Those bunch of people really needs signature campaigns in expectation to get accepted by first come first serve without even reading the whole thread and considering the rank of OP and its trust.
Apply first. Research later. Withdraw if fishy. That's the way I (and most sig renters) roll. RefYou're doing a good job at informing people. Keep it up. Just tone down the attitude. Everyone wants to earn money, its a basic necessity mate. You can't sit on your high horse and judge people for doing what they can (with honesty) to earn and fill their pockets.
|
|
|
May i ask if the payment is thru tokens or eth/btc?
Only Mfc erc20 tokens (Speaking from experience) Anyone who's interested in working with Andrew should : > Have their payments escrowed!> Make sure you share exactly what they tell you to share. Because apparently they have dumb investors who don't understand the difference between an external link / self promotion. > Never do overtime - your dedication and efforts will not be appreciated. > NEVER fall for Andrew's persuation for you to find investors. He'd rather pay you nothing for whatever work you do than anything. (He pays in peanuts anyways) To everyone else : Good Luck
|
|
|
Bitcointalk, I’m seeking a currency for integration within an upcoming sci-fi mmorpg in the classic roguelike genre. The currency in question should have some sort of desktop API that works with C and is generally liquid. Let ke know if you have any suggestions! Thanks! The Equal (EQL) community is very interested in integrating their token with a game. They are even doing their new wallet which is in beta right now and I believe they have an API system of sorts that can tie up into your in-game economy. Word of advice - stay away from Ionomy, Respawn or any other "masternode" coin.
|
|
|
So are you proposing to work for tokens itself?
|
|
|
You should have made this a self-moderated thread. I would recommend you to lock this one and start a new one. Now why would I do that? I like the way the conversation has opened up with so many people responding. Could be a mixture of both, projects nowadays are plenty and so are the offers and ideas
Investors give not more than 4 minutes of attention to any project that approaches them.
From my personal experience, this is the most inaccurate thing said so far.
|
|
|
I tried this free token maker to deploy the tokens for SurajCoinHow many of you have known about this service or have known any other instances where this was used this to create any tokens?
|
|
|
Generally speaking if you have upto a hundred thousand bucks to invest in a crypto project.
How likely is it that you would be an early investor for that project? As compared to just lending out the money to that project and expecting a return?
I've been a small investor in the past at any one instance where my investment in a project has never crossed the $1500 mark, however, I assume the mentality changes when you're gambling with deeper pockets.
I am in the process of raising funds for a couple different projects one of which is personal, I find that the outlook of investors has changed a lot from the mid-2017 era. They are much more conservative and much more cautious. And this is despite the fact that comparatively the condition of the crypto market wasn't very "stable" in mid 2017 yet investors were more adventurous.
Or am I just approaching the wrong people, especially those that have suffered some kind of losses in the January 2018 price swings?
|
|
|
What makes you different from the other bounty managers? What you are offering is the generic management services offered by every other novice around. What positive contributions do you bring to the forum using your management service? (That if you care about the forum's abuse from the bounty hunters)
My payment is $ 100. This is much lower .... You misunderstood his point. But why you? Let's say I will charge $100 too. Or lets say even Yahoo will charge the same. What set's you apart? What "extra" are you bringing to the table that the existing pro's and wannabes arent bringing already?
|
|
|
So basically another cloud mining "business" with a minimum entry cost of $428 .. great..
|
|
|
...
Actually, it's not his fault. And by his, I mean Ervin. I have been in talks with them back and forth since July. I was the guy who suggested them to hire me to run a campaign for them. They liked the idea of what a Bitcointalk signature could do but they figured they'd just run this campaign on their own because it seems easy enough on the surface. Seriously though, the fact that it "looks" easy is the very reason we have so many wannabe managers in this forum. (I guess one can classify me as a wannabe manager as well) If only they had taken my advice seriously and hired a competent manager or at the least an experienced user of the forum, they'd have a better result at hand. When they made a decision of not hiring me - for whatever reasons - I still applied to be a part of the campaign as a normal participant and the fact that they still didn't let me be involved says something about their lack of knowledge when it comes to this forum. But hey, you can't blame someone for not knowing any better you know... Regardless Ervin, good luck to Bitsgap. Maybe try again wholeheartedly next time (if there is one). Lesson of the day: Hire someone who knows what they are doing.
|
|
|
Why don't you make an investment from your own side and accept one or two jobs for free? Also called a "vouch copy" of your work. This way you will build trust with your future customers.
|
|
|
Which designers are interested to make some design as part of bounty campaign?
Designers like me.
|
|
|
Hello folks, what are your thoughts on Coinmama?. Is it a reliable site to buy btc in large amounts (15k + worth btc). I just dont wanna end up ripped off?. I read comments on coinmama for july and they are trashing it like crazy...so i dunno what to think or do...thank you
They've been around for a long time. Longer than many of the popular exchanges we have right now. Although their fees are crazy high. They don't need to rip anyone off with such high fees
|
|
|
That is a decent recommendation. I agree. He indeed is a good recommendation.
|
|
|
The campaign is paused until I hear back from the team.
