Bitcoin Forum
October 22, 2018, 09:04:10 AM *
News: Make sure you are not using versions of Bitcoin Core other than 0.17.0 [Torrent], 0.16.3, 0.15.2, or 0.14.3. More info.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 [114] 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 ... 272 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Merit & new rank requirements  (Read 90310 times)
d5000
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1890
Merit: 1225



View Profile
February 04, 2018, 07:31:40 AM
Merited by ImHash (1)
 #2261

However, they are profiting from their Avatars and signatures - they are getting more stakes in signature campaigns, because they have higher ranks. If they give their sMerits to lower rank users, then more users became Full/Hero/Legendary and they won't get so much profit from their stakes in signature campaigns. So that might prevent some of them giving sMerit to anyone. I hope most of Full/Hero/Legendary users don't think like that and I am not sure what is a solution if they do .. what do you think?
I don't think many veteran, high-ranked members that really love Bitcoin and this forum think that way, honestly.

And it would be a bit stupid and short-sighted, too: Quality content benefits the forum as a whole. I assume it is still the primary content source for Bitcoin-related stuff. If the forum continues to attract people coming from search engines, with good content, then its users will stay important targets for advertisers that could run bounty campaigns. So even for those whose primary goal here is to earn money by chasing bounties, the forum posessing quality content is important.

Now if old, high-ranked members don't incentive quality content from newer members giving them no merit, then the forum will most likely have lesser good authors, and thus less quality content. It could become a sort of Ivory Tower (no relation with the sub-forum intended), the user base will eventually decrease, and it will lose importance (Facebook and Twitter communities are already strong competitors.) Bounty campaigns will be less attractive for cryptocurrency businesses. So in the mid- to long term these high-ranked users that don't want to share merits would bite the hands that are feeding them.

1540199050
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1540199050

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1540199050
Reply with quote  #2

1540199050
Report to moderator
1540199050
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1540199050

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1540199050
Reply with quote  #2

1540199050
Report to moderator
1540199050
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1540199050

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1540199050
Reply with quote  #2

1540199050
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1540199050
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1540199050

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1540199050
Reply with quote  #2

1540199050
Report to moderator
1540199050
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1540199050

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1540199050
Reply with quote  #2

1540199050
Report to moderator
nullius
Copper Member
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 758


Help! I’ve got the Pleurodelinaemia! @nym.zone


View Profile WWW
February 04, 2018, 07:33:11 AM
 #2262

I think this is the best the decision you could take by removing abuser in your trust list, and i think you should ask Blazed to stop recruiting racist and abuser in his trust list. Noone of those  abusers fignt realy againts spammers all they want its money,power to destroy user accounts. Its time to leave the trust system in the hand of moderators instead of all those bad guys.

How come you are so smart as a newbie in terms of knowing which members are problematic?   Furthermore, why do you think that it is a good idea to bold your whole statement?  Why do you feel that your ideas are so important, as a newbie?

Oh, snap.  I hope that people with requisite information access are paying attention.  Due to the boldface, I mean.  The boldface is very impressive, especially when it is turned trust-negative red in colour.

[Edit:  Check post history.  Interesting.]

By the way, my respect for actmyname increases substantially with each new post of this kind.  They show that he was right on-target.  I hope that Blazed does the right thing, and keeps him in DT2.

kiver
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 04, 2018, 07:39:53 AM
 #2263

Quote from: ducdr ldate=1517724155
Quote from: sohel43



[/quote
English broken. I almost cannot understand your ideas. Account likes yours should not be ranked up. It is likely that before merit system implemented, you constantly posted shitty posts, after that point, you tried to posting longer ones with broken English. I guess, might be from Google translator).
You should improve yourself first, be better, more contributive before writing any complaints.
If you and other users (whose accounts continue to post shitty, non-sense, spamming threads), Theymos might go to his last, final decision :Removing campaigns, airdrops, bounties industry forever out of the forum. If that is what you want, let continue to write your shitty posts.

