What's your point?  Accepting action on a bad line is not cheating.  The book offers action, the player accepts it.  The closest thing to cheating is 1xbit taking a players balance because a player accepted action on a line that 1xbit shouldn't have offered.

It seems 1xbit was or is regularly offering bad lines by leaving them open too long, making it possible to place a bet on an outcome a few seconds after the outcome is determined.

You see the shills like Erdogan trying to write the whole thing off as scammers trying to scam, end of story.  However, it appears each time this happens, 1xbit is simply seizing the players entire balance, sometimes refunding only the players deposit.  In other words, these mistakes that 1xbit seems to be happening fairly regularly, are actually profitable.  

1xbit offers bad line => Player takes the line they offer=>  1xbit steals the players balance.

A player placing a bet on a line that the book mistakenly offered does not entitle the book to take all their money.  I don't care what their terms and conditions say, this is basic ethics.  They can void the bet and provide time stamps and explanation of why the bet was void - after all, if this happens regularly, it's only a matter of time before someone bets on a bad line without actually knowing the outcome.  The rest of the funds in the players account belong to the player.

Yes.  The most qualified, experienced scientists and doctors in the world.

Stop it you idiot.  Seriously.

Do you even bother reading this thread to see what a fool you look like when you copy paste the same thing 20 times?

No, you're the one that's unable to keep politics and science separate.

Over the past 100 years public health experts have contributed more to humanity than any other group arguably in history with vaccines being among their greatest accomplishments and reasons for human life expectancy basically doubling.  And today, public health experts have more resources and knowledge than at any other point in history.  They aren't the ones making vaccines or wearing a mask during a pandemic political.  The politicians telling you they are, are the ones doing that.

Japan situation is does make a good case against vaccine mandates, their vax rate is higher than most other countries with mandates. I imagine that's mostly due to them having a much smaller population of conspirtards though.







That's the anti vaxxer on the advisory board saying that, not a statement by the FDA.  And he's not a doctor or scientists, he's a tech guy that is building a business around Covid treatment.  He invented the optical mouse though, which is cool.

This tech millionaire went from covid trial funder to misinformation superspreader

After boosting unproven covid drugs and campaigning against vaccines, Steve Kirsch was abandoned by his team of scientific advisers—and left out of a job.
https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/10/05/1036408/silicon-valley-millionaire-steve-kirsch-covid-vaccine-misinformation/


In May 2021, Kirsch posted an article online making an unfounded claim that COVID-19 vaccines affect fertility, while also underplaying the vaccines' ability to prevent illness and death.[10] The following month, Kirsch appeared in a YouTube video posted with Bret Weinstein and Robert W. Malone to discuss COVID-19 vaccines. In the video, Kirsch makes several false claims, including that spike proteins used in COVID-19 vaccines are "very dangerous".

Smart move by the conspiratards though.  Find the one cook that got onto the FDA advisory board and then quote him as "FDA".

This is what makes you a shill.  To act like you have nothing to do with them, and then even when proof is staring you in the face that they're doing something unethical - not a single word of criticism from you.  You just defend defend defend, whether it's attacking those who claim to be scammed:


Or attempting to spin a situation to make 1xbit seem as if they deserve the benefit of doubt:


How is it a likely misunderstanding?  There are countless reports on this forum of accounts being closed without explanation.  More than any other casino.

Will you end all vaccinations?  Eventually if we stick together and ignore all the doctors we could probably bring enough of the old school viruses back to life like Polio, Cholera, Small pox... wouldn't be long before we've got a good old fashioned plague on our hands!  That would be so sick!

Sure you could.  You could say something about all the players that have had money stolen from them by 1xbit.  You are responsible for helping drive traffic to 1xbit after all.  

You choose not to though.  Because they pay you.  You could help other members avoid getting scammed, but instead you do the opposite.  Because 1xbit is giving you money.

Actually both Clinton and Biden won the popular vote.

What's unfair about awarding 1 ticket for every $1k wagered to every player?   Those who wager the most, generate the most revenue.  The prizes are funded by revenue.  Do you think it would be fair to increase your chances at winning prizes and decreasing the chances of other players who wagered 100 or 1000 times more than you? 

Don't let envy blind you.

Some advice for anyone that suddenly had their accounts frozen right after making a live table tennis or tennis live bet and continue to copy paste the same thing over and over again:

Stop it.  It's annoying and you're not being honest.  The only ones benefiting from what youre doing is 1xbit and the shills who run up their post count pointing to how annoying and dishonest you are.  They're using you to make 1xbit look innocent (they are obviously not innocent), and it's somewhat effective.  Youre also making the already slim chance of ever seeing your money again even more slim.

Come clean about the live bets.  1xbit put up a bad line, and you wagered on it.  Those bets should be void.  You should be entitled to the remaining balance, regardless of how much you deposited.  No sportsbook can justify confiscating a players entire balance because the player placed a wager, or even many wagers, that they mistakenly offered.  They should fully expect any bad line they offer to gt more action than the rest of their lines.  And no sportsbook that promotes themselves as "fully anonymous" can justify seizing any funds because a player has multiple accounts.  It's fully anonymous, that means they don't know or care who you are.

They said you would get up to 20%.
Last week they gave 15%.

If you say a number is going to be "up to" 20, and then the number ends up being 15, then your initial statement is not false.

It seems like you speak English pretty well, this shouldn't be such a difficult concept to understand.

Also, fwiw, last year during the december race they ended up giving everyone $1 per ticket added to their weekly boost the day of the drawing.

*I'm pretty sure that was the December race, it could've been Jan/Feb race though.

They said you would get up to 20%.
Last week they gave 15%.

If you say a number is going to be "up to" 20, and then the number ends up being 15, then your initial statement is not false.

Your petty argument is not legitimate.

---

This isn't Charity though, it's a business that's trying to be as profitable as possible.  

You think it makes sense to give your most valuable players less so that you can give the less valuable players more?  Top 3 racers have wagered over $150 million already.  Big players are why there is a $1m race, it's their money.

You bought the account from someone that stole it from someone else.

You use the account to make money by helping a dishonest Casino find new players, who will likely be scammed.

Just because you aren't scamming directly doesn't mean you bear no responsibility.

And what do you call someone with a hacked account  that gets paid to help bring new players to a Casino that has one of the worst reputations in the crypto world because of all the players they've refused to pay?

For me, the person that is using the stolen bitgov account is very dishonest!

Agree. Short shit post > Long.

That is literally what "up to" means.

Why would they say "up to" if they were sure everyone would get 20%?

Maybe one the promotions team wanted to do 20% but only got approved for 15%.  Maybe they were waiting to see how many people verified before deciding the final number.  Maybe they were pulling a bait and switch then give slightly less than the max, although I doubt they would over 5%.

But regardless, if you say a number is going to be "up to" 20, and then the number ends up being 15, then your initial statement is not false.  Ask a 5 year old to explain it to you if you still don't understand.

Did those two really give you more trouble than Buffalo Power? 
I'm approaching 10,000 spins without a 120x now on that one.