Bitcoin Forum
May 03, 2024, 03:17:50 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 [60] 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 »
1181  Other / Politics & Society / Re: The Fascists That Surround You on: November 30, 2012, 07:11:08 PM
http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/mussolini-fascism.asp

Quote
Benito Mussolini:
What is Fascism, 1932

Benito Mussolini (1883-1945) over the course of his lifetime went from Socialism - he was editor of Avanti, a socialist newspaper - to the leadership of a new political movement called "fascism" [after "fasces", the symbol of bound sticks used a totem of power in ancient Rome].



It thus repudiates the doctrine of Pacifism -- born of a renunciation of the struggle and an act of cowardice in the face of sacrifice. War alone brings up to its highest tension all human energy and puts the stamp of nobility upon the peoples who have courage to meet it.

The Fascist accepts life and loves it, knowing nothing of and despising suicide: he rather conceives of life as duty and struggle and conquest, but above all for others -- those who are at hand and those who are far distant, contemporaries, and those who will come after

Fascism, now and always, believes in holiness and in heroism; that is to say, in actions influenced by no economic motive, direct or indirect. And if the economic conception of history be denied, according to which theory men are no more than puppets, carried to and fro by the waves of chance, while the real directing forces are quite out of their control, it follows that the existence of an unchangeable and unchanging class-war is also denied - the natural progeny of the economic conception of history.

Fascism denies that the majority, by the simple fact that it is a majority, can direct human society; it denies that numbers alone can govern by means of a periodical consultation, and it affirms the immutable, beneficial, and fruitful inequality of mankind, which can never be permanently leveled through the mere operation of a mechanical process such as universal suffrage.

The foundation of Fascism is the conception of the State, its character, its duty, and its aim. Fascism conceives of the State as an absolute, in comparison with which all individuals or groups are relative, only to be conceived of in their relation to the State.

The Fascist State organizes the nation, but leaves a sufficient margin of liberty to the individual; the latter is deprived of all useless and possibly harmful freedom, but retains what is essential; the deciding power in this question cannot be the individual, but the State alone.

Fascism is the doctrine best adapted to represent the tendencies and the aspirations of a people, like the people of Italy, who are rising again after many centuries of abasement and foreign servitude. If every age has its own characteristic doctrine, there are a thousand signs which point to Fascism as the characteristic doctrine of our time. For if a doctrine must be a living thing, this is proved by the fact that Fascism has created a living faith; and that this faith is very powerful in the minds of men is demonstrated by those who have suffered and died for it.



http://www.buzzle.com/articles/treatment-for-sociopath.html

Quote
Sociopathy is an advanced form of Antisocial Personality Disorder, wherein a person's emotional and physical behavior, perception, and regards towards others, can prove to be damaging to the society. A sociopath doesn't feel emotions, and therefore, can never understand interpersonal relationships. There is a lack of feelings like attachment, respect, remorse, guilt, etc., there is lack of judgment between the right and the wrong; and there is lack of understanding that there is something wrong in them. Yes, a sociopath would never admit, in fact, never realize that they have a disorder. On the contrary, he or she would blame you for all the wrongdoings that have occurred in your life. It is your actions that resulted in what they did, so you are the one to be blamed, not them.
1182  Other / Politics & Society / Re: The Fascists That Surround You on: November 30, 2012, 06:22:04 PM
Fascism:Sociopaths::Garden:Roses.

You did not explained how the relation of a garden with a plant is an appropriate analogy for the relation of a political regime with a psychological disorder.

1183  Other / Politics & Society / Re: The Fascists That Surround You on: November 30, 2012, 06:08:28 PM
Then why are you in this thread, if you're not interested in the subject?

No, it is a reason. I care for textual definitions. You are producing a false relation between two different definitions.
1184  Other / Politics & Society / Re: The Fascists That Surround You on: November 30, 2012, 05:54:52 PM
Anyone who's made it through the second video should find this thread throughly amusing so far.

I did not even watched the first video and I find you very pathetic.
Arguing from an admitted position of ignorance is not a good idea.

I was not arguing, I was calling him pathetic. He did not made any argument. I am not interested to guess what is his argument.
1185  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Corporal Punishment (Re: Our response to Dmytri Kleiner's misunderstanding of money on: November 30, 2012, 05:51:27 PM
This psychologist debunks the myth of human nature:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPKo7XbUZ-8

The human nature is not a myth. Your statement is false. The Youtube video is rather irrelevant.
1186  Other / Politics & Society / Re: The Fascists That Surround You on: November 30, 2012, 05:41:43 PM
Anyone who's made it through the second video should find this thread throughly amusing so far.

