Judging from your post history, it looks like you failed to consistently make profits when you trade and are looking to DCA. I think that is a good idea, as long as you have the patience to hold and keep buying even if the market is full of bear sentiment. If you don't like the waiting part and want to grow your capital quickly, even if you find cheap electricity I don't think you'll be able to stick to your mining plan. Whether you mine or not, you'll need to wait for some time before it bears fruit.

If $300 is your only budget, I'd suggest you stick with your DCA plan. Especially since you mentioned you have some responsibilities to your family and can't allocate too much money to high-risk investments. CMIIW.

Yes. I think both of us refer to the same method of filtering tokens that can work on Trust Wallet, so that's that. Still, you can't do the same thing if they attack Bitcoin and similar networks, since you need coin control to manage the UTXO if you care about deanonymization issues. CMIIW.

Yes, it happens quite often, far before airdrops and stuff like that become popular. I think you can search more about it on this forum, I've seen several threads discuss it in the past. It is understandable that they attack ERC and its derivatives nowadays since they can actually exploit and benefits from careless users due to the weakness in smart contracts.

I'm starting to believe you're no longer seeking scam confirmation, but rather trying to look for anyone who can take care of your case without spending any money at all. Dozens of people tell you and you already confirmed it yourself that it is a scam, yet you keep reposting this and looking for attention.

Just forget it and move on, don't beg some white hat hacker would take your case if what you have are just an e-mail and a fake tx-id. Learn the lesson and stop creating new threads about it. Your previous thread will stay and anyone can read it, so there is no need for multiple topics if you want to spread awareness (which I doubt is the case here). Losing money definitely sucks, but this is not the way to respond to it.

I think banks would definitely stop offering crypto-related services if the government ban them. It would be stupid and such a scummy move if they just decide to confiscate crypto from the banks if they never stated that crypto is illegal. As for how some banks got into trouble recently, crypto is not really the reason as far as I know, just poor decision-making from the management in general. At the end of the day though, while I won't be surprised if they change their tune again, I do think they won't claim deposited crypto unless they want protests to happen frequently.

I also think it is inevitable that Bitcoin will be treated as assets like gold and silver. Regardless of how satoshi envisioned the future to be, people will always have different ideas. At the end of the day, as long as people are aware of the risk, I believe most of them will adjust their plans accordingly. Some, if not all will stop being reliant on a third party if they want full control over their wealth sooner or later imo. If they're not convinced then hopefully they don't get screwed if the banks decide to go bankrupt and lost their money.

I always feel that those who care are definitely in the minority. Most of those who read news about privacy & security issues, those who happen to be a victim of one of those issues, and so on. Those proportions might change if awareness about privacy is increasing, plus more decentralized alternatives become available (that are not that difficult and require many setups to use). I do agree that it won't come that soon, the market is still very new, and demand in general is not that high compared to centralized alternatives.

However, I also think it is not that far off since people are being exposed to many centralized system failures recently, such as a bank run, a defunct exchange, and so on. At the end of the day, most people still value flexibility and ease of use, so until there is a very good decentralized product that fits that bill, I expect the number of people who use decentralized services to increase. Unless they are mainly dealing with fiat, which I doubt can be streamlined unless you touch KYC and AML. CMIIW.

What is an example of that? Exchanges will be the ones who need a third party to make sure they don't scam their users. Most of them have no incentive to go decentralized if they can just pay a fee every now and then to make sure they can continue their services and rake in millions of profits.

Are you referring to Chipmixer, or mixers in general? If you're referring to Chipmixer mixing method, I believe you can just check the history of each chip to see whether your past transactions/addresses are linked or not. This should apply to any mixer that follows a similar mixing method, CMIIW. As for others, some of them develop a code that you need to save to make sure your coins don't get mixed with your past transactions. Time will tell how effective it is, but these prevention exist for now. You can probably use both mixer and coinjoin to add another layer of obfuscation, although I can't tell how effective it would be.

If I remember correctly, Australian can use Coinspot to trade fiat and crypto. I'm referring to this one[1], but as always you'll need KYC to do that. Keep in mind that I never use them since I'm not an Aussie. Still, I've heard good reviews from some Australian guys on the Telegram group for one of the crypto projects that I followed. Probably not the most reliable place to get reviews so please do your own research[2]. You can also share some platforms you have already tried so we don't suggest the same thing repeatedly. Do try P2P if you don't want to rely on a third party at all.

