Apakah fitur itu bisa memeriksa address lain yang tidak ditampilkan di wallet agan secara default tapi masih bisa diakses karena satu seed (beda derivation path)? Saya rasa fitur tersebut sangat berguna untuk memeriksa address-address di wallet agan layaknya Electrum dengan derivation pathnya daripada memastikan address yang agan salin itu benar punya agan. Bukan berarti ga bisa dipake untuk memeriksa address yang agan salin, tapi lebih keren aja kalau bisa mengecek derivation path.

Does this mean you mix some coins, transfer them back to your wallet, and then send some coins to Binance? They might flag them since your previous transactions are related to conjoin transactions. I recall reading something like this in the past, saying that Binance will check your previous 5 related transactions to see if they are "suspicious". So, as long as you use a new address from mixing your coins, the chance that they would detect your mixed coins would be smaller, albeit not impossible since everything is on the blockchain. It is also a good practice to never send back your mixed coins to your own wallet, and just use the new address/wallet entirely. CMIIW. Pretty sure any decent mixer would consider this when they built their platform.

If the worst comes to worst, using DEX would be a good idea to swap your BTC after doing some mixing. Or just drop centralized exchange entirely if you don't want to deal with their false flag regardless if you use a mixer or not. Improving your privacy practice would be a good idea too.

They can definitely collect any data related to mixers by doing something like using the mixer on their own to collect some addresses and so on. That being said, I don't see them being hacked or whatnot related to their ability to track/link coinjoin/mixer-related transactions.

Agan OP, ane rasa topik diskusinya bisa ditampung di thread diskusi saran yang di link oleh om Chikito di atas. Kalau masih ada rasa penasaran atau saran lanjutan bisa dipost di sana juga. Walau post terakhir di thread tersebut sudah lama banget, tapi thread tersebut masih bisa dipakai untuk mendiskusikan masalah tentang forum. Rata" member saat thread itu dibuat dan saat ini juga relatif sama (mungkin bertambah malah). Tentu saja ini hanya opini ane, kalau mau mendiskusikan lebih lanjut dengan moderator juga silakan saja.

Ane rasa masalah child-board ini tidak akan berubah dalam waktu dekat, mungkin malah kita yang perlu lebih kreatif dalam memperluas/mempersempit jenis topik yang bisa dibahas di masing" board kalau keaktifan user di local board merupakan masalah mendesak yang perlu diselesaikan ke depannya. Just my 2 cents.

Kalau agan exchange di pasar lokal, bukankah "hanya" 0,1% pajaknya per transaksi gan? Yakin itu exchangenya gak malak agan? Saya asumsi agan trading hanya beberapa juta/puluhan juta per bulannya, katakanlah 100 juta per bulan, maka pajak yang agan bayar adalah 1 juta (bener gak nih?). Kalau dibandingkan dengan pajak P2P online yang saat ini marak di pasaran, ane rasa masih jauh lebih murah karena tarifnya di situ besar sekali. Bukan berarti ane berharap pajak kripto jadi lebih besar, cuma saat ini ane rasa masih oke.

Mungkin lebih bagus kalau term yang dipakai bukan menghindari pajak gan, tapi membayar lebih murah atau kata lain yang serupa. 

I'd suggest using a multi-sig escrow if possible, and not relying on a third party to escrow your funds. Unlike fiat, you have other options to increase the chance that you get your funds after you finish your job, utilizing that feature would be a great idea. Especially after the recent collapse of many centralized platforms due to bad management, lying about their operations, etc.

Are you trying to translate some Bitcoin-related articles into Latin or something? Personally, I never see one myself (though the reason is probably that I read from English sources). Even on my local websites, most exchanges/news websites use English keywords to refer to technical terms such as blockchain, and mnemonic seed, while "wallet" or others are translated literally.

You might find better luck if you ask on Latin-speaking boards, or social media if those exist. That being said, is there a problem using those terms as long as you explain what the terms mean? I don't think they need to understand them perfectly. Since you're referring to older people, I also don't think you need to teach them about coinbase, UTXO, etc (I assume you just want them to know the basics to use Bitcoin).

If you're looking for short-term gain, the obvious answer would be the bull market. If you're looking for a long-term investment opportunity, I'd suggest looking for alternatives since the risk/opportunity ratio is quite skewed toward screwing you. Most of the time the tokens you farm are mintable, which means the rate of inflation is going to cut down your profit if there is any left for you. At least that's my experience with farming some tokens in BSC pools.

