Either Litecoin survives the attack, in which case it is a true cryptocurrency that can withstand the whims of a single Apple employee. It may be worth continued investment. Or Litecoin succumbs to the attack, in which case it was never a true cryptocurrency since it could not withstand a single person's attempts to compromise it. It survived only on the "greater fool" theory. Either way, the die was cast many moons ago when Litecoin was designed and implemented. All we are watching is the resolution. Everyone seems intent on shooting the messenger. What am I doing? I am selling popcorn.  |
|
|
|
Jeez those people are stupid :/ What on earth has CH done to deserve money from these people, aside from over promising and under delivering.
I especially like the guy "willing" to sell 25,000 solidcoins. Yeah awesome, good look selling those (who's going to want to buy them)? He may as well offer 25,000 pebbles.
I could put 25,000 pebbles in my yard and have a rock garden. Try another analogy |
|
|
|
Send $1 with a VouchX code (u could sell .12 btc) on vircurex and I will send you 1 ltc to your address.
I raise your offer. Give me TWO dollars and I will give you 1 LTC! |
|
|
|
I thought the last exchange dropped Soiledcoin a while ago. I am sure the 12 tyrant nodes + Groinhunters laptop are still ticking away. Though that hardly qualifies as life for a currency that cannot be exchanged for anything. |
|
|
|
I'd do Cameron Diaz.
You would have to be nerve dead from the neck down, or seriously hot for Tom Cruise to not do her. Of course, the day Cameron throws a pity bop horizontale to a broke down grumpy old bastard like me it will probably signal the end times on December 21. A Cameron Diaz pity lay is my hedge against the Mayan Apocalypse. I'll come out ahead either way. |
|
|
|
Everyone quit SoiledCoin. I am lonely. So I rant and rave here at the people who were right all along.
BCX will DDOS Microcash on May 10th. |
|
|
|
|
The petition was successful!!
I am the popcorn police.
I arrested BitcoinEXpress.
I read him/her his/her rights (he/she has the right to be unaffected by my packets on the internet...).
I booked him/her into my minecraft jail.
The Council of YouTube Commenters will hear his/her arraignment shortly.
|
|
|
|
It might be a catch 22.
If BCX succeeds and destroys Litecoin, then good luck proving damages. The coin was not viable and therefore without value.
If BCX fails, no damage occurs and thus no plane ticket to Gitmo from our jackboots.
P.S. no wonder SoiledCoin development ground to a halt, Groinhunter spends all his time here trolling threads instead of coding.
LTC isn't getting destroyed. The price may crash temporarily but that just enriches me in the long run as I'll just stop mining and start buying from all the BTC I've all ready made. Not to mention there are big names in BTC heavily invested in LTC already. It's not going anywhere. I will take it personally though. I will go after those who willingly try to destroy my investments. He better not be in the US or any of his "help" better not be. That's all I have to say. But is your "investment" worth anything if it turns out there is a serious flaw (hypothetical) that renders LTC nonviable? If there is a flaw in the core protocol of LTC, wasn't the damage "done" by the creators of LTC? In that case BTCXpress is just the messenger. IMHO cryptocurrencies should be proof against the whims of one Apple employee. |
|
|
|
|
It might be a catch 22.
If BCX succeeds and destroys Litecoin, then good luck proving damages. The coin was not viable and therefore without value.
If BCX fails, no damage occurs and thus no plane ticket to Gitmo from our jackboots.
P.S. no wonder SoiledCoin development ground to a halt, Groinhunter spends all his time here trolling threads instead of coding.
|
|
|
|
Bull Shit payment: 5% tx fee hahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahha Mountain View hahahahahahahahahahahaahahaaahah
5% is the cap, you do not always pay 5% of every transaction. That TX fee includes credit card fees they might have to pay to complete your transaction. For instance, when I pay Google for API services, there is a 0% fee on google wallet. YMMV depending on who the vendor is, and the method of payment. |
|
|
|
That doesn't state anything about RS abandoning the project, or members admitting the project is dead. You love those sensational thread titles eh?  All I see is a comment from an idiot I guess we all have to wait a little longer and stand strong while being tested. Does he think RS is some sort of god that is testing him? ugh One only needs to find SoiledCoin lonely by the side of the road to posit that it has been abandoned. You do not need a statement from Realsolid declaring that he has stopped work. He may have gone stealth mode, but this is unlikely given that he was an attention hound for months on both forums. A more precise statement would be: "It appears that RealSolid has abandoned SoiledCoin. Members caught admitting SoiledCoin is dead in the water." |
|
|
|
I'm not posting anymore, you'll have to do the hard work yourself if you want more. (Google).
You failed to live up to your promise. Now where have we seen that before? |
|
|
|
|
Bistromathematics is ASIC proof. Just build a hash algorithm based on it's principles.
|
|
|
|
When the "founders" of a currency have to hide behind aliases, it is the sign of a scam.
Fixed that for you. Gavin Andresen and the other active developers are not pseudonyms.
You originally said "founders", which Gavin is not, and not "active developers". You made a leap of logic. If S Nakamoto is a pseudonym and we don't know who he is, we cannot be certain that he/she was not one of the current active developers. You also assume that S Nakamoto was a single entity instead of a group of people publishing under a pseudonym. But this is just rehashing an old conversation. Bitcoin's genesis is a bit bizarre and leaves something to be desired grant you. If Bitcoin was proprietary source, with no white paper, with developers hiding behind aliases and phony registrar details I would not be a proponent of it. You seem to be jumping through some awfully tiny hoops in order to defend something you said which is inaccurate... I see that you have run out of argument and finally agree with me. Speaking of jumping through tiny hoops, when are you going to stop hopping through them? P.S. I put "founders" in quotes. What do the quotes around it signify? |
|
|
|
When the "founders" of a currency have to hide behind aliases, it is the sign of a scam.
Fixed that for you. Gavin Andresen and the other active developers are not pseudonyms.
You originally said "founders", which Gavin is not, and not "active developers". You made a leap of logic. If S Nakamoto is a pseudonym and we don't know who he is, we cannot be certain that he/she was not one of the current active developers. You also assume that S Nakamoto was a single entity instead of a group of people publishing under a pseudonym. But this is just rehashing an old conversation. Bitcoin's genesis is a bit bizarre and leaves something to be desired grant you. If Bitcoin was proprietary source, with no white paper, with developers hiding behind aliases and phony registrar details I would not be a proponent of it. |
|
|
|
When the "founders" of a currency have to hide behind aliases, it is the sign of a scam.
You mean like "Satoshi Nakamoto"?  Oh yes it seems to be pseudonym as well Gavin Andresen and the other active developers are not pseudonyms. We have been over this already, pay attention. Oh wait, SoiledCoin is all about making the same mistakes over and over. Speaking of the coin du filth, where is it? |
|
|
|
I have failed at coding Microcash. We still have not released it. So I come here to make another sock puppet.
 |
|
|
|
Perhaps you should advertise more widely instead. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