Since no applications were received I am removing the participation sheet for the time being and will be updating it with a new one as soon as possible. Update : Updated the Application form with a new one.Update : Editing Signature codes - standby for updateUpdate : Developers stopped responding
|
|
|
Contact me on telegram @Thebullsc I have made $5000 in 30 days selling my product. I no longer have the time to sell it any more as i have a new born baby. I will pay anyone that recruits members and you will receive 50%
Just like how you will not be able to provide any proof of whether you actually had a baby or not, similarly, you won't be able to provide any proof of whether you made any "sale" at all. That too of a "premium" trade signal service that's supposed to be so accurate that it compels people to buy - if that were the case why do you need to sell "signals"? Let me tell you why, because you never had a product. You buy cheap coins, then create a "signal" to buy, and then you trap your "customers" by telling them to buy while you alone cash out. That's the truth with most signal services and I am sure your's is no better.
|
|
|
PM with telegram contact sent to all that posted. Thank you.
I am quite certain not all were responded to I was left out, if you didn't notice, check your inbox.
|
|
|
the concept is very interesting, but the purpose is questionable. if you looking from the basic physical view - everything makes sense. but why would you encourage users to invest by burning other asset? theres plenty of non-destructive approaches to verify the investment's transition. this looks like a destructive practice due the unwritten standard of a blockchain to have limited supply. the tech (btc) was created to move away from the commercial influence, but sounds like this idea is driven exclusively from the commercial needs. destroying bitcoins for any purpose than securing the network - doesn't sounds right since it has a greed argument. this is regarding limited supply projects
p.s. is there anybody who's not regretting burning their bitcoins?)
I am a student of an economics although I might not have the degree to back up my years of experience in the subject. How I acquired the said experience is a debate for another time. However, the main project's idea is driven by a very practical effect that you can witness in the modern world. Examples of which I will give you further below. The cryptoverse in it's entirety is a closed system that is built to move money without the confined limits of our existing economy. And if you have read through all the posts then you would find that I am not talking about burning just Bitcoin but any and all cryptocurrencies essentially forming a deflationary system that aims to reduce the amount of available cryptos in the market. Which would only boost the unburnt cryptos that exist in the market afterwards. Now you may ask why deflation is important? In that case let me talk about those examples which I cited above. Take Venezuela's economy for instance and their national paper currency Bolivar, the hyperinflation in their economy is so bad that people are literally weighing the paper bills by the kilo to pay for basic everyday goods and services. A similar incidence of hyperinflation was recorded recently in Zimbawe. Cases of hyperinflation isn't new, the treaty of Versailles in World War I for Germany made them suffer a similar crisis. And even Hungary went through a similar if not more severe economic crunch after World War II. Now think about it more clearly, in our crypto-verse we cannot stop anyone from creating a new cryptocurrency since there is no regulatory body to put a check in place, however, we can create a deflationary system and we can target any cryptocurrency and take out large amounts of it from the open market from circulation. Not only the circulating supply but the total supply. This would directly help to stabilize the market against the uncontrollable influx of new coins/tokens every month.
In the end, you may say my motivations are fueled by greed. Yes Sir! I am greedy about the fact that I want to do something to help stabilize the crypto economy without the false pretext of creating a "stable coin" pegged by some centralized national currency. I am greedy about the fact that I want to insure people that when they have their investments stuck in a dead or abandoned project, that they can switch over to my system where even if they do not find themselves in profit, at the least they will not find themselves in loss. You may call this an idealistic project with idealistic goals but I want to stabilize the economy and this "burning system" could be a realistic and practical way to tackle this problem.
|
|
|
I want to buy real Instagram followers for BTC, Excluding people from Asian countries. Send your offers on private messages. Will pay half before service and another half after service and test of the quality of followers.
You can spend the same amount on Instagram's business plans and promote your content. You'd get better results with actual users and not bot accounts. Jut make sure you share stuff that's worth people's time and not just try to plug in your product / sales pitch.
|
|
|
The OneHash signature campaign manager is accepted most of account is just low quality , inactive and spammer member and i think the manager account rank is legendary and that is why he have no experience Yeah you are right mate and I think the manager is accepted his own friends or own account because I checked the spreadsheet. I think this thought has some credence to it. More than just a couple of guys being butthurt about not getting picked. In their last campaign when I applied the manager picked people with less merit and a poorer merit / post history than mine. When I asked this was their response : Username Name: livingfree
You are on the list! Not hating on it but I applied first and I had more merit, not sure why he was prioritized. But okay I guess I don't fit the bill Hey, livingfree contacted us 1 week ago through direct message and he was also in our previous signature campaigns. I have got you on the 1st place for the next campaign For some reason despite being the 13th direct applicant upon the resumption of their campaign again, I still find myself left out while shitposting users like : GreatOrchidminersdayhahahafruszaty43shursightdead_m92 PS: Nice digging Member helper +Merited So it is fair to assume that Onehash is seemingly gaming the signature campaign system by either paying their own accomplices or bought accounts. #Disappointed
|
|
|
|