Don't wait till tomorow now, adapt, shoot it out asap. i'm confident its a good project like quibuck but every minute past now will fuel discussion and speculation on no base.
This is a good point. Once the team is awake I will discuss this idea with them. How can it be so that our social media manager/ consultant is publishing news without informing you? Very unprofessional behavior from him. Hopefully those NHZ news are really good and coming out very soon. /rant off This news were published because one teammember felt like dumping 90,000,000 NHZ which made the price go down from ~400 to 100 Satoshi...luckily i was dumped on @ 101  And the news were also meant to be dislosed today, if you read the statement carefully!!! It was neccessary to keep NHZ allive i guess. Yes, you're correct. NHZ's news was posted early due to panic. Nick didn't act irresponsibly, he faced a dilemma and had no simple resolution to it. Arlyn ...cmon ....waiting one day will not have made the coin dead... If XC was in that situation I would not have delayed one second to get the news out. It's not a matter of a coin dying, it's rather a matter of acting in good faith with one's community. News pertinent to a panic should not be delayed. For the same reason - acting in good faith - I've posted here this morning rather than keeping quiet until Tuesday. |
|
|
|
Don't wait till tomorow now, adapt, shoot it out asap. i'm confident its a good project like quibuck but every minute past now will fuel discussion and speculation on no base.
This is a good point. Once the team is awake I will discuss this idea with them. How can it be so that our social media manager/ consultant is publishing news without informing you? Very unprofessional behavior from him. Hopefully those NHZ news are really good and coming out very soon. /rant off This news were published because one teammember felt like dumping 90,000,000 NHZ which made the price go down from ~400 to 100 Satoshi...luckily i was dumped on @ 101 And the news were also meant to be dislosed today, if you read the statement carefully!!! It was neccessary to keep NHZ allive i guess. Yes, you're correct. NHZ's news was posted early due to panic. Nick didn't act irresponsibly, he faced a dilemma and had no simple resolution to it. |
|
|
|
I can confirm that the big news coming out tomorrow has something to do with NHZ.
If any of you are concerned that Dan is not fully focussed on XC, you'd have no basis for this. He's releasing several app updates a day, and has put XC's tech so far ahead of any competition that there's simply no catching up. Dan's commitment is not in doubt.
As for NHZ, I can promise you that, as with every single previous project that Dan has involved himself with, this will serve to enhance XC.
My apologies for not having informed you all of this before it was posted on the NHZ forum. I was not made aware of the post. They should've co-ordinated with me.
to what extent it will enhance XC? Massively. to what extent Dan involve in NHZ? He is making sure a certain piece of code meets XC's standards. |
|
|
|
Don't wait till tomorow now, adapt, shoot it out asap. i'm confident its a good project like quibuck but every minute past now will fuel discussion and speculation on no base.
This is a good point. Once the team is awake I will discuss this idea with them. |
|
|
|
I guess Dan would tell this story tomorrow. Jeez guys, he's probably just agreed to check their code or something - I would use it as a chance to buy cheap coins while people shit their pants that he is going to suddenly abandon this project for no reason after having worked day and night on it for 3 months, just so he can become a junior contributor to a clone-coin of NXT. I can confirm that the big news coming out tomorrow has something to do with NHZ. If any of you are concerned that Dan is not fully focussed on XC, you'd have no basis for this. He's releasing several app updates a day, and has put XC's tech so far ahead of any competition that there's simply no catching up. Dan's commitment is not in doubt. As for NHZ, I can promise you that, as with every single previous project that Dan has involved himself with, this will serve to enhance XC. My apologies for not having informed you all of this before it was posted on the NHZ forum. I was not made aware of the post. They should've co-ordinated with me. |
|
|
|
This pertains to Dan's comments above: Some info on today's release, just for clarity:
- We will release the "coinjoin killer", with which we finalise XC's privacy tech, on schedule.
