civilian light aircraft, likely an Aeroprakt A-22. Ukraine's military intelligence said the strike "caused significant destruction of production facilities".[2] Local governor Rustam Minnikhanov said the attack brought no serious damage or disruption to production.[19][2] Russian media reported a nearby workers' dormitory was damaged, with 12 injured.[20][21] So, following your theory, Ruzzia is winning so big that they use teens in a drone factory, in which they get killed because Ukraine cannot hit Ruzzia???Boil frog boil.
|
|
|
|
The truth about the aid to Ukraine: Most of the investment goes directly into the US factories and benefits the economy of regions that are typically depressed. Republicans are trying to make it look as an expense, while the order authorising to seize Ruzzian assets has been given. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFf-kh_UX30&t=13sFor example, Mississippi's weapons factories are getting a fullbook or orders to replenish all stocks that are being sent to Ukraine. The funds range in the billion range. US is the only winner of this war. |
|
|
|
Trump just cannot help it. He just violated a gag order. Previously, he has been fined for tweeting shit about judges, their families, the witnesses ... beyond anything that you may have seen before in the US justice system.
I think they gave him a picture book too early in the trial. Now they have nothing to distract him.  Maybe a Playboy subscription in exchange for not Xtweeting anything for, lets say 48 hours? A textbook narcissist, he is got so many of the traits and tactics of narcissists that should be a case study like... Patient 187 describes himself as the leader and saviour of his country: - when he looses describes a situation in which "the largest conspiracy" took place to make him loose, - his projects are "the biggest projects ever seen" and anyone who dares to question absolutely anything is described as a hater, criminal, conspirationists... - Any and all failures are described as either "achivements" or "caused by his enemies". Responsibility for actions is nil, and once people do not serve his purpose he goes into full offensive onto them (e.g. the Vice president, his layers,...). Unable to recognise any mistake, when there is objective information or data showing those, he denies the data, the producers of the information, the media that publishes it and even the colour of the background if given opportunity (e.g. unemployment data). |
|
|
|
The aid to Ukraine has been signed by Biden, which was the only step left to start getting the supplies to Ukraine. Most of these are stored in Europe so they will start arriving. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDIxPNggr0UBiden says the U.S. will send weapons to Ukraine within 'hours' To put things into perspective, this was all the aid sent to Ukraine from January 2022 to January 2024. It is easy to see that is a huge package. https://www.cfr.org/article/how-much-aid-has-us-sent-ukraine-here-are-six-chartsThis is just all the aid until 5 months ago, just for measure. And today it is Feodosia's turn to be attacked by drones, at an oil depot be the victim of someone smoking in the wrong place. It seems that there are plenty of places that can be easily be attacked by Ukrainian drones have people smoking around. Maybe the resident trolls would like to evaluate how expensive this was and what little difference it makes, etc...? https://t.me/feodosiyachat/132088Edited to add: It seems that Ukraine is preferentially targeting Ruzzia air defence. Preparing the ground for the F-16? |
|
|
|
The important things:
- Ukraine knows what works and what does not.
- Ukraine can hit oil facilities. I expect that now to happen after the US elections. Latest drones are above the 1000 km of range (some say 3000 km, but I am not giving yet credit unless I see evidence).
- Ukraine has learnt from the Surovikin line and now has its own.
- Ukraine can stop Ruzzia in the front, is willing to do so and is willing to bleed Ruzzian economy hard.
I see that there is a clear direction. Optimal result: Crimea cut from railway lines this year.
I get that you're trying to concentrate on the positives, but at this point a child can see that cherry picking some facts that are adventitious to you usually means that someone is trying to mislead you. "Branko mentioned the Excalibur, used by HIMARS" lol what!?! At this point i'm just going to assume that you're drunk or just trolling me. Good that you could admit that Branko was right, still not sure why you continue discussing other price before the war even began and the current global shortage of 155mm shells. Until the shortage is gone might as well discuss the hypothetical price of 155mm shells if they were growing on trees, would be just as relevant. "when you deny that Ruzzia is sending soldiers in Golfcarts to the front" cite where i deny that Russia is using golfcart like vehicles? Or shamefully just ignore this point and change the subject yet again."Or would you want to admit that 60 billion is the US aid is on top of the EU aid and is more that the rate given on previous years and that you are lying when trying to make it appear otherwise?"Ohh boy, you actually believed that one too, huh? You know, it would help to develop some critical thinking skills instead of just blindly believing everything that you wish to be true. Let me explain so you don't set yourself up for another disappointment. Just because USA approves aid to Ukraine for $X (what congress passes) doesn't mean that $X will make it to Ukraine. In fact most will stay in US and only a small portion of that $Y will make it to Ukraine (what Kiel Institute accounts for). Just look into the previous $113B congress passed $113 billion: Where the US investment in Ukraine aid has gone
...
The largest chunk has gone directly to help Ukraine’s military
The US has actually spent a bit more than $43 billion on security aid for Ukraine since Russia’s invasion in February 2022.
Does the money go where it’s supposed to?
There have been indications of corruption. Zelensky, for instance, replaced the leadership at his defense ministry just before traveling to the US to address the United Nations and appear at the White House with Biden.
And let me spell this out so you don't get confused on this one too, I'm only talking about USA, sure Brits just committed $0,6B and other countries commit too "by your comments that Ukraine is just playing golf with the Scalps" are you sure you're not confusing me with someone else here? Or are you a bot that just generates positive messages to keep up Ukraine's morale? Finally, it's getting ugly out there for Ukrainians, guess they decided to completely shred the constitution and citizens rights, hope everyone who has Ukrainian passport here managed to renew it or it's a one way ticket to execute American KPIs Anger among Ukrainians in Poland as Kyiv halts passport renewals- Ruzzia is sending people in unarmoured vehicles to the frontline. did you lie or misread? - 60 Billion is nearly as much as the aid sent by US in two previous years - regardless if sent in weapons or cash - Now I know you have not misread, so this one is lying for you. The rest... textwalling, your favourite when your are caught. - Fronts collapsing... Lying or lying? (I cannot give you the honourable option). Excalibur shells are used for long range expensive targets. Are you trying to imply that is not the case?i (I did say HIMARS because I was thinking of the rocket, but they are fired by conventional artillery, so I am happy to correct THAT, which is irrelevant to the case) Branko is trying to imply that shells fired by Ukraine cost 100.000 US which is not the common case. See, he does not lie, just uses partial information. I am sure you are very familiar with using partial information uh? But let's just quote the same source: So now that you bring the topic, and for the benefit of those soldiers and people that you are trying to get to their deaths by trying to deny what this means: Excalibur is one shot one kill. Would you like to be on the receiving end thinking... "oh well, at least it costed them a lot". People living Ukraine... yes it happens. See below a link.... about people leaving Ruzzia... Boiling frogggggg https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/border-fear-then-relief-men-fleeing-russia-2022-10-05/For the men leaving Russia after vast journeys across the world's biggest country, there is now often a final ordeal: visceral fear at the border followed by a rush of relief for those who reach the other side.
Hundreds of thousands of men have left Russia since President Vladimir Putin invaded Ukraine on Feb. 24. Some feared they would be called up to fight, others simply sought new lives after war changed Russia more dramatically than at any time since the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