I did not even watched the first video and I find you very pathetic.
1187  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Usagi: falsifying NAVs, manipulating share prices and misleading investors. on: November 30, 2012, 04:40:13 PM
False? Where is it false. One of the steps of fraud is a false statement.

Yes, false accusation.

Second step if there any motive: usagi did it for profit.
Third step if there are any victims: there are.
Fourth step if there any cover up: usagi tried to wipe all of his statements.

There was no motive. There was no victim. There was no cover up.

You accusation is false.

You see - I am right and you're wrong. Get lost.

You are delusional.
1188  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Usagi: falsifying NAVs, manipulating share prices and misleading investors. on: November 30, 2012, 04:35:24 PM
The many threads on this board from which usagi has deleted 1000+ posts are the evidence.

You are admitting there is evidence in the lack of evidence. This persistent refusal will not change the facts. Usagi has already explained how he calculated the NAVs. Usagi even accepted a few suggestions that were made to improve his calculations. If he was falsifying the NAVs of his companies, there was enough time for any user to verify the data available. That did not happen. No scammer tag was issued. Usagi was not falsifying the NAV of his companies.

I know usagi falsified NAVs because I read the discussions between usagi and many other forum members. Did you?

You are certain that Usagi falsified numeric results because you read the discussion between two parties. In other words, you did not verified the evidence, you just read about the evidence. This demonstrate you are making an accusation based on mere allegations, without any substantial material to prove you are correct.

Because you are not even willing or able to interpret the contract between BMF and CPA and agree or disagree that it was violated.

I have already read that contract many times when this thread was started. Usagi has already explained that contract was made null. No shareholder came forward to settle a dispute. No violation happened. A scammer tag was not issued. Usagi was not defrauding his shareholders.

Which BTW was the point where I completely stopped taking you seriously. You can be proud of that, because not many people have achieved this.

You have no point. You pretend there is evidence when there is no evidence. You are delusional.

Yes, I am accusing usagi.

You see, this is called answering questions. An ability you and usagi seem to lack.

Your accusation is false.
1189  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Usagi: falsifying NAVs, manipulating share prices and misleading investors. on: November 30, 2012, 03:55:40 PM
Dude, you are absolutely clueless and you have no idea wtf was going on and is going on.
Please, strop trolling this thread. Your hysterical rants add no value to this discussion.

So, explain to me, what is 'going on'?
1190  Other / Politics & Society / Re: The Fascists That Surround You - Part 1 on: November 30, 2012, 03:43:40 PM
Roll Eyes Who the fuck are you to make demands?

Who are you to demand me to watch a video against my will if I do not agree with your implication?

Look at the presented material or don't but in any case I'm not going to hand feed it to you just because you're acting like a scary Internet bully.

Are you already frightened?

If you don't care about the video content there's no reason for you to post in this thread.

No, it is a reason. I care for textual definitions. You are producing a false relation between two different definitions.
1191  Other / Politics & Society / Re: The Fascists That Surround You - Part 1 on: November 30, 2012, 03:14:32 PM
So, where is the explanation followed by conclusive evidence?
In the videos you didn't watch, and in the listed sources you didn't read.

You made this thread. I could care less for the video content. The description you made in the original post imply that sociopaths are fascists (or fascists are sociopaths). I am challenging you to explain what relates a political regime to a psychological disorder.
1192  Other / Politics & Society / Re: The Fascists That Surround You - Part 1 on: November 30, 2012, 02:55:30 PM
Fascism:Sociopaths::Garden:Roses.

So, where is the explanation followed by conclusive evidence?
1193  Other / Politics & Society / Re: The Fascists That Surround You - Part 1 on: November 30, 2012, 02:04:05 PM
http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/sociopath?q=sociopath

Quote
Definition of sociopath
noun
a person with a personality disorder manifesting itself in extreme antisocial attitudes and behaviour.

http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/fascism?q=fascism

Quote
Definition of fascism
noun
[mass noun]
an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization.
(in general use) extreme right-wing, authoritarian, or intolerant views or practices:
this is yet another example of health fascism in action
The term Fascism was first used of the totalitarian right-wing nationalist regime of Mussolini in Italy (1922–43); the regimes of the Nazis in Germany and Franco in Spain were also Fascist. Fascism tends to include a belief in the supremacy of one national or ethnic group, a contempt for democracy, an insistence on obedience to a powerful leader, and a strong demagogic approach
1194  Other / Politics & Society / Re: The Fascists That Surround You - Part 1 on: November 30, 2012, 01:59:26 PM
These two videos discuss the prevalence of sociopaths in society, how they disguise themselves, and the lengths they'll go to in order to avoid detection.

