Quoted to show images (newbies can't post images).

Hi there, nice job.
So your bot support bittrex? Bitrex only or also other exchanges? Any trial version, vouch copy?  (I'm not interested, just asking as i'm pretty sure a lot of people will ask the same thing).

BTW: You price seems pretty high (if only for bittrex).
For same amount we can get (i'm not gonna mention it by name) bot together with access to telegram group with lot of experienced traders and full support from developer (aslo experienced trader). You might want to reconsider pricing or add more features (specify level of you support etc.)

Do not make new thread, just move this one (link at bottom left).
BTW I agree with above post.

EDIT: i see its too late (you broke forum rules). You can try to delete this entire topic or at least lock it.

Agree with the guidelines (or some basic requirements) option  ... relevant ICO should provide enough information, detailed plan, targets, milestones, risk mitigation ... like it's done in regular business. On the other hand a good investor should recognize good ICO ( but also should be able to accept the risk ).

I think the main mistake is that ICO investors are (in vast majority) "not well educated, business untouched people" (in other words just greedy dumbs).

But what i'm afraid of is when gov. would approve some ICO and it would fail. Then majority of investors would sue gov. for that  ... so why to undertake such risk ... much easier to ban them all.
I'm not saying it's right. It's just the easiest way.

I'm going to be rude but IMO it's mainly because of "stupid investors" putting their money in doubtful ICO's which "suprisingly" collapses.
Then they go and inform authorities demanding to help with getting their money back. (instead of accepting they made a bad decision and silently move forward).
Great paradox is when the ICO is actually successful, a lot of people would try to hide the profit from gov. (to avoid taxes) ... but when something goes wrong (please gov. help me ... it's you job to protect me ).

What else can governments do when courts are flooded with such complains? They have to react somehow and this is the only option (alternative would be BAN "stupid investors" from holding significant amount of money    ... but that's impossible/unacceptable ).

I'm a great example. Invested in Mycelium crowdsale ... bad move.
But am I complaining? NO (at least not to authorities). It was MY OWN MISTAKE and nobody forced me to. So I can (have to) live with that.

Why are you telling him to break rules (make double post)?

@OP: You'd better to follow the bottom left link "move topic" and move it.
And BTW welcome to crypto world.

Ok. Then 1KvDZSJeairGaa8D7oHPjPwc3hv8ngZeqw is not your address (it's your HASHNEST DEPOSIT ADDRESS ).

If you can't see any balance after those deposits you should definitely contact support.

Hasn't been your account hacked? Check your withdrawal history.

Which wallet you are using?  (You might need to rescan database)

https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/address/1KvDZSJeairGaa8D7oHPjPwc3hv8ngZeqw  Balance 0.35894409 BTC

And what is the actual problem?
Unspent output just means it's ready to be send (spend). Your address holds those 0.35894409 BTC at the moment.

Yeah, I think it was at 11:16 when I log in and found these already sold ( 16 minutes  ). Obviously it's still a very hot stuff.

Why not to buy some moonlanders2? Seems to be more efficient and are home-mining friendly.

One thing I'll never understand is why the hell would anybody send BTCs first. Directly to "new" account without escrow  You have learned a lesson (quite expensive one).

Are you sure the passport is his and valid? I kind doubt the scammer would reveal his identity and then just disappear. But you can try to hunt him.
You should make a scam accusation thread in this board (watch the proper format, read stickies). And I think posting your bounty (which is not small) in Ukrainian language board could bring some results as well.

BTW It's against the forum rules to show his IDs here. Only allowed space for such docs. is investigations board.

I hope you'll get your BTC back or the scammer gets what he deserves.

When you are paying via CC it's comfortable. No doubt.

BUT

You should see it also from the service provider perspective.

- CC payments can be easily cancelled/reversed. This is something e-shops have to count with (taking some sort of risk)
- service provider (e-shop) pay fees (or charge them to you) for accepting CC payments. (im not sure. This is just my assumption. But I doubt the CC payment processing is free service)

VS

- BTC transaction (once confirmed) can't be reversed
- it's open source so anybody with coding skills can make his own BTC payment processor. Or can use third party software (which might charge some fee as well).

Some other features:
- have you ever made an international bank transfer? If so you probably notice it took few days and you have been charged additional fees (int. bank transfer fee, convert currency fee etc.)
- anonymity. If you take the care your transactions can be completely anonymous )
- it's peer-to-peer (no third party which can arbitrarily cancel your transaction just because they think you are dealing with some bad person etc.)

In this case it's very high indeed.
But thing is you would pay similar fee when transferring eg. 100+ BTC In other words less amount you transfer the fee percentage rises. Which makes BTC not suitable to transfer small amount.

Is this still on?  All 3 prize money in OP are strikethrough.


Would be great to lock the thread or update the OP (in better way then just strikethrough the text) to show it's over.

Hi, I think there is nothing to worry about. Replaceable means the transaction is not yet confirmed and sender (you) can re-send it again with higher fee.
But you should see note: "balance: 0 BTC (+ amount you send)" at bottom of your new electrum wallet.

1 sat/B is very, very small fee
Two days ago I sent 25 sat/B tx and it took almost 2 days to confirm.

But mempool is quite small at the moment (comparing to last few days) 20k unconfirmed txs is not so much so I think your tx could be eventually confirmed, but it will take days (3-4).
I doubt you can speed the transaction with accelerators ( due to very small fee), but if you had sent tx as replaceable you can raise to fee.

OMG, HYIP master trying to lure some victims again.

Ok, so they sent you 10% of your deposit and that makes you confident it's good investment? Hmm, how trustworthy   
Thank you (for being so generous and sharing this super "project") but NO and now GTFO.

Interesting prices. Are you willing to use escrow? Sending PM.

No. There should be no difference in what wallet you have used so far. In principle all are same. You need private key to be able to send coins from corresponding address. But apparently starts to be complicated when more private key formats are being used.
I start to feel there has to be issue with coinomi when importing WIF format (but I have not heard about any so far ... you are the first).


This is where the error is IMO.
After hitting the "next" button appears a message about amount and fee (in my case). So if you did not see message there is something wrong with private key. As Erre pointed the scan might not worked properly ( but I would expect some warning/error message in such case )
Have you tried the manual enter ( or copy paste text)?

I would expect this ending up with some sort of "unknown key format" message. Incidentally I'm going to sweep some BCH soon as well. Will let you know how it should work step by step.

EDIT:

1 - Go to balance tab. Hit the options. Sweep wallet.
2 - Enter prv. key (scan or paste)
3- Hit next.
4- You should see message About amount which will be transacted and how much is the fee.
5- Confirm.

That's it.I just did it with exported key from electrum and works fine ( waiting confirmation right now).


 

I think he is sweeping. Thus there should be tx.
@OP - Before actual confirmation of the sweep you should get message about how many BCH going to be sweeped in. Have you seen such message?