The risk is many. Smart contract hacks, scam pools, some weird exploits that get discovered when your token was locked, etc. Compared to other alternatives like mining or swing trading, I'd say that the uncertainty is higher in the sense that most of those factors are not under your control. Personally, I don't think a booming yield market is the only sign that the bull market is happening, but of course, you can use it as one of its signs since the market has changed a bit compared to the past. At the end of the day, it is highly speculative (more than swing trading I'd say), so I don't recommend it unless you're doing it for short term for whatever reason.

Sounds like they are suggesting the same thing. They might implicitly suggest that they use the same seed to generate many addresses on different networks, so as long as OP has it, he can still recover it (like what Trust Wallet or other multichain wallet works). However, it contradicts their support page. OP probably interact with somebody who doesn't really understand the difference between how their network works, or the support page is inaccurate, so that's that. CMIIW.

That being said, OP, by "nothing", did you mean you already add USDC (Tron) token and it does not show on your wallet, or did you just use the default tokens list and see nothing there?

I wouldn't be too hopeful even if the firmware upgrade addresses some issues. If you already use your wallet many times, the battery drain might be more severe than you think, so a firmware upgrade might not help that much. It is a piece of good news if they help the battery drain issue, but it won't reverse what your battery has gone through. Might be worth looking for an alternative if the battery is such a big deal for your needs.

I wonder if we can modify the device and build our own connection so that we can use other batteries to power the device, albeit the cost might be higher than I think.

Are you not in your bounty manager group? I recall seeing one or two guys asking about their payment yesterday. It is not a problem on your end, the network is just busy due to ordinals or something (check Twitter and you'll know what I mean) if you're not familiar with how BTC works. I suggest reading more about Bitcoin so you can understand it better and not expect every transaction will get confirmation after a few minutes. It has been confirmed just now, but next week don't be surprised if something similar happens again.

As for the wallet, I suggest using Electrum if you use Trust Wallet only for accepting Bitcoin for your sig campaign. It should be better from a privacy and security point-of-view, as long as you know what you're doing.

Obviously using the code would be the best choice, since it would prevent your last coins from being linked to you through other transactions. I mean, the feature is there for a reason, would be weird if it didn't solve any problem at all. I'd use them since it is not that difficult to keep track of the codes.

I believe it is just to improve the mixing process. In the end, you can choose whether you can use segwit to send your transaction or not if fees are your concern. Other than that I see no real reason to prefer one type of address over another as long as my privacy is still safe. CMIIW.

I checked your website and it seems like you only have a Binance guide for API setup for now. Would be a good idea to add guides for other exchanges as well, since some of them don't have a concise guide on how to set up a read-only API key. That being said though, nobody should rely on one guide published by a third party and try to check out their exchange themselves.

Is your UI design final btw? I don't know how or why but I feel like it is not modern enough these days. The color scheme also doesn't really suit my taste. Not sure if it is a personal preference or not, but it is probably a good idea to do a review campaign or something similar if you're planning to improve your app further.

To be fair, it is not explicitly mentioned that they 'support' BSC or other networks (at least on their GitHub page). Even though they can interact with BSC and other ETH forks, some of their code explicitly use ETH exchange/dex to fetch the name of the token. You can probably modify it and run it locally by modifying this part[1], though I'm not sure if there are other codes that need to be modified to make sure it will automatically fetch your BSC tokens. CMIIW.

[1] https://github.com/Migratooor/migratooor/blob/main/utils/tokenLists.tsx

Because people can innovate, they have their own motives (the majority are for-profit obviously), some believe the network is not suitable for their purpose etc. At the end of the day, no one can guarantee that the project will always go the way its creator intended, you can even see some forks here and there claiming to follow the original idea of satoshi but some details are quite different from what has been discussed on the whitepaper.

What is the alternative in your mind? You need to consider that the network is still in the early stages. No one would bother running software for no reason. You don't have to know the dev or be an insider, you can just download the program and run it on your own. Basically, you can mine it yourself. This way there will be competition and the distribution will be fair. At least it is fairer than producing 1 million coins out of nowhere and then sending 1 satoshi for each new user.

I don't get it. If you have no plan on trading Bitcoin or using it as a currency, why bother owning it in the first place? Wanting to own some BTC without learning any 'skill' or knowledge related to wallets at the very least sounds like a silly idea. It sounds like you want to ride in a car, but don't want to drive, don't want to hire somebody to drive for you, don't want to rent a car, etc. It sounds like wishful thinking if I get what you're trying to say correctly.