Good luck.
That comment toke my attention, iam sorry for what iam about to say but stopping signature and annoucements...
etc are not the soluation at all and it will have a nigative effect on the forum if all of this should stop what will be the point of bitcointalk.org excatly? Someone should really answer this question i know a lot of useless topics are being spammed i know a lot of shitposts is being created
But i wanna tell you something when some bad news happens around crypto world where i go first to check the truth  bitcointalk there is alot of soluation that could help this problem i will point out some
1_ merit system was a Good idea but still need some improvment
2_ increase the number of moderators on the forum might help to stop the spam train
3_ making  some New mandotory rules for topics creating which wont affect the freedom of speach of course
4_ making another section about bitcoin alts news that we share our opinions ideas with a free will and wont affect the forum hoensty
I am sure that  the geniuses who invented  bitcoin revolution 10 years ago would be creative and think of another way that could help the increasing interest in crypto world not by stopping it all,  but by nature it educate the newcomers and try to help them understand what we want out of crypto currencies

don't accuse people of something  just because you can
P.S i don't care about your opinion if you didn't present it respectably
also i don't have any multple accounts on this forum and i won't make one
tbct_mt2
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 136



View Profile
February 04, 2018, 07:49:25 AM
 #2264

Time Pump VSX ..

How qualitied this Senior member is?

This is classic example how Senior member can post shitty-thread with broken English, only three words, almost non-sense thread. Your thread explains why Theymos have to launch merit system. It's unbelievable!

Please read this one, fella.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2818350.msg29540717#msg29540717

Deena
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 41


View Profile
February 04, 2018, 10:35:56 AM
 #2265

I think this is the best the decision you could take by removing abuser in your trust list, and i think you should ask Blazed to stop recruiting racist and abuser in his trust list. Noone of those  abusers fignt realy againts spammers all they want its money,power to destroy user accounts. Its time to leave the trust system in the hand of moderators instead of all those bad guys.

That's right. There's a growing resistance against these trust system abusers as more and more members are experiencing and seeing their unjust, devious actions. This forum needs only one good, fair alternative and we'll see a massive migration to that other forum.
pugman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1300


Sliding in ya DM's be like


View Profile WWW
February 04, 2018, 10:47:49 AM
 #2266

I think this is the best the decision you could take by removing abuser in your trust list, and i think you should ask Blazed to stop recruiting racist and abuser in his trust list. Noone of those  abusers fignt realy againts spammers all they want its money,power to destroy user accounts. Its time to leave the trust system in the hand of moderators instead of all those bad guys.

That's right. There's a growing resistance against these trust system abusers as more and more members are experiencing and seeing their unjust, devious actions. This forum needs only one good, fair alternative and we'll see a massive migration to that other forum.
OH really? And you will have signature campaigns in that forum too? Great. It's about time dumbfucks like you get the hell out of this forum, for you are not contributing anything. If trust system is unfair, theymos won't keep his hands off. There is resistance but it all seems to be one immature dumbass behind this shit. Good luck with finding an alternative to this forum.
It's too early to get a clear picture, but my thoughts so far:

First, most people complaining about merit are constantly posting garbage, and should not rank-up. The forum is not a welfare system
I am just enjoying this new authoritarian attitude by theymos.  Cheesy

fokinlipat
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 2


View Profile
February 04, 2018, 11:47:24 AM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1)
 #2267

OH really? And you will have signature campaigns in that forum too? Great. It's about time dumbfucks like you get the hell out of this forum, for you are not contributing anything. If trust system is unfair, theymos won't keep his hands off. There is resistance but it all seems to be one immature dumbass behind this shit. Good luck with finding an alternative to this forum.

Completely agree with you. I think it takes a lot of guts to take such a harsh decision being a forum admin. Very few forums would be in a position to do this.
shailkumari
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 12


View Profile
February 04, 2018, 12:04:09 PM
 #2268

Yes, dear cyber_smiley sir, I am 100% agree with you, new people like me my rank up stopped for the region of merit my Activity: 70 but till now my Position: Jr. Member, I Alrdaey Check it some people are joined 6 months ago for example a full member there get Merit: 100 by automatically without the quality and meaningful post. I like the  Merit system but It's Could have been better.

