That reminds me..
I bought 50 USBs from Friedcat directly before I started ordering from WTCR.
Here is my e-mail, which he never replied to:
"I ordered 50 USB Miners from you back in June when they were 2BTC/each.
I would like to take advantage of the promotion of 0.1BTC/each for new ones, based on that order of 50."
No reply back..
feels like I'm getting some cat shit on me too..
The promotion was for previous orders at the 0.99/0.89 price point. 2BTC orders were not included. |
|
|
|
Hello, I have problem.  Who can help me? I have mining rig hardware: - 4x XFX7950 FX-795A-TDJC
- ASUS SABERTOOTH 990FXR2.0 motherboard
- 8GB RAM
- CPU AMD FX8320 8x Cores 3.51 Ghz
- PSU Lepa 1600W
Software: - Windows 7 SP1 x64
- AMD Radeo HD drivers 13.4 x64
- AMD SDK 2.7 x64
- CGMINER 3.3.1
My cgminer.conf "api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1",
"api-listen" : true,
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "120",
"failover-only" : true,
"hotplug" : "5",
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin",
"log" : "5",
"no-submit-stale" : true,
"queue" : "1",
"rotate" : "10",
"scan-time" : "30",
"scrypt" : true,
"shares" : "0",
"auto-fan" : true,
"gpu-threads" : "1",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"gpu-engine" : "0-1025",
"gpu-fan" : "0-100",
"gpu-platform" : "0",
"gpu-memclock" : "1250",
"gpu-memdiff" : "0",
"gpu-powertune" : "0",
"gpu-vddc" : "1.087",
"intensity" : "20",
"temp-target" : "75",
"temp-overheat" : "88",
"temp-cutoff" : "95",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"vectors" : "1",
"worksize" : "256",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"shaders" : "2048",
"thread-concurrency" : "21712",
"no-pool-disable" : true
With this configuration 3x GPU cards running stable. But when I connect 4 card and run cgminer works very bad and turnoff motherboard. But PSU still running. Who can help me with this problem? Maybe not impossible run rig with 4x GPU's? Maybe my configuration is wrong? Or I forget something to install? Than you in advance, TDS Your motherboard can't deliver enough current. Get pci-e risers with power connectors to connect directly to the PSU. |
|
|
|
I love the speculation, to buy... to sell... to win but I'd rather lose as little as possible.  . I do not want me to run out my money because then the fun stops. Who do you trust in? > cypherdoc > adamstgBit > S3052 > some of you ............. Don't forget you can use leverage to increase your profit, a feature well developed on some of the different platforms and exchanges. Emphasis added. I don't think your suggestion is compatible with his requirements. @OP Don't trust S3052's public updates. He occasionally offers free reports that lead a herd of sheep to slaughter, but from what I understand he is good to his subscribers. adamstgBit plays cheerleader at times but has a sound grasp on the fundamentals and usually can read current market conditions decently. Cypherdoc will mostly just be a uberbull publicly. His newsletter teaches an interesting methodology that is applicable to other markets. This methodology is primarily useful for long term trading. |
|
|
|
so if p2pool.info is underreporting the pool hashrate, doesn't that mean it's over estimating our luck?
It isn't underreporting. It is using a smoother moving average that reacts less to temporary jumps and dips in hashrate. |
|
|
|
If you could see his newsletter, you would know that he only covers bitcoin on very large time scales, whereas you cover shorter term trading opportunities. You have different target audiences.
We are covering all time scales from the longest term to the shortest term. I think the next steps are clear and I leave the pitch to Goomboo. Then he must have changed things in the last few months because when I was a subscriber up until March he strongly advised against trading anything shorter than the weekly cycle in Bitcoin. Anyway, to the topic, potential bearish cross upcoming on the 4 hour for 10/21, potential bullish cross upcoming on the 30 minute. Other timeframes are mid trend. |
|
|
|
thanks, notme.
I agree that is was over-reacting by starting to do similar things that I criticize. I got too emotional and this is always wrong. It's not an excuse but there are people fully / partially living from the analysis and this is why it is business and not a hobby.
We keep our thread focused on content, and if someone wants to do a notification thread it should go somewhere else as you suggested.