The Fascists That Surround You - Part 1
The Fascists That Surround You - Part 2: Sociopaths

What fascism have anything to do with sociopaths?
1195  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Crypto New Message? on: November 30, 2012, 01:40:32 PM
If you are a customer with funds held by Kenseycol PTY LTD, you can immediately start to demand your funds back. It is important to produce evidence for further actions against Kenseycol PTY LTD. Any amount of money, including Bitcoin, can be reclaimed in accordance with your terms.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=126552.msg1364595#msg1364595
1196  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Usagi: falsifying NAVs, manipulating share prices and misleading investors. on: November 30, 2012, 01:32:17 PM
and have instead decided to blow a simple mistake in wording way out of proportion. At no time was there ever an intent to deceive because the actual formula was shown in immediately readable form on the spreadsheet.

You agree that it was one mistake. Let's see that any of your investors would like a refund due to your mistake.

So does you.

Quote
For fraud check the statement #1 which you avoided. AVG and MAX are two different functions. That's fraud.

Why did you made that? Why did you made false accusations against Usagi?
1197  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Usagi: falsifying NAVs, manipulating share prices and misleading investors. on: November 30, 2012, 01:28:42 PM
First part is easy: I state that you falsified NAVs, among other fraudulent activities with your toy companies.

Based on which evidence? How do you know that Usagi falsified the NAVs? What data you analysed to determine the intention of fraud?

WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE?

About the second part: If you insist. Can you ask theymos to restore your 1000+ deleted posts and put your companies websites back online, so we can show you the evidence again?

"We"? Who is "we"?

In the above quote you are sure that your accusation is supported by evidence, but you NEVER even spot the evidence? In other words, you PRETEND that your accusation is supported by EVIDENCE which you EXPECT to find in the deleted posts. You are accusing Usagi of something because you think you will find the evidence to prove it, when you should have the evidence BEFORE the accusation! This indicate that you are intentionally producing this accusations to defame Usagi.
1198  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Usagi: falsifying NAVs, manipulating share prices and misleading investors. on: November 30, 2012, 12:44:38 AM
No, that is not the definition of fraud. That is the definition of mistake.

If it was a mistake then usagi needs to refund everyone. If he didn't then it's fraud.

Yes, indeed. So, do you know if Usagi refunded 'everyone'? Do you know what agreements he made to correct this mistake? There is any user of this forum claiming for a refund?
1199  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Usagi: falsifying NAVs, manipulating share prices and misleading investors. on: November 30, 2012, 12:20:12 AM
For fraud check the statement #1 which you avoided. AVG and MAX are two different functions. That's fraud.

No, that is not the definition of fraud. That is the definition of mistake.

Statement #2 is about lying, not fraud. Though I wonder what would a judge think about a person who issued illegal securities using a false identity. Usagi deleted his statements shortly after this thread.

You ask to me prove any of your statements was wrong. I proved that your second statement was wrong with simple reasoning. Just because Usagi identified himself with different aliases it not means he was intentionally producing false statements. Further speculation over what a judge would possible think about does not prove your statement is right.
1200  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Usagi: falsifying NAVs, manipulating share prices and misleading investors. on: November 29, 2012, 11:47:47 PM
@augustocroppo

False? Read the #2 post of this thread. Prove me that any of my statements are wrong.


Well I was preparing some documentation, and I didn't have enough time to prepare.. But since puppet posted, I'll release my accusation of usagi's lies:

Exhibit
 
I wrote several books, including highschool textbooks and some free books on Go on the internet using my real name. Take a second look at that link. I make it blatantly clear I do not care who knows my "real name". I am who I am. And I have nothing to hide. I used usagi and my name interchangably all the time on KGS (a go server). I created the advanced study room in 2006 using these names.

Thank you for your support,
 
Serena

Identifies himself as Oliver in the first post, but constantly signs with Serena. One of the above is a lie.

Just because Usagi present himself with different aliases does not mean he is willful lying (even less committing fraud). Therefore your second statement is wrong.

http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/lie--2

Quote
Definition of lie
noun
an intentionally false statement:
Pages: « 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 [60] 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!