That's gotta be the one he means.  FWIW, OP, you'll probably want to update Multibit several times between now and the date when the hardfork happens on block size.  Anyway, good points cr1776 about the fact that there are little forks all the time.

Sweet!  I found the traditional quickseller masterbation post!  I love it.  I thought he had been masterbating less in public since I started the game to catch these masterbation posts.  But I guess sometimes you just feel that pressure and you gotta let it go.  For the record, a quickseller masterbation post is one where he "toots his own horn" (to use a euphemism) without providing any concrete proof or evidence.  "At least one person .. " lol.

While there's nothing wrong with the OP having a little fun.  It should be pointed out that being on the default list level 1 means that effectively, you are on Theymos' trust list.  Being on default trust level 2 means you are on someone's trust list who is on theymos' trust list.  There's no real meritocracy here, it's just a matter of who ya know and cetera.  Most of the folks who come and go from default trust are doing so on level 2 as someone on level 1 trusts them (perhaps temporarily).  You can see this with quickseller, he was on there for a moment from Badbear, who then had buyer's remorse.  Tomotocage has readded him, we'll see how long this lasts.  In the end, the people up the chain are more or less responsible for the behavior of the people down the chain.  If you don't vouch for the behavior of someone on your trust list, remove them!  This includes people on default trust.  If you don't like what someone on default trust is doing, put a tilde '~' before their name on your trust list (or remove the default trust list altogether).

I've argued many times that the default trust list is the crutch which people need to get rid of and it just enables people like those trust rangers that OP complains about to rule the forum and cause problems for people who cross them.  The best thing we can do is remove default trust from our lists and build our own lists as we interact with people.  A better thing, which is a long shot, would be to encourage Theymos to change default trust to "opt-in" rather than "opt-out".  This would also encourage people to build their own trust lists based on experience and weaken the abusers of the trust system.  The next best thing would be to change the warning message when someone has negative trust from the misleading and inflammatory "WARNING ... EXTREME CAUTION" to something more descriptive "This user has received negative feedback from someone on your trust list", with a link to your trust settings.  That would, IMO, encourage people to learn about the trust system and how to use it properly.

How long ago?  This thread has no real discussion going on for months.  Nultidah was here trolling recently.  Then there was a bunch of swearing at each other.  Look at the dates on the posts, it's important.

Not very classy to pop into a thread dedicated to another poker house and try to advertize a competitor.  But also inept because this poker house has closed (as of December 2014).  I think that if you want to go ahead with the off-topic advertising, then you should at least to go to the proper thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=962440.0

Good luck!

This post shows why this proposal would have less functionality than the current system, but even before this post, it wasn't clear to me how the proposal is any kind of improvement.  Why are the "casting of nines" any more interesting than a hash which sums to a value lower than the target?  I don't get it?

There was an altcoin called primecoin (I think) which claimed to be about exploring the prime number space.  I'm not sure if there was actually any interesting math in that one but at least on the fact of it, it seems more interesting than this thing with 9s.  Primecoin may still be around, FWIW, I don't know.  Also, sorry if I'm missing something about these nines, I'm not trying to be rude.

So, you probably want to double-check the location of the file.  In this recent thread, a user had a similar problem:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1065676.0

You can follow the same steps as there to make sure you have the file in the right place.

I agree, ring games are the best.  The freerolling, all-in nonsense is a bit of a gas from time to time but it's not normal poker.  If you like poker, you gotta sit down with some actual chips on the table and see what you can win by risking them.  When someone gives you a stack of freeroll chips, there's no cost to shoving, so the game is all weird.

You're welcome.  And hopefully this demonstrates how useful it is to actually post the terminal session with the messages you got when requesting help.  Believe it or not, some people actually know how to decipher those messages

I'm thinking that most likely, your problem will go away if you install libtool:


Cheers!

PatSNL is right.  MZ is, ironically, accusing Bicknellski of breaking a forum rule for being off-topic, but accusations are off-topic here.  So, I have to lol.

The old seals had the 1 chips tourneys, which were fun.  I still haven't been able to log in---waiting for a client---so I have no idea if these are still a thing.  I think once they get a working client for people who don't use .exe, they'll be back on top basically immediately.  The danger is that someone comes along and scoops us all up while we're just here waiting.

