Hey gents!
I am interested in Elrond project and I want to buy some coins since I love POS coins. I have few questions: Is the staking working now or we must wait for the MainNet release? Also is there a guide about ERD staking i.e. how many coins you need to stake, how the staking works, etc..?
Thanks!
ERC20 (pre mainnet token), staking works: https://elrond.com/stake |
|
|
|
Tagged this user named Etar for intellectual dishonesty/trying to fool newbies. Do not forget this: Trust summary for Etar
This user recently woke up from a long period of inactivity.
I think yo do not understand what are you talking...
Clearly you're looking to fool people who don't, sadly for you I'm not one of them. Though the fact that you don't recognize that I do is odd... |
|
|
|
Many updates:- Added section Not recommended or outdated Wallets
- The following wallets were removed, i.e. added to the above list: Copay, Bitpay, Blockchain.info, Ledger HW.1, Ledger Unplugged
- Link to Bitcoin.org removed and replaced by direct link to wallet download
- Added Bitcoin Knots (Desktop)
- Added Wasabi (Desktop)
- Added Samourai (Android)
- Added Jaxx Liberty (Universal)
- GreenAddress updated.
- GreenBits renamed to BlockStream Green and updated
- Added LN section (WIP)
- Slightly modified the description of Armory: "Most secure option" is incorrect
- Extended credits to include other individuals
- v2 release
|
|
|
|
Surveillance and spying on another level. We are turning this place into quite the police-state.  |
|
|
|
The reality is they have a long queue of reports to sort out every day and don't have time/interest to read dumpster fire threads like this one will inevitably become.
How would you know this? Are you, or were you ever staff?  |
|
|
|
I reported this one as plagiarism. Most of the other ones seem to have some quotations around them or the source of the content. But this one is definitely plagiarism. Thanks. Sorry about that, removed the ones that have a link. "" marks are meaningless without attribution when the whole thing has been blatantly copy/pasted. Therefore all remaining posts (including the one you reported) are plagiarism. |
|
|
|
|
I propose we flag the OP of the project and tag him. Simple solution.
|
|
|
|
I have to agree with this. Trying to tie up someone's ban situation with a completely unrelated person's unban situation is not the way to handle this. You're making an apples and oranges comparison trying to put hacker's ICO bumping and regulus' plagiarism offense on two opposite sides of the coin.
(and please don't bring up hacker's plagiarism offense here as punishment has already been meted out for that.)
Wrong. We are comparing the right things. Actually we are comparing a lesser evil that got more punished than a bigger evil. What are you rambling about? |
|
|
|
But...
Back to work...
Please, CfB - do a real work AGAIN. I see, you trying to do, but ... I don't know, what STOPs YOU, I trying to support YOU AGAIN, for a REAL work, without ANY unnecessary discussion of shit...
I think, the TRUTH community support you (the admin of this thread), if you deciding to REALIZE IOTA as it feasible wisely...
Come-from-Beyond was always a degenerate scammer, e.g. his NXT bullshit. People did not want to listen, so there they have it. Whatever he starts next I will tag and flag as a scam as soon as I see it. |
|
|
|
Not the best way to advance your argument guys I'm afraid.
Not the best way to support double standards, lack of transparency and accountability either. The lack of these is very evident, but this is exactly how liberals turn everything into a pile of shit. The forum is mostly a circle-jerk from people who are afraid to do something about it. faucet hunter !
Dumbasses and monkeys everywhere. |
|
|
|
I was actually referring to the stance presented by tmfp
IF it was just that one post
IF he hasn't been ninja editing
IF he has support of the Croatian community
I wouldn't argue with leniency.
I was also not referring to you as being his friend considering I was referring yo you referring to others, not me! I am nobody's friend truly, as it costs 22mil BTC to be granted my friend status. Last time people were asking for an exemption (which included me), it was rejected. Let's see whether the staff will remain consistent or change their stance. and other posts you made in the thread RegulusHr opened. Maybe you changed your mind about RegulusHr. I think more transparency around why hacker for example was unbanned while others are not. I have changed my mind when I have seen what kind of evil they are willing to unban and let roam around here. There is no reason that somebody as RegulusHr then should not be granted an unban too. Transparency would help, but it does not seem that theymos or Cyrus are interested in transparency or accountability (interestingly enough). |
|
|
|
I would consider a permaban getting reduced to a 60 day ban to being unbanned.