- As with all prior releases of new tech, you can expect updates after the release as we get feedback from you all. Testing in the wild is integral to any successful software. If you encounter an issue, let us know.
We were clear on release day that what's happening now is part of the plan. All is on track. Anyone who thinks that there's some kind of problem has misunderstood how XC is bringing its tech to maturity. For the record, every big release has been the first time a piece of tech is made public, not the finished product. After the release we fine-tune things. It's as simple as that. When we launch publicly things will need to work 100%. Before at day, XC is in development, and this is how releases will work. |
|
|
|
Goats are indeed funny - I fully support the goat logo  Thanks. Have you tried out XChat yet? Not yet - I'm not a big chat person TBH, but I am interested in the technology, so I plan to check it out soon. Feel free to send me a test message using the details in my signature. Since you're interested in XC's tech, once XChat Mobile launches, XC will have a major market in its targets. It'll be the first truly distributed, completely private instant chat app as far as I know. All the others use servers or compromise security and/or privacy in other ways. Can you maybe explain to me how the web 3.0 is going to work? I would like a detailed explanation not from some kind of whitepaper or something. A "whitepaper" is the only place you're likely to get a detailed explanation. If you want a brief and/or non-technical explanation, our press releases on the planned Web 3.0 content delivery service and on the "CoinJoin killer" are the information I have at the moment. |
|
|
|
Goats are indeed funny - I fully support the goat logo Thanks. Have you tried out XChat yet? Not yet - I'm not a big chat person TBH, but I am interested in the technology, so I plan to check it out soon. Feel free to send me a test message using the details in my signature. Since you're interested in XC's tech, once XChat Mobile launches, XC will have a major market in its targets. It'll be the first truly distributed, completely private instant chat app as far as I know. All the others use servers or compromise security and/or privacy in other ways. |
|
|
|
So when Mintpal V2 launches will we get another update?
The ways things are going with Mintpal, I wonder whether they'll ever launch. ;-) Mega tease news still valid for tuesday correct? Since Mintpal's previous delay didn't alter our plans, I don't see sufficient warrant to do so this time. |
|
|
|
Regarding Coinjoin killer, is Coinjoin actually in use anywhere? Is the SharedCoin service for Bitcoin still alive?
Given that CoinJoin is a concept rather than code, it's in use in Darkcoin and in DarkWallet, and Supercoin (I think), among others. No idea about Sharedcoin... |
|
|
|
I've been reading up on XC and it looks solid - I bought my first 200 XC yesterday and today (woohoo!). One thing I haven't been able to figure out: if I accumulate 1000 XC and create an Xmixer, will I lose my ability to stake and only collect Xmixer fees? Or can I both stake and act as an Xmixer? If I have to choose between running an Xmixer or stake, which do y'all think is more profitable? Thanks XCers (goats ?)! at the moment staking is more profitable until the mixers fees are fined tuned...anyway yep you will have to choose one or the other for the moment That answers my question - thanks! The goat thing started as a joke and actually still is a joke, but I think because I have been with XC(and my name is Mountaingoat) for a while now and goats are just funny in general people started using them as the official unnoficial mascot of XC. Here is the post I made about it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630547.msg8864030#msg8864030I am not a part of the XC team btw. Goats are indeed funny - I fully support the goat logo i think a goat has no connections to XC at all and wouldn't be a good decision branding wise. one better animal than a goat would be a cameleon, as it is hard to spot like the private transactions. That is true, but the only funny thing they have going for them is their wacky eyes. But we want to create a system that attracts investors and not childs so it doesn't have to be funny imo I agree that there's no necessity for XC to be "funny". However I really enjoy the effect that this sort of good-natured joking around has. It's great. Personally I'm fully in support of the official unofficial mascot. |
|
|
|
So when Mintpal V2 launches will we get another update?
The ways things are going with Mintpal, I wonder whether they'll ever launch. ;-) |
|
|
|
|
So, who's up for taking pot shots at those sell orders?
|
|
|
|
Bubbles..... no bubbles.....