I am sure you had seen similar posts by other members as well regarding the flaws in the current merit system. In my opinion, there will always be some flaws. As an admin, he has to make a balance between what is good for the forum and what is good for members. New members suffered but we have to deal with it. It is not that hard to reach the member rank at least in my opinion.
Zackgeno96
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 513



View Profile
February 04, 2018, 12:57:43 PM
 #2269

OH really? And you will have signature campaigns in that forum too?

Haha. No other forum can provide such a huge platform and audience for the new projects, so the signature campaigns will be useless on other forums.

There is resistance but it all seems to be one immature dumbass behind this shit. Good luck with finding an alternative to this forum.

There is hardly any forum which can beat the bitcointalk in all aspects. We should always keep in mind that this forum was started by the Satoshi and hence there could not be any alternative.
Semosuchi Tesongrato
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 29

GigTricks


View Profile
February 04, 2018, 02:39:02 PM
 #2270

I agree with this approach.
I admit that I was very upset at the beginning, as I was just near to become Member, and now I have to earn it in hard way.
But now I start to see the positive intention, I just received two merits, and this means that it's not impossible.
But the system needs some modifications: now I have earned two merits, and I have one to give away. I'd like to give one to this post, but then I'll have zero. I'll think about it. But with a so limited number it's difficult to take a decision.

I hope there will be improvement, but I have to admit that the system works: if I look at my first posts, I'm ashamed of them. They were really bad. Sorry.
Now, I don't make masterworks, but I put a lot more attention, and I think twice before to write something, and my motivation in writing something decent is higher.

If we stop complaining and we start to give a contribution, the system will have a very positive impact on the quality of the forum.



As other members already stated, this is a private forum, so the owner has any right to do what he thinks is the best move to improve his property.
It doesn't make any sense to complain about any aspect we don't like; much better to be grateful for the opportunity we have to learn a lot and - eventually - to have a little extra income from campaigns.

So, not with the intention to complain, but just to offer some ideas, here are my two cents: the intention behind the merit system is very good, and I think that only spammers and shitposters don't agree. What I find inefficient - and probably more of the "complainers" agree with me - are mainly these two aspect:

1) the system is really too unbalanced in favor of old members. I understand that I have to earn my position, and I agree that only "good members" will rank up. But if I read the old posts of a lot of high rank members, I find a lot of shitpost, and I just wonder why "they" had this privilege by luck in the meanwhile I have to work hard for the same results. I agree, life is unfair, but this aspect is very disturbing.

2) the merits are too scarce. I had ONE. Now I have THREE. Really, a so little number make me anxious to give them. Even if I like a post. I think it's the same for other low rank members. The result is that may be I write a masterwork (I'd like...) but nobody has merit to give to me.
The only members with a lot of merits to give are Legendaries (another privilege..), but it seems that they prefer to reward each other, may be just to show friendship. I'm pretty sure you did some math projections, but in this way the system it's really too rigid. Of course, may be I'm wrong. We'll see.

But please accept the idea that - even if the meirt system is a good point to start - there is a lot of space for improvement.





It's too early to get a clear picture, but my thoughts so far:

First, most people complaining about merit are constantly posting garbage, and should not rank-up. The forum is not a welfare system; you don't run through a few hoops and then get paid for doing something that nobody actually wants. I like that good forum members can make money, especially when said forum members are in poorer countries and this is a major opportunity for them. I very much do not want to destroy the sig-ad/airdrop/bounty "industry". But I am not going to tolerate people posting garbage upon garbage. If the merit system completely fails and I can't think of anything else to replace it, then my next step will probably be to completely remove all ways for forum users to make money from posting (eg. removing signatures entirely).

Maybe there are ways for people who were making money by posting garbage on the forum to make money on other sites with easy bounties, etc. (For example, I don't know if they're actually any good, but https://bountyhive.io is currently advertising on the forum.) But people should use the forum to talk about these money-making ideas, not as a way of making money itself. Once you spend a lot of time here, you may be able to make some money here (which is great!), but you should consider this a far-off hope, not your primary objective.

BTW, if anyone has any ideas for simple things that these ex-nonsense-posters could usefully do to make money, I think that this'd be a good project right now. There are apparently quite a few people who were making money on the forum and could use guidance. Even though their past activities were not good for this forum, I doubt that they are useless in general.