[1] https://www.coinspot.com.au
[2] https://coinspot.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360000775776-AUD-Withdrawals-FAQ

Based on what I've read so far, the exploit is done on a contract that is not commonly used, and Sushi manages to compensate for the loss rather quickly. I guess the relatively low amount of loss also contributed to that. So, it is not surprising that the price was not affected that much. It is also understandable to assume there are some whales or traders who try to keep the price as high as possible though, anything is possible.

I don't think they will survive if exploits are happening so often though, they better improve the security or they will lose more than just 1k ETH in the future.

I believe airdrop has always been popular, but it is true that the recent Arbitrum airdrop makes people get encouraged to try many new projects hoping they will get the airdrop. It is also understandable that those Youtubers or even Twitter influencers don't know the exact steps since no projects explicitly stated that they will airdrop some tokens to their users. It is a very good marketing strategy, to be honest, stay mysterious, and never explicitly deny any token airdrop so people will try their testnet, etc voluntarily. On top of that, they can simply post a pinned tweet saying there is no ongoing airdrop to prevent scammers without any further action to save time.

Judging from the recent airdrops, users need to spend some money to test the network, so they can't simply use an empty wallet and connect it to some platforms. I believe this is why the scam is also getting prevalent nowadays since people need to use actual tokens to make sure they are eligible when the airdrop happens. Anyway, if anyone is active on social media, I suggest staying away from dead subs/unmoderated forums since I've seen a lot of them popping up there nowadays.

I thought you were asking how to set up a custom trailing stop with a bot in the beginning, turns out you're just asking for advice when the market is unpredictable. Since others have more or less answered your question, I suggest you try or build your own bot if your exchange doesn't support trailing stop loss or something similar in order to prepare for stuff like that. Or you can simply change your trading platform, although it might be difficult since most of them require KYC nowadays.

IIRC, Zenbot is one free one that might be able to offer trailing stop even though the setup is a bit of a pain, at least according to some reviews that I've read. Since it is open source, some techniques are probably out of date, so you need to know a bit of coding if you want to customize it.

If people start using Bitcoin to show their wealth, I personally expect the price of Bitcoin relative to other currencies to become stable, or even increase depending on how inflation goes. But regardless of that, if people want to use Bitcoin to trade, there will be trades happening around the world, and I'm pretty sure sellers won't sell their BTC if the price is terrible (in most cases). There won't be any liquidity issues since people can simply buy again if they need to unless I misunderstood some of your points.

Others have mentioned it already, but there is no way people can own Bitcoin without spending/investing in something, just like how people can't own gold if they don't buy or mine them on their own. Do you expect everyone to own gold without any cost? I bet you don't think so. The same thing applies to Bitcoin, or any asset in general. Their limited nature is what makes them valuable, to begin with. CMIIW.

Apakah om yakin ini bukan fitur khusus di iPhone karena iPhone menganggap cloud drive sebagai folder di perangkat om? Ane menggunakan macbook juga memiliki fitur yang kurang lebih sama. Tapi untuk terhubung ke jasa cloud drive popular seperti Google Drive, Drive, dst butuh pengaturan lebih lanjut. Lebih tepatnya mungkin fitur ini bisa mengexport file ke direktori tertentu, jadi bila direktori yang digunakan terhubung ke folder cloud bakal ke cloud juga, walau harusnya sih jangan diarahkan ke sana dan gunakan direktori offline.

Bayaran per user tidak di publish oleh manajer gan, jadi kalau agan mau cari tahu opsi yang ada adalah dengan memeriksa address reviewer satu per satu dan dilihat berapa bayaran yang mereka dapatkan. Yang jelas kalau hanya sekedar menceritakan pengalaman menggunakan tanpa analisis yang lebih dalam bakal susah untuk dapat bayaran gede. Btw, sekilas ane lihat reviewnya sepertinya dipause sementara karena mau ada update[1].

Kemungkinan review masih jalan pasca adanya update, tapi yang jelas bakal ada perbedaan nantinya. Kalau agan mau review dan sejauh ini review agan ada kesamaan dengan user yang lain, bisa juga nunggu dulu adanya update supaya agan bisa ngasih feedback atas update yang dilakukan.