.001.... .002.....
All meaningless.
If Dan creates a mobile app that sends anonymous voice over block chain xc can compete with every telecom giant in the world...
We are talking 5 thousand per coin.
Skype sold for 2.5 billion
So invest what you can now, but never invest more than you can afford to lose.
+1 one hope the skype implementation will come soon even if not for mobile. Kore has it already if Dan make it on top of anon multipath trutless mesh it will be a no brainer It will come. Group chat, voice, and then video. And it'll be completely private. Korecoin apparently have a somewhat working voice chat. It's not anonymous though and their planned anon tech doesn't seem that strong to me. Korecoin's approach to the voice chat seems to be that it goes through some kind of centralised script or service (pbcx I think the dev refers to it as). Is this how our video and voice service will work? Or will it be truly decentralised like our messaging system? I don't know whether it's possible for voice chat to be done without some kind of centralised script or service. Not that it matters much to me, it's awesome either way. Once we have a generalised content service based purely on Xnodes, I don't think we'd need to centralise voice chat to any extent. |
|
|
|
|
Oh and we have some news today. Stay tuned.
|
|
|
|
Bubbles..... no bubbles.....
.001.... .002.....
All meaningless.
If Dan creates a mobile app that sends anonymous voice over block chain xc can compete with every telecom giant in the world...
We are talking 5 thousand per coin.
Skype sold for 2.5 billion
So invest what you can now, but never invest more than you can afford to lose.
+1 one hope the skype implementation will come soon even if not for mobile. Kore has it already if Dan make it on top of anon multipath trutless mesh it will be a no brainer It will come. Group chat, voice, and then video. And it'll be completely private. |
|
|
|
the only reason why xc's price isn't up is because there is not enough xc movements from investor to new investors. not enough people selling at lower price and not enough people buying at higher prices. this is caused by not having much speculations going on. everyone is keeping quiet and everyones keeping cool. people like to anticipate in great news and big releases and yell out to buy and speculate that prices going to moon or crashing to nothing. although we all say this is bad for long term because they will cause bubbles. but i think we actually need many of those bubbles phases to force change of hands on xc holdings therefor actually getting more adoptions. right now everyone is holding xc because they believe it can double or triple or 10x roi but because of this we are not getting new adopters because no one is willing to sell them. only way for people to sell and change of hands is by going through a bubble. and we need the change of hands to grow the economy. for best adoption we need: either the price goes up and old investors sell out and new investors buy in. or the price go down and weak hands goes out and new ballsy investors buy in. and bubbles does both. bubble are inevitable, don't be afraid of it. we actually need it. you may think slow steady rise is the best but i think we are in a much more competitive environment that if we are too slow, investors lose interests slowly and gets too boring in here that no new investors will take notice, its okay if people lost interest and actually dumps out, but the problem is we don't, because we have such good dev team people are just holding on to it. just look at our number of wallet addresses, All 6023 5,539,572 XC 100 % this has not changed much at all since... so long, i can't even remember when. /random investment thoughts.. i could be very very wrong. Good perspective. I agree, except that I foresee an alternative: XC's price will skyrocket when it approaches mainstream adoption. This is when a truly massive amount of new money will be directed at XC. If everyone holds for now, that's no problem for me. Once XChat mobile is out and the web 3.0 platform is live, there'll be entirely new kinds of users getting involved, new kinds of marketing, different news sites publishing about us, and the price will take care of itself. |
|
|
|
Hi Arlyn Today I have tried to disable and enable again the "rule" I made for xc to the firewall allowing receiving port tcp 32348 I can now send 1-1.5-2 xcs the first attempt will always fail though then after 1 or 2 attempts it goes trough..with a bigger number like 10 or 250 xcs it always fail or t says time expired? have you tried with bigger numbers of XCs? Does it go trough straight away at the first attempt for you? Nice, glad to hear some of your private transactions are now working. I'll try a bigger transaction and see what happens... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