It is not the same function. I would not consider unbanning someone to equivalent to supporting everything the person has ever done. I don't know why RegulusHr has not been unbanned. He appears to have a lot of friends in his local community, but I would not base a decision to urban, ban or not unban someone based on how many people are friends with the person.
People who agree that he is beneficial =/= friends. You are sounding like Quickseller with the above paragraph. Unfortunately, the admins rarely comment publicly on reasons for denials on those types of things.
Funny, isn't it? I would expect theymos to be pro transparency at least with some things. No problem to conclude: Bitcointalk.org condones ICO bumping I presume? Otherwise, the first step is to unban RegulusHr or ban hacker1001101001. |
|
|
|
If hacker1001101001's misdeeds were not apparent to the admins this time last year when he was unbanned, I cannot help that. They should have been. His misdeeds were highlighted four months ago, and the admins chose to not take action.
What makes you sure an admin banned him and not a global moderator? How about you stop wasting time defending evil individuals and go help somebody who needs it? You can thank me later. I may be mistaken, but I believe an administrator needs to unban someone if they will be unbanned. If this was not the case, I would think an admin would be aware of anyone unbanned. He did not get unbanned, his ban got reduced. There are only two options here: 1) Admin was unaware. 2) Admin was aware, and is a supported of ICO bumping, in other words the admin in question supports fraud. Pick your lesser evil. I guess my question to you, and to anyone else who supports hacker being banned is, what harm do you think hacker is causing the community today that is so dire that he must be prevented from ever posting again? I inquired above for evidence that hacker is currently (or very recently) engaged in continuing bump spam, and this might be a valid reason if shown to be true.
Either ban him forever, or unban actually contributing people too. Stop the forum double-standards, and stop indirect or direct support of them. Arguing for mr. hacker to remain unbanned is support of double standards. I can mathematically QED it if you need a drawing. |
|
|
|
Well, gotta love how your group is slowly dipping in negatives, you stand on a -4 yourself good to see you reviewed your rating.
Are you stupid? That is only what you see, not what other members see. Yeah lauda is only on -3 in negs Should have way more red Luckily I benefit from these negatives more than all those Turkish monkey combined, isn't it?  |
|
|
|
Well, gotta love how your group is slowly dipping in negatives, you stand on a -4 yourself good to see you reviewed your rating.
Are you stupid? That is only what you see, not what other members see. |
|
|
|
So are you claiming that you have been involved in a bumping service where dozens on accounts are involved in the service itself yet you only know your name? From what you have previously posted and expressed before it seems like you aren't willing to share their names because it would be "unethical" on your part, you cannot just simply take back some statements just for your own convenience. No, I don't consider this as some kind of torture and I think you should too since if your life and connections from these bumping service are really over I think this will be a good time to mention their names by now if you really have "discourage working of such services" .
For a thief it is unethical to disclose the names of his accomplices or his subordinates from his perspective. Evil protecting evil, nothing unusual. |
|
|
|
Just make sure you go to trust rating and put jolly's name with a tilde before along with his whole group, i see myself as green and you as neutral  . Do you need more kool-aid to disconnect yourself from reality? Almost all users of this forum see you in red.  |
|
|
|
I would also like to invite other DT members to examine facts posted in this topic.
Regular members and DT members are making this forum, not just moderators and creator, with all due respect.
Voice of the members must be heard.
Personally, I think that already many members expressed their opinion here and shared their disagreement with the decisions of the admins and the moderators. As you said, ''Regular members and DT members are making this forum, not just moderators and creator,'' but obviously admins and moderators don't want to listen and accept the opinions of forum members. -snip- You can PM some select DT members and kindly ask them to evaluate this situation. I highly doubt that any of them are going to disagree with my or the views of others supporting the unbanning of OP. |
|
|
|
maybe I should just let jolly reply once because he might have a different perception of deleting a comment
I think he will agree, but yes you can wait. , but thanks a lot for the replies and fun discussion that went in middle of it lol
Florida, Alabama, rednecks. Pick your source of online fun.  Locals probably know more. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