Merit awards may be too spotty/uneven currently, though it's still too early to say. In addition to continuously adding more sources, if things could still use improvement in this regard in a couple of months, I may do something like decay old sMerit and unused source merit and randomly redistribute the decayed merit. How the random distribution would work would magnify past merit -- so perhaps you would get an increased chance of winning extra merit for every post you've made which has at least 1 merit, but certainly you would not get any extra merit if none of your posts was ever merited.

Merit sales, transfers to aliases, back-and-forth trading, etc. are not much of an issue. All illegitimate merit will decay, and will account for a tiny and very expensive fraction of the total merit economy. It's basically a rounding error; fight it where convenient, but waste no sleep over it.

I think that actmyname has been too hasty with some of his negatives, but I haven't had time to look carefully enough into it to justify making forceful changes. I did exclude actmyname from my trust list, so another DT1 could remove him from the default trust network by doing the same.

fedorover
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 40
Merit: 1

❐ Zeex ❐ NO FIAT, NO FEES.


View Profile
February 04, 2018, 02:47:51 PM
 #2271

There is hardly any forum which can beat the bitcointalk in all aspects. We should always keep in mind that this forum was started by the Satoshi and hence there could not be any alternative.

Sorry I do not agree with this point given you. I appreciate the work being done by staff on this forum. But if you think that this forum will remain number one just because it was started by Satoshi, it is not practical. One has to keep up with the changing trends. For instance, at the time of starting the forum, he might not be expecting sections like alt coins here.

❐ Zeex  ❐
████ Crypto to product ████
█▄▄   No fiat , No fees  ▄▄█
QuestionAuthority
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002
Merit: 1325


You lead and I'll watch you walk away.


View Profile
February 04, 2018, 03:11:26 PM
Merited by LoyceV (1), anigoweb (1)
 #2272

The last few pages of this thread actually show your position on the earth as it turns in relation to the sun.

The non-English speaking forum members wake up and attempt to speak out about what they see as a problem in the only way they can (using a translator). You English speaking posters need to calm down and realize the local subs don’t each have their own Meta section fully translated in a language they speak fluently. They need to voice their concerns here in English.

Theymos made me think hard about why some of these people are here. Many of them probably are impoverished and see the little amounts of money they can make here as a gold mine. It’s true that this forum is not a substitute worldwide welfare system and many of them will need to go away but we don’t need to treat them like shit in the meantime. Save that for the very fluent scammers and conmen stealing from people here. You can say anything you want to someone like Bryan Micon or Josh Zerlan and be justified. Talking shit to a 15 year old kid from Bangladesh probably isn’t the best thing you could be spending your time on.

Fondago
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 6


View Profile
February 04, 2018, 03:21:03 PM
 #2273

I'm most impressed with those people who shout at others who are lower in rank, but they are here for bounty and freebies too. At the same time, they themselves run around with avatars and signatures.
How are you doing, dear arrogance? These people reached out to the rank they received, without effort, spamming messages, and now they have the courage and impudence "to drive on" other bountists.
petuhov
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 160
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 04, 2018, 03:39:25 PM
 #2274

I'm most impressed with those people who shout at others who are lower in rank, but they are here for bounty and freebies too. At the same time, they themselves run around with avatars and signatures.
How are you doing, dear arrogance? These people reached out to the rank they received, without effort, spamming messages, and now they have the courage and impudence "to drive on" other bountists.

They are rewarded for being here for long time and nothing wrong with that. With time, you will also rank up.
Magister Magus
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 33


View Profile
February 04, 2018, 04:37:27 PM
Merited by amishmanish (2), d5000 (1), LoyceV (1)
 #2275

I think there is a lot of hypocrisy in this thread, and I'm glad that someone says how things really are.
As I wrote in a precedent post, I'm starting to appreciate the intention behind the system, I received also some merits so - even it's hard - it doesn't appear as impossible as at the beginning.
What I found very disturbing was the bad attitude of some high rank members, that treated the rest of us with arrogance, without to see that a lot of them were just lucky shitposters and - if they were evaluated with this new system - they were still newbies. Of course, this is just a rough generalization.

