Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 03:33:47 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ... 84 »
181  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Scam/Loss Prevention on: March 05, 2014, 02:36:59 AM
When a system is corrupted from top to bottom, the only thing it can be done to improve security is to replace the whole system.
182  Other / Meta / Re: Questions to theymos about the $1,000,000 forum software project on: March 04, 2014, 05:42:42 PM
Really, you are one of the only people who aren't providing any sort of critical feedback, you are just complaining.

Do not really matter what criticism is made, Michael will ignore anyway.

Quote
Goat is complaining too, but he at least isn't complaining for no reason, he wants basic answers.

So do I. What is the problem with the questions I made? Do you have a problem with that?

Quote
I tend to trust people that have proven themselves in the past, so I am indeed giving Theymos the benefit of the doubt on this one.

Michael's past background is not the best example of trust and integrity.

Quote
I dont think hes incompetent, I just think that it would be better if he addressed the serious questions, and ignored you. I dont think hes stealing the forum money, because he could have just taken it all and since he is technically the forum "owner" and the forum is not a registered nonprofit, he could probably legally take it all.

You are still looking for excuses to cover up charity fraud...

Quote
Like I said in my previous post, I dont think Theymos is in this for the money anymore, because either he has plenty, or he thinks he can make more by operating the site legitimately. No one ever goes against self interest.

Not "anymore"? So he was before?
183  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Obligatory I'm not dead or running post on: March 04, 2014, 02:14:50 PM
I'm guessing not. But just as a comparison, did anyone here verify the CEO of PayPal's government ID before they opened a PayPal account?

That is not necessary because Paypal is a registered legal entity. Anyone can verify that before open a Paypal account. Anyway, I am certain that Paypal's CEO had to provide his ID at the time he founded his company. Meanwhile, you think John K is a real person because you were spoon fed to believe this.

I have no reason to believe it's fake, mainly because John was dealing with tens of thousands of BTC at a time just months ago. It doesn't make sense to take the small payout.

How do you know that?
184  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Obligatory I'm not dead or running post on: March 04, 2014, 01:36:17 PM
It was posted earlier in the thread:
https://www.facebook.com/TheJohnKoh

OK, let's try again:

Did anyone verified the above profile matches the real John's government ID? I mean, did anyone got a copy of John's government ID and compared with above profile?
185  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Most trustworthy forum members for multi-sig address on: March 04, 2014, 01:33:03 PM
I verified the script @ http://coinb.in/multisig/

The script just need 2 signatures from 3 public keys.

I must say that I am not satisfied with that. If my signature is an option than I cannot support your effort. Therefore I cannot vouch for you until my signature is fully required.
186  Other / Meta / Re: Questions to theymos about the $1,000,000 forum software project on: March 04, 2014, 12:56:42 PM
Of course there are going to be the idiots that wont listen to reason, but he can ignore them.

Let me explain:



The only idiots here are you and others providing all sorts of excuses and justifications to cover up the administration incompetence.
187  Economy / Securities / Re: [Active Mining] The UNofficial Active Mining Discussion Thread [UNmoderated] on: March 02, 2014, 07:33:47 PM
It is worth mentioning that this question was asked to Ken in the official thread, with no response.

I assume no bitcoins on MtGox either Ken?
+1, i just want to ask the same question

There was an indirect answer for that:

this may be way off topic but it reads very similar to a certain CEO of a certain company that we are all invested in, especially in regards to PR:

EXCLUSIVE: Charlie Shrem Speaks Out About Mt. Gox...

Quote
Shrem believes the company should have, long ago, hired an agency to handle its PR, but it didn’t, because Karpeles didn’t want anyone to know Mt. Gox’s inner workings (read: didn’t want anyone to know what a dire mess it was in).

Except we aren't in a dire mess.

I am still amazed at the delusional people in the moderated threat pretending that everything is fine.

Weekly Update 2/26/2014

We have hired a really good lawyer for the MSD problem.  I am out west working with our Project Manager working with our vendors to move our projects into high gear.  Expect good news in March. 

