I'd prefer to hear an update from EV; I don't know how these new members posting can be considered authoritative.
Considering that Erik has said the Satoshi_pr account can post on behalf of him and the satoshi dice site. So yeah it is an authoritative account. |
|
|
|
The list is meaningless fluff. We've brought thousands of people into Bitcoin in just a few months and have a great platform to internationalize Bitcoin adoption over the coming months. Have fun with your vanity poll.
Jesus Christ Charles, you don't have to be on the top of every list. Let someone else have a turn. I think everyone knows and appreciates what you've done for the community. Lord knows you've shoved it up our collective asses enough times. No every pissing match is important to him |
|
|
|
We won't get some real big transaction volume because of this issue.
It will just force the economies around the system to change. Not everyone will be able to maintain a real block chain. We need to work on trust issues with relying on 3rd parties to verify transactions for us.... this doesn't slow the machine down, just causes change. WOW so we should just give up and forgot about the core of bitcoin. We should just turn over and die I guess. I see another person that drinks the core dev team juice. The blockchain needs to be reworked to fix a very simple problem with the need for a complex solution. Satoshi believed from day 1 that not every user would maintain a full node. That is why his paper includes a section on SPV. Their a huge difference between a 3rd party server and SPV clients. Yes one day, when it takes 100's of GBs and their is no more optimizations that can be done. |
|
|
|
|
Thank you Erik, You have made some people very wealthy today. The company Satoshidice has always be in the best of hands in the bitcoin world.
Gratz on this buyout and good luck on your next ventures!
|
|
|
|
|
I am waiting for the bitcoin prices to rise so I can launch... Can some whale make this happen?
|
|
|
|
|
Why do exchange rates. Make an app so when I look at a store it tells me if they accept bitcoins.
|
|
|
|
It is not a sportsbook. Also I am not offering a small portion of profits.
Your offering ownership stake and last time I check that is a portion of profits. Unless you are giving like 49% and keeping 51% I don't see how someone wouldn't be getting a small portion of the profits. |
|
|
|
Yeah like currently widely accepted. Sadly winkelvoss are the only ones that can bring legitimacy, eg. no more bank accounts getting seized. without winkelvoss, we may never have true legitimacy
"true legitimacy"? Like the current criminal financial system? How on earth does the winklevoss ETF avoid bank accounts getting seized? For some in-depth analysis of that stuff interested people can read: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=252330.0Go to harvard, be famous in a movie, your family is super rich. That is how. |
|
|
|
Sweet I found it. Thank you guys so much. Now I need to figure out how to use it.
Just load up bitcoin-qt, if it is for the first time, then you probably want to download the blockchain. Once that syncs, then replace that wallet.dat, with your old wallet.dat and run -rescan, and your bitcoins should be there. |
|
|
|
|
That is a nice boat, looks well maintained. Good luck!
|
|
|
|
|
Since your were mining 2 years it is safe to bet you were using bitcoin-qt, you can search for wallet.dat. Which is the only file you need to get your bitcoins.
|
|
|
|
|
if you use blockchain make sure you don't use their alias feature, and use two-factor auth. I would use the bitcoin-qt on your computer with proper security.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree kiba is usually all over it.
|
|
|
|
I'm not talking about bitcoins. I'm talking about web security basics / best practices, which you violated many times for BitcoinLister. Including things like your architecture and code layouts. Every developer does that for hacky / pet projects really.
Aren't you arguing over a CHATROOM? Instead of Bitcoins (ie Inputs.io)?
Also, soon, the next time users sign into CoinLenders, they will be hashed and salted with data from /dev/random (so it's guaranteed to be all from environmental noise instead of some from PRNGs). I'm not doing this right now because it's impractical to get long salts for thousands of users from a blocking source.
When did inputs.io become Bitcoins? So you claiming that inputs.io is now bitcoin? |
|
|
|
|
Lets just bring this back on topic, cause we have gone off topic for a bit. TradeFortress now has 2 bad practices on his sites. Sounds like he just experimented learned as he went, and never updated his previous sites. Which we all can be guilty of and as soon as he proves that is fix, which isn't too much work. I will gladly remove all my post and threads.
I will how ever not be extorted and forced to do anything. I don't care if he tries and hack my paper wallets LMAO joke. But seriously extortion and trust system abuse isn't the route he should be taking.
|
|
|
|
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=254808.0LMAO you locked it LMAO Also, if you want your negative trust rating removed you just need to stop making false statements. Like the topic of this post.
When you prove to me that you have taken the necessary security. Then i will stop making statements against you. Extorting my trust rating doesn't look good for you btw.  I don't care about rep, I still do my business like I will always. Just a prime example that power always get abused.
|
|
|
|
1) He only takes full source code and database as proof apparenty
Only way in my book to prove it. 2) I am not disclosing my salt
*FACEPLAM* why would you disclose your salt, that would be pretty dumb and I never asked you to do that. 3) If I wasn't hashing / salting them, I could just hash later.
Exactly. Plus I always said your not strongly hashing them. |
|
|
|
CoinLenders and CoinChat hashes passwords.
CoinLenders also salt passwords.
CoinLenders also hashes your password in your browser with Javascript.
I cannot access your password (unlike what gweedo is claiming) on CoinLenders. I can only access the hash which is useless if it has been salted with a strong hash.
Gweedo is spreading FUD that I don't do this. He is posting a misleading screenshot out of context. I DO hash passwords. I don't salt them for CoinChat, but they are hashed.
As I am tired of saying the same thing again and again, this is now my stock response.
Now he is spamming. @Trade if you want i can make a test account on both of your sites with a random password, you can then post hash with salt here and a screenshot of username /hash from database to prove him wrong.
How do I know he didn't pay you just to say that. Also he could just take your stuff and throw into a hash generator. |
|
|
|
This is a warning! Don't use these site, TF can access your password at anytime! And take over your other accounts.  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
