Instead of recommending them straight away to exchanges, I think it is fair to tell them about other methods such as P2P trade, faucets, etc. Your goal should not push them to buy Bitcoin because they will get rich later on, but how to tell them what Bitcoin is useful for and how can they use it. It is not a good idea to push them into an investment direction straight away when they don't even understand what Bitcoin is, if something went south they'll just blame you and think Bitcoin is a scam or something along those lines.

There's no need to go straight to cold wallet either, just tell them different kinds of wallets, when and how to use them etc. Telling them basic security practices if they only have their phone to store Bitcoin for example is still a better education than telling them what exchange is cheaper if they want to buy BTC imo.

I wonder how cost-effective it will be compared to buying a dedicated PC for mining. Even if it was cost-effective, the profit might be questionable too. Can't say anything for sure unless somebody tested it I guess. Doing some Steam Deck reselling business is probably better at the end of the day, especially in a country where a local reseller is hard to find.

OP, from your post history I found that you own a 3070 TI already. Since you already tried mining on it, what makes you believe you can use your Steam Deck to mine profitably? Do you have cheap electricity access but can't make it work with your GPU or something? It sounds like you already run your PC for mining quite comfortably for now. That aside, websites like whattomine might be able to help you calculate further.

What kind of trading strategies are you familiar with right now? What kind of accuracy or efficiency are you looking for? I don't think there is any 90% or even 80% trading strategy that will net you profit without doing any adaptation. Some traders that I know use Bollinger bands, RSI, and just RMA, while some of them exclusively use Elliot wave theory to trade. The difference between their usage is on time-frame. Since you're looking for day trading, I think those tools are more than enough. CMIIW.

I'd suggest you use the strategy you're familiar with the most and adapt to market changes and stick with your risk management as mentioned above. As far as I can see, most traders are looking for bots nowadays to help with consistency and backtesting strategy. Some of them are free and you can modify them on your own, but keep in mind it won't magically increase your profits.

True. The only thing I can think of is some kind of FAQs that answers the most important question if a user doesn't have the time to read all of the ToS. Based on my experience, most faqs are only related to the operational side of the platform, never to the sensitive information that the user needs to know.

Personally, I only read the full ToS pages when I need to translate them for a project. After reading some of them, I can vaguely guess what this or that part means if I see it in other projects' ToS so it helps me if I want to skim it. Not everyone can do or have the time to do it though.

Their claim is ambiguous, to say the least. They did say it was at full power, but the testing method is unknown, even "full power" can be misinterpreted too. I think most companies do this nowadays so that's that. Not a big deal unless you really want to find something so quiet.

What is this Trade Control you are talking about? Why did you trust them if you never hold that much money in the first place?

Also, most decentralized wallets don't have the kind of support as Coinbase/centralized platform does (resetting your password, etc). Hopefully, you can learn from this and avoid being scammed again by someone pretending to be official support in the future. CMIIW.

It applies to most things in my opinion, especially if it is tech-related. You should never use things you have no knowledge of (even the basic ones) in the first place.

I assume by "journey" you mean trying to find low market cap tokens/coins and buy them so you can profit when they do a 10x or 100x at the next bull run.

A partnership is definitely a nice thing to have, but that should not be the only factor that you consider. I'd argue that focusing only on one part is not going to help you find which projects you should follow. For example, one of the projects that I like (the idea is good, but they don't have any marketing) suffers a lot in recent months. They do have some partnerships with established projects, but that didn't help them at all. On the other hand, you can argue that Doge doesn't have any "partnership" but because their presence in the market is well-known, it allows you to get decent profits (at least in the last bull run).

There are many things you can consider. Other than what has been said above, I believe you can also use these factors to decide which projects you want to follow:
- The team (whether they have a track record of doing business before, are their words reliable, are they transparent enough etc)
- The community that follows them (is there a pump & dump channel that promotes them heavily, which can be a sign of short-lived hype etc, is their social media/marketing very active, etc)
- The tech/product that they sell (do you see them as useful or not, is there any competitor on the market, do you think they can compete with established competitors or not, etc)
- Their financial leeway (do they always ask for funding, does their main funding comes from selling tokens that can be quite a problem for their community/token holders, etc)
- etc.

At the end of the day, don't forget about luck. Sometimes just being at the right time at the right place, you can make a decent profit. Or just stick with Bitcoin and stack sats every month if you don't like gambling with your money.