The funny part is any perceived "competition" between you and Cypherdoc is in your head. If you could see his newsletter, you would know that he only covers bitcoin on very large time scales, whereas you cover shorter term trading opportunities. You have different target audiences. |
|
|
|
ok
This is my last comment about cypherdocs's practices in this thread. As of then, I will tackle this differently and not drag "innocent" readers into it.
My only point is that it is not required to bump threads with the "excuse" that subscribers need this alert. They get the analysis for his services by email and this is very instant. By the way, bitcoinbullbear does the same and none of of our subscribers have ever complained about that we need to bump threads to alert them. I am just asking for fairness, because the thread bumping creates a lot of awareness and if this is not stopped, we might need to do the same, but being customer focused and loving this forum, I really do not want to do it. Perhaps the moderators can add a pure notification section and move his thread there, because obviously he admitted that it is for this purpose only. His thread does not belong into the speculation thread. Do you see my point at least a little bit?
Goomboo: sorry for this. I like your thread and it is great to keep discussing those moving average crossed which we also follow many of them in our analysis.
I understand your arguments, but I don't agree at all that he does anything different than what you do. Let me take a look at the last page of your thread: weekly newsletter is out to subscribers
bitcoin :-)
We have two updates for you
1. The special summer promotion for the bitcoin, stock market, precious metal, etc. forecasts is still open until August 19 (3 days left).
Use code: bbbsummer for six weeks free with a 3 month (+) subscription on https://digitalcurrencyresearch.com/
Also, we will soon add a new market as a surprise.
2. The poll is reset if you want to express your opinion about bitcoin prices direction.
have a great BitDay Looks like notifications and service updates to me. I also don't agree that email is infallible and especially not instant. Messages get hung up all the time. Also, some people have setups that download mail every X minutes and when an update is released they can trigger a manual download to fetch it right away.... if they know it has been sent out. However, I do agree this isn't the place for this discussion, but you had to go and do this: if I read this well, this model does not outperform buy and hold: only +643%
our newsletter has fared better :-) (had to throw this in :-))
You have done this type of advertising in several threads lately, and have the balls to simultaneously start a fight with Cypherdoc in his own thread because you think him bumping it once a day (you already go the moderators to limit him to that) "creates a lot of awareness". You are a hypocrite. I could however get on board with a separate notifications section where your thread, his thread, and others could go. If his thread doesn't belong here, neither does yours. Sorry Goomboo, et al. |
|
|
|
I don't know about that. With a flurry of news articles on the horizon about the end of bitcoin I think we'll see another frenzy of dumping which could take bitcoin to levels
lol, just buy back dude... +1 A flurry of news articles does nothing but bring new people in. It doesn't matter if it is positive news or negative news. At this stage news -> curiosity. And when the curious do some research, the smart ones see the beauty and buy. |
|
|
|
The market making mechanism is to build a reserve and deal with short term supply and demand volatility, for long term change in supply and demand, those delay at banking will not affect dealer too much
I'm not talking about supply/demand volatility. I'm talking about supply/demand imbalance within a particular country. Some countries will be net importers of Bitcoin. Some countries will be exporters. Fiat (or some commodity money or good I suppose) will have to be used to settle up the difference. |
|
|
|
if I read this well, this model does not outperform buy and hold: only +643%
our newsletter has fared better :-) (had to throw this in :-))
If your newsletter is so great, why do you need to advertize everywhere in every topics ? Stop spamming and make your newsletter public during 2 weeks, people will choose on real results. Not to mention bitching and moaning in threads for other newsletters. S3052 has been acting sleazy lately. Sorry for that. That was not my intent. But as you can see in this specific thread, there are lots if people complaining about the bumps. Another one just minutes ago . I stay out of this as of now. It is an issue for the moderators and I am focusing on analysis and forecasts. There is about one complaint a month except when you stir up a shitstorm. Then the peanut gallery chimes in because you and Cyperdoc's back and forth keeps the thread at the top. |
|
|
|
if I read this well, this model does not outperform buy and hold: only +643%
our newsletter has fared better :-) (had to throw this in :-))
If your newsletter is so great, why do you need to advertize everywhere in every topics ? Stop spamming and make your newsletter public during 2 weeks, people will choose on real results. Not to mention bitching and moaning in threads for other newsletters. S3052 has been acting sleazy lately. |
|
|
|
Mtgox need to offer Ripple as a cash in/out method like BitStamp.. this will entice people holding MtGoxUSD to hold onto them (as ripple assets) instead of exchanging for BTC and withdrawing.