Active Mining Staff
188  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Most trustworthy forum members for multi-sig address on: March 02, 2014, 05:00:14 PM
I am the person you are looking for. Please,  PM for more details.
189  Other / Meta / Re: Questions to theymos about the $1,000,000 forum software project on: March 02, 2014, 12:11:38 AM
He is pretty busy and he has been given a lot of power that he is using the best he can; as far as I understand he probably made a huge mistake with the 350,000$ (was it really 350,000$ when he paid or is it 350,000$ at today's price??) and he doesn't recognise it, maybe he will when it is crystal clear that it was a mistake; the rest of the money is here so it can still be used well

Yeah, d00d, he is pretty busy scratching his balls while the whole forum becomes a den of fraudsters and opportunists. His last amazing achievement was to allow newbies post freely whatever and wherever they want. This was a slap in the face of the moderators and staff which were already overloaded by the influx of meaningless information (a.k.a. spam, trolling, advertising, etc.). I am sure he is more busy looking at fluffy boobs in the university campus where he attend rather than take care of the forum he should administrate.
190  Other / Meta / Re: Questions to theymos about the $1,000,000 forum software project on: March 01, 2014, 08:34:01 PM
I understand your point but in that case how did doge grow so quickly? They grew so quickly because they getting extremely positive news articles when bitcoin was being mascaraed by the press. I think that what we need right now is a combination of both.

Distribution of forum funds for the mere purpose to cause a hype will lead to the press scrutinize where the money is coming from. Then the press will know how Michael provided support to fraudsters like BFL and Tradefortress. The good news will become bad news. I will be more than glad to explain to journalists how I was duped in a charity fraud perpetrated by the forum administration.
191  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Crowdfunding of a professional analysis of Mark's body language. on: March 01, 2014, 05:45:04 PM
ROFL!
192  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official Thread: AMT on: March 01, 2014, 05:30:50 PM
Everyone, just relax.

You all are going to have your "miners" in two weeks®!


193  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why Bitcoin is doomed to fail, and there's nothing you can do about it. on: February 28, 2014, 10:58:40 PM
LMAO bitcoin to the moon. Hey new users one of the largest exchange just stole everyones money and is bankrupt wouldn't love to accept Bitcoin.

They didn't steal it, they lost it due to incompetence.

http://cryptolife.net/today-mt-gox-died-and-it-tried-to-take-bitcoin-with-it/

 Roll Eyes

...and you believe in every word which is spoon fed to you? LoL

Just let me remind you that in the whole Bitcoin history there is not one single entity which provided evidence to prove they lost users funds to incompetence.

The "it was hacked" excuse became the standard excuse to cover up misappropriation of customers funds.
194  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Has Bitcoin Foundation done anything to help with recent developments? on: February 28, 2014, 10:36:20 PM
To understand what is the Bitcoin Foundation you have to understand where it come from. The idea of a foundation for the Bitcoin software came originally from Gavin Andresen, the core developer which was trusted by Satoshi Nakamoto to look after the Bitcoin open source code. On 25th October  2011 he proposed the idea for the first time:

Bitcoin is revolutionary because it is decentralized, with no single point of control or failure.

However, over the last six months or so it has become obvious to me that the rest of the world isn't set up to interact with a radically decentralized system like Bitcoin, and I think forming a not-for-profit organization will be a positive step towards Bitcoin's long-term success.

I'm posting this to see if there is a consensus on what a Bitcoin Foundation should be.

To get the conversation started, here are some functions I think a Bitcoin Foundation could perform:

  • Interact with the legal system, where a centralized entity is needed: for example, to hold the Bitcoin trademark, own/control the bitcoin.org domain name, etc.
  • Act as a central library for accurate information about Bitcoin, so journalists and policymakers have an 'official' place to learn about Bitcoin.
  • Collect donations to fund infrastructure necessary for Bitcoin's growth (organize regular developers' conferences or get-togethers maybe? pay for development of cross-implementation testing tools? pay core developers' salaries? create a certification/testing program for Bitcoin implementations? create a central clearinghouse for information about legal issues surrounding Bitcoin across the world?)

Other not-for-profit organizations that could be emulated:

  • The Anti-Phishing Working Group (the APWG's chairman, David Jevans http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Jevans, is willing to help make a Bitcoin Foundation happen).
  • The Tor Project
  • The Apache Software Foundation

Are there others that work well, or are there examples of what NOT to do? Assuming there is rough consensus that a Bitcoin Foundation is a good idea, I would like to get something imperfect up and running quickly, with the expectation that it will evolve over time.