If this question is related to how you can get BTC without going through exchanges, as others have mentioned P2P is probably the alternative. If you don't want to interact with anyone else but get the BTC directly from the network then mining is the only choice, but it is unrealistic to do it without any capital. Hoping to mine without spending any dime is also silly since the network has grown so much compared to the early days. I believe trading or earning BTC, not through mining is still within what satoshi envisioned if that is what you're worried about. CMIIW.

I'd suggest waiting a bit more since it seems like the GPU price will drop because there is too much supply. I've been surfing PC-related forums and many reports also claim that GPU sales are decreasing because the price is too much for most buyers. This might be the 'correction' time for GPU pricing after the insane price hike over the last few years, which some people attributed to mining or the increase in the price of GPU parts. Whatever the reason is, buying a new GPU right now can be quite tricky. CMIIW.

It is also not a bad idea to prepare for the worst so you won't get wrecked by an unexpectedly long time of mining at a loss or something similar. Some people always expect the best thing to happen and then they fail to prepare a contingency plan which results in massive losses and affects their livelihood. Better safe than sorry.

If the project is premined, OP might be able to pay more reputable exchanges with some coins and BTC for example. Although that would probably discourage new miners to join the network since some coins are mined beforehand, and it is difficult to justify when there are other coins that they can mine. That being said, if the developer is known beforehand, I bet they can request tier 2/3 to list their coins even if they don't pre-mine any, although fees might still be a requirement. No one is gonna give you publicity for free after all. CMIIW.

I'd argue that building a platform like suggested above is the better choice. Money will come after people use it and more exchanges will definitely take a look at your coin if there is a demand for it.

This is very similar to https://drain-tokens.vercel.app if I'm not wrong. I'm not aware of other tools but I won't be surprised if this idea has been implemented on many projects. It is a cool idea and useful if you need to send many tokens to other addresses, whether you are at risk of being hacked or not. I won't trust any tool like this if it is a closed source. Fortunately, that doesn't seem to be the case for this one.

To be fair, any tool can be used by malicious actors to do malicious things. It is not exclusive to this tool. Considering the recent attacks don't even need to access the user seeds to transfer tokens, I doubt they will use this just to transfer some tokens. They can easily transfer those as long as the hacked address has enough ETH since they don't need to save fees. Some hackers probably use a bot to do stuff like this. At the end of the day, anything can happen, being cautious is never bad.

If you are asking whether investing in Bitcoin for the long term is good or not, I'd say that as long as you can take the risk it is worth it. While I believe Bitcoin will increase its value in the future, some people don't have the necessary capital or management to make sure they can avoid being destroyed by the bear market due to overinvesting or something similar. If that is what you're worried about, you can read more about dollar cost averaging or value cost averaging and make sure you follow your plan carefully. It is difficult to give you detailed suggestions since we don't know if you also invest in other things or just Bitcoin to prepare for your children's future IMO. The general rule is to make sure you can invest the amount you can afford to lose.

For security or inheritance setup, there are many good threads about it here. I suggest you search and read about them. You can find discussion on time-locked transactions, multi-sig setup for inheritance purposes, or even find some service that provides custody for inheritance purposes. Although the latter is probably not the best option if you want complete control and don't want to rely on a third party who might or may not hold your money and use it without your consent.

Are you familiar with hardware wallets, air-gapped devices, etc? Depending on how familiar or how eager you want to learn about them, your setup options can be flexible. CMIIW.

That is a good approach. If you're wondering whether Kiwi Browser is good or not, you can probably take a look at their code since they publish it on GitHub[1]. They are based on Chromium just like Chrome, and some alternatives like Yandex which supports extensions also based their code on Chromium. There is not many alternatives for Android browser with extension support other than Firefox afaik, so you can try them too since the extension is also available on Firefox.

Other than Firefox, most of them come from the same root at least. I don't know how reliable Kiwi is compared to other browsers, but it is definitely not the most popular. Not that it matters if it serve your purpose. That being said, if you're worried that your account might be compromised if you use another browser/extension, you can also create an alt account for mobile usage. Then use that account to browse the forum with the extension/browser shared here.

[1] https://github.com/kiwibrowser

I wonder why some users ask questions like this. I'm pretty sure I've seen a few threads asking whether they can mine BTC with their CPU/laptop before. Is there a trend on social media where people share how they mine Bitcoin with their phone or something? Sure, lucky/lottery mining exists but using a laptop is probably a bit overkill, especially if your device consumes a considerable amount of electricity. Might as well consider buying BTC regularly or look for other alternatives OP.