Then users can trade their MtGoxUSD freely with other ripple assets, including BitStamp directly.. If MtGox are really having reserve problems this could extend their game a little longer.. but also allow liquid trading of GoxUSD and better arbitrage opportunities.
Mtgox were probably hesitant to adopt Ripple because they had such a dominating market share and didn't need too.. but that is quickly disappearing.
There are regulatory issues with issuing tradeable USD denominated IOUs. MtGox used to provide codes that allowed that before Ripple existed, but they shut it down because they have enough legal headaches as it is. Bitstamp is asking for trouble. Just look at how things turned out for Liberty Reserve. |
|
|
|
Interesting chart. It appears that the Bitcoin hashing network is the most powerful distributed supercomputer on the planet by far...
yes, absolutely. but very dumb supercomputer indeed. edit: well, not dumb. just not a supercomputer but a "dedicated solver" we roll dice REALLY well. world's largest and/or fastest psuedorandom number generater? <256 bits every 10 minutes isn't exactly quick (you can't count the leading 0s since they are predetermined) every hash is a psuedo-random number regardless if it is used or not. at least in my opinion. People here tend to focus on what we are doing and not what else could be done. Largest maybe, but certainly not the fastest. Sure, but the reason block hashes are used is because they are verifiable. For instance you can run a lottery and determine the winner based on the hash of block #X. I supposed feeding the lower bits of your mining share hashes into your entropy pool would be useful, but most people have no need for that much entropy. If they do have a need, they are better off with a hardware RNG. |
|
|
|
If each country have 6-10 large bitcoin dealers advertising their buy/sell order on localbitcoins.com, each of them have an order depth of 1000 coins, then people could move away from traditional exchanges and be independant of international bank transfers
It's very easy to setup a buy order ladder since everyone have fiat money, but it is more difficult to build up a sell order ladder since that will require huge amount of coins
Unless supply = demand in each and every country, international transfers will still need to happen. The localbitcoins.com could use an automated market making system to adjust the bid and ask price for the largest 6-10 dealers' order For example, if the demand for bitcoin is too high (Too much coins were bought from those dealers in a short time frame), they will automatically raise the bid/ask price for those large dealers, thus reduce the demand for coins. If the sell pressure is too high, they will lower the bid and ask price for those large dealers, thus increase the buying support. How much to raise or lower is the question here, it should provide low slippage but still enough flexibility Sure, but if prices get out of whack people will start importing bitcoins from other countries and exporting their fiat to keep prices in sync. Doing this in a decentralized nature will still likely be way easier than a handful of major institutions attempting to move millions of dollars in 4-5 figure increments. |
|
|
|
If each country have 6-10 large bitcoin dealers advertising their buy/sell order on localbitcoins.com, each of them have an order depth of 1000 coins, then people could move away from traditional exchanges and be independant of international bank transfers
It's very easy to setup a buy order ladder since everyone have fiat money, but it is more difficult to build up a sell order ladder since that will require huge amount of coins
Unless supply = demand in each and every country, international transfers will still need to happen. |
|
|
|
...
Largest maybe, but certainly not the fastest.
<256 bits every 10 minutes isn't exactly quick (you can't count the leading 0s since they are predetermined)
that's now interesting... can you elaborate it? <256 bits every 10 minutes isn't exactly quick (you can't count the leading 0s since they are predetermined)
The block hash is what is used as a pseudorandom source for some applications. |
|
|
|
No date, no number for the Executive Order... I call B.S. |
|
|
|
A friend of mine lost his 5 coins by having this android app and now he's spooked. Told him to play it safe and get a trezor for his computer.
Any idea when Trezor will be released? I can't find a date anywhere. |
|
|
|
Keep in mind the court was in TEXAS. Surely they love the federal government.
I'm not sure if you are familiar with Texas? I'm not sure if you are familiar with sarcasm? |
|
|
|
Interesting chart. It appears that the Bitcoin hashing network is the most powerful distributed supercomputer on the planet by far...
yes, absolutely. but very dumb supercomputer indeed. edit: well, not dumb. just not a supercomputer but a "dedicated solver" we roll dice REALLY well. world's largest and/or fastest psuedorandom number generater? Largest maybe, but certainly not the fastest. <256 bits every 10 minutes isn't exactly quick (you can't count the leading 0s since they are predetermined) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