After almost one whole year, on 27th September 2012, Gavin Andresen announced the formation of the Bitcoin Foundation:

Quote
I'm pleased to announce the launch of the Bitcoin Foundation:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=113400.0

Quote
Bitcoin Foundation standardizes, protects and promotes the use of Bitcoin cryptographic money for the benefit of users worldwide.
https://www.bitcoinfoundation.org/

The Bitcoin Foundation is modeled on the Linux Foundation. I think Linux is a great "role model" for Bitcoin; it is a very successful open source project that really embraced the notion of "open," encouraging the use of the core technology for a wide range of applications.

I hope that the Bitcoin Foundation will help do the same for Bitcoin.

Of course, "the Foundation" won't do anything at all-- people get things done. I want the Bitcoin Foundation to be an open, member-driven organization, and hope that you or your organization will not only become a member but will help the Foundation accomplish its mission.

Please visit the Foundation website for details, and please keep in mind that nothing is set in stone; the structure of the Foundation can be changed by a vote of its members, and exactly what the Foundation does will largely depend on who is willing to step up do the work to make things happen.

To any of you feel like you should have been invited to be part of the group who defined the initial structure and purpose of the Foundation: I apologize. But in my experience the larger the group, the longer it takes to get things done, and it has been 11 months since I first posted about the possibility of forming a Foundation.

In what will doubtless be an ineffective attempt to fend off the trolls, here are some answers to what I expect might be commonly asked questions:

Q: Is this the infamous September Announcement?

Yes.

Q: How do we know you won't just take our bitcoins and run?

We won't. The initial Foundation board members are all people with well established reputations using their real names.

Q: How do we know you won't lose our bitcoins to hackers?

We'll be using a cold wallet, with the private key securely backed up, for most of the Foundation's funds; in the near future I expect we'll be using a multisignature cold wallet, with keys controlled by multiple Board members to keep the funds even more secure.

Q: Is this just a front for the CIA? What is the hidden agenda?

No. And there is none.

Q: The Foundation is a corporation, and corporations (especially US corporations) are evil.

OK. So don't join-- go form your own non-corporate non-evil organization, or just ignore the Foundation and do whatever you think is right.

Q: How, exactly, is the Foundation going to spend the money it gets?

That depends on how many bitcoins it gets from memberships and donations. See Peter's "Letter from the Executive Director" for the current list of priorities, and see the Linux Foundation website for an idea of the types of things I hope the Bitcoin Foundation will be doing, assuming it has the funds.


Finally, thanks to Peter Vessenes, Patrick Murck, Mark Karpeles, Charlie Shrem, Jon Matonis and Roger Ver who stepped up and did the work necessary to get this started.

I advise anyone new to this forum to read the next threads from the begin to the end to have a better understanding what was the real purpose of the foundation. Once you understand that, you are going to be able to compare your understanding with the present situation and observe what was achieved and what was not achieved:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=49841.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=113400.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=113842.0
195  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official Thread: AMT on: February 27, 2014, 11:08:46 PM
nice try nothing. the point is, if you don't click through you would not have found that out.


Whut?

Do not babble, d00d.
196  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official Thread: AMT on: February 27, 2014, 11:05:03 PM
Here is what we DO know.
They have a registration in Delaware (incorporation)

No, they have not. ...and no, you do not know what are you talking about. Please, look at the final seconds of this video:

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1dmug0_outside-amt-building-casiriahmine_news

You see the sign? It reads: "Advanced Mining Technology, Inc".


https://i.imgur.com/SD4zOui.jpg


LoL

Nice try, but no, AMT is certainly not "Advanced Mining Technology, Inc". That company was registered in "07/18/1983":

197  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official Thread: AMT on: February 27, 2014, 10:41:50 PM
Here is what we DO know.
They have a registration in Delaware (incorporation)

No, they have not. ...and no, you do not know what are you talking about. Please, look at the final seconds of this video:

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1dmug0_outside-amt-building-casiriahmine_news

You see the sign? It reads: "Advanced Mining Technology, Inc".
198  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official Thread: AMT on: February 27, 2014, 05:43:07 PM
@newbies:

What the hell are you talking about, isn't AMT registered in Delaware?

Is 5341525 not their Delaware registration?

No, AMT did not admitted they are registered in Delaware. They could be misrepresenting that company. Until AMT comes here and say in clear words they are that entity, this is just an assumption.

Why the hell are all these folks in Bitcointalk want to play detective or vigilante??

A couple of guys want to start a business selling mining hardware that is sourced from Europe.   

