At least here in EU, anything beyond 3K€ needs to be justified from/to bank per said periode of time ( a week I think) and the amount is even less depending on the country, I don't know about the US but I won't be surprised if there isn't something similar. Of course I'm talking about the average joe account, a professional business man, enterprise or commercent ect accounts are a different story

XBOX 360, PS4 and XBO emulator are more possible than a supposed PS3 the architecture is too different and too complexe to emulate

I fell like he is just trolling, and wasting peoples time

Relative IT Company ? Transfering BTC? and a new BCT account, lol well that sounds like a good news indeed /S

Do you need french translation?

Count me in

Posts count: 311
BTC Adress : 13TQEgpS1ENz76HGTwSFh8Xv6oqdvqdrRV

regards.

Someone wants to drive the price down no matter what, or the guys that used to use the maleability issue to make profit, thinks it's a matter of time till they are found, and brought the big guns and are going nuclear before fixs are implemented and the whole txid is disregarded, anyway popcorn time ^^

Thank you, I noticed after I wrote my response I've downloaded and setting it at the moment will give a feedback after running it for a couple of hours

I'll try the cudaminer aswell on my laptop

Edit: it works now

Sadly I use Windows, if you have a windows version, I can beta test it and give you a feedback

Edit, Oh I see you guys already released a new version, thanks reorder I'll run trough the night and give you a feedback after a few hours

great news, thanks, hopefully it will be ready soon

It doesn't crash as it used to do, I always find the program closed after a while (maybe it crash but without giving debug option) and it s way worse than it used, I will give it one more try before changing the pool, I had enough, dispite babysitting it I keep missing hours of mining.


Sadly it still crash/force close even more than it used to be

Edit: I confirm the new cgminer client just close randomly and after a short while for me, anything from 1s to 20min max

Thanks for the help, I'll try and search for my gpu config for cuda miner I'll tell you if it works in a sec

Yeah I have no issue with the wallet appart from that I didn't succed cpu mine with it, and I can use the commands no problem, also an easier way to launch the cmd directly from the daemon folder (shift + right click in the folder and you'll have a new command on the right click list to launch cmd )

Can anyone post a guide to how to solo mine with cudaminer on windows?

I've been trying to mine on my laptop with cudaminer for a while now without a success
Do I need to launch the wallet as server maxoind.exe --server ? (dont think the command is included)
my bat file has the following command is it right? or do I need to specify somethng else?

The error I'm getting is the following


I've changed port several times without a success...

there is the conf files that i'm using :


Thank you in advance for your help

I'm having the exact same issue, did you manage to solve it? can anyone help with this ?

Do I need to launch the wallet as a server? or just launch it as is? I also turned gen=0 (but even with gen=1) I coudn't mine on two different machines since I can't find nodes.

I also had this issue in the past with cudaminer but aftersearching for a couple of hours I gave up (since I only have an Nvidia card on my laptop)
When I used xptproxy to try ypool, it was mining, although it showed no shares of course (boo! and on xptproxy cmd it says algho unknown)

Thank you in advance for your help

Bitch-break......pet solution
if only you've bothered to read some of other people replies instead of having wrong assumptions (reading doesn't take much......)

the rest of your reply was also answered in that same post.

I am hiding under another handle and I'm not participating to any of the conversations and I said this before and a couple of times and I stated my reasons and One of this reasons is being demonstrated right now!, people moves easly from a respect based conversation based on arguments facts and numbers to insults and threats once they are out of arguments, also if I recall correctly I was called a liar just a few poste before what happened to that? And if you see me rising my ton a bit it is because I am well aware of the current situation and I'll leave it at that.



Exactly, and I think you were the first person to propose it If I remember correctly.

Lying ? I am on #catcoin-dev 24/7 (not nearly but 24/7! I keep it on even when I'm away so I don't miss a thing!) and I can post the chat logs + screen shots want me to do so? (so there is no room to say I lied. So are you going to call me a liar aswell now even if I provide the definitive prove than I am not the one lyng here ?

And what about sticking to the point and bringing some decent arguments against the proposed solutions you know the one that are outside your SMA solution. and how about counter aguing what I said before?

So this is your factual argument(s)? this is the demonstration you have, the numbers? the math? ressorting to insults and also do I hear some threatening in your words? third notice what? go ahead and show us what are you going to do.

No you are not. your acts =/= that picture poeple aren't that naif really, not even once you've considered KGW as a legitimate solution and discussed it properly, all I saw here, #catcoin-dev #catcoin-code ##catcoin whatever is one line SMA nothing else and reserver/concerners denials of KGW! and skillface proposed double SMA but it ended at that and fell free to prove me wrong!

As for the rest of your comment we are just repeating our selfs, I've answered that a couple of times I've even repeated my self again on the comment above/ previous page and here click here if you are lazy or don't know which one if you a real argument to add against KGW it would be nice to have it.


That's how 36SMA12 was supposed to converge, just instead of linear a linear evolution block to block you have exponential factors, and you are well informed on the current situation of 36SMA12 right now, I've been repeating this for a couple of time aswell, the simulation is great, BUT it has limited set of parameters while the real life conditions are different, and When we talk about simulations vs real life I know very well what I'm talking about.

So this is the level of conversation we are having right now?