Kalau dilihat di https://www.socios.com/socios-polls/ juga rata" polling/voting hanya berhubungan dengan aktivitas yang tidak terlibat langsung dengan bagaimana klub itu dikelola oleh manajemen. Artinya aspirasi untuk mereka yang ingin mendepak owner misalnya susah untuk terwujud kalau bergantung ke voting semacam ini. Kalaupun iya mereka bisa voting, peluang manipulasi juga ada (misalnya tim owner beli vote, atau memegang mayoritas power voting dst).

Daya tarik utamanya mungkin memang lebih ke interaksi fan dengan tim yang disupport, bukan ke harga token itu sendiri. Loyalty rewards, event yang ditampilkan di hompage mereka dst juga arahnya ke sana. Bukan token yang tepat untuk diperjualbelikan kalau agan ingin dapet untung lewat trading imo. Selama token masih berfungsi, mungkin volume trading yang hampir ga ada bukan masalah besar, kecuali hal itu jadi faktor apakah pihak Socios bakal melanjutkan kerjasama dengan klub terkait atau tidak. Ane pribadi sih ga bakal membeli token semacam ini hanya untuk voting, malah mungkin bakal mendesak klub dst untuk menggunakan platform lain macam Twitter poll misalnya kalau kita perlu milih warna bangku stadion.

Seingat ane setahun/dua tahun yang lalu banyak mixer altcoin semacam Smartmixer, Bestmixer (iirc), dst tapi udah pada tutup sekarang. Kalau agan lihat ada iklan mungkin itu situs phishing karena setahu ane rata-rata mereka tutup begitu saja (exit scam) setelah beberapa bulan beroperasi. Tornado cash juga sempet rame seperti yang disebutkan di atas.

Alternatif yang mungkin ada kalau agan ingin melakukan mixing altcoin mungkin ya instant swap ke coin lain yang disupport oleh exchange/platform yang mau agan pakai. Instant swap/atomic swap sejauh yang ane tahu belum support (belum dikembangkan) fitur" lain misalnya delayed transaction dst, jadi mungkin ga bakal memenuhi kebutuhan kalau agan bener-benar ingin privasi yang sempurna. Agak susah juga kalau ingin privasi tapi agan berinteraksi dengan centralized platform/pihak ketiga yang punya syarat A-Z karena mereka punya kewajiban hukum sih.

Kalau sudah mentuk ya pake BTC saja kalau mau dimix.

Apakah fitur itu bisa memeriksa address lain yang tidak ditampilkan di wallet agan secara default tapi masih bisa diakses karena satu seed (beda derivation path)? Saya rasa fitur tersebut sangat berguna untuk memeriksa address-address di wallet agan layaknya Electrum dengan derivation pathnya daripada memastikan address yang agan salin itu benar punya agan. Bukan berarti ga bisa dipake untuk memeriksa address yang agan salin, tapi lebih keren aja kalau bisa mengecek derivation path.

Does this mean you mix some coins, transfer them back to your wallet, and then send some coins to Binance? They might flag them since your previous transactions are related to conjoin transactions. I recall reading something like this in the past, saying that Binance will check your previous 5 related transactions to see if they are "suspicious". So, as long as you use a new address from mixing your coins, the chance that they would detect your mixed coins would be smaller, albeit not impossible since everything is on the blockchain. It is also a good practice to never send back your mixed coins to your own wallet, and just use the new address/wallet entirely. CMIIW. Pretty sure any decent mixer would consider this when they built their platform.

If the worst comes to worst, using DEX would be a good idea to swap your BTC after doing some mixing. Or just drop centralized exchange entirely if you don't want to deal with their false flag regardless if you use a mixer or not. Improving your privacy practice would be a good idea too.

They can definitely collect any data related to mixers by doing something like using the mixer on their own to collect some addresses and so on. That being said, I don't see them being hacked or whatnot related to their ability to track/link coinjoin/mixer-related transactions.

Agan OP, ane rasa topik diskusinya bisa ditampung di thread diskusi saran yang di link oleh om Chikito di atas. Kalau masih ada rasa penasaran atau saran lanjutan bisa dipost di sana juga. Walau post terakhir di thread tersebut sudah lama banget, tapi thread tersebut masih bisa dipakai untuk mendiskusikan masalah tentang forum. Rata" member saat thread itu dibuat dan saat ini juga relatif sama (mungkin bertambah malah). Tentu saja ini hanya opini ane, kalau mau mendiskusikan lebih lanjut dengan moderator juga silakan saja.

Ane rasa masalah child-board ini tidak akan berubah dalam waktu dekat, mungkin malah kita yang perlu lebih kreatif dalam memperluas/mempersempit jenis topik yang bisa dibahas di masing" board kalau keaktifan user di local board merupakan masalah mendesak yang perlu diselesaikan ke depannya. Just my 2 cents.