Everything checks out.  They've delivered miners before source from technobit.   They are delivering new miners sourced from Bitmine.   These chips are real as evidenced by other parties.   Bitmine is real as evidence by delivery of their chips to multiple sources.   Bitmine has endorsed AMT, says so in their website and youtube video.

Can anoyone explain all this B.S. sleuthing?

BFL also "checks out" in the begin of their business, so your rant is just meaningless.

Curious,  do you think Bitmine.ch is also fraudulent?  They've been equally as sloppy as AMT.   

Nice attempt to divert the focus of the discussion when you realize you do not know what are you babbling about.

Please, look this:

https://i.imgur.com/xvGtJHO.jpg

There is a stick where I read "Advanced Mining Technology, INC"

https://i.imgur.com/U3P1NSY.jpg

There is a sign where I read "Advanced Mining Technology, INC"



There is a paragraph where I read "Advanced Mining Technology INC"



There is an invoice where I read "Advanced Mining Technology INC"

So, this is not just a mistake. AMT is deliberately using the name of an already registered company which they certainly do not own.
199  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official Thread: AMT on: February 26, 2014, 09:52:56 PM
OMG, you are indeed the douchebag of the year. Assuming C0Kez3R0 is telling the truth, who the fuck are you to lecture about his personal decisions? ROFL.

If it is true... that is even worse. (He is the one throwing his "personal decisions" at me/us.)

He is the one who said, "I clearly need to learn to make better decisions"..."might not get married..." (Shocker! Intentions of post? Sympathy/begging.)

Then he asked for "help" from "us"... (Money, advice?) He did not ask AMT anything. They already contacted him, multiple times. What help would you be doing... Go there, build it, and pack it for AMT to deliver it to him faster... Go pick it up yourself, and deliver it to him personally?

I offered him advice. Not going to give him money. Tough love is help... Reality check is help... Giving to moochers is not help... Moochers who blow rent on 80GHs miners and 1.2THs miners, then beg for more money (help). Oh, and LIE.

He didn't come back, the fourth time... for help with the miner. He has been told when it will ship. He was told not to use the forum to ask about his specific delivery again. (Told to contact them directly.)

He is begging for someone to give him money, or buy it from him, or whatever. (That is unclear) He isn't asking for a refund. (That is clear.)

Want more advice.. Mine TEKcoin solo with your 80GHs miner that you already have delivered... You will make a ton more than mining BTC.

Going back to turning my quarters into rings, to sell on ebay for $5.00 each... until the video is posted and my miner is delivered. Tongue Enjoy the silence.

Whatever... You are still the douchebag of the year.
200  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official Thread: AMT on: February 26, 2014, 04:39:33 PM
I agree with "I clearly need to learn to make better decisions"...

So.... how exactly were you going to pay for power and rent and food... if the miners were delivered a month ago? You would still have burned through all that, and more... and even more, until you broke-even...

If she marries you... she is getting scammed... by you. You just admitted you are a freeloader with real poor judgement and absolutely no ability to make economical decisions. Might want to move back home, until you can afford to live alone... You can't afford you... you can't afford her... you can't afford to operate a miner... you surely can't afford an accidental kid (or the birth-control that would prevent that from happening)... and you DEMAND sympathy from us, in addition to AMT, for your poor judgement.

Sorry... Can't find it in my soul to contribute to a professed lost cause. (Hey I am bankrupt, owe everyone, can't handle money, can you lend me a dollar and correct my errors for me, I have better things to do, like find others to loaf off-of... There are still a few more relatives in my family.)

Sounds like your miner is already owed to your parents, and your GF's parents, and your landlord. Might want to give it to them. They obviously have money, and know how to manage it. Well, maybe not, if they loaned you some.

You are either a liar, or all of the above is true... In any event, "I" have no sympathy for you. So your plea for "me"/"us" to help you is falling on deaf ears here. Only replying, since you asked for "us" to help.

I will offer this free tip/help... Stop buying crap you can't afford, and stop leeching off others. Let the girl go... You will just drag her down with you.

Best way for "us" to truly help you, is by NOT helping you. Since your idea of help is "us do it for you".

LoL

You are so moronic...

Are you admitting AMT miners are crap? I would agree with you.

ROFL.

PS: OMG, you are indeed the douchebag of the year. Assuming C0Kez3R0 is telling the truth, who the fuck are you to lecture about his personal decisions? ROFL.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ... 84 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!