Hahahahahahahaha This is obviously fake. If they were showing a real screenshot of the platform do you think it would show 300 comments?

This is pure scam for idiots.


Plus look at the OPs account, he registered in 2013 and never posted a thing till this year. A pure scammer who has set up loads of sock puppet accounts so he can look legit later. Priceless hehe

Awesome! The price is starting to move at last too.

I'm not sure there is any maths involved. I can't understand for the life of me why anyone would bother being negative on a thread here unless the developer had personally wronged you or lied etc. There are so many coins here obviously scams, you would take all day to go around pissing acid on all of them. My conclusion would have to be you like the project and want a lid on the price or you are a lonely sad old dick who can't get a girl to kiss you. Which is it?

The word on the street is when you appear its a very bullish sign.

I understand. But sometimes you just got to go with your gut when you know something is great and wait. I wish I had done that SIA which I knew in my gut was going to explode but I didn't have the patience and sold out a week or so before it shot up. They are talking about testing some apps on slack so I think things will change very soon.


What I like about this project is there is a real economy in there. As they make more and more apps and uses the demand for the token will increase. It's wrong to say something can't fail but this one almost can't. Haha Also crypto was almost made for loyalty and rewards, it's amazing there aren't any real competition in this space.

I've put quite a bit into Coval. it's a sleeper that almost no one is watching but is an incredibly innovative project that will very soon release apps and will no doubt pop in price. Research.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1594565.0

Surprised there isn't more interest in this project. After researching it a bit it seems one of the more likely ones to succeed. Maybe once the team have a working example people will understand it?

Thanks for the reply I didn't expect the actual developer to reply. It's an interesting project but I'm wondering when we can actually see a working example of the platform? A white paper would be nice too.

BTW I recommend some marketing, it was only by chance I saw this one from another thread.

Anyone have an opinion on Coval. After a long time away from crypto I'm looking for a decent project that isn't just artificial hype but has a real economy. Seems to be a reboot of Ribbet rewards? Right? Or some thing else?

Specifically want to know who the developer is, his reputation etc.


http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/circuits-of-value/

Believe it or not Daniel I'm not an asshole. I don't like the way you weren't willing to hold onto your principles and balls in terms of handing the lucrative side of Paykey which WAS developed on getgems and getgems community time and investment over to the very banks Bitcoin was meant to oppose. And I didnt like the way you decided not to engage with this opinion but instead act like a twerp....My opinion on this is unlikely to change. And you did in my mind blowing the opportunity of playing a big part of taking Bitcoin mainstream.

BUT I recognise getgems is starting to gain some traction and I hope at least you don't lose focus on it....

Of course it is.....People here will get that at some point but by then they would of realised they have been played...

Bottom line, a lot of belief in expanding user base is based on Daniels post of 10,000 new users in 30 days. now if come 30 days from then, around Christmas he can't show another 10,000 or even 5,000 were added we know the figures are a head fake from getting buffalo audience to download the app....and there IS NO organic growth to get excited about.


Btw you are delusional about Paykey downloads being bullish.....it hasn't even broken 100 downloads.....even shitcoins on here get more wallets than that downloaded at the beginning.

How exactly does one manipulate a coin with less than 1 btc vol?

If the price is so friken awesome right now why is no one buying?

Clearly the GETGEMS team have been asleep at the wheel when it comes to getgems app development.....they seem pretty eager to push PayKey with banks out the door though to beat competitors.....shame they couldn't of felt the same about gems investors.

Call me cynical but the really difficult things have not actually been done and have been procrastinated about since the beggining if this year. Paykey seems even to be a simple taking of getgems coin sending and sticking it on a google keyboard. Every development so far has been built on someone else's work ie Telegram and Counterparty. The only real complex promises are the airdrop that takes some effort to build an algorithm and stops any cheating......still waiting and of course AE which we are saying is delayed but I'm guessing is not ready for prime time after more than a year of being announced.


What I think has happened is Daniel and his team made promises first and then just hoped he could pull off his promises at a later date by winging it.    

You're desperate and insane. Wanna post a screenshot of me saying I'm hacked......silly boy.

Hahha well your call of a dump, a 3 btc dump and the timing of you posting now almost guaratees you were the manipulator. Do what you want......free market.

Well I'm not suggesting the blockchain can be broken. What I'm asking is how will banks try to corrupt things?

I mean Ethereum had Goldman Sachs employees involved but more worrying is ether doesnt have a fixed amount which in my mind misses the point of bitcoin. Plus there are probably ways banks could create a layer on Bitcoin and get involved with fractional reserve banking etc. My hunch is they will simply make a 'Bitcoin' bank account which is really a derivative of Bitcoin......will the masses know any different?

i was listening to Jim Willie the other day, he doesn't know much about Bitcoin but he did say the banks will want "join it, infiltrate it, alter it and corrupt it"......before it gains any legitimacy.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sldUugfArNc&feature=youtu.be


So the question is what are the banks doing to do this if true. I personally see Etheruem as potentially a bank infiltration, I'm seeing getgems project infiltrated by Citi bank so am wondering how the banks are now or will attack Bitcoin. people like Blythe masters getting involved is another sign of intent. She was involved in Goldman Sachs in the area of deriveratives and manipulation of the gold market....now she has been given 30 million to go start a blockchain company......it can't have good intentions.

Completely inaccurate, there will be no bank connection or btc with gems version....there is no plans for it.

I can see that some here have at the back of their minds that if the team get rich in fiat they will somehow boost the value of gems by buying the sell wall or something. This is a very shitcoin sleazy viewpoint and also isn't very likely. Or even they legitimately use money made to fund further an app that is struggling and not making money.....again not very likely.