It seems the marketing team has stopped responding regularly here, but it is possible the situation will improve soon:
You and some of the other sig campaign members kind of are the 1xbit marketing team, at least on this forum. |
|
|
|
|
Give it a rest signature spammers.
The guy obviously isn't a shill. If you want to know what a shill looks like go check out the 1xbit threads.
|
|
|
|
No, this is a real win, I continued to play and won another 250,000 dogecoins in the habanero. But there are already the first disadvantages that this casino has: - Already 2 times there was a situation when they have problems with processing the withdrawal request. Refer to technical problems on the part of the payment system; - Withdrawals from them are not instant, but take from 5 minutes to 7 hours, then there will be more information about this, they need to process more withdrawal requests. What is true is kyc, it wasn't really requested.  Know why? the way you posted this reply? you clearly give us idea how truth what others says above about you being a shill. Why need to Clearly State that "NO KYC PROCESS" as this is an obvious reason why gamblers here in forum stay away or stays in casinos? in which you are truly shilling here . Am sure you are one of the team member if not the owner of this site because Look how you delivered this post, even the Minute process of withdrawals and also the referral from technical support stated here? Nice try mate, but you have just proven How cheap your marketing strategy are . Dude, they didn't even mention KYC in the OP. But they did mention a really shitty withdraw policy that shouldn't make anyone ever want to play there.... Now I have 550,000 dogcoins on my account, and the withdrawal limit in this casino per day is 15,000 doge coins, 75,000 per week, and 300,000 per month, it will take me almost 2 months to withdraw all this, the main thing is to be able to control myself.
I hope all will be ok
This isn't something a shill would say. |
|
|
|
Good afternoon! Today I was fortunate enough to receive the biggest prize of my life. With a bet of 300 Dogoins, I won 496,500 Dogoins. This is x1655 of the bet amount. It's just incredible, I still can't get away from the received free spins. Played in the provider of booming games, slot - Book of Tombs. I immediately decided to publicize my winnings, since this casino is new, and I am not sure of their honesty to the end. Therefore, I will inform about all events here. Now I have 550,000 dogcoins on my account, and the withdrawal limit in this casino per day is 15,000 doge coins, 75,000 per week, and 300,000 per month, it will take me almost 2 months to withdraw all this, the main thing is to be able to control myself. I hope all will be ok   Shilling for that company ? do you really believe that this is worth to believe considering a account simply created just to make this post to advertise that site? if this is real then congratulations but I'm sure there is something behind this thread in favor that Gambling site. Yeah I think this seems like more of a "omg I won, I hope I get paid, I'm going to open a thread so they know if I don't get paid other gamblers will know about it" Good luck OP, keep us posted. (I fixed the images) And when you get your money off there don't play at any of those shady sites anymore, plenty of decent crypto casinos with instant cashouts nowadays. |
|
|
|
Where I am located right now in Albania,you pay 100 USD in local currency here and you get a real vaccination document.Many persons don't like what the government is doing trying to force vaccine on many professions or they will be fired from the work place so people have found a way around it.Corruption here has always been in huge quantities so this is not something new here but already people are buying real vaccination documents.
Plenty of examples here too, in Greece. People were even bribing doctors to not vaccinate them but update their social security number to show that they've completed the vaccination. There are even instances of medical staff purposely faking vaccinations on patients, who were unaware of the situation. Fortunately, those instances are extremely limited. It's astonishing to see such drastic measures taken from anti-vaxxers. They recently caught a drug abuser, who would get vaccinated for you, by providing your details (ID, SSN etc.) at the vaccination site. He had received more than 15 doses of Johnson and more than 12 doses of Pfizer. I don't think most of these people are anti-vaxxers. Most of them are probably uncomfortable being forced to be injected with a drug, rather than being given the relevant data/information, and being given the opportunity to make the decision on their own. I would be willing to bet that most people who are resisting getting the vaccine would be willing to get it if they were shown the relevant data and given the opportunity to make the decision on their own. So they're not vaccinated because they were forced to be vaccinated and weren't given the opportunity to make their own decision? And how is the relevant data/information anything other than very accessible to all? |
|
|
|
COVID destroying the festive fixture calendar in the UK. This does not make me happy, maybe Newcastle can get something from Man City to cheer me up. A Christmas miracle? I won’t get my hopes up.
