i want to opt-out
I will process this tomorrow as it is late here. |
|
|
|
The solution I thougth to this problem, is to dedicate as much hashing power as possible to new accounts, so they will be able to become completed quickly.
Can't say I'm too happy about that. I'd rather older accounts get priority (as they should). I agree, I feel like I am getting a little bit of the shaft for believing early on, and giving money. |
|
|
|
I don't recommend online wallets.
Online wallets are more secure that a homemade computer. Actually online wallets have a very low security rating. They are so easy to rob, this has been shown many times over and over. |
|
|
|
|
This is why local clients will never be overthrown by web clients. To be honest they should have multiple mirrors and backup database, I have worked with large data sets and this is pretty standard.
|
|
|
|
All,
This thread will be locked in an hour. Please get your comments and votes in now!
Shibe07
Why you locking? How am I suppose to keep up with developments on this project? new Thread Will Be opening shortly and Ill post the link in here... Name has been chosen, domain has been purchased and we now have a small team working on this project. This Project has a GREEN light!!  PM me the new link so I can watch it. |
|
|
|
All,
This thread will be locked in an hour. Please get your comments and votes in now!
Shibe07
Why you locking? How am I suppose to keep up with developments on this project? |
|
|
|
|
Bump! We are still looking for a partner to launch with. We want to show off our powerful api, you will be getting a free month of our service as well!
|
|
|
|
I didn't know you could post anonymously on this forum.
How would one do that?
His account was deleted that is why it says anonymous as his username |
|
|
|
|
I am pretty sure the wiki has changed hands, so if that person wants to add a payment system I would donate my robust api system when it launch to help fixing the payment mod.
|
|
|
|
Why anyone would like to use Bitcoin-qt over Multibit i don't get it.
Cause I don't trust any nodes on the network. |
|
|
|
I mean maybe she smoothed her skin or fixed lighting or something.
We wouldn't care if it was on her skin or lighting but that show the big black area on her skin, not on her sign, which is the exact size of the sign she is holding. Trust me she just photoshoped it on, a lot of them do that with sign pics. |
|
|
|
First off their is no other black parts, just darker pixels and we know it was photoshop, no one will judge you if you just say it, but don't lie and say it isn't.
What color would you say is the thing to the right of the sign which appears to be the floor? I'm not lying. I didn't photoshop and I know the model doesn't have the skills to do it. She takes sign pics all the time so there's no reason for her to photoshop it. No there isn't any big dark area, and you can't not lie about the analysis of the picture because you can test the image your self they all show the same thing. That area is very dark and it is one part. It isn't the RGB colors which shows it is was digitally altered. I also know cammodels and most of them are handy with photoshop it is part their job to touch up and focus things on them. I know it looks photoshopped but I'm telling you I really don't think it is. Maybe the image was touched up but the sign definitely wasn't photoshopped in. Maybe touched up? No something was deleted and then something was added from another image or created on top of it. Trust me I know these things  |
|
|
|
First off their is no other black parts, just darker pixels and we know it was photoshop, no one will judge you if you just say it, but don't lie and say it isn't.
What color would you say is the thing to the right of the sign which appears to be the floor? I'm not lying. I didn't photoshop and I know the model doesn't have the skills to do it. She takes sign pics all the time so there's no reason for her to photoshop it. No there isn't any big dark area, and you can't not lie about the analysis of the picture because you can test the image your self they all show the same thing. That area is very dark and it is one part. It isn't the RGB colors which shows it is was digitally altered. I also know cammodels and most of them are handy with photoshop it is part their job to touch up and focus things on them. |
|
|
|
You do know that dark part, means it is photoshopped. Something was covered up and pasted from another image on top. It be nice if you actually read as well.  What about the other black part on the image? That photoshopped too? Who wants to put a Bitcoin bet on it? Examine all of the different images and the angles of the lettering...no one is that good of a photoshop artist to adjust each one perfectly based on the way the model holds the sign. First off their is no other black parts, just darker pixels and we know it was photoshop, no one will judge you if you just say it, but don't lie and say it isn't. |
|
|
|
New rules (draft): - The hashing power is distributed proportionally to the power bought with each deposit, and it does not get averaged anymore. Deposits will get their real hashing power instead of being a part of the whole pool.
- The hashing power left (completed accounts) is distributed to the 10 oldest and still active deposits as a bonus, to speed up completion.
- The % of mined coins distributed to upper levels (sponsors) is changed. Before it was 15% to 1st level, 7.5% to second level and 7.5% to third level. It will become: 5% first level, 2.5% second level, 2.5% third level.
Kinda not happy since I will end up with less mining power and probably not get the full reward I was offered for a while. But if you think this is the best business decision I can accept it. I think what would be better is start new accounts off with this, and leave the old accounts the other way because then we can accept this new TOS or still enjoy the old TOS. I believe he is referring to newly active deposits. Current deposits should keep the old rules. The way I read this, and the way I believe it should be is that the older deposits split at least some of the excess hardware he brings online to get them out of the way. I have deposits going back to july of last year, and I am willing to wait for those older than me to get their due before I get paid. So in short, here is my suggestion. We have 5.9ths in queue and 30+ coming online. Take 10ths and split it among the oldest deposits, by 10, or whatever # makes sense for the size of the earliest accounts and leave the rest for new deposits. Also pyramining can you put on our profiles when we login if we have an old account? I think one of my accounts should just be able to make that oldest account, i just don't know based on the information I can see. If this is for new accounts then I think it is fair. |
|
|
|
New rules (draft): - The hashing power is distributed proportionally to the power bought with each deposit, and it does not get averaged anymore. Deposits will get their real hashing power instead of being a part of the whole pool.
- The hashing power left (completed accounts) is distributed to the 10 oldest and still active deposits as a bonus, to speed up completion.
- The % of mined coins distributed to upper levels (sponsors) is changed. Before it was 15% to 1st level, 7.5% to second level and 7.5% to third level. It will become: 5% first level, 2.5% second level, 2.5% third level.
Kinda not happy since I will end up with less mining power and probably not get the full reward I was offered for a while. But if you think this is the best business decision I can accept it. I think what would be better is start new accounts off with this, and leave the old accounts the other way because then we can accept this new TOS or still enjoy the old TOS. |
|
|
|
Who's escrow to trust now?
You can trust me for escrows |
|
|
|
I would like a bitcoin style radio station, I can't offer much other than support.
Gweedo, thanks for the support! Please help us spread the word! I notice your a HTML/CSS Dev? Maybe you could help us with the site? I can give you direction but right now I am launching a startup so I don't have the time, So we can't have two in the community? I say lets have two, chances are at some point I know I will switch back and forth depending on the content at the time I am listening. |
|
|
|
yes the .htaccess file has been uploaded as well.... I checked the error logs and it just has blank files
Make sure you are looking at the correct error.log for the correct virtual host, because a 500 code would log that into the error.log otherwise it will be also impossible to figure out the problem. Goto your virtual host and make sure it is logging. |
|
|
|
|
I can probably do better security at a cheaper cost, with key splitting, encryption and P2SH addresses. I think they are just trying to profit on misinformation.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