Kalau agan exchange di pasar lokal, bukankah "hanya" 0,1% pajaknya per transaksi gan? Yakin itu exchangenya gak malak agan? Saya asumsi agan trading hanya beberapa juta/puluhan juta per bulannya, katakanlah 100 juta per bulan, maka pajak yang agan bayar adalah 1 juta (bener gak nih?). Kalau dibandingkan dengan pajak P2P online yang saat ini marak di pasaran, ane rasa masih jauh lebih murah karena tarifnya di situ besar sekali. Bukan berarti ane berharap pajak kripto jadi lebih besar, cuma saat ini ane rasa masih oke.

Mungkin lebih bagus kalau term yang dipakai bukan menghindari pajak gan, tapi membayar lebih murah atau kata lain yang serupa. 

I'd suggest using a multi-sig escrow if possible, and not relying on a third party to escrow your funds. Unlike fiat, you have other options to increase the chance that you get your funds after you finish your job, utilizing that feature would be a great idea. Especially after the recent collapse of many centralized platforms due to bad management, lying about their operations, etc.

Are you trying to translate some Bitcoin-related articles into Latin or something? Personally, I never see one myself (though the reason is probably that I read from English sources). Even on my local websites, most exchanges/news websites use English keywords to refer to technical terms such as blockchain, and mnemonic seed, while "wallet" or others are translated literally.

You might find better luck if you ask on Latin-speaking boards, or social media if those exist. That being said, is there a problem using those terms as long as you explain what the terms mean? I don't think they need to understand them perfectly. Since you're referring to older people, I also don't think you need to teach them about coinbase, UTXO, etc (I assume you just want them to know the basics to use Bitcoin).

If you're looking for short-term gain, the obvious answer would be the bull market. If you're looking for a long-term investment opportunity, I'd suggest looking for alternatives since the risk/opportunity ratio is quite skewed toward screwing you. Most of the time the tokens you farm are mintable, which means the rate of inflation is going to cut down your profit if there is any left for you. At least that's my experience with farming some tokens in BSC pools.

The risk is many. Smart contract hacks, scam pools, some weird exploits that get discovered when your token was locked, etc. Compared to other alternatives like mining or swing trading, I'd say that the uncertainty is higher in the sense that most of those factors are not under your control. Personally, I don't think a booming yield market is the only sign that the bull market is happening, but of course, you can use it as one of its signs since the market has changed a bit compared to the past. At the end of the day, it is highly speculative (more than swing trading I'd say), so I don't recommend it unless you're doing it for short term for whatever reason.

Sounds like they are suggesting the same thing. They might implicitly suggest that they use the same seed to generate many addresses on different networks, so as long as OP has it, he can still recover it (like what Trust Wallet or other multichain wallet works). However, it contradicts their support page. OP probably interact with somebody who doesn't really understand the difference between how their network works, or the support page is inaccurate, so that's that. CMIIW.

That being said, OP, by "nothing", did you mean you already add USDC (Tron) token and it does not show on your wallet, or did you just use the default tokens list and see nothing there?

I wouldn't be too hopeful even if the firmware upgrade addresses some issues. If you already use your wallet many times, the battery drain might be more severe than you think, so a firmware upgrade might not help that much. It is a piece of good news if they help the battery drain issue, but it won't reverse what your battery has gone through. Might be worth looking for an alternative if the battery is such a big deal for your needs.

I wonder if we can modify the device and build our own connection so that we can use other batteries to power the device, albeit the cost might be higher than I think.

Are you not in your bounty manager group? I recall seeing one or two guys asking about their payment yesterday. It is not a problem on your end, the network is just busy due to ordinals or something (check Twitter and you'll know what I mean) if you're not familiar with how BTC works. I suggest reading more about Bitcoin so you can understand it better and not expect every transaction will get confirmation after a few minutes. It has been confirmed just now, but next week don't be surprised if something similar happens again.

As for the wallet, I suggest using Electrum if you use Trust Wallet only for accepting Bitcoin for your sig campaign. It should be better from a privacy and security point-of-view, as long as you know what you're doing.

Obviously using the code would be the best choice, since it would prevent your last coins from being linked to you through other transactions. I mean, the feature is there for a reason, would be weird if it didn't solve any problem at all. I'd use them since it is not that difficult to keep track of the codes.

I believe it is just to improve the mixing process. In the end, you can choose whether you can use segwit to send your transaction or not if fees are your concern. Other than that I see no real reason to prefer one type of address over another as long as my privacy is still safe. CMIIW.