Show Posts
It seems you are picking matches with really high odds. Debitme's sports tracking shows a lot of wins but a net profit loss.
Do you have a separate spreadsheet for yourself?
Do you have a separate spreadsheet for yourself?
He is the only one profiting. The whole idea is to appear profitable by picking high probability winners in order to gain referral income, or now in this case, direct subscription income.
A profitable picker has NO incentive to share his picks in the same way a profitable trader or algo coder has NO incentive share their trading rules/strategy.
Its a scam. I've posted this in this thread hundreds of pages ago...
To take on your second point, he is not the only one profiting. I have been betting with him before the spreadsheet I started online, and must say, I am pretty far in the green on this. With my winnings, I have bought an Xbox One and am getting ready to buy a big screen TV. Now, you may look at the spreadsheet and see that it is in the negative, and I would agree with you. Late October had a pretty bad 3 game losing streak and we are currently recovering from that. You should also notice that since the loss, the spreadsheet has made back about a bitcoin and a half and will be returning to profit quite shortly. Again though, he has neither hid, nor asked me not to report the loss, which only goes back to attest to his integrity.
I may be slow but please explain it to me like I'm 5 years old. I am looking at your spreadsheet and it seems you are $1,600 in the RED mainly thanks to a $3000 bet on a soccer over/under with extremely high odds. A majority of these bets are insanely high odds, -1000 and above. Most recently I see risking $1000 to win $100. This is not going to be a profitable endeavor overall unless you hit at an astronomical 90% rate. All it takes is one of these big losses to throw you into a net loss.
I'm not here to argue the system or your business but you keep saying profits and all I see is red. Even the OP says he has profited +12.12 BTC but where is this documented? Once again I don't see it.