Not only in UK, it's also happening in US as lots of NBA players have been placed in covid-19 protocol, and in fact, tonight we have 2 games that are confirmed postponed. I'm afraid the NBA season will be halted again because of the growing cases of people infected with covid-19. The NFL is getting really bad too, they had to postpone a few games this week and it's only getting worse with the playoffs quickly approaching. |
|
|
|
In my opinion, they stopped responding here, because this is not the official way that support should respond to. Spammers and cheaters took advantage of the fact that marketing team wanted to help here. You can speed up resloving of the case at any time without spamming this thread: Cases are being solved one by one, but if you want to speed things up - please contact our support first: support-en@1x-bit.comSo you're going to pretend like you think they didn't send any emails. Could you please stop shilling so hard? It's basically trolling at this point it's so obvious. Yes the spamming is annoying. But they're spamming because they're getting ignored and the fact that they are is not an excuse for 1xbit to just not respond. they dont want to replay on emails anymore.
I send emails, livechat on the website write here on bitcoin manager. And do you know what? NOTHING received. even email.
Then I wrote in the email from security 1xbit why my account is blocked.
I sent 10 emails, with pictures with evidence but THEY ARE NOT INTERESTED!
my account is still locked from 5 September 2021. I dont know how to recover my account but I tried everything (emails, livechat), so many times
|
|
|
|
Interesting. I also remember that I read about the US generals. I remember that some of them wouldn't obey the president's order if Trump told them to go to war. Which makes me wonder, from whom they take their orders if not from the elected president? research "war powers resolution" if being attacked then yes the president can declare war in response. but to start a unprovoked attack he needs to get congress to agree. this resolution is there to stop some idiot president going full nutcase and causing unneeded death.. kind of an anti-tyrant clause in the presidents contract. its a safety feature to stop the president from just pressing the big red button out of boredom/insanity. much like any president of any public business, cant just do anything he pleases, he is still accountable to his share holders imagine congress as shareholders owning ~just under 2% of america shares each I bet you mindtrust will still choose to believe this is clear proof of a giant conspiracy. |
|
|
|
Court siding is when you take a device into match where it's not permitted, usually there is no crowd or anything, to relay what's happening to someone else. You'll see in one case the guy had a device sewn into his shorts. If these players have someone at the match illegally relaying information to them, then yes, they are cheating. Although it still wouldn't make 1xbit entitled to help themselves to the players balance. As I've explained already, I think what's happening is 1xbit not updating their odds fast enough. By the way, would you feel comfortable betting live Tennis on 1xbit, knowing that there's a possibility that you inadvertently place a wager on a line that 1xbit left open too long, which could result in your entire balance being seized? |
|
|
|
The above is so bad that even Mr. Vindman, who is an expert in undermining US Presidents he does not agree with politically, has called on Milley to resign if the reports are true. Don't be fooled by the radical right wing nut jobs that think when Trump was president he was a King. Trump undermined himself. Vindman complied with a congressional subpoena and then told Congress the truth. Nothing more American than speaking truth to power. |
|
|
|
maybe they just prefer to catch those who are trying to cheat.
Betting on a bad line doesn't make you a cheater. If they offer a bet on something that already happened, it's not cheating to accept it. They aren't "catching cheaters". They are the ones cheating the players. |
|
|
|
Betting on a bad line doesn't make you a cheater. The issue I have with these guys is they aren't being up front about what happened. Stop using it as an excuse for 1xbit to ignore them.
If I saw a line on sportsbet.io, or Stake, or any other reputable sportsbook right now for a match that had just ended, I'd bet on the winner. They might void the bet, or they might just pay me, I don't know. What I do know is that they wouldn't just take my balance for placing the bet.
Taking advantage when the House makes a mistake (like setting a bad line, or exposing a card) doesn't make you a cheater.
You claim that you are betting on a sport events, knowing its result? Did you just confirm that you did it and are doing this or is it still a hypothetical situation? Somehow I can't imagine you doing something like that .. I've never seen a line that was still open after a match ended. That's a pretty stupid and expensive mistake for a sportsbook to make, unless they decided they will just steal the balance from any player that accepts their wager. I really don't see any other explanation for this happening so frequently on 1xbit other than they view the income from stolen funds as part of their business model. |
|
|
|
Unfortunately, those who participated in the signature campaign cannot be charged because it's hard to trace who these people are, we can only get their location because some of them are posting in their local board but getting their information I don't think the authorities will pursue them, they are safe and they can promote as long as they want, in fact, we have 2 campaigns related to 1XBIT now in the service section.