Btw: it's evident that if a system rewards people for writing shit, the system will be filled soon by shitposters!
The revenue from a campaign can appear ridiculous to an average guy in USA of Europe, but for someone in other parts of the world are very big sums.
I understand that the forum must be protected, and something must be done, but when I see some "stars" of the forum talking about "3rd world monkeys" or "3rd world cancer", I think this has nothing to do with the improvement of the forum but only reveals a racist and Nazi mentality.
I'm not from 3rd world, but I think that everyone on the planet deserves respect, and actually I think that the "15 year old kid from Bangladesh" trying to make a buck on the forum should be rewarded for his good will, not insulted.
Of course, a million of 15 years old kids writing on the forum would be a tsunami, so we needed measures.

The new system is not perfect, but I was very glad to see that theymos is open to suggestions.
It's very simple to blame. I'd like to have good proposal but sincerely I don't have any, for the moment.
But I'm working on it! We'll see :-)


The last few pages of this thread actually show your position on the earth as it turns in relation to the sun.

The non-English speaking forum members wake up and attempt to speak out about what they see as a problem in the only way they can (using a translator). You English speaking posters need to calm down and realize the local subs don’t each have their own Meta section fully translated in a language they speak fluently. They need to voice their concerns here in English.

Theymos made me think hard about why some of these people are here. Many of them probably are impoverished and see the little amounts of money they can make here as a gold mine. It’s true that this forum is not a substitute worldwide welfare system and many of them will need to go away but we don’t need to treat them like shit in the meantime. Save that for the very fluent scammers and conmen stealing from people here. You can say anything you want to someone like Bryan Micon or Josh Zerlan and be justified. Talking shit to a 15 year old kid from Bangladesh probably isn’t the best thing you could be spending your time on.

▂▂▃▅▇ EVO - THE WORLD OF SELF-DEVELOPMENT ▇▅▃▂▂
MEDIUM    ●  LINKEDIN  ●TELEGRAM ◄  Blockchain platform for assessing and developing human skills  ▶ TWITTER  ● FACEBOOK  ●
WHITEPAPER
marlboroza
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 966

Don't need it.


View Profile
February 04, 2018, 04:41:56 PM
Merited by LoyceV (1)
 #2276

I did some research last couple of days.

What I noticed so far is large number of accounts which are posting farming as usual and then all of sudden they post very constructive post just to receive merit, often paraphrasing articles and/or just copying articles here.

On the other hand, it is not really hard to post 50 short lines in off topic or games and rounds and after that to post 10 high quality posts at right place and point them to right people.
I don't think current system will decrease number of farming accounts, spam or account sales and honestly I think 10 merits to rank up to member rank is too low, because people will just create hundred accounts, do exactly what I said above and abuse signature/bounty campaigns, giveaways etc.

For every 10 Smerits received, junior member can easily send 5 Smerits to other account, from that account 2 Smerit to third account and so on - and repeat with many accounts.

So, in my honest opinion this system need little improvement:

RankRequired activityRequired merit
Jr Member300
Member6050
Full Member120150
Sr. Member240300
Hero Member480550
LegendaryRandom in the range 775-10301050

Raising merit requirement by 50 points will make difference and should solve most "merit" issues, account farming, account sales etc(or at least make them so hard that people will give up doing it) and won't affect on number of merits required for full-hero member to rank up because older users will need the same amount of Smerit to rank up(members will need 100 SMP*, full members 150 SMP, senior member 250 SMP and hero 500 SMP) and it will actually force "new users" to write better posts from first day, which isn't the case at the moment.

However, number of Smerits given to all members should remain the same as it is now, but i guess this is irrelevant because we all already received smerits.

*SMP - sMerit points

DarkoBlog
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 60
Merit: 6


View Profile
February 04, 2018, 05:06:36 PM
 #2277

As long as this new Merit points system has caused different reactions, I can personally support moderator efforts to bring some order to the forum. Every change is a subject of discussion, but better this than doing nothing.
bitgov
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 252


View Profile
February 04, 2018, 05:07:55 PM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1)
 #2278

I did some research last couple of days.

