You do realize that less than 430 million people here speak Hindi as their mother tongue, right? Most of them and the rest the country can't even read the language. So, what's the use of writing in Hindi?

And if you are feeling that generous, why don't you go ahead and write the guide down in the 1600 odd languages we have here... including the ones that the Siddi people speak.

Forget about warranty. You won't get International warranty here. India is not on Earth so most companies nullify the international warranty in our realm.

And if you add the product to the cart, they will show you an estimated quote for tax and shipping. Sometimes, like the last 2 times I bought something from them, the customs people were extra greedy and I had to shell out 2 - 3k extra as duty overcharge when taking the delivery.



Better to buy & ship it through parcel forwarders, I use PPObox. They offer transit insurance as well.

It seems like you are the one who understands very little about the implications of blockchain.

Let me dumb it down for everyone.

Bitcoin = More money syphoned from the mainstream economy into an untraceable and un-taxable system. = Bad for business.

Like it or not, India has made a business out of governance. They are taxing people to death. Now offcourse, I understand that the death for tax incidence in that link was an exception and not a rule, but you get the message. Taxes are high here. And this is a business. Bitcoin or any crypto, HURTS that business.


Now blockchain.

Think of it like a really advanced ledger system, the likes of which didn't exist before. They did come close in some instances like the one I talked about here : _{How close did they get to Blockchain before it's 'invention'?}

In our country, cases of duping the system has always existed, for instance, Electronic Voting Machine (EVM) tampering, duplicate bank accounts, duplicate pan cards, multiple ration cards, multiple ID proofs in different state etc etc.. all of it can be quelled directly with the decentralized integration of a blockchain like system.

Was that dumb enough for everyone?

In each of your last 6 posts, you have mentioned Hexorr. It does not take a new Einstien to see through what you're trying to do here.

You mean to say we will get a 'just' resolution to the whole Bitcoin issue? That too from a corrupted body?

Just look at how they are handling the Aadhaar issue since 2014. Its been 4 years since the debacle started and yet they haven't reached a conclusion on whether the -clearly intrusive and privacy-busting, Aadhaar system is unconstitutional or not.

Gomment hi nahi, adaalat bhi bik gayi hai mere bhai.

Anyone can get any number of views on any thread on this forum. There's a neat old trick to it. And no, it does not corresponds to the actual number of visitors or readers you get on that post.


Appreciate the kind words. Don't hesitate to bookmark this thread.

This is why newbie jail was such a good thing.

Just because your post was not merit worthy doesn't mean that you are a bad person.
If theymos really cares to improve this place, then he'll hire just enough mods to get this done.
The forum can afford this. (Economically as well as practically).

20 merits for 25 posts for heroes? That's absurd!
And it's going to be even harder for lower ranks if not impossible.

I do not think that would be a good idea.

Yup. Normally I do not join campaigns with token payments but IOST is special. It has Binance support along with a few other exchanges.
And just to emphasize on the impact of this campaign 6500 IOST is now worth $340 which was $150 at the start.

Categories could be there. But it could be a soft jail. As in you still get to post out of this place but with maybe a day of wait time between posts.


Agreed with inactivity issue. Users could get their merit decayed with long periods of inactivity. But that is a different thing that does not require the existence of Merit Jail.

Time based merit expiration would really burn out the newbies and the mods pretty soon.

Maybe it should be like get xx amount of merit per rank before you get to post outside this board with normalcy.

Remember we used to have newbie jail?
Why not make a Merit jail as well?
If you do not get a certain amount of merit, you will not be allowed to post 'normally' outside of that board or not at all maybe.
We can do this for each rank and not just newbies. Might also need to make the admins of that board become the defacto merit sources. Their job would be to exclusively asard merit to decent posts within that board.

What do you guys think?

I do a lot of things. Shit posting ain't one of them. And if I only posted to earn, my post counts wouldn't be so high. I started regularly participating in campaigns since December 2017

Anyways, this isn't about me, or whatever it is that you think of me.
I'm aware of the wrong doings of OP. I do not condone it and I even think a temp ban could serve him well. But I'm one of those guys who thinks even thieves are human beings and capable of change (in the long run) and should be given a fair chance to make ammends.


Bullshit.



And a colorful racist too. Just like a few elite people here on this thread. But the guy does have an eye to spot scams / shitposts and in general shittery. So if he hands anyone a report, that is well deserved.

PS I don't care if he and Lauda or someone else are joined at the hips. As long as he does not misuse his power or misjudge people, I'm fine.

Oye! chance for retribution eh? Hit me up on Tele.

Do you see your name in the following quote which was made after your application?



Since your name isn't there, you weren't picked. Word of advice, kindly refrain from asking redundant questions, it would only make it hard for you to enter in ANY campaign.

Case in point, OP resorts to threats rather than understanding the context. Squiggled out when asked to escrow funds for his job. So if you're smart AVOID working with OP.

PS: @OP You just earned yourself a rightful spot on my ignore list. TC

Since you have a less than stellar history when in comes to dealing with people, how about setting up an escrow for this task first? Hey, I'll even be the escrow for this task for free. But feel free to choose anyone trustworthy.

Bottomline, OP's arrant trust history raises a lot of flags, please make sure you have your funds secured/escrowed before you start working for him.

Good luck

Quoting that section for posterity.


Get off your high horse mate, yes the lad made a blunderbust of himself but everyone makes a mistake or two and I mean EVERYONE. And everyone is redeemable. 

@OP
Stick around the forum if you care about your identity. With time, the right behaviour, honesty and perhaps an extension of an olive branch from the pharmacy at some point in the future may be enough to get you your account standing back.
All that or just wait till the pharmacy goes bankrupt and makes a mistake of his own.

Let this be a lesson though for everyone, stop shitposting on this forum with alts.

Yes, I said pharmacy.

So what do you think I have been hinting at all along?


I thought your point was to be as coy as possible while telling me how puny my business brain is.. No? Okay.


This is news to me. I find it hard to believe that they raised so much money for an Indian exchange, that too, for an exchange that only dealt with Bitcoins initially. Sadly there is no way to authenticate such claims and no one cares enough.
This is one of their public crowd-funding rounds : https://bnktothefuture.com/pitches/coinsecure Even there they did not cross the million mark. And this was when they were well established and quite popular already.
However, since I am not affiliated with them or anything, who knows what's been cooking behind the closed doors.

Instead of advocating about how potent my business knowledge is why don't you find out how the company was funded and how much of personal money Mohit Kalra and Samuel poured into the startup. And they barely raised a few crores in each of their seed funding rounds - both public and private. FYI, 1 crore = $154000

Now my information might be outdated and may be incorrect. But my comment about them funding this out of their own pocket is stemming from a simple fact, Benson's own admission of having poured in a few crores of his own savings into Bitcoin early on.
I'm simply saying that even if the company doesn't have enough funds in their coffer to refund every customer, the founders themselves can fund it all from their own pockets.


Nope, not aware. Care to share the source of this information?