I am not saying it directly, I just used it as an example. Just saying the real reason why negative trusts given to the people that joined the campaign not bad. I have read in some posts how some people that joined the campaign are not having guilt but only chasing the weekly paid money which is wrong. That others that can be fall into the category of money loss should be what they should post about I stead of advertising non reputable campaign on this forum. The post was just indirect. I understand your opinion, but I am surprised that you are focusing your attention only on 1xBit. If you are driven by such a high sense of morality, why are you not criticizing the ChipMixer signature campaign? After all, it is clear that all mixers are involved in money laundering. Why do you not criticize and mark red users who, in signature have ChipMixer ad and support criminals (or maybe even terrorists as it is suggested in Wikipedia)? It doesn't take a high sense of morality to understand the difference between Chip Mixer and 1xbit. Chip Mixer is an honest business that is useful to both honest and dishonest people doing both honest and dishonest things. The same could be said for any crypto exchange, or vpn service, or really any business that provides a service or sells goods that could help someone commit a crime. If Chip Mixer regularly stole money from their customers like 1xbit does, then members of the Chip Mixer campaign would receive negative trust like you. I understand that once Chipmixer receives official criminal charges, you will mark everyone, who wear their ad in signature in red. Until that happens, you can turn a blind eye to their money laundering and pretend everything is okay? I think it's hypocrisy .. don't you think? If Chip Mixer regularly stole money from their customers like 1xbit does, then members of the Chip Mixer campaign would receive negative trust like you. It's none of my business what people do with their money, just like it's none of Chip Mixers business what their customers do with their money. I think Chip Mixing is a good service to have for the community. Yes, some people will do bad things with their money, they should be held accountable for those bad things. Providing a mixing service is not a bad thing. Stealing money from you customers is. Chip Mixer isn't stealing money. 1xbit is. |
|
|
|
the saddest part about it all is that even the creator of this thread has stopped responding and solving all the problems the customers have in this thread, which means they are trying to convince people that only a small group of people are accusing them and making up complaints. when in fact these complaints are legitimate
To be honest, it doesn't matter to me anymore whether these complaints are legitimate or not. What matters to me, and what everyone can see here, is their attitude toward the players. They have given themselves the right to treat any customer as a shit, to deny their winnings, and to seize user's funds whenever they want, without providing any explanations or proof. This is in essence a dictatorship. Fortunately, there are plenty of alternatives we can choose from. After all, there were always alternatives for everyone. When it comes to not responding to spam complaints, I think I understand support. When they started responding to complaints, responses were simply ignored and the spam continued. If they will start responding only to complaints that did not come from cheaters, they would give further arguments to continue hate. They made the decision not to respond here at all. On the other hand, it is not the official way for users to communicate with support. This is just my theory, but I'm sure you have yours, better ones  They offered bad lines. Players bet on them. Instead of just voiding the bet (or just paying it out because it was their mistake) like any honest casino would, they voided the bet and took additional money that didn't belong to them. Now they're ignoring players complaints, and you're defending their actions because the players are being annoying spamming. Quit defending them. It's pathetic. I don't know what the reason is, these are just my guesses. If they would stopped responding only to the cheaters and responded only to real complaints, they would give further arguments to criticize them. It seems logical to me. But I don't really know why they stopped responding. I'm sure you have some theory too? Betting on a bad line doesn't make you a cheater. The issue I have with these guys is they aren't being up front about what happened. Stop using it as an excuse for 1xbit to ignore them. If I saw a line on sportsbet.io, or Stake, or any other reputable sportsbook right now for a match that had just ended, I'd bet on the winner. They might void the bet, or they might just pay me, I don't know. What I do know is that they wouldn't just take my balance for placing the bet. Taking advantage when the House makes a mistake (like setting a bad line, or exposing a card) doesn't make you a cheater. |
|
|
|
A surprisingly brilliant comparison.  I am glad that 1xbit ad is visible, it means that the campaign is working. However, in my opinion, this is a big difference. He owns the casino, I only wear an ad in the signature space. But everyone sees what want to see. Person A scams people. Person B is paid by person A to find new people for them to scam. Is there a difference? Yes. But it's not a big difference. You're person B. |
|
|
|
Unfortunately, those who participated in the signature campaign cannot be charged because it's hard to trace who these people are, we can only get their location because some of them are posting in their local board but getting their information I don't think the authorities will pursue them, they are safe and they can promote as long as they want, in fact, we have 2 campaigns related to 1XBIT now in the service section.