[1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5447322.msg62060873#msg62060873

Setelah saya baca ulang, sepertinya apa yang om chikito katakan lebih tepat. Mereka memang bilang untuk memindahkan dana/sats yang ada di custodial mereka karena dana tersebut ga bakal bisa diakses lagi setelah tutup (ane rasa cepat atau lambat withdrawal pasti bakal ditutup juga karena tidak mungkin mereka membuat resources untuk membuka jasa tersebut kalau sudah ada kepastian mau ditutup), tapi tidak ada anjuran yang sama kalau user menggunakan self-hosted node. Kalau om refer ke bagian alternatives, solusi self-hosted node dan sejenisnya juga disebutkan lebih dulu. Yah tinggal tunggu saja nanti apakah bakal berubah atau tidak.

Itu GPU yang agan temukan apa aja gan? Setahu ane dari beberapa bulan yang lalu harga GPU udah mulai turun, bahkan GPU terbaru dari AMD saja sudah dapet diskon lebih dari $100. Walau di Indo mungkin karena pajak harganya masih agak mahal dibandingkan beli langsung di market luar. Eniwei, bisa jadi GPU bekas itu murah bukan karena bekas mining, tapi karena harga GPU baru sudah pada turun semua, jadi market secondhand pada menyesuaikan.

Judging from how many exchanges went insolvent, I think it is fair to say that at the very least they need to provide proof of their sustainability. If they do that, users can see whether they have the ability to sustain their business if all users withdraw their BTC or coins at the same time. Even if they do that though, they can still lie or deliberately be misleading to avoid further questioning. I mean, even the latest FTX case can be solid proof that 'reputable' exchanges need more than just name and marketing to survive the market. You should not underestimate how scammy exchanges can be regardless if they are popular or not.

AFAIK, trading volume should not be a metric for reserves anyway. Exchanges can fake them anytime, or at least manipulate them to some extent to hide their insider trading or something similar.

Is there any documented case of this? I've never heard of exchange freezing accounts because someone uses mixers to send money from the wallet they own. If you use a mixer or tainted coins to deposit, then this one is common. As far as I know, most exchanges are only concerned about incoming deposits since they need to practice KYC/AML or whatever regulations they need to obey (or use). Even if their users are funding hackers, they are free from legal obligations as long as they don't accept transactions related to those services.

Are you sure this is not a scam exchange? I'm not familiar with Bitrue, but as far as I know, they never mentioned having other domains other than the com you mentioned. Even if it is true, I don't think any tier-3 or 2 exchange such as Hotbit asks you for a 20% deposit for verification. At best they would just close your account without saying anything else other than they were allowed to do so because the user is breaking their TOS. Still shady as hell, but not as scammy as this one IMO. Either your friend registered into a scam exchange that will serve its users for a while before they scam them, a phishing website, or a very shady exchange that should never be used regardless if she does copy trade or not.

Hmm, so they were trying to keep their image clean, more or less? Looks like this is the norm for Binance operations for overseas users. AFAIK, they also have no license to operate in Indonesia but still accept registration from Indonesian users. Their domain was banned, though ineffective since a DNS encryption or VPN can still bypass it.

That said, they tried to enter the market by investing/acquiring (not sure which term is the right one) one of the popular exchanges here. Most of the top executives seem to be related to Binance. So far it seems to work in their favor. It is interesting to see if their affiliated exchange here will survive if Binance gets into troubles like FTX. Hopefully, the money doesn't go overseas.

I don't think you can be a source of third-party feedback[1] if you're running and developing the platform yourself. It is like seeing an FTX employee saying FTX is the best exchange that is impossible to hack. No one would believe you regardless of how you convince them. You can try to run a review campaign if you want to market your product here. I'm sure you know one or two things about marketing on this forum from how old your account is.

Also, what you listed above are just protection measures that are more or less common on other platforms with different names. It is definitely not an exclusive feature that you can sell and sway potential business from using your gateway IMO. But yeah, you should also consider security measures available to protect the sellers/business too, as others have mentioned many times.

[1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5205257.msg53202200#msg53202200