What I noticed so far is large number of accounts which are posting farming as usual and then all of sudden they post very constructive post just to receive merit, often paraphrasing articles and/or just copying articles here.

On the other hand, it is not really hard to post 50 short lines in off topic or games and rounds and after that to post 10 high quality posts at right place and point them to right people.
I don't think current system will decrease number of farming accounts, spam or account sales and honestly I think 10 merits to rank up to member rank is too low, because people will just create hundred accounts, do exactly what I said above and abuse signature/bounty campaigns, giveaways etc.

For every 10 Smerits received, junior member can easily send 5 Smerits to other account, from that account 2 Smerit to third account and so on - and repeat with many accounts.

So, in my honest opinion this system need little improvement:

RankRequired activityRequired merit
Jr Member300
Member6050
Full Member120150
Sr. Member240300
Hero Member480550
LegendaryRandom in the range 775-10301050

Raising merit requirement by 50 points will make difference and should solve most "merit" issues, account farming, account sales etc(or at least make them so hard that people will give up doing it) and won't affect on number of merits required for full-hero member to rank up because older users will need the same amount of Smerit to rank up(members will need 100 SMP*, full members 150 SMP, senior member 250 SMP and hero 500 SMP) and it will actually force "new users" to write better posts from first day, which isn't the case at the moment.

However, number of Smerits given to all members should remain the same as it is now, but i guess this is irrelevant because we all already received smerits.

*SMP - sMerit points

It is true that in this way you will make it difficult for all account farmers, but for ordinary users, achieving more merit points will be practically impossible and then the entire ranking system loses meaning.
QuestionAuthority
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002
Merit: 1325


You lead and I'll watch you walk away.


View Profile
February 04, 2018, 05:38:08 PM
Merited by Jet Cash (1), coolcoinz (1)
 #2279



It is true that in this way you will make it difficult for all account farmers, but for ordinary users, achieving more merit points will be practically impossible and then the entire ranking system loses meaning.

You are a curious person to me. The majority of your post history is in Chinese. I randomly translated some of the older posts from that Chinese guy and he was a pretty big bitcoin supporter. He was worried about what his government would do to bitcoin.

Then *poof* as if by some kind of forum magic that Chinese guy becomes fluent in English, never posts in a Chinese language thread again, becomes a bounty hunter and only posts in threads talking about profit. I hope you didn’t spend too much for that account.

I don’t know how much I trust your opinion on the whole merit situation since you’re probably one of the people this system is supposed to eliminate.

coolcoinz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 577


View Profile
February 04, 2018, 05:43:48 PM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1)
 #2280

I did some research last couple of days.

What I noticed so far is large number of accounts which are posting farming as usual and then all of sudden they post very constructive post just to receive merit, often paraphrasing articles and/or just copying articles here.

On the other hand, it is not really hard to post 50 short lines in off topic or games and rounds and after that to post 10 high quality posts at right place and point them to right people.

That's why when you see a suspicious account you can always check their previous posts and find their true intentions. I've seen some good campaign managers do it. Shitposters won't keep pretending forever. At some point they will start doing their thing again.



It is true that in this way you will make it difficult for all account farmers, but for ordinary users, achieving more merit points will be practically impossible and then the entire ranking system loses meaning.

You are a curious person to me. The majority of your post history is in Chinese. I randomly translated some of the older posts from that Chinese guy and he was a pretty big bitcoin supporter. He was worried about what his government would do to bitcoin.

Then *poof* as if by some kind of forum magic that Chinese guy becomes fluent in English, never posts in a Chinese language thread again, becomes a bounty hunter and only posts in threads talking about profit. I hope you didn’t spend too much for that account.

I don’t know how much I trust your opinion on the whole merit situation since you’re probably one of the people this system is supposed to eliminate.

It's one of the hacked accounts.
All posts in Chinese until September 19, 2014. Then we have a 3 year break in which time we had that data leak and someone grabbed it, sold and suddenly since August 11, 2017 it's running under new, English speaking management.  Cheesy
Pages: « 1 ... 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 [114] 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 ... 272 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!