Usagi,
Clearly contracts, and law, and finance etc are not your forte.
|
|
|
Good call 21after2
There is a flaw in MOST of usagi's arguments
legal or otherwise.
|
|
|
Usagi
It is your fiduciary responsibility to produce Motion 80 to prove that you did not intentionally defraud your investors.
But you can't produce Motion 80 because it will prove the core accusation against you.
That you are a scammer.
|
|
|
usai,
How is it that you can so precisely quote and reference internet citation of contract langue and definitions to fit your needs
but it is IMPOSSIBLE
for you to produce evident that you deleted from you wordpress website that could prove you are right.
THAT IS BECAUSE IT WOULD ONLY PROVE ALL THE ACCUSATIONS AGAINST YOU.
Please produce Motion 80.
|
|
|
usagi
You may win the battle but you most certainly will lose the war.
You're arrogance is undeniable
you're desperation is palpable
and your sheer stupidity is just unbelievable
|
|
|
What a strange strange thread, was there any staff input and conclusion as to why he was banned?
bit of a lolwut haha
Is there any confirmation that he has been banned? He was still posting a few hours ago. He has not been banned. Just his many selling threads have been locked. Go figure??
|
|
|
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders fourth edition, DSM IV-TR, a widely used manual for diagnosing mental disorders, defines narcissistic personality disorder (in Axis II Cluster B) as:[1]
A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following:
Has a grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements) ✔ Is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love ✔ Believes that he or she is "special" and unique and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people (or institutions) ✔ Requires excessive admiration ✘ Has a sense of entitlement, i.e., unreasonable expectations of especially favorable treatment or automatic compliance with his or her expectations ✔ Is interpersonally exploitative, i.e., takes advantage of others to achieve his or her own ends ✔ Lacks empathy: is unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others ✔ Is often envious of others or believes others are envious of him or her ✘ Shows arrogant, haughty behavior or attitudes. ✔
confirmed for narcissistic personality disorder Are you talking about MPOE-PR and he/her many alts??
|
|
|
Not a security flaw, but bug: Go to Buy Bitcoins -> Select nothing ("Select payment method") -> Enter address (12gKdNCYoEZ9SfnRkiouNJV2QrCdyC8ooD) -> Error page "Bad gateway"
Edit: and please include "labels" for the textboxes, I had to look in the source which field is for what (IE)...
The text boxes have labels in them, until you click in the text box and start typing. they have "placeholders" not "labels"
|
|
|
I'm selling BTC at SPOT for LR. If I sell enough I'll take you MP for LR.
|
|
|
I've noticed ADMINS starting to LOCK hacked account invite threads.
Thank you!
|
|
|
Can we just get a ban for this guy.
|
|
|
Theymos, is there really a question and do we need a "forum policy" to know right from wrong? Stealing is stealing. Why would you want this forum or Bitcoin associated with that?
++1 Bitcoin already has too many nefarious connections. I don't care what you use your bitcoins for and it is non of my business but I for one would strongly prefer the forum policy only allow discussion of issues that do not promote activites that generally and broadly accepted to be illegal or illicit.
|
|
|
I just received information that pirate did express an fondness for palladium at the PPT meeting in Las Vegas. So the info from the skype chat about the hooker and the blow was true or one of the other Vegas participants was trolling me.
You can't assume that one piece of information being accurate means that the rest is. Even knowing for a fact that pirate spent user funds on hookers and blow wouldn't bring anyone any closer to getting their funds back. The location of safe deposit boxes, however, is information which can be used for a search warrant if there are reasonable grounds to believe that they hold the proceeds of illegal activity. To get a search warrant for the safety deposit box would have to imply that a crime was committed. To imply that a crime was committed some one would have had to file charges. The sad fact of the matter is that NO ONE filed any charges. The SEC may or may not still be investigating but it seem then those "investors" or as they now see themselves "co-conspirators" with any material evidence refuse to be interviewed. Meanwhile we rail and threaten here on our little internet chat board, yet Trendon Shavers remains at large with your liquidated bitcoin. Bitcoincoiners are clearly very GREEDY and not the smartest lot and Bitcoin is truly a scammers paradise.
|
|
|
Request for a moratorium on usagi post until January 7th, 2013.
Usagi, at that time please report back on your developments with paying your investors back and winding down your companies.
Thank you.
|
|
|
Request for a moratorium on usagi post until January 7th, 2013.
Usagi, at that time please report back on your developments with paying your investors back and winding down your companies.
Thank you.
|
|
|
Request for a moratorium on usagi posts until January 7th, 2013.
Usagi, at that time please report back on your developments with paying your investors back and winding down your companies.
Thank you.
|
|
|
Request for a moratorium on usagi post until January 7th, 2013.
Usagi, at that time please report back on your developments with paying your investors back and winding down your companies.
Thank you.
|
|
|
usgai does not have time to respond to provide evidence that could make any scam accusations go away (i can only assume becuase providing such information would only further prove his guild) however he does have the time to open a months old scammer thread to continue this practice of obfuscation and distraction. Usagi, It is OBVIOUS that you are not able to or just do now want to clear your name so PLEASE WIND DOWN YOUR COMPANIES, PAY YOUR INVESTORS BACK AND GO AWAY. Thank you. Dear BCB; I will make a response to the evidence you have presented in your locked thread when I have time. I'm busy with other things right now, like closing down my companies and making payments to shareholders. First payments go out tomorrow (friday) actually, as we've gotten paid by a number of companies. Hardware payments will go up soon too, since we were refunded from BFL for 2 jalapenos and a SC single so far.
Usagi, there's no need to defend yourself I feel, as TECSHARE has already been paid for the work. I will be instructing him to finish the work and give it to you, as I recognize this as being a miscommunication. Do with them as you will, consider it as a gift regardless from a fan ^_^
There are outstanding issues here, and TECSHARE seems to consider my right to a fair process as a "threat". He's tormenting me over it so I thought I would unlock the thread and provide an update. Note: this is 4 or 5 months old. The basic issue here is that TECSHARE has been paid in full for work he did not deliver. In my view his refusal to complete first revision (he promised two revisions and could not complete the first one) was unacceptable -- he said it was 'too difficult' and/or 'didn't look good'. So I fired him and he immediately opened a scam accusation against me. Matthew N. Wright then stepped up and paid him off for me before I was even able to log on and read what happened. This all happened while I was at work IIRC. Fast forward to today. I still do not have the hi res art files TECSHARE claimed he completed and has been fully paid for. Frankly I didn't care until he started asking me what my right was to claim the work he was paid for. Then again, how could he have completed it when he did not complete second revision, let alone first? Choosing from a bunch of samples is not a revision. All I am asking is for TECSHARE to give me the work he says he already completed and has been paid for. If he can't do this and refuses to STFU about it, why not tag him as a scammer? I mean the remedy here is so easy -- either give me the art I paid for and allow me one more revision as was agreed, or give me the money back. It's really that simple.
|
|
|
Really usagi,
You don't have time to provide evidence that could support your claim of an unjust scam accusation.
Yet you have time to open a months old dispute about a case that no one cares about because you have NO credibility in this community and not one really cares anymore.
The only excuse could be that the evidence you refuse to provide must go to further prove your guilt.
|
|
|
|