I am not saying it directly, I just used it as an example. Just saying the real reason why negative trusts given to the people that joined the campaign not bad. I have read in some posts how some people that joined the campaign are not having guilt but only chasing the weekly paid money which is wrong. That others that can be fall into the category of money loss should be what they should post about I stead of advertising non reputable campaign on this forum. The post was just indirect. I understand your opinion, but I am surprised that you are focusing your attention only on 1xBit. If you are driven by such a high sense of morality, why are you not criticizing the ChipMixer signature campaign? After all, it is clear that all mixers are involved in money laundering. Why do you not criticize and mark red users who, in signature have ChipMixer ad and support criminals (or maybe even terrorists as it is suggested in Wikipedia)? It doesn't take a high sense of morality to understand the difference between Chip Mixer and 1xbit. Chip Mixer is an honest business that is useful to both honest and dishonest people doing both honest and dishonest things. The same could be said for any crypto exchange, or vpn service, or really any business that provides a service or sells goods that could help someone commit a crime. If Chip Mixer regularly stole money from their customers like 1xbit does, then members of the Chip Mixer campaign would receive negative trust like you. |
|
|
|
the saddest part about it all is that even the creator of this thread has stopped responding and solving all the problems the customers have in this thread, which means they are trying to convince people that only a small group of people are accusing them and making up complaints. when in fact these complaints are legitimate
To be honest, it doesn't matter to me anymore whether these complaints are legitimate or not. What matters to me, and what everyone can see here, is their attitude toward the players. They have given themselves the right to treat any customer as a shit, to deny their winnings, and to seize user's funds whenever they want, without providing any explanations or proof. This is in essence a dictatorship. Fortunately, there are plenty of alternatives we can choose from. After all, there were always alternatives for everyone. When it comes to not responding to spam complaints, I think I understand support. When they started responding to complaints, responses were simply ignored and the spam continued. If they will start responding only to complaints that did not come from cheaters, they would give further arguments to continue hate. They made the decision not to respond here at all. On the other hand, it is not the official way for users to communicate with support. This is just my theory, but I'm sure you have yours, better ones They offered bad lines. Players bet on them. Instead of just voiding the bet (or just paying it out because it was their mistake) like any honest casino would, they voided the bet and took additional money that didn't belong to them. Now they're ignoring players complaints, and you're defending their actions because the players are being annoying spamming. Quit defending them. It's pathetic. |
|
|
|
By the way, you still haven't explained why you are trying to trick users on your website by displaying fake bets made by bots.
In my opinion, the answer is very simple. The casino script he bought just has a built-in bot service. Maybe he could turn it off, but why would he do it? After all, thanks to this, it inspires more confidence among inexperienced users, because they think that these winnings are real. So, it's okay for you to display fake bets from bots and that would deceive and mislead inexperienced players? Interesting. This is exactly the sort of response you'd expect from a scam promoter like you. What?  What I wrote is sarcasm. Read it again and maybe you'll understand. It's also possible that he just can't turn off this bot. Someone who buys a ready script does not have to be able to change its code. They're still responsible for their decision to use it. Much like a user that accepts money to advertise a sportsbook that steals money from players on a regular basis (like 1xbit) does not decide how how much money the casino steals, but they are still responsible for promoting a scam. |
|
|
|
The casino is provably fair and no control over any game out comes is available at any time.
Nope. You still haven't fixed it.  If it were provably fair then we would know how the server secret were generated and that it couldn't be manipulated. Or there just wouldn't be a server secret, it's completely unnecessary and only prevents your card games from being provably fair. You're basically shuffling the deck without letting us watch, and then allowing us to cut the deck. There's no proof that you haven't put the cards in a favorable order so that, for example, a royal flush can not be dealt. |
|
|
|
What is your point?
You can't offer a bad line and then help yourself to the entire balance of any player that accepts your offer. It's stealing if you do. And that's what 1xbit is doing. That's my point. Do you think that someone who bets on a result that he know, because he is using advantage of the delay in updating the result is entitled to get a win?
I've already explained this multiple times. The bet should be void, which means any winnings from the bet are returned to the Casino, and the player keeps their initial wager. Taking anything more than the winnings from the voided bet is theft. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