@dooglus,  I think you're looking less-and-less classy the more you troll these guys.  It's not your usual style.  It's not the style I've seen from you in the past.  Just sayin'

You're not telling the whole story here.  Using the word "blindly" is merely an accusation.  FWIW, ndnhc likely has a lot more information than the average person about the bankroll of dadice.  So it's a little ridiculous to suggest that he's acting "blindly".  Also, if you look carefully at this thread, you'll see that very few people are "defending" him.  Most people who aren't throwing him to the wolves are simply saying that they're waiting to hear the rest of the story.  Calling those people's actions "blind" is mere weasel words---intending to weaken their opinions by sneaking in adverbs which are unsupported.

If we want to examine the rest of the story about ndnhc's "blind" backing then I think we'd look at his post history and see where he simply offers to Shorena that he hopes that dadice will show him the bankroll and that he has confidence it's there.  To tell even more of the story, we should mention that only about 12 hours before this thing with NLNico and the bankroll began, you had showed up in the dadice thread trolling, telling everyone that these guys were scammers because they didn't take your word for it when you called someone else a scammer.  As an account trader/farmer, we have no idea how many alts you're working with and whether this is some kind of coorindated attack on dadice by you in an effor to exact a vendetta on them for not "respecting" you when you tried to tell them what to do.

There's a lot of history between dadice and quickseller/acctseller (and possibly other alts), unless he's gone and deleted these old posts, people can read up for themselves on it.  I merely caution everyone to take QS accusations against someone who has worked with dadice with a large grain of salt.  Carra23 has said in the dadice campaign thread that ndnhc is supposed to be back next tuesday.  I, for one, am not going to contributed to this FUD, but will wait to see what happens.

@grendel25, try it out, it's not really a website, you just need to download the client and then play.  They have the client for linux, (and I assume windows and osx).  You can have a lot of fun and it's possible to win big.

@melody82, it's free to try.  You can log in and just hang around and do nothing.  You can pick up a few ksat for free to gamble with but obviously you're not going to get  alot of free money.  If you buy in, you can gamble just like a normal casino.  The difference between this and a casino website is that you have an avatar and you can walk around and chat with other players and watch what they're playing, etc.

@fox, that probably happened, but probably about 3 or 4 years ago.  DT has been around a long time and it was around when bitcoins were worth pennies.  Nowadays, 50mBTC jackpot sets off fireworks and you see a system message.  Just the other day, I saw a guy win about 50 BTC, but that was pretty extreme.

Looks to me like an encoding problem.  Those characters are unicode characters, just the wrong ones.  If these folks were merely missing glyphs in their fonts, they'd see ??, not random unicode characters.  I dunno, do you think someone set big-endian rather than little-endian on utf-16?  I dunno why they wouldn't use utf-8.  Anyway, I'm just curiuos about this matter, I don't type in russian on PD, but I'm curious about multilingual issues in general.

I've said the same thing as well.  I guess dragons tale members just tend to talk to each other in dragons tale, not so much here on bitcointalk.  And yah, it's a fun game, I play on there about once a week or so.

I'm surprised that you find issues using debian 7 vs debian 8.  Anyway, if you post your error messages you'll have better luck with replies helping you to understand them.  Anyway, I've used bitcoind on debian jessie and debian wheezy without issue.   Similarly with debian vs. ubuntu, the differences are quite minimal (at least when it comes to building/running bitcoin-core).  Post your error messages and we can probably help you.

While you're certainly correct about quickseller having run an abortive smear campaign against me, to set the record straight, the word came down from the dadice guys that quickseller's feedback on me was considered bullshit, and for ndnhc to re-add me.  It's doubtful that quickseller knew this, however.  Anyway, ndnhc has alwasy been polite and kind to me, but he followed the rules as set by the people he was working for.

If quickseller is trying to frame him in this, it would be a shame.  Although it may be that he's simply frustrated with his inability to successfully troll the dadice threads (as he tried for a while).

Who knows?

Strangely, I see his trust as a yellow "".  Never seen that before.  Maybe a weird math error in whatever the new trust calculation code is.