Entire crypto 2.0 is debatable.

Ripple was first crypto 2.0 and it set the standards (2 years ago). It offers instant transactions, ability to send any currency anywhere (you can send even USD, EUR, BTC, or airline points) instantly, asset exchange (where you have the ability to make your own order books in any currency you want), gateways (where anyone can become a gateway) etc etc.

NXT so far managed only to copy asset exchange from ripple (but in next you cannot choose in which currency to list assets etc, nor can you make your own order books, its central exchange) and will try to copy gateways (but run by devs, not by anyone) and will try to copy instant transactions (but only in nxt, you cannot transfer other currencies).

So NXT and other clones of ripple can be called crypto 1.1 only for now since they managed to copy only small part of Ripple so far.

Your meant to keep the machine offline. Looks like he had it online, which is asking for trouble using any OS.

POS does generate new coins.. the distribution is spread to who has most coin.. AKA stake. so someone with the slowest miner possible, but has 600k coins hoarded would get the most reward.. hense if bitcoin became POS. the exchanges that hoarded coins, and those that are hiding hoards of stolen coins, will get all the fresh coins, for little to no work.. POS is the profit making schme for the preminers. once they sell coins the coin soon dies.. POS is not about security at all

NXT was the first POS.

Or just use an Linux OS, no need to mess about with any of that nonsense.

i am saying NOTHING should be proposed.

read the topic title..

they are not entitled to anything nor do they deserve anything ..it's open source software after all.
and many of these greedy dipshits should be in jail for charging money for open source code other people wrote and GPL'd.
debating on how i should charge people for open source software is typical idiot fucktard logic.. no big surprise around here 

save the excuses.. they don't work on me

It is but they have other foreign currency reserves so in case of hyperinflation its marginally better protected. Also, you get marginally better interest rates.

HKD or EUR.

EUR because there are some places that offer halfway decent interest rates. Especially in Ukraine which the Euro union isn't going to allow to default 
HKD because its an actually stable currency.

5. POS!!!! are you kidding me. thats the lame brainchild of th rich, basically those that already own the large hoard of coins get richer. so satoshi gets 8% of each block, coinbase gets 6%, mark karpeles gets 6%, bitstamp gets 6% (all rough figures) all for doing jack shit and none of which helps secure bitcoin by having an ever increasing difficult encryption to crack.. POS is weak security and for the greedy pre-miners to profit from before the dump and run.. havnt you learnt that yet

He needs to send only deposits and withdrawals (redemptions of an asset), that's what he charges a fee for, but once deposited - all trades on the exchange are automatic and can go for a long time until someone decides to withdraw. Deposits and withdrawals can have a minimum limit, so he doesn't waste time on very small amounts.

NewEgg uses BitPay.

Hello everyone,

Yesterday we were contacted by the Bitmark's developer.
He asked us to set a pool for BTM and so we did

Here is the pool info:

URL: http://xhash.net
Pool address: stratum+tcp://pool.xhash.net:3405

Single registration / Global workers / DDOS Protected / VARDIFF / Prop payouts / Fees 1%

Thank you and enjoy !

Regards,
xHash Team

I think u had your coins in Bitcoin Core and u just made a copy of it offline thinking this is a offline storage. Please correct me if I am wrong.

I think some of your wallet copy has remained online, which was stolen through malware. Please accept it as a lesson and dont download anything from unknown sources.

Can u please tell us if u have downloaded any alt coin client in last 7 days ?

Well, for a gateway keeper there is an opportunity to make money regardless of what the price is doing, the gateway keeper charges 0.5% (arbitrary but reasonable fee) on all deposits and redemptions. The gateway keeper just needs initial supply of XMRs to act as the first market maker, but later other XMR holders would deposit into the gateway to add to liquidity of the asset.
Here is an example of how Qora gateway is set up:
https://nxtforum.org/assets-board/qora-on-nxt-asset-exchange/

I agree.

For now it may be useful to extol the virtues of using the "coin control" features, as these let you choose which inputs (or addresses) are linked to each transaction. For most common cases, where you do not want Bob to know that you have sent money to Peter, or for anybody to know your full savings, this is sufficient, if a little technical.

For people who really want anonymity all they need to do is go off chain, on to another, and then back. This is simple to do for anybody who really wants to. For example convert DRK to BTC, move BTC to another exchange, convert BTC to DRK and send to a fresh address. Clean inputs. People have been doing this with Fiat for years to erase the trace, the same applies to block chain based currencies.

In my opinion it does not require a technical solution.

Privacy concerns however are fair to address, coin control and documentation/examples on how to use it practically, or multiple wallet support, may address this simply for the common person.