Anti-KGW arguments so far:

-It's a black box, it's black magic!
It's even funny when you add the fact that these same people didn't bother to look it up before and I've posted everything to be able to have an objectif judgement about it, but anyway KGW is based on a single math formula that is applied dynamically, I've posted the formula behind it,And also the code behind it, so no it's not a blackbox

-But wait what does the numbers mean ? why 0.7084 or -1.228?
I provided an answer to this, those numbers are scientific constantes (thermodynamics and consmolgy) and obviously if you didn't figure it by now Kimoto seems to be inspired by fundamental physics in his work hence the gravity well, event horizon blackholes....., after testing the numbers they worked and were adopted, and wasn't you guys who were promoting arbitrary numbers such as 36 and 12% saying that the testing will judge these numbers ?


-Wait wait wait, but how can we be so sure that KGW will not bring issues to the coin ? this is a major concern and this is the reason why we can't proceed with KGW.
There are at least a dozen of coins that adopted KGW and almost every new coin is released with it, with a date of adaption vareying from 2 months + to a few hours/min and more to come of course as many coins are annouced with it, KGW proved to work perfectly without adding any issue to these coins!

-No it can't be our coin is very different than other coins, we have a very lonnnnnnnng 10min block target time so no it will not work for sure!
KGW worked for every coin with a block time ranging from 30s or 1/2min to 6min with every coin having unique set of parameters (number of coins, coins per block halfing time ...ect) KGW worked 100% of the time and perfectly, I also remind you that the difference between 30s or 0.5min and 6min is 12x and the difference between 6min is 10min is less than 1.667 so in our case the behaviour at 10min won't be any different than 6min (6 is very close to 10 in this scall 12x>>>>1.67).
If you use any extrapolation law and probability law, KGW will have around 90% rate of succeding AS IS and over 99.9% to work if the parametes are tweaked and adapted (this is just probability calculus and math is absolute)

-It can't be!? Aha gotya now! since all these coins will use this similar small piece of alghorithm it will mean that it will be a target for hackers
lol No! the whole altcoin system is based on copying bitcoin, 99% of code you see on other altcoin is copied from bitcoin/litecoin (except new algo PoW/PoS coins) which means that there is a huge chunk of code that is used by all the cryptocurrencies while KGW is just started to spread for the last month or two, so this assumption is stupid on it self.

-Nah all these devs are using this KGW because they are lazy and stupid and there is no merite to the solution!
Are fcking kidding me? we are starting to get to self denial zone here like the little kid who close his ears with his hands and start screaming I don't hear you and start yealling, well let me tell you: there are devs that understand code better than any of us, and can weight the merite of the solution better than any of us, these  devs that you call lazy, developped some innovative coins that uses new alghorithms altogether and new code (lazy huh?), and choose the KGW because it is by far the best solution available.

- KGW is just bandaid fix
lol! it's a fix that works end of story

-We don't want to consider it because we can't weight the issues it can bring in the future.
This is a legitimate concern but the answer to this was already given! KGW been used on some coins for over than 2 months now and it behaves as it supposed to be without briging any issue! longterm and in real life conditions! and if you were this wize to begin with we woudn't be having this discussing I believe, euh hint blockchain n°3 or n°4 and more to come? and not going to elaborate more on this because you know what I'm talking about and this is really no joke

-"I feel smart ! I can descredit this people by posting a joke"
Speaking of joke see last paragraph, I doubt we have the time to joke around with the current situation and I fear that some don't understand the responsability they have on their hand, let me just remind you that some people have invested dozens of thousands of €s on this coin what are you playing with right now is these guys money and I'm sure they aren't appreciating/won't appreaciate the current situation and some people will be held accountable for this, just saying.

-Why are you (and others who are supporting KGW) so obstinate about KGW?
No I'm not obstinate about it because I want this solution implemented over other solutions no matter what, this is totally wrong! I've posted and kept posting alternative possible solutions, but since these solutions and any other proposed solution are just a plain theory and not faced to all the real world variables we don't know for sure that they will work and how much they'll break before fixing something (aka look at current solution that was supposed to work and was tested on the testnet ( this is not to disregard the test net, and Thanks to the person who invested in a VPS for it) and had been simulated over and over again) this is the opposite of KGW, KGW is implemeted in real coins and it works! this why I believe it's the solution to solve the current critical situation and this is solution will give us the opportunity to work out our own solution with not stress and time constraint, and this is what I'm obstinated about, it to have a solid plan and proceed and steam steps as I've said before

-How about implementing Pheonixcoin solution ?
Why not? BUT like I said previously and it seems that you didn't bother to read, is that Pheonixcoin did not suffer from profitability a month before and only once or twice after their fork and during mid december (the coin wasn't tradable on cryptsy for a long periode of time which means and this was the reason the why profitability pools didn't push on it at all) so pheonixcoin = Bad example, their fix wasn't stressed to prove it works.
Also are you contradicting your own principales, euh weren't you saying "lazy copy solution no good" then now "pheonixcoin solution works we should implement that"  double standards much?!.

As you can see every single of your pseudo-arguments has been proven wrong. Hope this will help, and brings some enlightement to your way of proceeding and thinking, and I'm sure any reasonnable person will do and some of you are, but at the same time I'm sure there are one or two persons, with a huge inflated ego, (they'll recon themselves)  this will refuse categorically common sense and will keep doing the same little kid attitude of closing ears with hands and screaming "I DONT HEAR YOU"